Skip to main content
Log in

A Game Theoretical Approach for Improving the Operational Efficiencies of Less-than-truckload Carriers Through Load Exchanges

  • Published:
Networks and Spatial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Less-than-truckload (LTL) transportation offers fast, flexible and relatively low-cost transportation services to shippers. In order to cope with the effects of economic recessions, the LTL industry implemented ideas such as reducing excess capacity and increasing revenues through better yield management. In this paper, we extend these initiatives beyond the reach of individual carriers and propose a collaborative framework that facilitates load exchanges to reduce the operational costs. Even though collective solutions are proven to provide benefits to the participants by reducing the inefficiencies using a system-wide perspective, such solutions are often not attainable in real-life as the negotiating parties are seeking to maximize their individual profits rather than the overall profit and also they are unwilling to share confidential information. Therefore, a mechanism that enables collaboration among the carriers should account for the rationality of the individual participants and should require minimal information transfer between participants. Having this in mind, we propose a mechanism that facilities collaboration through a series of load exchange iterations and identifies an equilibrium among selfish carriers with limited information transfer among the participants. Our time-efficient mechanism can handle large instances with thousands of loads as well as provide significant benefits over the non-collaborative management of LTL networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/transportation-management

  2. http://www.transplace.com/

  3. http://www.trivizor.com/

References

  • America Trucking Associations (2019) Reports, Trends & Statistics. Date Accessed 20 September 2019 https://www.trucking.org/article/Trucking-Industry-Revenues-Top-$796-Billion-in-2018

  • Barcos L, Rodriguez V, Alvarez MJ, Robuste F (2010) Routing design for less-than-truckload motor carriers using ant colony optimization. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 46(3):367–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger S, Bierwirth C (2010) Solutions to the request reassignment problem in collaborative carrier networks. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 46(5):627–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbajal JA, Erera A, Savelsbergh M (2013) Balancing fleet size and repositioning costs in LTL trucking. Ann Oper Res 203(1):235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caschili S, Medda F, Parola F, Ferrari C (2014) An analysis of shipping agreements: The Cooperative Container Network. Netw Spatial Econ 14 (3):357–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castelli L, Longo F, Pesenti G, Parola R, Ukovich W (2004) Two-player noncooperative games over a freight transportation network. Transport Sci 38(2):149–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H (2016) Combinatorial clock-proxy exchange for carrier collaboration in less than truck load transportation. Transp Res E 91:152–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crainic TG (2000) Service network design in freight transportation. Eur J Oper Res 122(2):272–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruijssen F, Borm P, Fleuren H, Hamers H (2010) Supplier-initiated outsourcing: A methodology to exploit synergy in transportation. Eur J Oper Res 207(2):763–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai B, Chen H (2012a) A benders decomposition approach for carrier collaborative planning with less than truckload transportation. Int J Model Oper Manag 2(3):242–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai B, Chen H (2012b) Profit allocation mechanisms for carrier collaboration in pickup and delivery service. Comput Ind Eng 62(2):633–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erera AL, Hewitt M, Savelsbergh M, Zhang Y (2013a) Creating schedules and computing operating costs for LTL load plans. Comput Oper Res 40(3):691–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erera AL, Hewitt M, Savelsbergh M, Zhang Y (2013b) Improved load plan design through integer programming based local search. Transp Sci 47(3):412–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergun Ö, Kuyzu G, Savelsbergh M (2007a) Reducing truckload transportation costs through collaboration. Transp Sci 41(2):206–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergun Ö, Kuyzu G, Savelsbergh M (2007b) The shipper collaboration problem. Comput Oper Res 34(6):1551–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figliozzi M (2006) Analysis and evaluation of incentive-compatible dynamic mechanisms for carrier collaboration. Transport Res Record: J Transport Res Board 1966(1):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friesz TL, Mookherjee R, Holguín-Veras J, Rigdon MA (2008) Dynamic pricing in an urban freight environment. Transp Res B 42:305–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansterer M, Hartl RF (2018) Centralized bundle generation in auction-based collaborative transportation. OR Spectrum 40(3):613–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández S., Peeta S, Kalafatas G (2011) A less-than-truckload carrier collaboration planning problem under dynamic capacities. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 47(6):933–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández S, Peeta S (2014) A carrier collaboration problem for less-than-truckload carriers: characteristics and carrier collaboration model. Transportmet A: Transport Sci 10(4):327–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang GQ, Xu SX (2013) Truthful multi-unit transportation procurement auctions for logistics e-marketplaces. Transp Res B 47:127–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarrah AI, Johnson E, Neubert LC (2009) Large-scale, less-than-truckload service network design. Oper Res 57(3):609–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Commerce (2019) Top 50 trucking company rankings 2018. Date Accessed 20 September 2019 https://www.joc.com/trucking-logistics/top-50-trucking-company-rankings-2018_20190813.html./

  • Kaewpuang R, Niyato D, Tan P, Wang P (2017) Cooperative management in Full-Truckload and Less-Than-Truckload vehicle system. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 66(7):5707–5722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Cai X, Zeng Y (2016a) Cost allocation for less-than-truckload collaboration among perishable product retailers. OR Spectrum 38 (1):81–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Chen H, Prins C (2016b) Lagrangian relaxation approach to combinatorial exchange in freight logistics. IFAC-PapersOnLine 49 (12):1650–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu X, Chen H, Wang N, Yang Z (2019) A multi-round exchange mechanism for carrier collaboration in less than truckload transportation. Transp Res E 129:38–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadarajah S, Bookbinder JH (2013) Less-than-truckload carrier collaboration problem: modeling framework and solution approach. J Heuristics 19 (6):917–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özener OÖ, Ergun Ö (2008) Allocating costs in a collaborative transportation procurement network. Transp Sci 42(2):146–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özener O. Ö, Ergun Ö, Savelsbergh M (2011) Lane-exchange mechanisms for truckload carrier collaboration. Transp Sci 45(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scrimali L (2019) On the Stability of Coalitions in Supply Chain Networks via Generalized Complementarity Conditions. Networks and Spatial Economics

  • Sheffi Y (2004) Combinatorial auctions in the procurement of transportation services. Interfaces 34(4):245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein O, Sudermann-Merx N (2018) The noncooperative transportation problem and linear generalized Nash games. Eur J Oper Res 266(2):543–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tamannaei M, Zarei H, Aminzadegan S (2021) A Game-Theoretic Approach to the Freight Transportation Pricing Problem in the Presence of Intermodal Service Providers in a Competitive Market. Networks and Spatial Economics

  • Tyan JC, Wang FK, Du TC (2003) An evaluation of freight consolidation policies in global third party logistics. Omega 31(1):55–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Kopfer H, Gendreau M (2014) Operational transportation planning of freight forwarding companies in horizontal coalitions. Eur J Oper Res 31(1):1133–1141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieberneit N (2008) Service network design for freight transportation: A review. OR Spectrum 30(1):77–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao F, Yang H (2007) Three-player game-theoretic model over a freight transportation network. Transp Res C 15(4):209–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yen JY (1971) Finding the k shortest loopless paths in a network. Mangement Science 17(11):661–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz O, Savasaneril S (2012) Collaboration among small shippers in a transportation market. Eur J Oper Res 218(2):408–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Yao T, Friesz TL, Sun Y (2015) A tractable two-stage robust winner determination model for truckload service procurement via combinatorial auctions. Transp Res B 78:16–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Hui YV, Liang L (2011) Strategic alliance in freight consolidation. Transport Res Part E: Logist Transport Rev 47(1):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the editor and the anonymous referees who kindly provided valuable suggestions and comments to improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baṣak Altan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altan, B., Özener, O.Ö. A Game Theoretical Approach for Improving the Operational Efficiencies of Less-than-truckload Carriers Through Load Exchanges. Netw Spat Econ 21, 547–579 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-021-09536-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11067-021-09536-7

Keywords

Navigation