Abstract
Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) are areas of marine ecosystems that have some level of protection to support one or more conservation objectives. One characteristic of MPA networks is that MPAs are spatially configured such that they provide the greatest protection possible for multiple species. Yet, it can be difficult to determine optimal MPA network arrangement due to insufficient information on multi-species habitat use and their dispersal abilities as larvae and adults. Here, we propose a modelling approach that involves determining the optimal MPA network configuration for multiple species assemblages, located at different depths and having differing dispersal abilities. As a case study, we applied this methodology in Pacific Canada where we identified optimal MPA configurations to protect 40 species having different pelagic larval duration (proxy for dispersal) at 3 different depth class groupings (proxy for habitat use). Taken together, we found dispersal ability had a larger impact on optimal MPA network configuration for species spending a long time as larvae compared to species spending a short time as larvae. We identify which 10% of this area is most important to conserve to maintain connectivity for a multi-species MPA network and show that half of these sites remain important to conserve in the future as climate change alters connectivity patterns. This model for MPA network design is feasible with limited data which is beneficial for application to other regions and ecosystems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Almany GR, Connolly SR, Heath DD, Hogan JD, Jones GP, McCook LJ, Mills M, Pressey RL, Williamson DH (2009) Connectivity, biodiversity conservation and the design of marine reserve networks for coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28:339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0484-x
Álvarez-Romero JG, Munguía-Vega A, Beger M, Mancha-Cisneros MM, Suárez-Castillo AN, Gurney GG, Pressey RL, Gerber LR, Morzaria-Luna HN, Reyes-Bonilla H, Adams VN, Kolb M, Graham EM, VanDerWal J, Castillo-López A, Hinojosa-Arango G, David P-R, Moreno-Baez M, Godínez-Reyes CR, Torre J (2017) Designing connected marine reserves in the face of global warming. Glob Change Biol 24:e671–e691. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13989
Anadón JD, Macha-Cisneros MM, Best BD, Gerber LR (2013) Habitat-specific larval dispersal and marine connectivity: implications for spatial conservation planning. Ecosphere 4:82. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00119.1
Andrello M, Jacobi MN, Manel S, Thuiller W, Mouillot D (2015a) Extending networks of protected areas to optimize connectivity and population growth rate. Ecography 38:273–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.00975
Andrello M, Mouillot D, Somot S, Thuiller W, Manel S (2015b) Additive effects of climate change on connectivity between marine protected areas and larval supply to fished areas. Divers Distrib 21:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12250
Balbar AC, Metaxas A (2019) The current application of ecological connectivity in the design of marine protected areas. Global Ecol Conserv 17:e00569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00569
Ball IR, Possingham HP, Watts M (2009) Marxan and relatives: Software for spatial conservation prioritization. In: Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Possingham HP (eds) Spatial conservation prioritization: quantitative methods and computational tools. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 185–195
Bani R, Marleau J, Fortin M-J, Daigle R, Guichard F (2021) Dynamic larval dispersal can mediate the response of marine metapopulations to multiple climate change impacts. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.07760
Bennet JR, Maxwell SL, Martin AE, Chadès I, Fahrig L, Gilbert B (2018) When to monitor and when to act: Value of information theory for multiple management units and limited budgets. J Appl Ecol 55:2102–2113. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.13132
Bonacich P (2007) Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Soc Netw 29:555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002
Botsford LW, White JW, Coffroth MA, Paris CB, Planes S, Shearer TL, Thorrold SR, Jones GP (2009) Connectivity and resilience of coral reef metapopulations in marine protected areas: matching empirical efforts to predictive needs. Coral Reefs 28:327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-009-0466-z
Burt JM, Akins P, Lathem E, Beck M, Salomon AK, Ban NC (2014) Marine protected area network design features that support resilient human-ocean systems - applications for British Columbia, Canada. Burnaby, British Columbia
Cabral RB, Mamauag SS, Aliño PM (2015) Designing a marine protected areas network in a data-limited situation. Mar Policy 59:64–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.04.013
Carr MH, Neigel JE, Estes JA, Andelman S, Warner RR, Largier JL (2003) Comparing marine and terrestrial ecosystems: implications for the design of coastal marine reserves. Ecol Appl 13:90–107
Carr MH, Robinson SP, Wahle C, Davis G, Kroll S, Murray S, Schumacker EJ, Williams M (2017) The central importance of ecological spatial connectivity to effective coastal marine protected areas and to meeting the challenges of climate change in the marine environment. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshwat Ecosyst 27:6–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2800
Daigle, R (2015a): Cuke Particle Positions - 1998-2007 - Grid sites. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1405701.v16
Daigle, R (2015b): Cuke Particle Positions - 2068-2077 - Grid sites. figshare. Dataset. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1419654.v16Daigle R. 2016. cuke_biophysical_particle_tracking: publication version. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51411
Daigle, R. (2016) cuke_biophysical_particle_tracking: publication version. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.51411
Davey A (1998) National system planning for protected areas. IUCN, Switzerland and Cambridge
Davis J, Pavlova A, Thompson R, Sunnucks P (2013) Evolutionary refugia and ecological refuges: key concepts for conserving Australian arid zone freshwater biodiversity under climate change. Glob Change Biol 19:1970–1984. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12203
Delmas E, Besson M, Brice MH, Burkle LA, Dalla Riva GV, Fortin MJ, Gravel D, Guimaraes PR, Hembry DH, Newman EA, Olesen JM, Pires MM, Yeakel JD, Poisot T (2019) Analyzing ecological networks of species interactions. Biol Rev 94:16–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12433
Dudley N (ed) (2008) Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN, Switzerland
D’Aloia CC, Daigle RM, Cȏte IM, Curtis JMR, Guichard F, Fortin MJ (2017) A multiple-species framework for integrating movement processes across life stages into the design of marine protected areas. Biol Cons 216:93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.10.012
Foreman MGG, Callendar W, Masson D, Morrison J, Fine I (2014) A model simulation of future oceanic conditions along the British Columbia Continental Shelf. Part II: results and analyses. Atmos Ocean 52:20–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2013.873014
Gerber LR, Botsford LW, Hastings A, Possingham HP, Gaines SD, Palumbi SR, Andelman S (2003) Population models for marine reserve design: A retrospective and prospective synthesis. Ecological Applications 13:S47–S64. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0047:PMFMRD]2.0.CO;2
Gerber LR, Mancha-Cisneros MDM, O’Connor MI, Selig ER (2014) Climate change impacts on connectivity in the ocean: implications for conservation. Ecosphere 5:33. https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00336.1
Gravel D, Poisot T, Albouy C, Velez L, Mouillot D (2013) Inferring food web structure from predator–prey body size relationships. Methods Ecol Evol 4:1083–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12103
Hilário A, Metaxas A, Gaudron SM, Howell KL, Mercier A, Mestre NC, Ross RE, Thurnherr AM, Young C (2015) Estimating dispersal distance in the deep sea: challenges and applications to marine reserves. Front Mar Sci 2:e00006. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00006
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate. (International Panel on Climate Change), Change. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland
Jacobi MN, Jonsson PR (2011) Optimal networks of nature reserves can be found through eigenvalue perturbation theory of the connectivity matrix. Ecol Appl 21:1861–1870
Jonsson PR, Jacobi MN, Moksnes PR (2016) How to select networks of marine protected areas for multiple species with different dispersal strategies. Divers Distrib 22:161–173. https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12394
Kendall MS, Poti M, Karnauskas KB (2016) Climate change and larval transport in the ocean: fractional effects from physical and physiological factors. Glob Change Biol 22:1532–1547. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13159
Kininmonth S, Drechsler M, Johst K, Possingham HP (2010) Metapopulation mean life time within complex networks. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 417:139–149. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps08779
Korotenko KA, Mamedov RM, Kontar AE, Korotenko LA (2004) Particle tracking method in the approach for prediction of oil slick transport in the sea: modelling oil pollution resulting from river input. J Mar Syst 48:159–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmarsys.2003.11.023
Lebreton LC-M, Greer SD, Borrero JC (2012) Numerical modelling of floating debris in the world’s oceans. Mar Pollut Bull 64:653–661
Levy JS, Ban NC (2013) A method for incorporating climate change modelling into marine conservation planning: An Indo-west Pacific example. Marine Policy 38:16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2012.05.015
Magris RA, Andrello M, Pressey RL, Mouillot D, Dalongeville A, Jacobi MN, Manel S (2018) Biologically representative and well-connected marine reserves enhance biodiversity persistence in conservation planning. Conserv Lett 11:4. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12439
Magris RA, Treml EA, Pressey RL, Weeks R (2016) Integrating multiple species connectivity and habitat quality into conservation planning for coral reefs. Ecography 39:649–664. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.01507
Margules CR, Pressey RL (2000) Systematic conservation planning. Nature 405:243–253
Masson D, Fine I (2012) Modeling seasonal to interannual ocean variability of coastal British Columbia. J Geophys Res 117:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JC008151
McCook LJ, Almany GR, Berumen ML, Day JC, Green AL, Jones GP, Leis JM, Planes S, Russ GR, Sale PF, Thorrold SR (2009) Management under uncertainty: guide-lines for incorporating connectivity into the protection of coral reefs. Coral Reefs 28:353–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-008-0463-7
Melià P, Schiavina M, Rossetto M, Gatto M, Fraschetti S, Casagrandi R (2016) Looking for hotspots of marine metacommunity connectivity: a methodological framework. Sci Rep 6:23705. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23705
Momigliano P, Harcourt R, Stow A (2015) Conserving coral reef organisms that lack larval dispersal: are networks of marine protected areas good enough? Front Mar Sci 2:16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2015.00016
Morales-Castilla I, Matias MG, Gravel D, Araújo MB (2015) Inferring biotic interactions from proxies. Trends Ecol Evol 30:347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2015.03.014
Morrison J, Calendar W, Foreman MGG, Masson D, Fine I (2014) A Model Simulation of Future Oceanic Conditions along the British Columbia Continental Shelf. Part I: Forcing Fields and Initial Conditions. Atmosphere-Ocean 52:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/07055900.2013.868340
Mouquet N, Loreau M (2002) Coexistence in metacommunities: the regional similarity hypothesis. Am Nat 159:420–426. https://doi.org/10.1086/338996
Munday PL, Leis JM, Lough JM, Paris CB, Kingsford MJ, Berumen ML, Lambrechts J (2009) Climate change and coral reef connectivity. Coral Reefs 28:379–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-008-0461-9
Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Grubler A, Riahi K , Roehrl RA, Rogner H-H and Victor N (2000) Special Report on Emissions Scenarios (SRES), A special report of working group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, UK.
Nielsen ES, Beger M, Henriques R, Selkoe KA, von der Heyden S (2017) Multispecies genetic objectives in spatial conservation planning. Conserv Biol 31:872–882. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12875
North WE, Adams EE, Schlag Z, Sherwood CR, He R, Hyun KH, Socolofsky SA (2011) Simulating oil droplet dispersal from the deepwater horizon spill with a Lagrangian approach. In: Liu Y, Mcfadyen A, Ji Z-G, Weisberg RH (eds) Monitoring and modeling the deepwater horizon oil spill: a record-breaking enterprise. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 217–226
O’Connor MI, Bruno JF, Gaines SD, Halpern BS, Lester SE, Kinlan BP, Weiss JM (2007) Temperature control of larval dispersal and the implications of marine ecology, evolution, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1266–1271. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0603422104
Reisser J, Shaw J, Wilcox C, Hardesty BD, Proietti M, Thums M, Pattiaratchi C (2013) Marine plastic pollution in waters around Australia: characteristics, concentrations, and pathways. PLoS ONE 8:e80466
Saura S, Bertzky B, Bastin L, Battistella L, Mandrici A, Dubois G (2018) Protected area connectivity: shortfalls in global targets and country-level priorities. Biol Cons 219:53–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.032
Saura S, Bodin Ö, Fortin MJ (2014) Stepping stones are crucial for specie’s long-distance dispersal and range expansion through habitat networks. J Appl Ecol 51:171–182. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12179
Sbrocco EJ, Barber PH (2013) MARSPEC: Ocean climate layers for marine spatial ecology. Ecology 94:979. https://doi.org/10.1890/12-1358.1
Tingley MW, Darling ES, Wilcove DS (2014) Fine- and coarse-filter conservation strategies in a time of climate change. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1322:92–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12484
Treml EA, Roberts JJ, Chao Y, Halpin PN, Possingham HP, Riginos C (2012) Reproductive output and duration of the pelagic larval stage determine seascape-wide connectivity of marine populations. Integr Comp Biol 52:525–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/ics101
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) and CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity) (2010) Decisions adopted by the conference of the partiesto the convention on biological diversity at its tenth meeting. UNEP and CBD, Nagoya. Available from https://www.cbd.int/decisions/cop/?m=cop-10. Accessed Nov 2016
Waters CN, Zalasiewicz J, Summerhayes C, Barnosky AD, Poirier C, Gałuszka A, Cearreta A, Edgeworth M, Ellis EC, Ellis M, Jeandel C, Leinfelder R, McNeill JR, Richter D, Steffen W, Syvitski J, Vidas D, Wagreich M, Williams M, Zhisheng A, Grinevald J, Odada E, Oreskes N, Wolfe AP (2016) The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science 351:aad26221. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad2622
Watson JR, Siegel DA, Kendall BE, Mitarai S, Rassweiller A, Gaines SD (2011) Identifying critical regions in small-world marine metapopulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108:E907–E913. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1111461108
Watts ME, Ball IR, Stewart RS, Klein CJ, Wilson K, Steinback C, Lourival R, Kircher L, Possingham HP (2009) Marxan with Zones: Software for optimal conservation based land- and sea-use zoning. Environ Model Softw 24:1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.06.005
Williams JC, ReVelle CS, Levin SA (2004) Using mathematical optimization models to design nature reserves. Front Ecol Environ 2:98–105
Wood LJ, Fish L, Laughren J, Pauly D (2008) Assessing progress towards global marine protection. Oryx 42:340–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S003060530800046X
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by funding for the CHONeII Grant to Fortin and Guichard; NSERC Discovery Grants to Fortin and Krkosek, and Canada Research Chairs to Fortin and Krkosek.
Funding
This work was supported by funding for the CHONeII Grant to Fortin and Guichard; NSERC Discovery Grants to Fortin and Krkosek, and Canada Research Chairs to Fortin and Krkosek.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CB and MJF developed the research questions. CB performed the analyses. CB, MK, and MJF wrote the paper.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
There was no field work or animal collections involved in this study. All species data referenced in this paper was either collected by previous research or analysed through computer simulation.
Data/code availability
As referenced in the manuscript, code describing the biophysical modelling parameters and the model outputs can be found in Daigle (2015a, b, 2016). Code used in this paper to generate results can be found at: https://www.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4639808
Additional information
Responsible Editor: S. Connell.
Reviewers: R. Magris, A. Metaxas and an undisclosed expert.
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blackford, C., Krkošek, M. & Fortin, MJ. A data-limited modeling approach for conserving connectivity in marine protected area networks. Mar Biol 168, 86 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03890-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-021-03890-3