Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Economic damage cost of premature death due to fine particulate matter in Seoul, Korea

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Analyzing the economic value of the damage to human health caused by environmental risks has become an essential research focus, given the increasing necessity for effective decision-making. Since logical and rational analyses such as cost–benefit and cost–utility analyses will likely gain importance in future policymaking, the evaluation of economic costs becomes necessary. Among the various types of air pollutants, fine particulate matter (PM) is reported as closely related to mortality. To reduce result uncertainty by improving the methodology of risk assessment or the economic evaluation of fine PM, risk control measures are required for high-priority areas. This study addresses this issue by estimating the relative risk of PM2.5 while calculating the economic loss cost arising from acute death due to fine PM exposure in Seoul, Korea. The value of statistical life of one person’s willingness to pay for mortality risk reduction is calculated to estimate the economic loss cost at each current level of exposure. The estimated economic loss cost due to all-cause mortality during 2016–2018 totaled approximately USD 1307.9 million per year; the costs of loss from respiratory and cardiovascular mortalities were USD 128.1 million per year and USD 426.9 million, respectively. Based on these results, this study concludes that the standards for PM2.5 are more effective than the ones established for PM10 in terms of economic value.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable

References

  • Alberini A, Cropper M, Fu T, Krupnick A, Liu JT, Shaw D, Harrington W (1997) Valuing health effects of air pollution in developing countries: the case of Taiwan. J Environ Econ Manag 34:107–126. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1997.1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA panel on contingent valuation. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce: Washington D.C.

  • Brethour C, Weersink A (2001) An economic evaluation of the environmental benefits from pesticide reduction. Agric Econ 25:219–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2001.tb00202.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dockery DW, Pope CA III, Xu X, Spengler JD, Ware JH, Fay ME, Ferris BG Jr, Speizer FE (1993) An association between air pollution and mortality in six US cities. New Engl J Med 329:1753–1759. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199312093292401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanemann WM (1985) Some issues in continuous- and discrete-response contingent valuation studies. Northeastern J Agric Econ 14:5–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones-Lee MW, Hammerton M, Phillips PR (1985) The value of safety: results of a national sample survey. Econ J 95:49–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krupnick A, Alberini A, Cropper M, Simon N, O’Brien B, Goeree R, Heintzelman M (2002) Age, health, and the willingness to pay for mortality risk reductions: a contingent valuation survey of Ontario residents. J Risk Uncertain 24(2):161–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014020027011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laden F, Neas LM, Dockery DW, Schwartz J (2000) Association of fine particulate matter from different sources with daily mortality in six US cities. Environ Health Perspect 108:941–947. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.00108941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Resource for the Future: Washington D.C.

  • Pope CA III, Burnett RT, Thun MJ, Calle EE, Krewski D, Ito K, Thurston GD (2002) Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. J Am Med Assoc 287:1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.287.9.1132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rabl A, Spadaro J (1998) Environmental damages and costs: an analysis of uncertainties. Environ Int 25:29–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-4120(98)00089-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samet JM, Dominici F, Zeger SL, Schwartz J, Dockery DW (2000) The national morbidity, mortality, and air pollution study. Part I: methods and methodological issues. Health Effects Institute Research Report 94.

  • Schwartz J, Marcus A (1990) Mortality and air pollution in London: a time series analysis. Am J Epidemiol 131(1):185–194. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Styer P, McMillan N, Gao N, Davis J, Sacks J (1995) Effect of outdoor airborne particulate matter on daily death counts. Environ Health Perspect 103(5):490–497. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.95103490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1993) A guidebook to comparing risks and setting environmental priorities. Washington D.C, Regional and State Planning Branch

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2000) Guideline for preparing economic analysis. EPA-240-R-00-003. Office of the Administrator: Washington D.C.

  • US EPA (2001) Air quality criteria for particulate matter. EPA 600/P-99/002bB. Office of Research and Development: Washington D.C.

  • Ware JE, Albertsen PC, Aaronson NK, Muller MJ, Keller SD (1997) Health-related quality of life among patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Urology 49(2):207–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00485-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHOQOL Group (The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment) (1998) Development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med 46(12):1569–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Korea Ministry of Science and ICT and Ministry of Education and School Particulate Matter Center for Energy & Environment Harmonization (No. 2019M3E7A1113082).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Dr. YJ LEE: Conceptualization; Data curation; Formal analysis; Funding acquisition; Investigation; Methodology; Project administration; Resources; Software; Supervision; Validation; Visualization. Dr. JY Yang: Roles/Writing — Original Draft. Dr. YW Lim: Writing — Review and Editing. Dr. CS Kim: Review and Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yongjin Lee.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Lotfi Aleya

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, Y., Yang, J., Lim, Y. et al. Economic damage cost of premature death due to fine particulate matter in Seoul, Korea. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 51702–51713 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14362-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14362-y

Keywords

Navigation