Abstract
The key objective of the 2015 revised national curriculum in South Korea is nurturing transformative and creative convergence talent of students. Home economics teachers in South Korea have tried to shift the empirical-rational science-based home economics instruction into critical science perspective-based home economics instruction so that learners can develop these competencies. To help with this change, this study aimed to reveal the process of a teacher’s reflection to implement critical science perspective-based instruction and resolve the difficulties on the reasoning stage, which is a key course of the instruction. Action research as a qualitative research approach was conducted. For the analysis it employed materials such as instruction observation journals, teacher’s reflection journals, student interview records etc. The study revealed that it needed the teacher’s constant challenges and reflections on the thinking process for implementing critical science perspective-based instruction. Through the reflection, the teacher realized that she should break away from her teaching tendencies and her fixed ideas of pedagogy, which reflected the empirical-rational science-based perspective. Also, it found that the teacher should experience and get familiar with how to think at each stage of practical reasoning earlier than the students: Identifying concerns, understanding context of concerns, making and evaluating alternatives, setting valued ends, and making a judgment about action. Based on these findings, the proposals of developing teacher’s communities, teacher training, and a national home economics curriculum are suggested.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Critical Science Perspective-based Home economics Instruction.
Concerns, Practical problem.
References
Brown, M. M. (1978). A conceptual scheme and decision-rules for the selection and organization of home economics curriculum content (Bulletin No. 0033). The Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.
Brown, M. M., & Paolucci, B. (1979). Home economics: A definition. American Home Economics Association.
Byun, H. J., & Chae, J. H. (2002). The effect of practical reasoning instruction in home economics on the critical thinking: Focusing on family relations and resource management. Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association, 14(3), 1–9.
Gentzler, S. Y. (1999). What is critical theory and critical science? In J. Johnson & C. Fedje (Eds.), Family and consumer sciences teacher education: Yearbook. (Vol. 19, pp. 2–22). McGraw Hill Glenco.
Han, J., & Chae, J. H. (2016). Experiences of the teachers in the practical problem-based home economics class. Family and Environment Research, 54(4), 351–363.
Jeon, G. I. (2014). Making good lessons for students majoring in early childhood education in community college: The action research implemented throughout hermeneutic questions and conversation. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 17(2), 59–110. https://doi.org/10.17318/jae.2014.17.2.002
Jo, Y. H. (2015). Field research and action research. The Journal of Anthropology of Education, 18(4), 1–49. https://doi.org/10.17318/jae.2015.18.4.001
Knorr, A. J., Schmalzel, P., & de Bogart, E. (1981). Reasoning and acting on practical problems of home and family (project no. 81-904C-03-05). Arizona Department of Education.
Kokoszka, J. (2015). Reforming the teaching of textiles. In M. L. de Zwart & M. G. Smith (Eds.), Proceedings of the canadian symposium XIII issues and directions for home economics/family studies/human ecology education. Winnipeg, Manitoba.
Korthagen, F. A., Kessels, J., Koster, B., Lagerwerf, B., & Wubbels, T. (2001). Linking practice and theory: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Routledge.
Lee, D. H., & Yang, J. H. (2010). Effects of practical problems solving instruction on problem solving ability and dietary self-efficacy: Centering on the unit of food and nutrition of practical arts education. Journal of Korean Practical Arts Education, 23(1), 73–94.
Lee, S. H., & Yoo, T. M. (2008). Focus group interview for the development of an in-service educational program on the practical problem focused home economics curriculum. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 20(3), 107–129.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1946.tb02295.x
Mills, G. E. (2000). Action research: A guide for the teacher researcher. Prentice-Hall Inc.
Ministry of Education. (2015a). General curriculum for elementary and secondary school. Ministry of Education.
Ministry of Education. (2015b). The practical arts (Technology·Home Economics) curriculum. Ministry of Education.
Montgomery, B. (2010). Curriculum development: A critical science perspective. National Standards for Teachers of Family and Consumer Sciences, 159, 169.
Oh, K., Ha, J., & Lee, S. H. (2019). Development of Home Economics teaching-learning plan in the clothing and textiles area for teenager’s empowerment improving (I). Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 31(3), 155–177. https://doi.org/10.19031/jkheea.2019.09.31.3.155
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD.
Park, M. O., & Chae, J. H. (2012). Home Economics teachers’ stages of concern and levels of use about the practical reasoning Instruction. Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 24(4), 133–144.
Park, M. R., & Cho, J. S. (2010). Application and development of teaching-learning plan for ‘sustainable residence created with neighbor.’ Journal of Korean Home Economics Education Association, 22(3), 1–18.
Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn: A view of what education might become. Charles E. Merrill.
Seo, K. W. (2008). The meaning of doing qualitative research. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 46(3), 133–161.
Spradley, J. P. (2006). Participant observation (JY Shin, Trans). Sigmapress. Original work published 1980.
Staaland, E., & Strom, S. (1996). Family, food, and society: A teacher’s guide. ERIC Clearinghouse.
Thorsbakken, P., & Schield, B. (1999). Family system of action. In J. Johnson & C. Fedje (Eds.), Family and consumer sciences teacher education yearbook. (Vol. 19, pp. 117–131). McGraw Hill Glenco.
Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2010). Practical problem based home economics class: Theory and practice. Book Korea.
Yoo, T. M., & Lee, S. H. (2014). A critical review of Korean home economics education research based on a critical science perspective. International Journal of Human Ecology, 15(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.6115/ijhe.2014.15.1.23
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oh, K., Lee, S.H. A Korean teacher’s reflection on critical science perspective-based home economics instruction. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 23, 15–25 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09699-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09699-5