Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Impact of Competitiveness on the Shadow Economy

  • Published:
International Advances in Economic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The shadow economy absorbs critical resources from the formal economy and to a certain extent impedes the implementation of policies that are necessary for the common good. Its size varies and even exceeds one-fourth of gross domestic product (GDP) in certain European Union (EU) member states. Although some shadow economies may have beneficial effects for some citizens, or even the formal economy of a country, overall the shadow economy harms that country’s competitiveness as it reduces external parties’ trust in that country, and thus their likelihood to cooperate. On the other hand, competitiveness could offer incentives to bring underground operations to the surface and thus fight the undeclared economy. Using appropriate econometric approaches, this study finds evidence that the more competitive a member country of the EU is, with respect to the global competitiveness index, GDP per capita, exports as a percent of GDP and unemployment rate, the smaller its shadow economy (as a percent of GDP) becomes. More precisely, as anticipated, there is a negative relationship between the shadow economy and global competitiveness, GDP per capita and exports. There is a positive relationship between the shadow economy and unemployment. These results could assist relevant authorities in containing the shadow economy by appropriately steering the selected competitiveness drivers of the country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, M. C., & Ginsburgh, V. (1985). The effects of irregular markets on macroeconomic policy: Some estimates for Belgium. European Economic Review, 29(1), 15–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K. (1996). Creating a dynamically competitive economy: Defining the competitiveness of a nation and a case study of the postwar economic policy which made Austria competitive. Chapter 7 in Competitiveness, Subsidiarity and Industrial Policy. Devine, P.J., Katsoulacos, Y.S., & Sugden, R. (Eds.). Competitiveness, Subsidiarity and Industrial Policy (1st ed.). Routledge, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203976142

  • Aiginger, K. (2006). Competitiveness: From a dangerous obsession to a welfare creating ability with positive externalities. Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 6(2), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi, B. H., & Li, D. (2002). Series estimation of partially linear panel data models with fixed effects. Annals of Economics and Finance, 3(1), 103–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, J., Paua, F., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (2003). The growth competitiveness index: Analyzing key underpinnings of sustained economic growth. Global Competitiveness Report, 2003-2004, 3–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, S., Hoeffler, A. & Temple, J., (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Economic Papers, W21. Nuffield College, University of Oxford, http://www.nuffield.ox.ac.uk/economics/papers/2001/w21/bht10.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2020.

  • Borlea, S. N., Achim, M. V., & Miron, M. G. A. (2017). Corruption, shadow economy and economic growth: An empirical survey across the European Union countries. Studia Universitatis “Vasile Goldis” Arad–Economics Series, 27(2), 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J., Pass, C. L., & Prescott, K. (1988). Measures of international competitiveness: A critical survey. Journal of Marketing Management, 4(2), 175–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehn, A. & Schneider, F. (2009). Corruption and the shadow economy: A structural equation model approach. IZA discussion paper no. 4182, http://ftp.iza.org/dp4182.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2020.

  • Dell’ Anno, R. (2003). Estimating the shadow economy in Italy: A structural equation approach. University of Aarhus. Abstract only, https://papers.ssrn.com/ sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=411443. Accessed 23 March 2019.

  • Dudá, T., & Cibuľa, A. (2018). The changing methodology of the global competitiveness index and its impact on Slovakia. Ad Alta: Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 8(2), 50–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dybka, P., Kowalczuk, M., Olesiński, B., Torój, A., & Rozkrut, M. (2019). Currency demand and MIMIC models: Towards a structured hybrid method of measuring the shadow economy. International Tax and Public Finance, 26(1), 4–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enste, D. H. (2010). Regulation and shadow economy: Empirical evidence for 25 OECD-countries. Constitutional Political Economy, 21(3), 231–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezeala-Harrison, F. (1999). Theory and policy of international competitiveness. Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.

  • Fagerberg, J. (1996). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fajnzylber, F. (1988). International competitiveness: Agreed goal, hard task. Cepal Review. CEPAL review no. 36, https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/ 10257. Accessed 23 March 2020.

  • Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis (5th ed.). Delhi, India: Pearson Education.

  • Gyomai, G. & van de Ven, P. (2014), The non-observed economy in the system of national accounts, OECD, Statistics Brief, no. 18, http://www.oecd.org/sdd/na/ statistics%20Brief%2018.Pdf. Accessed 23 March 2020.

  • Jensen, J. & Wöhlbier, F. (2012). Improving tax governance in EU Member States: Criteria for Successful Policies (Vol. 114). Publications Office of the European Union, https://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications/occasional_paper/2012/pdf/ocp114_en.pdf. Accessed 23 March 2020.

  • Kao, C. (1999). Spurious regression and residual-based tests for cointegration in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 90(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2009). A dictionary of business and management (6th ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

  • Maddala, G. S., & Wu, S. (1999). A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 631–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marinov, A. (2008). Hidden economy in the rural regions of Bulgaria. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 5(1), 71–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medina, L. & Schneider F. (2018). Shadow Economies Around the World: What Did We Learn Over the Last 20 Years? IMF Working Paper, WP/18/17, https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/WP/Issues/2018/01/25/Shadow-Economies-Around-the-World-What-Did-We-Learn-Over-the-Last-20-Years-45583. Accessed March 23, 2020.

  • OECD. (1996). Industrial competitiveness: Benchmarking business environments in the global economy. Paris, France: Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development.

  • Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(S1), 653–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. IZA discussion paper No1240, http://ftp.iza.org/dp1240.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2020.

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Time series and panel data econometrics (1st ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

  • Russell, B. (2010). Revenue Administration: Managing the Shadow Economy, Technical Notes and Manuals, International Monetary Fund, Fiscal Affairs Department, TNM 10/14, https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/tnm/2010/tnm1014.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2020.

  • Schneider, F. (2013). Shadow economy, tax evasion and corruption in Portugal and in other OECD countries: What can be done? Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University of Linz, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Shadow-Economy%2C-Tax-Evasion-and-Corruption-in-and-Schneider/. Accessed 23 March 2020.

  • Schneider, F., & Enste, D. H. (2000). Shadow economies: Size, causes, and consequences. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(1), 77–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, B. R., & Lodge, G. C. (1985). U.S. competitiveness in the world economy. Boston, USA: Harvard Business School Press.

  • Tyson, L. D. A. (1992). Who's bashing whom? Trade conflict in high-technology industries. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

  • Verbeek, M. (2008). A guide to modern econometrics (3rd ed.). West Sussex, England: John Wiley & Sons..

  • Wiseman, T. (2013). US shadow economies: A state-level study. Constitutional Political Economy, 24(4), 310–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolridge, J. M. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (5th ed.). Mason, USA: South-Western Cengage Learning.

  • World Bank. (2019). World Bank Open Data, https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD. Accessed 23 August 2019.

  • World Economic Forum. (1996). The global competitiveness report. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian.

  • World Economic Forum. (2007). The Global Competitiveness Report 2007–2008, https://www.weforum.org/reports/annual-report-2007-2008. Accessed 23 August 2019.

  • World Economic Forum. (2016). The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017, https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitiveness-report-2016-2017-1. Accessed 23 August 2019.

  • World Economic Forum. (2019). The Global Competitiveness Report 2019, https://www.weforum.org/reports/how-to-end-a-decade-of-lost-productivity-growth. Accessed 25 February 2021.

  • Zagoršek, H., Jaklič, M., & Hribernik, A. (2009). The shadow economy and its impact on National Competitiveness: The case of Slovenia. South East European Journal of Economics and Business, 4(1), 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Poufinas.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Poufinas, T., Galanos, G. & Agiropoulos, C. The Impact of Competitiveness on the Shadow Economy. Int Adv Econ Res 27, 29–46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-021-09820-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11294-021-09820-9

Keywords

JEL

Navigation