Abstract
People frequently adopt extra-pair mating strategies, which could be potentially harmful for their legitimate partners. In order to protect themselves from the costs of cheating, people need first to detect infidelity, and for this purpose, they employ specific infidelity-detection strategies. By using a combination of qualitative research methods, we identified 47 acts that people perform in order to detect their partners’ infidelity. Using quantitative methods, we classified these acts into six broader strategies for detecting infidelity. Participants indicated that they were more likely to employ the “Observe changes in her/his behavior,” followed by the “Ask and observe her/his reactions,” and the “Check where she/he is” strategies. Almost 58% of the participants indicated that they would use three or more strategies in order to detect their partners’ infidelity. We also found that higher scorers in Machiavellianism and psychopathy were more likely to employ the identified strategies than lower scorers. In addition, sex and age effects were found for most strategies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data are available on request by the first author.
References
Allen, E. S., & Baucom, D. H. (2006). Dating, marital, and hypothetical extradyadic involvements: how do they compare? The Journal of Sex Research, 43, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224490609552330
Amato, P. R., & Previti, D. (2003). People’s reasons for divorcing: gender, social class, the life course, and adjustment. Journal of Family Issues, 24, 602–626. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X03254507
Apostolou, M. (2019). Why Greek-Cypriots cheat? The evolutionary origins of the Big-Five of infidelity. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, 13, 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1037/ebs0000140
Apostolou, M. (2021). Plurality in mating: exploring the occurrence and contingencies of mating strategies Personality and Individual Differences 175 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.110689
Apostolou, M., & Wang, Y. (2020). The challenges of keeping an intimate relationship: an evolutionary examination. Evolutionary Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704920953526
Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion: why jealousy is as necessary as love and sex. The Free Press.
Buss, D.M. (2017). The evolution of desire: strategies of human mating (4th ed.). Basic Books.
Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.022
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.100.2.204
Corry, N., Merritt, R. D., Mrug, S., & Pamp, B. (2008). The factor structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 90, 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802388590
Crawford, A. V., Green, S. B., Levy, R., Lo, W.-J., Scott, L., Svetina, D., & Thompson, M. S. (2010). Evaluation of parallel analysis methods for determining the number of factors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 885–901. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410379332
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
De Graaf, P. M., & Kalmijn, M. (2006). Divorce motives in a period of rising divorce. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 483–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X05283982
Fisher, H. (1992). Anatomy of love: a natural history of mating, marriage, and why we stray. Norton.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0000337X
Greiling, H., & Buss, D. M. (2000). Women’s sexual strategies: the hidden dimension of extra pair mating. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, 929–963. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(99)00151-8
Greeley, A. (1994). Marital Infidelity. Society, 31, 9–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02693241
Hald, G. M., & Høgh-Olesen, H. (2010). Receptivity to sexual invitations from strangers of the opposite gender. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31, 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.07.004
Hawkins, A. J., Willoughby, B. J., & Doherty, W. J. (2012). Reasons for divorce and openness to marital reconciliation. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 53, 453–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2012.682898
Hughes, S. M., Harrison, M. A (2017). Your cheatin’ voice will tell on you: detection of past infidelity from voice Evolutionary Psychology 15 https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704917711513
Jakobwitz, S., & Egan, V. (2006). The Dark Triad and normal personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 40, 331–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.07.006
Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the Short Dark Triad (SD3): abrief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105
Lancaster, J. B., & Lancaster, C. S. (1987). The watershed: change in parental investment and family-formation strategies in the course of human evolution. In J. B. Lancaster, J. Altmann, A. S. Rossi, & L. R. Sherrod (Eds.), Parenting across the life span: Biosocial dimensions (pp. 187–205). Aldine Publishing.
Lippa, R. A. (2009). Sex differences in sex drive, sociosexuality, and height across 53 nations: testing evolutionary and social structural theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 38, 631–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9242-8
Lykken, D. T. (1995). The antisocial personalities. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: narcissism, Machiavellianism and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00505-6
Prins, K. S., Buunk, B. P., & Van Yperen, N. W. (1993). Equity, normative disapproval, and extramarital relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 10, 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407593101003
Schmitt, D. P. (2005). Sociosexuality from Argentina to Zimbabwe: a 48-nation study of sex, culture, and strategies of human mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 247–275. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x05000051
Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. Oxford University Press.
Tafoya, M. A., & Spitzberg, B. H. (2007). The dark side of infidelity: its nature, prevalence, and communicative functions. In B. H. Spitzberg & W. R. Cupach (Eds.), The dark side of interpersonal communication (2nd ed., pp. 201–242). Erlbaum.
Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11, 375–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/0162-3095(90)90017-Z
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors (Menelaos Apostolou & Maria Ioannidou) contributed to the conception and design of the study as well as to material preparation, data collection, and analysis. The manuscript was written by Menelaos Apostolou. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval
The current research received ethics approval from the department of social sciences ethics committee.
Consent to Participate
Consent was asked from all participants prior to participation.
Consent for Publication
The authors grant the publisher permission to publish this manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Apostolou, M., Ioannidou, M. Strategies for Detecting Infidelity: An Explorative Analysis. Evolutionary Psychological Science 7, 380–389 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00287-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-021-00287-9