Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal pricing decision of composite service offered by network providers in E-commerce environment

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increasing demand of consumers for diversified network services, more and more network service providers are competing fiercely in providing network composite services in order to meet the market demand. Network composition service is the most basic service. According to certain rules, it synthesizes new services and then realizes new functions. At present, the pricing of service composition by network service providers in the market is not scientific, meanwhile random and temporary pricing is still relatively common. In order to scientifically guide network service providers to price composite service scientifically and effectively, improve the profit of service providers, and meet the maximum service demand of consumers. Based on the theory of market demand price, this paper applies the pricing model in supply chain management to the pricing link of composite service network. From the perspective of network service providers, a two-objective competitive pricing model is constructed, and the simulation example analysis and sensitivity test are carried out. The simulation results show that the composite service provided by network service providers satisfy the general market demand price theory. In order to help service providers make scientific decisions on price adjustment of network services, this paper also makes sensitivity analysis of market demand on price changes. The research shows that the composite service provided by network service providers satisfy the general market demand price theory, while adjusting the price can only meet the general market demand price change theory if the original price is less than half of the original price.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Paulraj, D., Swamynathan, S., Chandran, D., et al. (2016). Service composition and execution plan generation of composite semantic web services using abductive event calculus. Computational Intelligence, 32(4), 711–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Moghaddam, M., & Davis, J. G. (2019). Simultaneous service selection for multiple composite service requests: A combinatorial auction approach. Decision Support Systems, 120, 81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen, I. R., Guo, J., & Bao, F. (2017). Trust management for SOA-based IoT and its application to service composition. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 9(3), 482–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Moser, O., Rosenberg, F., & Dustdar, S. (2013). Domain-specific service selection for composite services. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 38(4), 828–843

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Feng, L., Lin, Z., Liu, Y., et al. (2017). A clustering network-based approach to service composition in cloud manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(3), 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  6. Khansari, M. E., Sharifian, S., & Motamedi, S. A. (2018). Virtual sensor as a service: A new multicriteria QoS-aware cloud service composition for IoT applications. Journal of Supercomputing, 74(10), 5485–5512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, H., Liang, M., & He, T. (2016). Optimizing the composition of a resource service chain with interorganizational collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 99, 1–1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lim, C. H., & Kim, K. J. (2017). IT-enabled information-intensive services. It Professional, 17(2), 26–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ji, S., Li, B., & Dong, Q. (2016). Incremental verification of evolving BPEL-based web composite service. Chinese Journal of Electronics, 25(1), 6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Deng, S., Huang, L., Hu, D., et al. (2016). Mobility-enabled service selection for composite services. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 9(3), 394–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, X. M., Fan, Q. L., Wang, D. F., & Leng, J. Z. (2018). Analysis on bundle pricing of product and service of telecom supply chain based on network externality. Journal of Systems and Management, 27(2), 366–373

    Google Scholar 

  12. Qiang, K. D., & Management S O. (2015). Internet service pricing based on customer loyalty. Value Engineering, 34(11), 244–246

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., & Nojima, Y. (2008). Evolutionary many-objective optimization: A short review. In IEEE world congress on computational intelligence (pp. 2419–2426).

  14. Hamidi, M. (2015). Solution of P versus NP problem. Algorithms Research, 1(4), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The finding is sponsored by the National Social Science Fund of China (Grant No. 18CGL015).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin Hu.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Z., Guo, H., Zhao, Y. et al. Optimal pricing decision of composite service offered by network providers in E-commerce environment. Electron Commer Res 22, 177–193 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09487-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-021-09487-8

Keywords

Navigation