Abstract
The long and established roots of biographical research have been well documented, over the last decades, in a rich body of reflections about the main trends, traditions and contexts of production of the field within social sciences, including the identification of milestones and turns. Most of these notable analyses mapping the field’s key approaches and methods tend to be exclusively qualitatively driven, cross-disciplinary, and focused on particular research practices, national contexts. In this article, our aim is to make an innovative yet complementary contribution to the mapping of biographical research. Our contribution has a broader analytical window of observation by acknowledging not only the field’s main traditions and nucleus, but also its periphery and margins. We carried out a bibliometric analysis based on 1270 sociological publications written in English (journal articles, books and book chapters) and, through multivariate statistical analyses, identified three profiles. The Precursors, the founders of the field, define the key theoretical parameters of a sociological analysis of the relation between biography and society, while testing them empirically. The Engineers are the developers of the biographical method, by creating, producing and implementing methodological tools. The Explorers have a distinctive empirical focus, with publications illustrating the implementation of the bases developed by the Precursors and the Engineers in the collection of biographical data to study specific life contexts. All profiles have a singular contribution to the definition of the field’s structure, contents and dynamics in analytical, methodological and conceptual terms; thus, showing the many faces of biographical research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrantes, P. (2013). Socialization and inequality: A biographical approach to the working class in Portugal. Current Sociology, 61(7), 984–1002
Apitzsch, U., & Lena, I. (2000). Biographical analysis: A “German” school? In P. Chamberlayne, J. Bornat, & T. Wengraf (Eds.), The turn to biographical methods in social science: comparative issues and examples. (pp. 53–70). London: Routledge.
Atkinson, P. (2005). Qualitative research—unity and diversity. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), 26.
Atkinson, P., Seweryn, A., & Tirini, S. (2011). Knowing selves: Biographical research and European traditions. International Review of Qualitative Research, 4(4), 461–487
Atkinson, R. (1998). The Life Story Interview. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bertaux, D. (Ed.). (1981). Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences. London: Sage.
Bertaux, D. (1996). A Response to Thierry Kochuyt’s. Biographical and empiricist illusions: A reply to recent criticism. Biography and Society Newsletter, December 1996, pp. 2–6.
Bertaux, D., & Kohli, M. (1984). The life story approach: A continental view. Annual Review of Sociology, 10, 215–237
Bertaux, D., & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (1993). Between generations: family models, Myths and memories. Oxford University Press.
Bolívar, A. (2017). Biographical and narrative research in Iberoamerica: Emergence, development and state fields. In I. Goodson, A. Antikainen, P. Sikes, & M. Andrews (Eds.), The routledge international handbook on narrative and life history. (pp. 202–213). Abingdon: Routledge.
Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of ‘bibliometrics.’ Scientometrics, 12(5–6), 373–379
Bukowski, J. (1974). Biographical method in Polish sociology. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 3(1), 18–30
Caetano, A., & Nico, M. (2019). Forever young: Creative responses to challenging issues in biographical research. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 361–378.
Carvalho, H. (2008). Análise multivariada de dados qualitativos. Utilização da Análise de Correspondências Múltiplas (ACM) com o SPSS. Lisboa: Sílabo.
Chamberlayne, P. (1997). Social exclusion: Sociological traditions and national contexts. In SOSTRIS working paper 1: Social exclusion in comparative perspective. London: Centre for Biography in Social Policy, University of East London.
Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Wengraf, T. (2000). The turn to biographical methods in social science. Comparative issues and examples. London: Routledge.
Chamberlayne, P., Bornat, J., & Apitzsch, U. (Eds.). (2004). Biographical methods and professional practice: An international perspective. Policy Press.
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). Scimat: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630
Denzin, N. K. (1989). Interpretive biography. Newbury Park: Sage.
Ferrarotti, F. (2003). On the science of uncertainty: The biographical method in social research. Lanham: Lexington Books.
Fischer-Rosenthal, W., & Rosenthal, G. (1997). Daniel Bertaux’s complaints or against false dichotomies. In Biography and Society Newsletter (pp. 5–11). December 1997.
Gobo, G. (2005). The renaissance of qualitative methods. Forum: Qualitative social research, 6(3), 42.
Goodson, I. (2001). The story of life history: Origins of the life history method in sociology. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1(2), 129–142.
Goodwin, J. (Ed.). (2012). SAGE Biographical Research. London: Sage.
Harrison, B. (Ed.). (2009). Life Story Research. London: Sage.
Hatch, J. A., & Wisniewski, R. (Eds.). (1995). Life history and narrative. London: Routledge.
Heinritz, C., & Rammstedt, A. (1991). L’Approche Biographique en France. Cahiers Internationaux De Sociologie, 91, 331–370
Humphrey, R., Miller, R., & Zdravomyslova, E. (Eds.). (2003). Biographical Research in Eastern Europe: Altered Lives and Broken Biographies. London: Ashgate.
Jindra, I. W. (2014). Why American sociology needs biographical sociology—European style. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 44(4), 389–412
Kaźmierska, K. (2014). Analyzing biographical data – different approaches of doing biographical research. Qualitative Sociology Review, X(1), 6–17.
Kupferberg, F. (2018). Biography Research in the Nordic Countries. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung. (pp. 765–775). Springer VS.
Lechner, E. (2019). Migrants’ lives matter: biographical research, recognition and social participation. Contemporary Social Science, 14(3–4), 500–514
Merrill, B., & West, L. (2009). Using biographical methods in social research. London: Sage.
Merrill, B., & West, L. (2018). A history of biographical research in the United Kingdom. Revista Brasileira de Pesquisa (Auto)Biográfica, 3(9), 765–780.
Miller, R. L. (2000). Researching life stories and family histories. London: Sage.
Mrozowicki, A. (2011). Coping with Social Change: Life Strategies of Workers in Poland’s New Capitalism. Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Nurse, L., & O’Neill, M. (2018). Biographical research in the UK: Profiles and perspectives. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung. (pp. 709–720). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
O’Neill, M., Roberts, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (Eds.). (2015). Advances in biographical methods: Creative applications. Abingdon: Routledge.
Plummer, K. (1995). Telling sexual stories: Power, change and social worlds. London: Routledge.
Plummer, K. (2001). Documents of life 2: An invitation to a critical humanism. London: Sage.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349
Rammstedt, A. (1995). Biographical research in Italy. Current Sociology, 43(2), 179–207
Riemann, G. (2003). A joint project against the backdrop of a research tradition: An introduction to “doing biographical research”. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(3), 18.
Roberts, B. (2002). Biographical research. Principles and Practice. Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Rosenthal, G. (1993). Reconstruction of life stories: Principles of selection in generating stories for narrative biographical interviews. The Narrative Study of Lives, 1(1), 59–91
Rosenthal, G., & Fischer-Rosenthal, W. (2004). The analysis of narrative-biographical interviews. In U. Flick, E. Kardoff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research. (pp. 259–265). London:Sage.
Schütze, F. (2003). Hülya’s migration to Germany as self-sacrifice undergone and suffered in love for her parents, and her later biographical individualization. Biographical problems and biographical work of marginalisation and individualisation of a young Turkish woman in Germany. Part I. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 4(3), 23.
Schütze, F. (2014). Autobiographical accounts of war experiences. An outline for the analysis of topically focused autobiographical texts—using the example of the “Robert Rasmus” account in studs Terkel’s book, “The Good War”. Qualitative Sociology Review, X(1), 224–283.
Shaw, C. R. (1966). The Jack-Roller: A delinquent Boy’s own story. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Spanò, A., Perone, E., & Domecka, M. (2013). Biographical costs of transnational mobility in the European space. In J. D. Turk & A. Mrozowicki (Eds.), Realist biography and European policy: An innovative approach to European policy studies. (pp. 93–114). Leuven: Leuven University Press.
Stanley, L. (1992). The auto/biographical I: The theory and practice of feminist auto/biography. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Stanley, L. (Ed.). (2013). Documents of life revisited: narrative and biographical methodology for a 21st century critical humanism. Farnham: Ashgate.
Szász, A. L., & Vajda, J. (2018). Biographical research in Hungary. In H. Lutz, M. Schiebel, & E. Tuider (Eds.), Handbuch Biographieforschung. (pp. 107–123). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
Thomas, W. I., & Znaniecki, F. (1918–20). The Polish peasant in Europe and America: Monograph of an immigrant group, Boston: The Gorham Press.
Thomson, R., & Holland, J. (2005). “Thanks for the memory”: Memory books as a methodological resource in biographical research. Qualitative Research, 5(2), 201–219
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538
Wengraf, T., Chamberlayne, P., & Bornat, J. (2002). A biographical turn in the social sciences? A British-European view. Cultural Studies—Critical Methodologies, 2(2), 245–269.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SOC-SOC/29117/2017].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caetano, A., Nico, M., Baía, J. et al. More than meets the eye: traditions, nucleus and peripheries of the biographical research field. Scientometrics 126, 5707–5726 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04020-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04020-y