Accessing the spatiotemporal heterogeneities of single nanocatalysts by optically imaging gas nanobubbles

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2021.101465Get rights and content

Abstract

Catalysts that catalyze the generation of products in the gas phase, especially those involved in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), hold great promise for ecofriendly and sustainable energy development. In general, gas chromatography is widely used to measure catalytic activity. Unfortunately, it gives an averaged output that washes out the heterogeneities among individuals. To assess the unique catalytic properties at the single nanoparticle level, various methods based on single particle catalysis have been proposed. Over the past fifteen years, tremendous breakthroughs have been achieved, which uncovered hidden spatial and temporal heterogeneities. Although powerful, effectively quantifying the activities of single HER nanocatalysts remains challenging because of the fast diffusion of hydrogen (H2). In 2017, a novel approach based on a nanobubble indicator was proposed to correlate the kinetics of gas bubble evolution with the catalytic activities of individual nanoentities during the HER process. Since then, a plethora of optical microscopy techniques have been utilized to monitor dynamically evolved nanobubbles and to measure the catalytic activities of single HER catalysts. In this minireview, we summarized state-of-the-art optical microscopy for in operando imaging of dynamic nanobubbles involved in gas-generating reactions while highlighting some important discoveries, including the blinking photocatalytic activity and heterogeneous distribution of active sites. Finally, challenges and future perspectives in this promising field were identified.

Introduction

Catalysts that catalyze the generation of products in the gas phase, especially those involved in the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) [1,2] and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) [3], hold great promise for ecofriendly and sustainable energy development. Traditionally, the catalytic activities of these catalysts are usually evaluated by gas chromatography at an ensemble level. However, the averaged output from quantitative samples washes out the heterogeneities (differences) among individuals and hampers researchers from identifying the relationship between the structure and activity/function of catalysts in a bottom-up manner [4]. Recent advancements in nanotechnology provide opportunities to prepare nanoscale gas-generating catalysts with ultrahigh activities. Concomitantly, more significant heterogeneities are also introduced among individuals with respect to the structure (shape, size, crystal facet, etc.) and catalytic efficiency of nanocatalysts. Thus, it is highly desirable to develop a tool to accurately measure the chemical activity of individual nanocatalysts, which can promote the rational design of HER/OER catalysts with high performance [3,5]

To overcome the abovementioned difficulties, single particle catalysis has been proposed in operando to reveal the hidden spatiotemporal heterogeneities of catalysts at the single nanoparticle (NP) level [4,6, 7, 8∗]. Since the pioneering work done by Hofkens's group and Chen's group, single molecule fluorescence (SMF)-based single particle catalysis has become one of the most widely explored technologies to measure the catalytic activities of single NPs [9, 10∗, 11]. This method utilizes nonfluorescent precursors as model substrates and detects SMF signals from fluorescent product molecules during catalytic reactions. For instance, by this method, the intraparticle distribution of catalytic sites could be accessed with a spatial resolution of ca. 40 nm [12]. Despite this advantage, the SMF method only detects the efficiencies of model reactions rather than the real activities of HER/OER catalysts. Moreover, the introduction of dyes into the HER/OER reaction might interfere with the inherent catalytic behaviors of NPs. Dark-field scattering spectroscopy [13,14] has also been proposed to monitor the catalytic processes of single NPs. However, suitable types of materials used for this detection are generally required to express a strong scattering nature, e.g., metal nanoobjects with a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) effect [15]. Considering that most catalysts used in photocatalysis with H2 generation are semiconductors (pure dielectrics), dark-field scattering is not applicable. Although metal–semiconductor hybrid nanostructures have been reported [14], the introduction of metal NPs might make the catalytic processes more complicated.

Despite many breakthroughs in interrogating and even manipulating the activities of single catalysts [16], there is still a major challenge to directly monitor the catalytic kinetics of single HER and OER catalysts, particularly photocatalytic H2 generation catalysts. Indeed, the extremely small numbers of gas molecules generated around a single catalyst NP and the highly diffusive/relatively inert nature of gas molecules in these complicated reaction systems make it very difficult to design a fluorogenic reaction with high specificity and sensitivity to detect gas molecule products [17,18]. Thankfully, gas bubbles are usually generated during HER and OER reactions, rendering it possible to measure the catalytic efficiency of these catalysts by monitoring the evolution of gas bubbles [5]. In addition, in the field of interface science, the physical properties of nanometer-sized bubbles (so-called nanobubbles) have been extensively explored in recent years [19,20], which provides a theoretical background to study the catalysts involved in gas-generating reactions based on the growth kinetics of nanobubbles. Inspired by relevant works, our group utilized surface plasmon resonance microscopy (SPRM) to monitor the evolution of nanobubbles in situ during photocatalytic H2 generation on single cadmium sulfide (CdS) NPs in 2017 [21]. This allowed for in operando measurement of the photocatalytic HER activities of single semiconductor catalysts. Afterward, our group and other groups demonstrated the power of utilizing nanobubbles as an indicator to quantify the activities of single catalysts involved in gas-generating reactions by optical microscopy. These studies include photocatalytic water splitting, formic acid decomposition, and electrocatalytic HER process [22∗, 23∗∗, 24∗∗]. Compared with traditional gas chromatography-based methods, these methods based on nanobubble indication by optical imaging focused on the size, location, and growth kinetics of nanobubbles during catalytic reactions rather than the amounts and compositions of gas products. Although nucleation-related factors such as the geometric structure of catalysts might compromise their capability in measuring catalytic activities, these methods enabled direct detection of gaseous molecule products under practical conditions. Note that this is hard to achieve through other techniques, such as the SMF method, and opens up a new dimension for the fundamental study and application of nanobubbles.

In this minireview, we first introduce optical microscopy for in operando imaging of nanobubbles in gas-generating reactions and present a representative progress. Subsequently, we emphasize some important discoveries with respect to single gas-generating catalysts via optical imaging of nanobubbles, especially the blinking photochemical activity of single semiconductor catalysts and heterogeneous distribution of active sites. Finally, we conclude with our opinions on the challenges and perspectives in this promising field.

Section snippets

Nanobubble imaging techniques

To date, the existence of stable surface nanobubbles is still a mystery, and the underlying physicochemical mechanism is not fully understood. In this context, a variety of technologies have been developed to image nanobubbles in operando. Owing to its high spatial resolution and sensitive force response, atomic force microscopy (AFM) has become the gold standard for nanobubble characterization, since the first image of nanobubbles taken by AFM in 2000 [25,26]. However, there exists a notable

Extracting catalytic activities by counting and dynamic tracking of nanobubbles

The generation and evolution kinetics of nanobubbles have been monitored by several optical microscopy techniques at the solution-NP interface. Through optically counting nanobubbles and tracking evolution kinetics, some inherent but elusive natures of gas-generating catalysts have been revealed, such as blinking photochemistry and structure–activity relationships at the single NP level.

Mapping of catalytic active sites from the spatial distribution of nanobubbles

In addition to directly monitoring single nanobubble dynamics, various efforts have been made to study the spatial distribution and movement trajectory of nanobubbles generated on single nanocatalysts. Statistically analyzing the distribution of nanobubbles allows us to map the catalytic active sites of the reaction and to investigate the effects of defects or facet structures on catalytic performance.

Conclusion and perspective

In conclusion, this minireview summarizes current optical imaging techniques for tracking nanobubbles involved in gas-generating reactions and compares the pros and cons of these methods in interrogating the activity of single catalysts. While AFM can only provide static characterization of nanobubbles, the optical imaging techniques mentioned above are probe-free in terms of instrumentation (a tip is necessary in AFM) and applicable under practical catalytic conditions. Thus, optical imaging

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21874070, 22004066) and the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20190280).

References (54)

  • Y.M. Fang et al.

    Intermittent photocatalytic activity of single CdS nanoparticles

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2017)
  • N. Ishida et al.

    Nano bubbles on a hydrophobic surface in water observed by tapping-mode atomic force microscopy

    Langmuir

    (2000)
  • X.B. Chen et al.

    Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation

    Chem Rev

    (2010)
  • Z.J. Han et al.

    Robust photogeneration of H-2 in water using semiconductor nanocrystals and a nickel catalyst

    Science

    (2012)
  • N.T. Suen et al.

    Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives

    Chem Soc Rev

    (2017)
  • I.L.C. Buurmans et al.

    Heterogeneities of individual catalyst particles in space and time as monitored by spectroscopy

    Nat Chem

    (2012)
  • Q. Wang et al.

    Particulate photocatalysts for light-driven water splitting: mechanisms, challenges, and design strategies

    Chem Rev

    (2020)
  • P. Chen et al.

    Spatiotemporal catalytic dynamics within single nanocatalysts revealed by single-molecule microscopy

    Chem Soc Rev

    (2014)
  • M. Hesari et al.

    Charge carrier activity on single-particle photo(electro)catalysts: toward function in solar energy conversion

    J Am Chem Soc

    (2018)
  • W. Wang

    Imaging the chemical activity of single nanoparticles with optical microscopy

    Chem Soc Rev

    (2018)
  • M.B.J. Roeffaers et al.

    Spatially resolved observation of crystal-face-dependent catalysis by single turnover counting

    Nature

    (2006)
  • W.L. Xu et al.

    Single-molecule nanocatalysis reveals heterogeneous reaction pathways and catalytic dynamics

    Nat Mater

    (2008)
  • T. Tachikawa et al.

    Single-molecule, single-particle fluorescence imaging of TiO2-based photocatalytic reactions

    Chem Soc Rev

    (2010)
  • X.C. Zhou et al.

    Quantitative super-resolution imaging uncovers reactivity patterns on single nanocatalysts

    Nat Nanotechnol

    (2012)
  • C. Novo et al.

    Direct observation of chemical reactions on single gold nanocrystals using surface plasmon spectroscopy

    Nat Nanotechnol

    (2008)
  • D. Seo et al.

    Plasmonic monitoring of catalytic hydrogen generation by a single nanoparticle probe

    J Am Chem Soc

    (2012)
  • H.H. Wang et al.

    Dark-field spectroscopy: development, applications and perspectives in single nanoparticle catalysis

    J Phys Condens Matter

    (2019)
  • J.B. Sambur et al.

    Sub-particle reaction and photocurrent mapping to optimize catalyst-modified photoanodes

    Nature

    (2016)
  • P. Kos et al.

    A fluorescent molecular probe for the detection of hydrogen based on oxidative addition reactions with crabtree-type hydrogenation catalysts

    Angew Chem Int Ed

    (2015)
  • Y. Zhou et al.

    Sensitively fluorescent detection of H2 with resazurin hydrogenation reactions catalyzed by Pd/C nanocomposites

    Inorg Chem Commun

    (2019)
  • D. Lohse et al.

    Surface nanobubbles and nanodroplets

    Rev Mod Phys

    (2015)
  • M. Alheshibri et al.

    A history of nanobubbles

    Langmuir

    (2016)
  • H. Su et al.

    Monitoring the dynamic photocatalytic activity of single CdS nanoparticles by lighting up H-2 nanobubbles with fluorescent dyes

    Chem Sci

    (2018)
  • S.P. Li et al.

    Nanobubbles: an effective way to study gas-generating catalysis on a single nanoparticle

    J Am Chem Soc

    (2017)
  • R. Hao et al.

    Imaging nanobubble nucleation and hydrogen spillover during electrocatalytic water splitting

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (2018)
  • S.T. Lou et al.

    Nanobubbles on solid surface imaged by atomic force microscopy

    J Vac Sci Technol B

    (2000)
  • S. Karpitschka et al.

    Nonintrusive optical visualization of surface nanobubbles

    Phys Rev Lett

    (2012)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Reaction-diffusion model to quantify and visualize mass transfer and deactivation within core-shell polymeric microreactors

      2022, Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the catalyst community, to date, several critical investigations have been reported on these systems, focusing on ascertaining elementary parameters from experimental measurements. Reaction kinetic parameters of individual reactors operating in a solution have been quantified using surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS), tip-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (TERS), scan electrochemical microscopy (SECM), and surface plasmon spectroscopy (SPS) [12,13]. New information has also emerged from these works, in particular, the reason for local spatial variations of catalyst active phase is largely unknown [14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text