Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: a case study from Tamil Nadu, India

  • Research on Sustainable Developments for Environment Management
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The optimal design and performance monitoring of wind farms depend on the precise assessment of spatial and temporal distribution of wind speed. The aim of this research is to investigate the appropriateness of nine popular probability distribution models (exponential, gamma, generalised extreme value, inverse Gaussian, Kumaraswamy, log-logistic, lognormal, Nakagami, and Weibull) for the assessment of wind speed distribution (WSD) at 10 sites situated at topographically distinct locations in Tamil Nadu, India, based on 39 years of data. The results suggest that a single distribution cannot produce best fit for all the stations. On an individual level, the generalised extreme value distribution provided the most suitable fit for majority of the stations, followed by the Kumaraswamy distribution. The Kumaraswamy distribution has performed well even if the WSD of the station is negatively skewed. Hence, based on the ranking and performance consistency, the Kumaraswamy distribution can be preferred irrespective of the topographical heterogeneity of the stations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

NN performed the simulation studies. MV compiled the introduction and conclusion sections. SR contributed in preparing the abstract and discussion sections. All authors read and approved the final revised manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Narayanan Natarajan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1. Exponential distribution

The PDF of the exponential distribution is determined using the following function (Masseran et al. 2012):

$$ f\left(\nu, \lambda \right)=\left\{\begin{array}{c}\lambda {e}^{-\lambda \nu}\kern0.75em \nu \ge 0\ \\ {}0\kern3em \nu <0\end{array}\right. $$
(4)

where λ is known as the scale parameter and λ can be calculated from the inverse of the mean wind speed:

$$ \lambda =\frac{1}{\overline{\nu}} $$
(5)

2. Gamma distribution

The PDF of the gamma distribution is determined using the following function (Masseran et al. 2012):

$$ f\left(v,\alpha, \beta \right)=\frac{v^{\alpha -1}}{\beta^{\alpha}\Gamma \left(\alpha \right)}\exp \left(-\frac{v}{\beta}\right) $$
(6)

where α is the shape parameter, and β is the scale parameter, and г is the Gamma function. The shape and scale parameters are calculated by following equations simultaneously:

$$ \alpha \beta =\overline{v} $$
(7)
$$ nln\left(\beta \right)+ n\psi \left(\alpha \right)={\sum}_{i=1}^n\ln \left({v}_i\right) $$
(8)

where n is the number of samples and ψ is the di gamma function.

3. Generalised extreme value distribution

The PDF of the generalised extreme value distribution is defined as (Shukla et al. 2010):

$$ f\left(v,\xi, \mu, \sigma \right)=\frac{1}{\sigma}\mathit{\exp}\left[-{\left(1+\xi \left(\frac{v-\mu }{\sigma}\right)\right)}^{-1/2}\right]{\left(1+\xi \left(\frac{v-\mu }{\sigma}\right)\right)}^{-1-\left(\frac{1}{\xi}\right)} $$
(9)

For \( 1+\xi \left(\frac{v-\mu }{\sigma}\right)>0 \) and ξ ≠ 0.

4. Inverse Gaussian distribution

The PDF of the inverse Gaussian distribution is given by (Masseran et al. 2012):

$$ f\left(v,\lambda, \mu \right)=\sqrt{\frac{\lambda }{2\pi {v}^3}\mathit{\exp}\left\{-\frac{\lambda }{2{\mu}^2v}{\left(v-\mu \right)}^2\right\}} $$
(10)

where λ and μ are the shape and scale parameter, respectively. The parameters of the inverse Gaussian distribution is determined using the following expressions:

$$ \mu =\overline{v} $$
(11)
$$ \lambda =\frac{n}{\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{1}{v_i}-\frac{1}{\overline{v}}} $$
(12)

5. Log-Logistic distribution

The PDF of the log-logistic distribution is determined using the following functions (Meeker and Escobar 1998):

$$ f\left(v,\mu, \sigma \right)=\frac{\mathit{\exp}\left(\frac{\ln (v)-\mu }{\sigma}\right)}{\sigma v{\left(1+\mathit{\exp}\left(\frac{\ln (v)-\mu }{\sigma}\right)\right)}^2} $$
(13)

where μ and σ are log location and log scale parameters, respectively. The parameters of the log-logistic can be determined using the following equations simultaneously:

$$ {\sum}_{i=1}^n\frac{\exp \left(\frac{v_i-\mu }{\sigma}\right)}{1+\exp \left(\frac{v_i-\mu }{\sigma}\right)}=\frac{n}{2} $$
(14)
$$ n\sigma - n\mu +{\sum}_{i=1}^n{v}_i-2{\sum}_{i=1}^n\frac{\left({v}_i-\mu \right)\exp \left(\frac{v_i-\mu }{\sigma}\right)}{1+\exp \left(\frac{v_i-\mu }{\sigma}\right)}=0 $$
(15)

6. Lognormal distribution

The PDF of the lognormal distribution, with shape and scale parameters σ and μ, is obtained using the following function (Masseran et al. 2012):

$$ f\left(v,\mu, \sigma \right)=\frac{1}{v\sigma \sqrt{2\pi }}\mathit{\exp}\left\{\frac{-1}{2}{\left(\frac{\ln (v)-\mu }{\sigma}\right)}^2\right\} $$
(16)

7. Nakagami distribution

The PDF of the Nakagami distribution is defined by the following functions (Lopez-Martinez et al. 2013):

$$ f\left(v,m,\varOmega \right)=\frac{2{m}^m}{\varGamma (m){\varOmega}^m}{v}^{2m-1}\exp \left(-\frac{m}{\varOmega }{v}^2\right) $$
(17)

where Γis the gamma function and m and Ω indicate the shape and scale parameters calculated using the following expressions:

$$ \varOmega =\overline{v^2} $$
(18)
$$ m=\frac{\left(\overline{v^2}\right)}{{\left({v}^2-\overline{v^2}\right)}^2},m\ge 1/2 $$
(19)

8. Weibull distribution

The PDF of the Weibull distribution is given by (Manwell et al. 2002):

$$ f\left(\nu, k,c\right)=\frac{k}{c}{\left(\nu /c\right)}^{k-1}\exp \left[-{\left(\frac{\nu }{c}\ \right)}^k\right] $$
(20)

where ν, k, and c are the wind speed, shape, and scale parameter, respectively.

The shape and scale parameters are determined as follows:

$$ k={\left[\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n{v_i}^k\ln \left({v}_i\right)}{\sum_{i=1}^n{v_i}^k}-\frac{\sum_{i=1}^N\ln \left({v}_i\right)}{N}\right]}^{-1} $$
(21)
$$ c={\left[\frac{\sum_{i=1}^n{v_i}^k}{n}\right]}^{1/k} $$
(22)

where vi is the wind speed at time step i (m/s) and n is the number of non-zero WD points.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natarajan, N., Vasudevan, M. & Rehman, S. Evaluation of suitability of wind speed probability distribution models: a case study from Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29, 85855–85868 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14315-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14315-5

Keywords

Navigation