Functional limit theorems for discounted exponential functional of random walk and discounted convergent perpetuity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2021.109148Get rights and content

Abstract

Let (ξ1,η1), (ξ2,η2), be independent and identically distributed R2-valued random vectors. Put S00 and Skξ1++ξk for kN. We prove a functional central limit theorem for a discounted exponential functional of the random walk k0eSkt, properly normalized and centered, as t. In combination with a theorem obtained recently in Iksanov et al. (2021) this leads to an ultimate functional central limit theorem for a discounted convergent perpetuity k0eSktηk+1, again properly normalized and centered, as t. The latter result complements Vervaat’s (1979) one-dimensional central limit theorem. Our argument is different from that used by Vervaat. The functional limit theorem is not informative in the case where ξk=ηk. As a remedy, we show that k0eSktξk+1 concentrates tightly around the point t in a deterministic manner.

Introduction

Let ξ1, ξ2, be independent copies of a real-valued random variable ξ. Denote by (Sk)kN0, where N0N{0}, the zero-delayed standard random walk with jumps ξk, that is, S00 and Skξ1++ξk for kN. For each t>0, put X(t)k0eSkt. Plainly, X(t)< a.s. for all/some t>0 if, and only if, limkSk=+ a.s. Under this condition we call (X(t))t>0 discounted exponential functional of random walk. Our terminology is inherited from a continuous-time counterpart 0exp(S(y))dy, where (S(y))y0 is a Lévy process diverging to +, known in the literature as ‘exponential functional of Lévy process’, see, for instance, (Bertoin and Yor, 2005, Carmona et al., 2001). Distributional properties of X(t), with t>0 fixed, were investigated in Szabados and Székely (2003). The latter authors call X(t) exponential functional of random walk. There are many works investigating the asymptotics of k=0nf(Sk) as n for various functions f (for instance, exponential) in the situation that the corresponding series is divergent. This circle of problems which is very different from that related to discounted exponential functional is discussed in the books Borodin and Ibragimov (1995) and Skorokhod and Slobodenjuk (1970).

As usual, we write P to denote convergence in probability, and and d to denote weak convergence in a function space and weak convergence of one-dimensional distributions, respectively. We prefer to use the notation Yt(u)Y(u) as t in place of Yt()Y(). Also, we denote by D(0,) (D[0,)) the Skorokhod space of right-continuous functions defined on (0,) (on [0,)) with finite limits from the left at positive points.

Here is our first result.

Theorem 1.1

Assume that μEξ(0,) and σ2Varξ(0,). Then, as t, 1t12(k0euSkttμu)(σ2μ3)12[0,)euydB(y)in the J1-topology on D(0,), where B(B(y))y0 is a standard Brownian motion.

Remark 1.2

Under the assumptions ξ0 a.s. and Eξp< for all p>0 a one-dimensional central limit theorem for k0eSkt as t was proved in Theorem 2 of Dall’ Aglio (1964) with the help of the method of moments.

Remark 1.3

The limit process in Theorem 1.1 is an a.s. continuous centered Gaussian process on (0,) with E[0,)euydB(y)[0,)evydB(y)=1u+v,u,v>0.Integration by parts yields an alternative representation [0,)euydB(y)=u0euyB(y)dy,u>0.

Let (ξ1,η1), (ξ2,η2), be independent copies of an R2-valued random vector (ξ,η) with arbitrarily dependent components. Whenever the random series k0eSktηk+1 is a.s. convergent for each t>0, following Iksanov et al. (2021), we call its sum discounted convergent perpetuity. We refer to the cited article for the justification of the term and standard limit theorems: a strong law of large numbers, a functional central limit theorem and a law of the iterated logarithm. In particular, Proposition 1.4 given next is Theorem 1.2 in Iksanov et al. (2021), up to the change of variable.

Proposition 1.4

Assume that μ=Eξ(0,), Eη=0 and s2Varη(0,). Then, as t, 1t12k0euSktηk+1(s2μ)12[0,)euydB(y)in the J1-topology on D(0,), where (B(y))y0 is a standard Brownian motion.

A combination of Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 1.4 plus some additional work enables us to treat the case Eη0, thereby leading to an ultimate version of the functional central limit theorem for discounted convergent perpetuities.

Corollary 1.5

Assume that μ=Eξ(0,), σ2=Varξ[0,), mEηR, s2=Varη[0,), σ2+s2>0. Then 1t12(k0euSktηk+1mtμu)v[0,)euydB(y)in the J1-topology on D(0,). Here, (B(y))y0 is a standard Brownian motion, v2μ1Var(μ1mξη)=σ2μ3m22γmμ2+s2μ1[0,),γCov(ξ,η)=EξημmR.The constant v2 is positive unless ξ=cη for some cR.

Remark 1.6

Putting in Corollary 1.5 u=1 we obtain the one-dimensional central limit theorem 1t12(k0eSktηk+1mtμ)d212vNormal(0,1),t,where Normal(0,1) is a random variable with the standard normal distribution. This result was proved in Theorem 6.1 of Vervaat (1979). Our argument is different from that exploited in Vervaat (1979).

A perusal of the proof of Corollary 1.5 reveals that the distributional asymptotic behavior of the process on the left-hand side of (3) is driven by the competitive distributional fluctuations of the functional versions of the random walks (Sk) and (η1++ηk). The latter are represented in the limit by the same integral functional of (generally) dependent Brownian motions B1 and B2. Because of the minus sign and the dependence the contributions of the two random walks compensate each other. When ξ and η are linearly dependent, the Brownian motion B1 is a multiple of B2. As a result, the contributions of the random walks get mutually neutralized, so that the limit variance v2 is equal to 0. This means that t12 is not a proper normalization in this case. According to Theorem 1.7, when η=cξ for nonzero real c, no normalization is needed at all, and k0eSktηk+1 concentrates tightly around the point ct in a deterministic manner for t large enough.

Theorem 1.7

Assume that μ=Eξ(0,) and σ2=Varξ[0,). Then limt(k0eSktξk+1t)=Eξ22μa.s.

The rest of the paper is structured as follows. We prove Theorem 1.1, Corollary 1.5 and Theorem 1.7 in Sections 2, 3 and 4 respectively. The appendix collects some auxiliary facts.

Section snippets

Proof of Theorem 1.1

For tR, put N(t)=#{k0:Skt}. Since limkSk=+ a.s., we have N(t)< a.s. Write, for u>0, k0euSkt(μu)1t=k0euSkt1{Sk0}+(0,)euxtd(N(x)μ1x).The first summand does not contribute to the limit. Indeed, for any 0<c<d<, supu[c,d]k0euSkt1{Sk0}k0edSkt1{Sk0}N(0),ta.s.Further, integration by parts followed by change of variable yields, for any T>0, (0,)euxtd(N(x)μ1x)+N(0)=u(0Teux(N(xt)μ1xt)dx+Teux(N(xt)μ1xt)dx). By Proposition A.1, as t, t12(N(ut)μ1ut)

Proof of Corollary 1.5

In view of Theorem 1.1 and Proposition 1.4 the most important thing that remains to be done is determining the dependence between the Brownian motions appearing in (1), (2).

Let (B(u))u0((B1(u),B2(u)))u0 denote a two-dimensional Wiener process such that B(1) has the covariance matrix Γ=σ2γγs2 (B is a two-dimensional standard Brownian motion whenever ξ and η are uncorrelated). Assume that we can prove that t12(k0euSkt(μu)1t,k0euSkt(ηk+1m))([0,)euyd(μ1B1(μ1y)),[0,)euydB2(

Proof of Theorem 1.7

Using k0eSkt(1eξk+1t)=1, we write k0eSktξk+1t=k0eSkt(ξk+1(1eξk+1t)t).With the help of y1+eyy22andey1yy2ey2,y0we infer k0eSkt(ξk+1(1eξk+1t)t)1{ξk+10}12tk0eSkt(ξk+1+)2and k0eSkt(ξk+1(1eξk+1t)t)1{ξk+1<0}=k0eSkt((eξk+1t1)tξk+1)12tk0e(Skξk+1)t(ξk+1)2, respectively. We intend to use Lemma A.3(a) with particular (Rk)kN and (τk)kN. By the strong law of large numbers for random walks, for each ω from some set of probability measure

Acknowledgments

We thank an anonymous referee for very detailed and useful comments concerning both mathematics and presentation. The present proof of Lemma A.3 was suggested by the referee. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Ukraine (project 2020.02/0014 “Asymptotic regimes of perturbed random walks: on the edge of modern and classical probability”).

References (12)

  • BertoinJ. et al.

    Exponential functionals of Lévy processes

    Probab. Surv.

    (2005)
  • BillingsleyP.

    Convergence of Probability Measures

    (1999)
  • BorodinA.N. et al.

    Limit theorems for functionals of random walks

    Proc. Steklov Inst. Math.

    (1995)
  • CarmonaP. et al.

    Exponential functionals of Lévy processes

  • Dall’ AglioG.

    Present value of a renewal process

    Ann. Math. Stat.

    (1964)
  • GutA.

    Stopped Random Walks. Limit Theorems and Applications

    (2009)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.
View full text