Cancer as a form of life: Musings of the cancer and evolution symposium

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2021.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Advanced cancer is one of the major problems in oncology as currently, despite the recent technological and scientific advancements, the mortality of metastatic disease remains very high at 70–90%. The field of oncology is in urgent need of novel ideas in order to improve quality of life and prognostic of cancer patients. The Cancer and Evolution Symposium organized online October 14–16, 2020 brought together a group of specialists from different fields that presented innovative strategies for better understanding, preventing, diagnosing, and treating cancer. Today still, the main reasons behind the high incidence and mortality of advanced cancer are, on one hand, the paucity of funding and effort directed to cancer prevention and early detection, and, on the other hand, the lack of understanding of the cancer process itself. I argue that besides being a disease, cancer is also a form of life, and, this frame of reference may provide a fresh look on this complex process. Here, I provide a different angle to several contemporary cancer theories discussing them from the perspective of “cancer-forms of life” (i.e. bionts) point of view. The perspectives and the several “bionts” introduced here, by no means exclusive or comprehensive, are just a shorthand that will hopefully encourage the readers, to further explore the contemporary oncology theoretical landscape.

Section snippets

Early diagnosis

The first speaker, Azra Raza, the author of the “The First Cell: And the Human Costs of Pursuing Cancer to the Last”, a deeply moving exploration of cancer from multiple perspectives, (Raza, 2019), proposed the use of new technologies like circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) (Cohen et al., 2018), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and DNA methylation, to detect cancers at an early stage. She also suggested that an earlier stage detection will lead to improvement of cancer survival. For some cancer types,

Cancer prevention

The best way to address cancer is, of course, to prevent its initiation in the first place. Several personal life style changes can decrease cancer incidence and recurrence including exercise, dietary changes, weight reduction and smoking cessation. According to American Cancer Society, in the United State, smoking cessation alone can prevent 480,000 yearly cancer deaths (ACS website).

A futuristic perspective of cancer prevention was introduced by George Church who presented several

Understanding cancer as a form of life

The March 28, 2014 cover of Newskeek magazine read “you can't cure what you can't understand” alluding to the fact that the main reason behind our failure to find a cure for cancer is our lack of deep understanding of the cancer process.

The Cancer and Evolution symposium was mainly an effort in bringing forth several ideas that may be implemented in the near future and improve cancer prognostic by adopting novel, more efficient paradigms.

A suggestive analogy between the Cambrian explosion of

Three perspectives

To classify the bionts presented below, first I divided them in two broad categories according to two perspectives familiar to the physics community: the substantivalist approach, focused mostly on material entities and structures, and, the relationist approach, focused on the relationships between them. This dichotomy that became popular since the Newton-Leibnitz debate on the nature of space-time (Pooley, 2013) is highly significant also for biology as has been pointed out by Denis Noble

Cancer as an abnormal growth

The oncobiont The Latin term “oncos” means “swelling, growth” and was introduced by Galen in the second century to refer to tumors and cancer, in general. Even though the phenomenon of metastasis has been known for several centuries (Weiss, 2000), until recently, cancer treatment has been focused mainly on growth inhibition.

For a long time, growth has been considered the main cancer characteristic. As recent as in 2000, in the frequently cited hallmarks of cancer article, Hanahan and Weinberg,

Cancer as a temporal disease. The chronobiont

If an organism is akin to a symphony in which cells, tissues and organs interact harmoniously, as described in “The music of life” (Noble, 2006), cancer can be viewed as a disharmonious process in dissonance with the rest of the organism. Life is a process sculpted by two complementary temporal forces: evolution and development and, in cancer, both these forces are at work.

Cancer cells are asynchronous with the tissue where they originate and with the rest of the organism. It has been known for

A systems biology look at cancer. The logobiont

Logos in Greek means “word,” “reason,” or “plan” and cancer can also be seen on one hand as a communication disorder between cancer and different normal organism components either at the tissular or the organismic level, or as a disease following a different plan than the normal organism blue print. The importance of communication for understanding life, and, by extension, cancer, has been discussed in a series of papers by Guenther Witzany (Witzany, 2010, 2020; Baluška and Witzany, 2014). In

Cancer as an unknown life form. The cryptobiont (from “crypto” Greek, hidden, secret)

All theories presented above each with its own explanatory strengths, should not make us forget that a real comprehensive “theory of cancer” does not yet exist. Why? We started our investigation into the nature of cancer, and we described various “forms-of-life” i.e. “bionts”. However, fundamentally, we do not know what life is, and, we cannot solve a mystery by introducing an even deeper one. Like the wise men in the old Buddhist parable about touching an elephant in a dark room and trying to

Conclusion

The Cancer and Evolution Symposium demonstrated the power of transdisciplinary collaboration. The plethora of perspectives brought by the different experts-speakers created a strong inspirational momentum prompting the organizers to initiate a series of conferences that will likely benefit in the future both the fields of cancer and evolution.

Cancer continues to be a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020 (WHO website). The therapeutic landscape of

Author statement

Please note that the work submitted has not been published previously, it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, its publication is approved by its author and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, it will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, including electronically without the written consent of the copyrightholder.

Declaration of competing interest

The author declare that they have no competing financial interests or personal relationships that could be perceived to have influenced the work reported in this paper.

References (259)

  • K.L. Gallik et al.

    Neural crest and cancer: divergent travelers on similar paths

    Mech. Dev.

    (2017)
  • R.J. Gillies et al.

    A unifying theory of carcinogenesis, and why targeted therapy doesn't work

    Eur. J. Radiol.

    (2012)
  • M.D. Goncalves et al.

    Engineered diets to improve cancer outcomes

    Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.

    (2021)
  • D. Hanahan et al.

    The hallmarks of cancer

    Cell

    (2000)
  • D. Hanahan et al.

    Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation

    Cell

    (2011)
  • T.M. Illidge et al.

    Polyploid giant cells provide a survival mechanism for p53 mutant cells after DNA damage

    Cell Biol. Int.

    (2000)
  • H. Jimenez et al.

    Tumour-specific amplitude-modulated radiofrequency electromagnetic fields induce differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma via targeting Cav3.2 T-type voltage-gated calcium channels and Ca2+ influx

    EBioMedicine

    (2019)
  • A.M. Abdel-Haleem et al.

    The emerging facets of non-cancerous Warburg effect

    Front. Endocrinol.

    (2017)
  • ACS website...
  • A. Aktipis

    The Cheating Cell. How Evolution Helps Us Understand and Treat Cancer

    (2020)
  • S.R. Amend et al.

    Polyploid giant cancer cells: unrecognized actuators of tumorigenesis, metastasis, and resistance

    Prostate

    (2019)
  • N. Amirouchene-Angelozzi et al.

    Tumor evolution as a therapeutic target

    Canc. Discov.

    (2017)
  • J. Arechaga

    On the boundary between development and neoplasia. An interview with Professor G. Barry Pierce

    Int. J. Dev. Biol.

    (1993)
  • E. Aria
    (April 19, 2006)
  • K. Arney

    Rebel Cell. Cancer Evolution and the New Science of Life's Oldest Betrayal

    (2020)
  • A. Aytes et al.

    NSD2 is a conserved driver of metastatic prostate cancer progression

    Nat. Commun.

    (2018)
  • N. Azad et al.

    The future of epigenetic therapy in solid tumours--lessons from the past

    Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol.

    (2013)
  • F. Badulescu et al.

    More than 9 years of continuous trastuzumab treatment in metastatic breast cancer without cardiac toxicity: a case report and literature review

    OncoTargets Ther.

    (2014)
  • J. Baedke et al.

    The holobiont concept before Margulis

    J. Exp. Zool. B Mol. Dev. Evol.

    (2020)
  • M.H. Bailey et al.

    Comprehensive characterization of cancer driver genes and mutations

    Cell

    (2018)
  • K.E. Baillie et al.

    Beyond kinases: targeting replication stress proteins in cancer therapy

    Trends Cancer

    (2020)
  • S.F. Bakhoum et al.

    Chromosomal instability and cancer: a complex relationship with therapeutic potential

    J. Clin. Invest.

    (2012)
  • S.F. Bakhoum et al.

    Chromosomal instability drives metastasis through a cytosolic DNA response

    Nature

    (2018)
  • F. Baluška et al.

    Life is more than a computer running DNA software

    World J. Biol. Chem.

    (2014)
  • C.H. Bangma et al.

    Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer

    World J. Urol.

    (2007)
  • V. Barresi et al.

    Gene expression profiles in genome instability-based classes of colorectal cancer

    BMC Canc.

    (2018)
  • M.J. Bissell et al.

    Putting tumours in context

    Nat. Rev. Canc.

    (2001)
  • D. Blackiston et al.

    Transmembrane potential of GlyCl-expressing instructor cells induces a neoplastic-like conversion of melanocytes via a serotonergic pathway

    Dis Model Mech

    (2011)
  • M. Bloomfield et al.

    Inherent variability of cancer-specific aneuploidy generates metastases

    Mol. Cytogenet.

    (2016)
  • A.C.F. Bolhaqueiro et al.

    Ongoing chromosomal instability and karyotype evolution in human colorectal cancer organoids

    Nat. Genet.

    (2019)
  • I. Bozic et al.

    Accumulation of driver and passenger mutations during tumor progression

  • M.F. Brennan et al.

    Lessons learned from the study of 10,000 patients with soft tissue sarcoma

    Ann. Surg.

    (2014)
  • S.F. Brunner et al.

    Somatic mutations and clonal dynamics in healthy and cirrhotic human liver

    Nature

    (2019)
  • F.M. Burnet

    Cancer A biological approach. 1. The process of control

    Br. Med. J.

    (1957)
  • R.A. Burrell et al.

    Replication stress links structural and numerical cancer chromosomal instability

    Nature

    (2013)
  • K.J. Bussey et al.

    Ancestral gene regulatory networks drive cancer

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. Unit. States Am.

    (2017)
  • V.L. Cannataro et al.

    Effect sizes of somatic mutations in cancer, JNCI

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (2018)
  • H. Chen et al.

    The reverse evolution from multicellularity to unicellularity during carcinogenesis

    Nat. Commun.

    (2015)
  • A.C. Chiang et al.

    Molecular basis of metastasis

    N. Engl. J. Med.

    (2008)
  • A. Cipponi et al.

    MTOR signaling orchestrates stress-induced mutagenesis, facilitating adaptive evolution in cancer

    Science

    (2020)
  • Cited by (0)

    This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

    View full text