Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mycorrhizal type effects on leaf litter decomposition depend on litter quality and environmental context

  • Published:
Biogeochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Slower leaf litter decomposition rates for trees associated with ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi compared to arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi may lead to the development of conservative nitrogen cycling and accumulation of soil organic matter in surface soils of ECM-dominated forests. Slower decomposition is hypothesized to occur via two often-confounded mechanisms: production of lower quality litter by ECM-associated trees compared to AM-associated trees and competition for nitrogen between ECM and saprotrophic decomposers in ECM-dominated stands. To disentangle the effects of litter quality and stand mycorrhizal type on decomposition, we measured litter mass loss rates of two AM species higher and two AM species similar in chemical quality to two ECM species. Leaf litter was decomposed for two years in neighboring ECM- and AM-dominated stands of a wet tropical montane forest. Litter phosphorus (P) was the strongest predictor of decomposition rates across all species, with no effect of litter mycorrhizal type on decomposition rates. Only one species, which exhibited intermediate litter chemical quality and decomposition rate, decomposed significantly faster in AM- compared to ECM-dominated stands. Leaf litter decomposition rates cannot be predicted directly from litter mycorrhizal type or stand mycorrhizal type because litter chemical quality and environmental conditions mediate the manifestation of slower decomposition in ECM stands.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are available upon request from the corresponding author.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We appreciate field assistance from Evidelio Garcia and Carlos Espinosa, and lab assistance from Rachel Van Allen and Helen Fisher. This research was funded by the Clark Research Award, Ferguson Fund, and the University of Illinois Graduate College Dissertation Travel Grant to GSS. The National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program (NSF IGERT 1069157) and the Illinois Distinguished Fellowship supported GSS. The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute provided logistical support at the Fortuna Forest Reserve.

Funding

This research was funded by the Clark Research Award, Ferguson Fund, and the University of Illinois Graduate College Dissertation Travel Grant to GSS. The National Science Foundation Integrative Graduate Education and Research Traineeship Program (NSF IGERT 1069157) and the Illinois Distinguished Fellowship supported GSS. The Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute provided logistical support at the Fortuna Forest Reserve.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GSS and WHY conceived of and designed the study in consultation with JD; GSS conducted the study, processed the samples, analyzed the data, and wrote the manuscript; WHY edited the manuscript with contributions from JD.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgia S. Seyfried.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Responsible Editor: Feng Zhou.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 395 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seyfried, G.S., Dalling, J.W. & Yang, W.H. Mycorrhizal type effects on leaf litter decomposition depend on litter quality and environmental context. Biogeochemistry 155, 21–38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00810-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-021-00810-x

Keywords

Navigation