A refined analytical model for the mesh stiffness calculation of plastic gear pairs
Introduction
As a new type of gear, plastic gears are gradually replacing traditional metal gears in low and medium load areas [1] due to advantages such as light weight and low cost [2]. The key problem of plastic gears, which restricts its large-scale application, is their lower load-bearing capacity than metal gears. Therefore, studying the load carrying capacity of plastic gears is significant as it ensures the transmission performance of plastic gears at different conditions. Hasl et al. [3] considered the influence of tooth deflection under load on the contact ratio of plastic gear pair, and proposed a method for calculating the nominal tooth root stress based on existing analytic guidelines. They [4] also proposed a method for calculating the root stress of oil-lubricated plastic gears, and verified the rationality of the method through experimental results. Past researches show that the contact analysis of plastic gears is the basis for the load carrying capacity analysis, such as the contact temperature modeling. Based on the contact analysis, Mao [5], Fernandes et al. [6] and Černe et al. [7] proposed a thermal model to predict the contact temperature, which consists of flash temperature, ambient temperature and bulk temperature.
The variation of the gear mesh stiffness (GMS) is an important excitation source to gear systems [8]. Accurate calculation of GMS is the key step for the tooth contact modeling and load carrying capacity analysis. Thus, it has received intensive attention in the literature. Tsai et al. [9] proposed an algorithm to calculate the static transmission error of plastic gear pair based on the Houser's method, which takes the influence of corner contact into account. Based on the potential energy method, Jabbour et al. [10] proposed a mathematical model to calculate the GMS of plastic helical gears, and the premature engagement of tooth pairs is considered. Wan et al. [11] improved the traditional model based on the potential energy principle and studied the evaluation method of the GMS when the base circle radius is larger or smaller than the tooth root circle radius. Ma et al. [12] proposed an improved analytical method by introducing the fillet-foundation deformation correction coefficient to account for the overestimation of the tooth foundation induced stiffness during the meshing of multiple tooth pairs. In addition, the effect of tooth tip modification on GMS was studied. Wang et al. [13] proposed an improved model for the GMS of helical gears, which considered not only transverse-meshing stiffness but also axial-meshing stiffness, and the effect of helix angle on meshing stiffness was furtherly analyzed. Cao et al. [14] improved the potential energy method by analyzing the influence of gear eccentricity error on the center distance and mesh position of gear pair, and investigated the influence of eccentricity errors of sun gear and planetary gear on the dynamic performance of planetary gear transmission system. Based on finite element method, Wang [15] proposed a model to calculate the GMS and analyzed the effect of ambient temperature and external load on the GMS. However, since the plastic is a thermal-sensitive material, the change of tooth contact temperature will affect the analysis accuracy of the load carrying capacity. Gou et al. [16] considered the influence of tooth surface contact temperature on GMS by treating the effect of thermal expansion on the GMS as an additional stiffness component superimposed on the original stiffness components (i.e. the Hertzian contact stiffness, the tooth flexibility induced mesh stiffness and the tooth foundation induced mesh stiffness). Luo et al. [17] proposed a thermal dynamic model of gear system by considering the effect of heat on GMS. The results show that the thermal effect causes an additional thermal load during the meshing process.
There are many studies towards the GMS calculations by using analytical methods, which are applicable to both metal gears and plastic gears. However, due to the lower elastic modulus and poor thermal conductivity of plastics, a lower external load can cause large tooth deformation and higher additional thermal load. These factors will inevitably cause the meshing position to deviate from the theoretical position. In addition, the elastic modulus of plastics is extremely susceptible to the effect of ambient temperature, which will further affect the meshing process of the gear pair. As far as we known, these effects have been rarely considered for the GMS calculation of plastic gears in previous work.
In order to address this issue, this study first investigates the meshing process of plastic gear pair, and studies the influence of tooth deformation and thermal effect on the meshing position. A novel GMS calculation method for plastic gear pairs via an iterative algorithm is introduced. The proposed method overcomes the deficiency of traditional method in the meshing analysis of plastic gear pair, and provides a theoretical reference for further research and analysis on the load carrying capacity. This constitutes the major contribution of this work to the literature. It should be noted that only elastic deformation is considered in this paper, which is the commonly-used assumption.
The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 elaborates on the origin of the problem to be studied in this article, and clarifies the influence of gear tooth deformation and temperature variations on the mesh behavior of a plastic gear pair. Section 3 introduces the modeling process of the GMS of a plastic gear pair, and illustrates load distribution mechanism among meshing tooth pairs. Section 4 first presents a comparison study to demonstrate the rationality of the proposed model, and then analyzes the effects of ambient temperature, load and friction coefficient on the meshing point, GMS and load sharing ratio (LSR) of a plastic gear pair. Section 5 concludes this study.
Section snippets
Problem description
Fig. 1 shows a pinion tooth with the meshing force F acting on point X in the line of action (LOA). Thus, X is the theoretical meshing position without considering the tooth deformation. Rbp is the base radii of pinion. Fb is the vertical component of F representing the shear force acting on the tooth. Fa is the horizontal component of F representing the axial compression force acting on the tooth, and its direction is parallel to the center line of the tooth. M is the bending moment applied on
Traditional models
Wan et al. [11] proposed an improved analytical method for GMS by considering the potential energy stored in the part between base circle and root circle. In their method, the GMS is a function of the gear load angles (i.e. θXp and θXg) at the meshing point X and can be expressed by,where ki(t) is the mesh stiffness of the ith tooth pair at point X, n is the number of tooth pairs in the mesh zone, kfj(θXj) (j=p, g) is the
Simulation and discussion
In this section, the effects of load, ambient temperature and friction coefficient are analyzed. It should be noted that the gears considered are plastic gears, which have a lower Young's modulus and a higher expansion coefficient than their metal counterparts. The parameters used in the simulation are shown in Table 1 [15].
Conclusion
Unlike the metal gears, plastic gears have much lower elastic modulus. Therefore, the influences of the tooth meshing deformation on the meshing position, which are normally neglected for metal gear pairs, are significant for plastic gear pairs and should be seriously considered in the modeling of gear mesh stiffness. This study proposed an improved method via an iterative algorithm for the accurate calculation of gear mesh stiffness for plastic gear pairs considering the elastic approach of
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgement
This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51905053, 52035002).
References (28)
- et al.
Design and analysis of plastic gears in rack and pinion steering system for formula supra car
Mater. Today Proc.
(2018) - et al.
Method for calculating the tooth root stress of plastic spur gears meshing with steel gears under consideration of deflection-induced load sharing
Mech. Mach. Theory
(2017) A numerical method for polymer composite gear flash temperature prediction
Wear
(2007)- et al.
Finite element method model to predict bulk and flash temperatures on polymer gears
Tribol. Int.
(2018) - et al.
Thermo-mechanical modeling of polymer spur gears with experimental validation using high-speed infrared thermography
Mech. Mach. Theory
(2020) - et al.
Review on dynamics of cracked gear systems
Eng. Fail. Anal.
(2015) - et al.
A method for calculating static transmission errors of plastic spur gears using FEM evaluation
Finite Elem. Anal. Des.
(1997) - et al.
An improved time-varying mesh stiffness algorithm and dynamic modeling of gear-rotor system with tooth root crack
Eng. Fail. Anal.
(2014) - et al.
An improved analytical method for mesh stiffness calculation of spur gears with tip relief
Mech. Mach. Theory
(2016) - et al.
An improved time-varying mesh stiffness model for helical gear pairs considering axial mesh force component
Mech. Syst. Signal Process.
(2018)
Nonlinear dynamic model of a gear-rotor-bearing system considering the flash temperature
J. Sound Vib.
Investigation on the influence of heat on the dynamic characteristics of a gear transmission system
Eng. Fail. Anal.
Novel mathematical modelling methods of comprehensive mesh stiffness for spur and helical gears
Appl. Math. Model.
Dynamic simulation of spur gear with tooth root crack propagating along tooth width and crack depth
Eng. Fail. Anal.
Cited by (24)
Study on the vibration characteristics of toroidal involute worm meshing with different plastic gears
2024, Mechanical Systems and Signal ProcessingDynamics analysis of spur gears considering random surface roughness with improved gear body stiffness
2024, International Journal of Non-Linear MechanicsAnalysis of damage origin of bevel gear wheels
2023, Engineering Failure AnalysisModeling and analysis of load distribution ratio and meshing stiffness for orthogonal spur-face gear drive under point contact
2023, Mechanism and Machine TheoryMesh characteristic analysis and dynamic simulation of spur gear pair considering corner contact and tooth broken fault
2023, Engineering Failure AnalysisCitation Excerpt :Xu et al. [25] considered the position error of gear in the planetary gear set, load sharing was discussed under the influence of corner contact. Wu et al. [26] calculated the mesh stiffness of a plastic gear pair considering the corner contact effect based on the method proposed by Yu and Mechefske. Liu et al. [27] studied the pitch deviation induced corner contact of a spur gear pair, the double side meshing states were simulated.