Abstract
Pathological gambling is a growing health problem in Romania, recognized in DSM V (2013) as a form of psychopathology included in the category of addictions. This study aims to find out whether there are differences between gamblers and the control group among the dependent variables (impulsivity, conscientiousness, and defense mechanisms). According to the literature, impulsivity and low conscientiousness are specific features to pathological gamblers. A second goal is to check if there are one or more defense mechanisms defining gamblers. A recent study (Waqas et al., Waqas et al., Psychiatry Research 243:463–468, 2016) about the association of defense mechanisms and the problematic use of the Internet identified the following defense mechanisms: projection, denial, passive aggression, and movement. The present study questionnaire consists of four sections: a) The impulsivity questionnaire (Eysenk et al., Eysenck et al., Personality and Individual Differences 6:613–619, 1985), b) Defense Style Questionnaire-40, c) C-NEO (only the items related to the Conscientiousness factor) and d) SOGS (South Oaks Gambling Screen) test. This questionnaire was applied to 40 gamblers in the full version, and the control group was given the same questionnaire apart from the SOGS test. All data were analyzed in SPSS v20. The research results show that pathological gamblers have higher impulsivity than the control group, their defense mechanisms are predominantly neurotic and immature and their conscientiousness is significantly lower than the control group.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, CMC, upon request.
References
Abt, V., McGurrin, C. M., & Smith, F. J. (1985). Toward a synoptic model of gambling behavior. Journal of Gambling Behavior, 2, 79–88
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.
Andrews, G., Singh, M., & Bond, M. (1993). The Defense Style Questionnaire. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 181, 246–256
Blanco, C., Hanania, J., Petry, N. M., Wall, M. M., Wang, S., Jin, C. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2015). Towards a comprehensive developmental model of pathological gambling. Addiction, 8(1340–1351), 6
Boag, S. (2017). Splitting (Defense Mechanism). In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.Cham: Springer.
Chan, C. C., Li, W. W. L., & Leung, E. C. I. (2016). The Etiology of Problem Gambling. In Problem Gambling in Hong Kong and Macao. Springer, Singapore, 75-94.
Comings, D. E., MacMurray, J., Johnson, P., Dietz, G., & Muhleman, D. (1995). Dopamine D2 receptor gene (DRD2) haplotypes and the defense style questionnaire in substance abuse, Tourette syndrome, and controls. Biological Psychiatry, 37, 798–805
Costa, Paul & R.R, McCrae (Adapted and translated by: Iliescu, D., Minulescu, M., Nedelcea, C., Ispas, D. (2008). NEO PI-R. Manual tehnic: Inventarul de Personalitate NEO, Revizuit (NEO PI-R) & Inventarul NEO-FFI, Revizuit (NEO-FFI) / NEO PI-R: Technical Manual for NEO PI-R & NEO-FFI
Cramer, P. (2003). Defense mechanisms and physiological reactivity to stress. Journal of Personality, 71, 221–244
Eysenck, S. B., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G., & Allsopp, J. F. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5), 613–619
Floros, G., & Siomos, K. (2014). Excessive internet use and personality traits. Current Behavioral Neuroscience Reports, 1, 19–26
Fong, T. W. (2005a). The Vulnerable Faces of Pathological Gambling. Psychiatry. April, 34–42
Fong, T. W. (2005). The biopsychosocial consequences of pathological gambling. Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa: Township), 2(3), 22–30
Hammelstein, P. (2004). Faitesvosjeux! Another look at sensation seeking and pathological gambling. Personalityand Individual Differences, 37, 917–931
Holden, C. (2010). Psychiatry: behavioral addictions debut in proposed DSM-V. Science, 5968, 935
Kaare, P. R., Mottus, R., & Konstabel, K. (2009). Pathological gambling in Estonia: Relationships with personality, self-esteem, emotional statesand cognitive ability. Journal of Gambling Studies, 25, 377–390
Kertzman, S., Vainder, M., Aizer, A., Kotler, M., & Dannon, P. N. (2017). Pathological gambling and impulsivity: Comparison of the different measures in the behavior inhibition tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 107, 212–218
Leeman, R. F., & Potenza, M. N. (2012). Similarities and differences between pathological gambling and substance use disorders: A focus on impulsivity and compulsivity. Psychopharmacology (berl), 219, 469–490
Mackinnon, S. P., Lambe, L., & Stewart, S. H. (2016). Relations of five-factor personality domains to gambling motives in emerging adult gamblers: A longitudinal study. Journal of Gambling Issues, 34(179–200), 27
MacLaren, V., Ellery, M., & Knoll. (2014). Gambling motives and cognitive distorsions mediate effects of personality on problem gambling in electronic gambling machine players. Manitoba Gambling Research Program, March., 38, 29
MacLaren, V. V., Fugersang, J. A., Harringan, K. A., & Dixon, M. J. (2011). The personality of pathological gamblers: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(1057–1067), 28
Michalczuk, R., Bowden-Jones, H., Verdejo-Garcia, A., & Clark, L. (2011). Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report. Psychological Medicine, 12(2625–2635), 30
Miller, J. D., MacKillop, J., Fortune, E. E., Maples, J., Lance, C. E., Campbell, K. W., & Goodie, A. S. (2013). Personality correlates of pathological gambling derived from big threeand big five personality models. Psychiatry Research, 206, 50–55
Pellerano, F. (2015). Azzardopatia. Smettere di giocared’azzardo. Amrita.
Ponsi, M. (2017). Acting Out (Defense Mechanism). In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.Cham: Springer.
Rizeanu, S. (2014). Psychological profile of the Romanian pathological gambler. Social and Behavioral Science, 127, 265–269
Rogier, G., Beomonte Zobel, S., & Velotti, P. (2020). Pathological personality facets and emotion (dys)regulation in gambling disorder. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 61(2), 262–270
Salicetia, F. (2015). Internet addiction disorder (IAD). Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 1372–1376
Samuel, D. B., & Widiger, T. A. (2008). A meta-analyticreview of the relationships between the five-factor model and DSM-IV-TR personality disorders: a facet level analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 18, 1326–1342
Savron, G., Pitti, P., De Luca, R., & Guerreschi, C. (2001). Psicopatologia e gioco d’azzardo: uno studio preliminare su un campione di Giocatori d’Azzardo Patologici. Rivista Di Psichiatria, 36, 14–21
Sharma, M. G., Sharma, V., & Upadhyay, A. (2013). Therapeutic Interventions on Pathological Gamblers. Journal of Business Management and Social Sciences Research, 2(4)
Tattini, M., Casalboni, D., Salaris, M., & Pegli, E. (2012). Giocatori d’azzardo patologici e tratti di personalità: quali correlazioni? The Italian Journal on Addiction, 2, 93–97
Vaillant, G. E. (1994). Ego mechanisms of defense and personality psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 44–50
Waqas, A., Rehman, A., Malik, A., Aftab, R., Yar, A. A., Yar, A. A., & Rai, A. B. S. (2016). Exploring the association of ego defense mechanisms with problematic internet use in a Pakistani medical school. Psychiatry Research, 243, 463–468
Yi, S., & Kanetkar, V. (2011). Coping with guilt and shame after gambling loss. Journal of Gambling Studies, 27(3), 371–387
Zuckerman, M. (1994). Impulsive unsocialized sensation seeking: The biological fundations of a basic dimension of personality. In J. Bates & T. D. Wasch (Eds.), Temperament: Individual difference at the interface of biology and behavior. (pp. 219–255). American Psychological Association.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Ciobotaru Maria Ciobotaru carried out the research independently with the coordination of Aurel Ion Clinciu.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
I declare that there are no conflict and/or competing interests.
Consent to participate
“My name is Ciobotaru Camelia, I am a third-year student at the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences at the Transilvania University of Brasov. Through this form, you are asked to participate in a study whose purpose is to find out if high impulsivity defines most gamblers. Before starting to complete the questionnaires, please read the following details carefully: The data collected will be confidential and will be processed only for scientific purposes. There are no right or wrong answers. The validity of the results depends on the sincerity with which you answer the questions. Estimated completion time: 0-15 minutes. Issues to consider: By signing this document, you agree to voluntarily participate in this research. Your answers are protected by anonymity. You have the right to withdraw from completing the questionnaire without further explanation. Thank you for your time!
Consent for publication
I give my consent to publish this study.
Ethics approval
The study has received ethics approval by the Ethics Commission in Socio-Human Scientific Research (CECS) of Transilvania University and ratified by the Code of Ethics of socio-human scientific research, operating under the Council for Scientific Research.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ciobotaru, C.M., Clinciu, A.I. Impulsivity, Consciousness and Defense Mechanisms of the Ego Among Pathological Gamblers. J Gambl Stud 38, 225–234 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10035-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10899-021-10035-0