Skip to main content
Log in

Where old is gold again: antidepressants in Nepal, 1961–2021

  • Original Article
  • Published:
BioSocieties Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The so-called psychopharmaceutical revolution began in the 1950s, with apparently ever better drugs coming to market. Amitriptyline (Elavil), introduced in 1961, was one of the first ‘antidepressants’. Over the next decades, many other antidepressants came out, including fluoxetine (Prozac). In the 2000s, critiques that antidepressants were no better than placebos could not slow down a massive global rise of prescriptions. In 2018, a large meta-analysis of clinical trials argued that antidepressants were indeed better than placebos, but that none of the new drugs was as effective as the old amitriptyline. 1961 is also the birth year of psychiatry in the Himalayan country of Nepal. Since the 1960s, Nepali psychiatrists have been using amitriptyline as their first-line drug. The inclusion of amitriptyline in the first WHO list of Essential Drugs (1977) cemented its status. All the ‘new’ psychopharmaceuticals came to Nepal, but they never displaced the ‘old’ amitriptyline. No other drug could beat amitriptyline's affordability, availability, and efficacy for the typical Nepali depression patient: a ‘somatizer’ who suffers from multiple bodily aches, insomnia, and anxiety. Fieldwork with Nepali psychiatrists reveals the tenacity of local affordances over global changes in evidence and health policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aich, T.K. 2010. Contribution of Indian psychiatry in the development of psychiatry in Nepal. Indian journal of psychiatry 52 (Suppl1): S76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acland, S. 2002. Mental health services in primary care: the case of Nepal. In World Mental Health Casebook, ed. A. Cohen, A. Kleinman, and B. Saraceno, 121–152. New York: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 1980. American Psychiatric Association diagnostic and statistical manual. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applbaum, K. 2009. Getting to yes: corporate power and the creation of a psychopharmaceutical blockbuster. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry 33 (2): 185–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayd, F.J., Jr. 1960. Amitriptyline (Elavil) therapy for depressive reactions. Psychosomatics 1 (6): 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayd, F.J. 1961. Recognizing the Depressed Patient: With Essentials of Management and Treatment. New York: Grune & Stratton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, D. 2016. Markets and molecules: a pharmaceutical primer from the south. Medical Anthropology 13: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, J. 2007. Pharmaceuticalization: AIDS treatment and global health politics. Anthropology Quarterly 80 (4): 1083–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brhlikova, P., I. Harper, M. Subedi, S. Bhattarai, N. Rawal, and A.M. Pollock. 2015. Aid conditionalities, international Good Manufacturing Practice standards and local production rights: a case study of local production in Nepal. Globalization and health 11 (1): 25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, L.E., K. Marahatta, K. Sidgel, S. Shrestha, K. Gautam, N.P. Luitel, B.R. Dotel, and R. Samuel. 2018. Building back better? Taking stock of the post-earthquake mental health and psychosocial response in Nepal. International Journal of Mental Health Systems 12 (1): 44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cipriani, A., T.A. Furukawa, G. Salanti, A. Chaimani, L.Z. Atkinson, Y. Ogawa, S. Leucht, H.G. Ruhe, E.H. Turner, J.P. Higgins, and M. Egger. 2018. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant drugs for the acute treatment of adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The Lancet 391: 1357–1366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumit, J. 2012. Drugs for Life: How Pharmaceutical Companies Define Our Health. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, W. 1991. Mad Tales from the Raj: The European Insane in British India, 1800–1858. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecks, S. 2013. Eating Drugs: Psychopharmaceutical Pluralism in India. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecks, S. 2022. Living Worth: Value and Values in Global Pharmaceutical Markets. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Green, A.R., J.K. Aronson, and P.M. Haddad. 2018. Examining the ‘psychopharmacology revolution’(1950–1980) through the advertising of psychoactive drugs in the British Medical Journal. Journal of Psychopharmacology 32 (10): 1056–1066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanganu-Bresch, C. 2012. Treat her with Prozac: Four Decades of direct-to-physician antidepressant advertising. In Drugs & Media: New Perspectives on Communication, Consumption, and Consciousness, ed. R.C. MacDougall. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, I. 2014. Development and Public Health in the Himalaya: Reflections on Healing in Contemporary Nepal. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrington, A. 2019. Mind Fixers: Psychiatry’s Troubled Search for the Biology of Mental Illness. New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. 1997. The Antidepressant Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. 2001. The Psychopharmacologists: Interviews by David Healey. London: Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutt, M. 2003. Unbecoming Citizens: Culture, Nationhood, and the Flight of Refugees from Bhutan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, S.L., D. Abate, K.H. Abate, S.M. Abay, C. Abbafati, N. Abbasi, H. Abbastabar, F. Abd-Allah, J. Abdela, A. Abdelalim, and I. Abdollahpour. 2018. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. The Lancet 92 (10159): 1789–1858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, J.C., N.P. Luitel, M.J.D. Jordans, B.A. Kohrt, I. Weissbecker, and W.A. Tol. 2018. Mental health and psychosocial problems in the aftermath of the Nepal earthquakes: findings from a representative cluster sample survey. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 27 (3): 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirsch, I. 2010. The Emperor’s New Drugs: Exploding the Antidepressant Myth. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitanaka, J. 2011. Depression in Japan: Psychiatric Cures For A Society in Distress. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kohrt, B.A. 2005. “Somatization” and “Comorbidity”: a study of Jhum-Jhum and depression in rural Nepal. Ethos 33 (1): 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laing, R., B. Waning, A. Gray, N. Ford, and E.T. Hoen. 2003. 25 years of the WHO essential medicines lists: progress and challenges. The Lancet 361 (9370): 1723–1729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. 2017. Psychopharmaceuticals as ‘essential medicines’: local negotiations of global access to psychotherapeutic medicines in India. In The Sedated Society: The Causes and Harms of our Psychiatric Drug Epidemic, 227–248. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, J.C., and D.A. Spyker. 2017. Morbidity and mortality associated with medications used in the treatment of depression: an analysis of cases reported to US poison control centers, 2000–2014. American Journal of Psychiatry 174 (5): 438–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsi, F. 2015. Value Theory. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patel, Vikram, et al. 2018. The Lancet Commission on global mental health and sustainable development. The Lancet 392 (10157): 1553–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, J. 2013. Maoists at the Hearth: Everyday life in Nepal’s Civil War. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prince, M., V. Patel, S. Saxena, M. Maj, J. Maselko, M.R. Phillips, and A. Rahman. 2007. No health without mental health. The Lancet 370 (9590): 859–877.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 2003. Neurochemical selves. Society 41 (1): 6–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. 2018. Our Psychiatric Future. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale-Feldman, A. 2020. Historicizing the emergence of global mental health in Nepal (1950–2019). HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies 39 (2): 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subedi, M. 2009. Trade in health service: unfair competition of Pharmaceutical products in Nepal. Dhaulagiri Journal of Sociology and Anthropology 3: 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therrien, A. 2018. Anti-depressants: Major study finds they work. BBC News, 22 February 2018. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-43143889.

  • World Health Organization. 1977. The Selection of Essential Drugs. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2001. Mental Health: New Understanding, New Hope: The World Health Report 2001. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2016. mhGAP intervention guide for mental, neurological and substance use disorders in non-specialized health settings. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. 2019. Model List of Essential Medicines, 21st List. Geneva: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Fieldwork in Nepal was embedded in two larger projects: the ESRC/DFID-funded “Tracing Pharmaceuticals in South Asia” and the MRC-funded “Confidence in Global Mental Health Research”. I want to thank colleagues from both these projects for their support, especially Ian Harper, Sumeet Jain, Nabin Rawal, Gael Robertson, and Madusudhan Subedi. I also want to thank Aidan Seale-Feldman, Gael Robertson, and Sushrut Jadhav for commenting on an earlier draft.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Ecks.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I have no competing interests to declare.

Ethical approval

I confirm that the manuscript is composed of original material that is not under review elsewhere, and that the study on which the research is based has been subject to appropriate ethical review.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ecks, S. Where old is gold again: antidepressants in Nepal, 1961–2021. BioSocieties 17, 601–618 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00233-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00233-9

Keywords

Navigation