Skip to main content
Log in

Entropy, Shannon orbit equivalence, and sparse connectivity

  • Published:
Mathematische Annalen Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We say that two free p.m.p. actions of countable groups are Shannon orbit equivalent if there is an orbit equivalence between them whose associated cocycle partitions have finite Shannon entropy. We show that if the acting groups are sofic and each has a w-normal amenable subgroup which is neither locally finite nor virtually cyclic then Shannon orbit equivalence implies that the actions have the same maximum sofic entropy. This extends a result of Austin beyond the finitely generated amenable setting and has the consequence that two Bernoulli actions of a group with the properties in question are Shannon orbit equivalent if and only if they are measure conjugate. Our arguments apply more generally to actions satisfying a sparse connectivity condition which we call property SC, and yield an entropy inequality under the assumption that one of the actions has this property.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This bifurcation is also reflected in the two logically independent ways in which the ideas of amenability and nonamenability have been adapted to operator algebras, on the one hand through the notions of finiteness and pure infiniteness and on the other through injectivity and finite-dimensional approximation. All of this traces back to the basic Dedekindian alternative for defining what it means for a set to be finite, either as the property that every injection from the set to itself is surjective, or by the existence of a bijection between the set and \(\{ 1,\dots , n\}\) for some positive integer n.

  2. Again this is consistent with operator algebra theory, where amenability has become synonymous with certain kinds of finite-dimensional approximation.

References

  1. Abért, M., Weiss, B.: Bernoulli actions are weakly contained in any free action. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 33, 323–333 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin, T.: Behaviour of entropy under bounded and integrable orbit equivalence. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26, 1483–1525 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bekka, B., de la Harpe, P., Valette, A.: Kazhdan’s Property (T). New Mathematical Monographs, 11. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2008)

  4. Belinskaya, R.M.: Partitions of Lebesgue space in trajectories defined by ergodic automorphisms. Functional Anal. Appl. 2, 190–199 (1968)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Bezuglyi, S.I., Golodets, V.Ya.: Hyperfinite and II\(_1\) actions for nonamenable groups. J. Funct. Anal. 40, 30–44 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bowen, L.: Measure conjugacy invariants for actions of countable sofic groups. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 23, 217–245 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bowen, L.: Orbit equivalence, coinduced actions and free products. Groups Geom. Dyn. 5, 1–15 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bowen, L.: Stable orbit equivalence of Bernoulli shifts over free groups. Groups Geom. Dyn. 5, 17–38 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bowen, L.: Every countably infinite group is almost Ornstein. In: Dynamical Systems and Group Actions, 67–78, Contemp. Math., 567, Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2012)

  10. Bowen, L.: Sofic entropy and amenable groups. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Syst. 32, 427–466 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. de Santiago, R., Hayes, B., Hoff, D. J., Sinclair, T.: Maximal rigid subalgebras of deformations and \(L^2\)-cohomology. To appear in Anal. PDE

  12. Epstein, I.: Some Results on Orbit Inequivalent Actions of Non-amenable Groups. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles, 55p (2008)

  13. Fieldsteel, A., Friedman, N.A.: Restricted orbit changes of ergodic \(\mathbf{Z}^d\)-actions to achieve mixing and completely positive entropy. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 6, 505–528 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Furman, A.: Orbit equivalence rigidity. Ann. Math. 150, 1083–1108 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Gaboriau, D.: Coût des relations d’équivalence et des groupes. Invent. Math. 139, 41–98 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaboriau, D., Popa, S.: An uncountable family of nonorbit equivalent actions of \(\mathbb{F}_n\). J. Amer. Math. Soc. 18, 547–559 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayes, B.: Fuglede-Kadison determinant and sofic entropy. Geom. Funct. Anal. 26, 520–606 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Hjorth, G.: A converse to Dye’s theorem. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357, 3083–3103 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Ioana, A.: Orbit inequivalent actions for groups containing a copy of \(\mathbb{F}_2\). Invent. Math. 185, 55–73 (2011)

  20. Kechris, A.S: Global Aspects of Ergodic Group Actions. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 160. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI (2010)

  21. Kechris, A.S., Miller, B.D.: Topics in Orbit Equivalence. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1852. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2004)

  22. Kechris, A.S., Solecki, S., Todorcevic, S.: Borel chromatic numbers. Adv. Math. 141, 1–44 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Kerr, D., Li, H.: Bernoulli actions and infinite entropy. Groups Geom. Dyn. 5, 663–672 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerr, D., Li, H.: Soficity, amenability, and dynamical entropy. Amer. J. Math. 135, 721–761 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Kerr, D., Li, H.: Ergodic Theory: Independence and Dichotomies. Springer, Cham (2016)

  26. Kida, Y.: Orbit equivalence rigidity for ergodic actions of the mapping class group. Geom. Dedicata 131, 99–109 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Lück, W.: \(L^2\)-Invariants: Theory and Applications to Geometry and\(K\)-Theory. Ergebnisse der Mathematik und ihrer Grenzgebiete, 3. Folge, vol. 44. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2002)

  28. Mann, A.: How Groups Grow. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 395. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

  29. Monod, N., Shalom, Y.: Orbit equivalence rigidity and bounded cohomology. Ann. Math. 164, 825–878 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Ornstein, D.S., Weiss, B.: Entropy and isomorphism theorems for actions of amenable groups. J. Analyse Math. 48, 1–141 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Peterson, J., Sinclair, T.: On cocycle superrigidity for Gaussian actions. Ergodic Theory Dynam. Syst. 32, 249–272 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Popa, S.: Cocycle and orbit equivalence superrigidity for malleable actions of w-rigid groups. Invent. Math. 170, 243–295 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Popa, S.: On the superrigidity of malleable actions with spectral gap. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 21, 981–1000 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Seward, B.: Bernoulli shifts with bases of equal entropy are isomorphic. arXiv:1805.08279

  35. Stepin, A.M.: Bernoulli shifts on groups. Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR 223, 300–302 (1975)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Tucker-Drob, R.: Invariant means and the structure of inner amenable groups. Duke Math. J. 169, 2571–2628 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Vershik, A.M.: Approximation in Measure Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Leningrad University, 1973. In Russian

  38. Vershik, A.M.: Theory of decreasing sequences of measurable partitions. St. Petersburg Math. J. 6, 705–761 (1995)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Zimmer, R.J.: Strong rigidity for ergodic actions of semisimple Lie groups. Ann. Math. 112, 511–529 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1800633 and was affiliated with Texas A&M University while this work was done. Preliminary stages were carried out during his six-month stay in 2017-2018 at the ENS de Lyon, during which time he held ENS and CNRS visiting professorships and was supported by Labex MILYON/ANR-10-LABX-0070. He thanks Damien Gaboriau and Mikael de la Salle at the ENS for their generous hospitality. The second author was partially supported by NSF grants DMS-1600717 and DMS-1900746. We thank Robin Tucker-Drob for comments. We also thank one of the referees for pointing out that our original version of Lemma 3.9 is valid in a stronger purely Borel form and follows as such from results of [22], and that this lemma additionally yields an elementary proof of Lemma 3.30.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kerr.

Additional information

Communicated by Andreas Thom.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kerr, D., Li, H. Entropy, Shannon orbit equivalence, and sparse connectivity. Math. Ann. 380, 1497–1562 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-021-02190-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00208-021-02190-x

Navigation