Abstract
The undoped YVO4 and Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals have been successfully grown by the Czochralski method in a medium frequency induction furnace. The X-ray diffraction patterns testified that all samples exhibited the pure tetragonal YVO4 crystalline phase without any parasitic phases. The optical properties of Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals with different doping concentrations were investigated via a combination of absorption, emission, and excitation spectra. Dependence of luminescence and absorption intensity on Ce3+ doping concentration was discussed at different excitation wavelengths. The typical transitions of Ce3+ ions and the unusual intrinsic luminescent phenomena of
1 Introduction
Yttrium orthovanadate (YVO4) is a promising optical material because it has a broad transparency spectra ranging from visible to far-infrared regions (400–5,000 nm), strong birefringence that ensures the polarization state of emitted light (
The structural properties, elastic properties, hardness, and electronic structure of YVO4 have been investigated extensively [3,20,21,22]. The YVO4 belongs to the tetragonal crystallographic system (zircon-type phase) with space group
Up to now, the growth and spectral properties of RE3+-doped YVO4 (RE = Nd, Eu, Er, Tm, and Yb) phosphors and crystals have been reported extensively in the literature. In this paper, we focus on the photoluminescence properties and energy transfer phenomena in the Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystal via a combination of absorption, excitation, and emission spectroscopy. More attentions were paid to ascertaining the corresponding transition states, analyzing luminescent mechanism, and revealing the energy transfer from
2 Experimental procedures
Pure YVO4 and Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals were grown by the Czochralski method in a medium frequency induction furnace. High-purity synthesized powders (>99.99%) of commercially available Y2O3, V2O5, and Ce2(CO3)3 were applied to crystal growth. These raw materials were weighed and mixed in stoichiometric amounts. It is to be noticed that the Ce2O3 is unstable at room temperature. Generally, the CeO2 is used as a raw material of Ce3+-doped optical crystals in reducing atmosphere. Nevertheless, it cannot rule out the possibility of some Ce4+ ions existing in crystals. In this work, the Ce2(CO3)3 is used to grow the Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals in nitrogen atmosphere, which is considered as the donor of Ce3+ ions. We believe that the reaction obeys the following equations:
The concentrations of Ce3+ ions in YVO4 single crystal vary from x = 0.005 to x = 0.06. The process of crystal growth has been reported in our previous work [27].
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was measured at room temperature and performed by a Rigaku D/max 2,500 v/PC diffractometer in the 2θ range from 10° to 90° in a step scan mode, with steps of 0.02°, using CuKα radiation of wavelength 0.154056 nm (40 kW/200 mA).
Absorption spectra were measured by a Shimadu UV-3101 PC Spectrometer in the ultraviolet-visible and near infrared ranges (200–3,000 nm). The emission and excitation spectra were recorded with the Jobin-Yvon FL3221 TCSPC spectrophotometer and SPEX F-212 fluorescence spectrometer. Photoluminescence photographs were taken with Kimmom Koha IK Series Helium Cadmium 325 nm (He–Cd) laser systems in the darkroom. All tested samples are slices cutting from Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals with different Ce3+ doping concentrations. The thickness of these slices is 2.00 mm after optically polishing. All the measurements were carried out at room temperature.
We did not carry out the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) measurement so that the actual Ce3+ doping concentrations in the Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals are not obtained through the XRF. The final heat treatment and annealing process have an effect on the photoluminescence, but don’t affect the luminescent mechanism. In addition, the segregation phenomenon also leads to the difference between actual cerium ion concentration and theoretical concentration in different parts of the as-grown crystal. Therefore, the theoretical calculations of optical parameters related to Ce3+ doping concentration are not carried out in this paper, such as absorption cross, integrated absorption cross, integrated emission cross-section, energy transfer probability, critical distance, and so on.
3 Results and discussion
Figure 1(a) and (b) show the photographs of as-grown undoped YVO4 single crystals and Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals with various cerium doping concentrations, respectively. The test specimens are Ce3+-doped YVO4 single-crystal slices, as shown in Figure 1(c). The XRD patterns of the pure YVO4 and Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals are presented in Figure 2. The strong XRD peaks are collected in a wide angle range and some evident peaks are assigned. The diffraction peaks and relative intensity agree well with the standard data of YVO4 (JCPDS card No. 72-0341), which indicates that the obtained phase is YVO4 without any parasitic phase, such as the Y2O3 or V2O5 phases. The Ce3+ ions enter into the YVO4 crystal and occupy the Y3+ lattice sites. The ionic radii of Ce3+ and Y3+ ions are 0.102 and 0.1015 nm [28,29,30], respectively. It is obvious that the radius of Ce3+ ions is very similar to that of the Y3+ ions so that the lattice distortion caused by Ce3+ ions is very small, which contributes to the crystal growth. However, the higher Ce3+ ions are doped in the crystal, the more severe lattice distortion is. The samples doped with different Ce3+ concentrations exhibit the pure tetragonal YVO4 crystalline phase. It is indicated that partial substitution of Ce3+ for Y3+ does not affect the structure of YVO4 phase and the Ce3+ ions doped into the host lattice effectively [31].
For a free Ce3+ ion, its electronic configuration is 4f1. The free-ion Hamiltonian (including electron-electron and spin-orbit interaction terms) produces the 2S+1LJ multiplets. We only consider the spin-orbit coupling of trivalent rare earth and do not take account of Stark splitting under the influence of the crystal field. Based on the Hund’s rules, the ground state is 2F5/2 and the excited state is 2F7/2. The energy gap between 2F7/2 and 2F5/2 states is about 2,200 cm−1 [27,32,33]. The 5d energy levels of the excited 4f05d1 configuration form a 2D term splitting into 2D3/2 and 2D5/2 states, which are influenced strongly by the crystal field of the host. The energy gap between 2D3/2 and 2D5/2 states is about 1,890 cm−1 [34,35]. The energy of the 5d levels is so low that the spectra of 5d–4f transition can be observed in the near-ultraviolet and visible ranges.
Figure 3 shows the absorption spectra of pure YVO4 and Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals in the ultraviolet-visible and near infrared ranges at room temperature. The pure YVO4 crystal exhibits a very wide transparency spectrum ranging from 500 to 3,000 nm, while an intense broad absorption bands below 350 nm can be recorded. The same intense absorption bands below 350 nm are also observed in the samples with different dopant concentrations. Up to now, this phenomenon has been well-understood. The central metal ion V5+ in isolated
Figure 4 shows the visible emission spectra of Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals with different cerium doping concentrations (from x = 0.005 to x = 0.06). On a basis of the absorption spectrum (Figure 3), the excitation wavelength at 460 nm is applied to pumping all the samples. As can be seen from the Figure 4, a very broad emission band centered at about 620 nm is observed in the region from 480 to 800 nm. Except for the emission intensity, the obtained spectra are identical in the range of 480–800 nm. The 460 nm excitation wavelength corresponds to the 2F5/2 → 2D3/2 absorption transition of Ce3+ ions. However, it is very difficult to determine the energy levels of emission transition. Wang et al. [41] studied the same broad emission band and concluded that the broad emission band centered at 620 nm was attributed to the charge transfer transition of the Ce4+–O2− ions pairs (CTS2 → CTS1). Generally speaking, the charge transfer transition of rare-earth ions is usually located in the ultraviolet range, such as Lu2Si2O7:Ce3+ [42,43], YVO4:Eu3+ [13,44,45], Na2YMg2(VO4)3:Yb3+ [31,46]. The red emission band at 620 nm corresponding to the 3T1 → 1A1 transition has been also observed in the pure Zn3(VO4)2, Ca5Mg4(VO4)6, Ca5Zn4(VO4)6, and NaYMg2(VO4)3 single crystals with isolated VO4 tetrahedra [26,31,47]. Moreover, the influences of phonons and Stark split induced by crystal field cannot be neglected. In the view of above analysis, we assume that the observed broad band centered at about 620 nm can be assigned to the 3T1 → 1A1 transition (the charge transfer from oxygen ligands to the central vanadium atom inside the
Since the radial wave function of the excited 5d electron extends spatially well beyond the closed 5s25p6 shells, the 2D3/2 and 2D5/2 states are strongly perturbed by the ligand field of the host. The absorption and emission wavelength of Ce3+-doped different oxides have been published in ref. [35]. These data are listed in Table 1. The different hosts lead to a great change in the f–d transition, which is different from the f–f transition of 4f N electronic configuration.
Host | Absorption wavelength λ abs (nm) | Emission wavelength λ em (nm) |
---|---|---|
YPO4 | 320 | 333 |
YAl3(BO3)4 | 322 | 338 |
YBO3 | 357 | 383 |
LiYSiO4 | 348 | 397 |
YAlO3 | 303 | 345 |
Y3Al5O12 | 458 | 535 |
Y3Al4GaO12 | 445 | 523 |
Y3Al3Ga2O12 | 437 | 505 |
SrY2O4 | 397 | 560 |
YVO4 * | 460 | 620 |
*Present work.
In order to investigate the spectral properties and analyze the energy transfer mechanism from
Figure 8 shows the excitation spectra of Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystal for 620 nm (a), 440 nm (b), and 470 nm (c) emissions at room temperature. Monitoring the emissions at 620, 440, and 470 nm, the specimen exhibits a broad excitation band extending from 260 to 360 nm, which is attributed to the 1A1 → 1T2, 1T1 charge transfer band (CT) of V5+–O2− (from oxygen ligands to the central vanadium stom inside
The CIE coordinates and correlated color temperatures (CCTs) are two important characteristics for luminescent materials [56]. The color coordinates can be obtained on a basis of emission spectra (Figures 4 and 5). According to the CIE chromaticity coordinate, the correlated color temperature also can be calculated through the following approximate formula proposed by McCamy [19,57,58,59].
where n = (x − x e )/(y − y e ) is the inverse slope line, and x e = 0.3320, y e = 0.1858.
The CIE chromaticity coordinates and correlated color temperatures of Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals have been calculated under different excitation wavelengths, as listed in Table 2. Figure 9 presents the CIE chromaticity coordinates (x, y) positions of Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals in the Commission Internationale de I’Eclairage (CIE) 1931 chromaticity diagram. It is clear that the samples excited at 325 nm are located in blue region, which is in good agreement with Figure 7. When the excitation wavelength is 460 nm, the samples are located in yellow region. In addition, the Ce3+ doping concentration has little effect on the emitting color.
Sample | Concentration | Excitation wavelength (nm) | Calculation data ranges from λ 1 to λ 2 (nm) | CIE chromaticity coordinates | Color | Color temperature (K) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
x | y | ||||||
Y1−x Ce x VO4 single crystal | x = 0.005 | 325 | 355–700 | 0.1649 | 0.1458 | Blue | 7836.454 |
460 | 480–800 | 0.4974 | 0.4875 | Yellow | 2763.211 | ||
x = 0.01 | 325 | 355–700 | 0.1655 | 0.1485 | Blue | 7771.629 | |
460 | 480–800 | 0.5006 | 0.4849 | Yellow | 2712.763 | ||
x = 0.02 | 325 | 355–700 | 0.1666 | 0.1565 | Blue | 2923.931 | |
460 | 480–800 | 0.4941 | 0.4903 | Yellow | 2816.445 | ||
x = 0.05 | 325 | 355–700 | 0.1653 | 0.1514 | Blue | 7099.445 | |
460 | 480–800 | 0.4943 | 0.4902 | Yellow | 2813.62 | ||
x = 0.06 | 325 | 355–700 | 0.1697 | 0.1562 | Blue | 4118.842 | |
460 | 480–800 | 0.4966 | 0.4882 | Yellow | 2776.2 |
4 Conclusion
In summary, the high-quality YVO4 and Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals were grown by the Czochralski method. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns indicated that the obtained phase was YVO4 without any parasitic phase. Optical properties of Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystal with different doping concentrations were investigated via a combination of absorption, excitation, and emission spectra. Particularly, more attentions were paid to ascertaining the corresponding transition states, analyzing the luminescence mechanism and revealing the charge transfer (CT) transition in Ce3+-doped YVO4 single crystals. Based on the experimental data, CIE chromaticity coordinates and correlated color temperatures of Ce3+-doped YVO4 crystals were calculated and depicted in CIE chromaticity diagram.
Acknowledgments
This work is partially supported by the National Science Foundation of China (11505107), National Science Foundation of Shandong province (ZR2015AL022), and Ph.D. Research Foundation and Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Jiaotong University (Z201517). We thank Wenrun Li, Liangang Li, and Zhouli Wu at Tianjin University for providing the help.
-
Conflict of interest: Author states no conflict of interest.
References
[1] Milev DR, Atanasov PA, Dikovska AO, Dimitrov IG, Petrov KP, Avdeev GV. Structural and optical properties of YVO4 thin films. Appl Surf Sci. 2007;253:8250–3.10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.02.110Search in Google Scholar
[2] Zhou XJ, Zhao L, Feng QC, Wei XT, Duan CK. Unusual intrinsic luminescence of the host and energy transfer process in YVO4:Er3+ phosphors. Mater Res Bull. 2009;44:1935–8.10.1016/j.materresbull.2009.06.017Search in Google Scholar
[3] Huang ZC, Feng J, Pan W. Theoretical investigations of the physical properties of zircon-type YVO4. J Solid State Chem. 2012;185:42–8.10.1016/j.jssc.2011.10.050Search in Google Scholar
[4] Tang XD, Ding ZJ, Zhang ZM, Lumin J. Membrane fluidity altering and enzyme inactivating in sarcoma 180 cells post the exposure to sonoactivated hematoporphyrin in vitro. Ultrasonics. 2007;122:66–73.10.1016/j.ultras.2007.10.002Search in Google Scholar
[5] Rubin JJ, Van Uitert LG. Growth of large yttrium vanadate single crystals for optical maser studies. J Appl Phys. 1966;37:2920–1.10.1063/1.1782159Search in Google Scholar
[6] Levine AK, Palilla FC. A new, highly efficient red‐emitting cathodoluminescent phosphor (YVO4:Eu) for color television. Appl Phys Lett. 1964;5:118–20.10.1063/1.1723611Search in Google Scholar
[7] Hu BQ, Zhang YZ, Wu X, Chen XL. Defects in large single crystals Nd:YVO4. J Cryst Growth. 2001;226:511–6.10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01422-1Search in Google Scholar
[8] Wang Y, Qin WP, Zhang JS, Cao CY, Lü SZ, Ren XG. Photoluminescence of colloidal YVO4:Eu/SiO2 core/shell nanocrystals. Opt Commun. 2009;282:1148–53.10.1016/j.optcom.2008.12.007Search in Google Scholar
[9] Mei Y, Zheng WC, Yang YG, Liu HG. An interpretation of the g factors for the tetragonally-compressed Cr5+ centers in YVO4 and YPO4 crystals. Phys B. 2012;407:4365.10.1016/j.physb.2012.07.035Search in Google Scholar
[10] Ji TK, Jiang HY, Chen F. Clinical experience of the brushite calcium phosphate cement for the repair and augmentation of surgically induced cranial defects following the pterional craniotomy. J Alloy Comp. 2010;502:180–4.10.3340/jkns.2010.47.3.180Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[11] Li Y, Zheng YH, Wang QM, Zhang CC. Synthesis of luminescent YVO4:Eu3+ submicrometer crystals through hydrogels as directing agents. Mater Chem Phys. 2012;135:451–6.10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.05.007Search in Google Scholar
[12] Nebatti A, Pflitsch C, Eckert C, Atakan B. Sol–gel-deposition of thin TiO2:Eu3+ thermographic phosphor films. Prog Org Coat. 2010;68:147–50.10.1016/j.porgcoat.2009.08.024Search in Google Scholar
[13] Kolesnikov IE, Tolstikova DV, Kurochkin AV, Pulkin SA, Manshina AA, Mikhailov MD. Concentration effect on photoluminescence of Eu3+-doped nanocrystalline YVO4. J Lumin. 2015;158:469–74.10.1016/j.jlumin.2014.10.024Search in Google Scholar
[14] Tucker AW, Birnbaum M, Fincher CL, Erler JW. Stimulated‐emission cross section at 1,064 and 1,342 nm in Nd:YVO4. J Appl Phys. 1977;48:4907–11.10.1063/1.323618Search in Google Scholar
[15] Huang CH, Chen JC. Nd:YVO4 single crystal fiber growth by the LHPG method. J Cryst Growth. 2001;229:184–7.10.1016/S0022-0248(01)01117-4Search in Google Scholar
[16] Fields RA, Birnbaum M, Fincher CL. Highly efficient Nd:YVO4diode‐laser end‐pumped laser. Appl Phys Lett. 1987;51:1885–6.10.1063/1.98500Search in Google Scholar
[17] Yu HH, Zhang HJ, Wang JY. A recombinant pseudotyped lentivirus expressing the envelope glycoprotein of hantaan virus induced protective immunity in mice. Acta Phys Polonica A. 2013;124:301.10.1186/1743-422X-10-301Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central
[18] Soharab M, Bhaumik I, Bhatt R, Saxena A, Karnal AK, Satapathy S. Effect of Yb doping on the crystal structure, polarization dependent optical absorption and photoluminescence of Yb:YVO4 single crystal grown by optical floating zone technique. J Alloy Compd. 2015;649:766–71.10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.07.183Search in Google Scholar
[19] Sun JY, Zhu JC, Liu XT, Du HY. Calculation of noncontact forces between silica nanospheres. Mater Res Bull. 2013;48:2175–84.10.1021/la305156sSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[20] Morikawa J, Leong C, Hashimoto T, Ogawa T, Urata Y, Wada S, et al. Thermal conductivity/diffusivity of Nd3+ doped GdVO4, YVO4, LuVO4, and Y3Al5O12 by temperature wave analysis. J Appl Phys. 2008;103:063522.10.1063/1.2899181Search in Google Scholar
[21] Oshikiri M, Boero M, Matsushita A, Ye JH. Water adsorption onto Y and V sites at the surface of the YVO4 photocatalyst and related electronic properties. J Chem Phys. 2009;131:034701.10.1063/1.3170928Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[22] Wang X, Loa I, Syassen K, Hanfland M. Structural properties of the zircon- and scheelite-type phases ofYVO4 at high pressure. Phys Rev B. 2004;70:064109.10.1103/PhysRevB.70.064109Search in Google Scholar
[23] Wang YF, Wu ZL, Li WR, Wang S, Tong HS, Ruan YF. Spectroscopic properties of cerium doped YVO4 crystals and analysis on valence state of cerium ion. Acta Phys Sin. 2012;61:228105.10.7498/aps.61.228105Search in Google Scholar
[24] Stoltzfus MW, Woodward PM, Seshadri R, Klepeis JH, Bursten B. Structure and bonding in SnWO4, PbWO4, and BiVO4: lone pairs vs inert pairs. Inorg Chem. 2007;46:3839–50.10.1021/ic061157gSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
[25] Michelle RD, Alexandra MP, Matthew WS, Samantha CY, Patrick MW. The electronic structures of vanadate salts: cation substitution as a tool for band gap manipulation. J Solid State Chem. 2009;182:1964.10.1016/j.jssc.2009.04.032Search in Google Scholar
[26] Pitale SS, Gohain M, Nagpure IM, Ntwaeaborwa OM, Bezuidenhoudt BC, Swart HC. A comparative study on structural, morphological and luminescence characteristics of Zn3(VO4)2 phosphor prepared via hydrothermal and citrate-gel combustion routes. Phys B. 2012;407:1485.10.1016/j.physb.2011.09.067Search in Google Scholar
[27] Wang YF, Wang S, Wu ZL, Li WR, Ruan YF. Photoluminescence properties of Ce and Eu co-doped YVO4 crystals. J Alloy Comp. 2013;551:262–6.10.1016/j.jallcom.2012.10.042Search in Google Scholar
[28] Wang S, Ruan YF, Tsuboi TJ, Tong HS, Wang YF, Zhang SC. Temperature dependence of luminescence behavior in Er3+-doped BaY2F8 single crystal. Phys B. 2013;431:37.10.1016/j.physb.2013.08.046Search in Google Scholar
[29] Shannon RD. Revised effective ionic radii and systematic studies of interatomic distances in halides and chalcogenides. Acta Cryst A. 1976;32:751–67.10.1107/S0567739476001551Search in Google Scholar
[30] Zhang SC, Ruan YF, Jia GZ, Feng ZH, Liu ZP, Pei LB. Blue-emitting properties of Ce3+ doped YVO4 under ultraviolet excitation. J Inorg Mater. 2014;29:1067.10.15541/jim20140060Search in Google Scholar
[31] Li Y, Wei XT, Chen HM, Pan Y, Ji YX. Near-infrared downconversion through host sensitized energy transfer in Yb3+-doped Na2YMg2(VO4)3. Phys B. 2015;478:95.10.1016/j.physb.2015.09.011Search in Google Scholar
[32] Zhang K, Zhao CC, Zhong HM, Hang Y. Rapid detection of low-abundance K-ras mutation in stools of colorectal cancer patients using chip-based temperature gradient capillary electrophoresis. Opt Mater. 2011;33:788–98.10.1038/labinvest.2010.200Search in Google Scholar
[33] Ruan YF, Zhang SC, Lu SH, Li GH, Wen WR, Liu JW, et al. Growth and spectrum properties of Ce:YVO4 single crystal. Earth. 2007;25:122–4.10.1016/S1002-0721(07)60538-9Search in Google Scholar
[34] Jacobs RR, Krupke WF, Weber MJ. Measurement of excited‐state‐absorption loss for Ce3+ in Y3Al5O12 and implications for tunable 5d → 4fr are‐earth lasers. Appl Phys Lett. 1978;33:410–2.10.1063/1.90395Search in Google Scholar
[35] Zhang SY. Spectroscopy of rare earth ions: spectral property and spectral theory. Beijing: Science Press; 2008. p. 204–9Search in Google Scholar
[36] Pitale SS, Gohain M, Nagpure IM, Ntwaeaborwa OM, Bezuidenhoudt BC, Swart HC. A comparative study on structural, morphological and luminescence characteristics of Zn3(VO4)2 phosphor prepared via hydrothermal and citrate-gel combustion routes. Phys B. 2012;407:1485.10.1016/j.physb.2011.09.067Search in Google Scholar
[37] Ronde H, Blasse G. The nature of the electronic transitions of the vanadate group. J Inorg Nucl Chem. 1978;40:215–9.10.1016/0022-1902(78)80113-4Search in Google Scholar
[38] Nakajima T, Isobe M, Tsuchiya T, Ueda Y, Manabe T. Correlation between luminescence quantum efficiency and structural properties of vanadate phosphors with chained, dimerized, and isolated VO4 tetrahedra. J Phys Chem C. 2010;114:5160.10.1021/jp910884cSearch in Google Scholar
[39] Nakajima T, Isobe M, Tsuchiya T, Ueda Y, Kumagai T. A revisit of photoluminescence property for vanadate oxides AVO3 (A: K, Rb and Cs) and M3V2O8 (M: Mg and Zn). J Lumin. 2009;129:1598.10.1016/j.jlumin.2009.03.029Search in Google Scholar
[40] Wang S, Ruan YF, Tsuboi T, Tong HS, Wang YF, Zhang SC. Temperature dependence of luminescence behavior in Er3+-doped BaY2F8 single crystal. Phys B. 2013;431:37.10.1016/j.physb.2013.08.046Search in Google Scholar
[41] Wang YF, Wu ZL, Li WR, Wang S, Tong HS, Ruan YF. Spectroscopic properties of cerium doped YVO4 crystals and analysis on valence state of cerium ion. Acta Phys Sin. 2012;61:228105.10.7498/aps.61.228105Search in Google Scholar
[42] Feng H, Ding DZ, Li HY, Lu S, Pan SK, Chen XF, et al. Annealing effects on Czochralski grown Lu2Si2O7:Ce3+ crystals under different atmospheres. J Appl Phys. 2008;103:083109.10.1063/1.2906348Search in Google Scholar
[43] Pauwels D, Le Masson N, Viana B, Kahn-Harari A, van Loef EVD, Dorenbos P, et al. A novel inorganic scintillator: Lu2Si2O7:Ce3+ (LPS). IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2000;47:1787–90.10.1109/23.914446Search in Google Scholar
[44] Zhou YH, Lin J. Morphology control and luminescence properties of YVO4:Eu phosphors prepared by spray pyrolysis. Opt Mater. 2005;27(8):1426–32.10.1016/j.optmat.2004.10.006Search in Google Scholar
[45] Devaraju MK, Yin S, Sato T. Solvothermal synthesis, controlled morphology and optical properties of Y2O3:Eu3+ nanocrystals. J Cryst Growth. 2009;311(3):580–4.10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2008.09.139Search in Google Scholar
[46] Van Pieterson L, Heeroma M, de Heer E, Meijerink A. Charge transfer luminescence of Yb3+. J Lumin. 2000;91:177–93.10.1142/9789812810960_0025Search in Google Scholar
[47] Huang YL, Yu YM, Tsuboi T, Seo HJ. Novel yellow-emitting phosphors of Ca5M4(VO4)6 (M = Mg, Zn) with isolated VO4 tetrahedra. Opt Express. 2012;20:4360–8.10.1364/OE.20.004360Search in Google Scholar PubMed
[48] Boutinaud P, Mahiou R. Excited state dynamics of Pr3+ in YVO4 crystals. J Appl Phys. 2004;96:4923–9.10.1063/1.1797551Search in Google Scholar
[49] Pankratov V, Grigorjeva L, Millers D, Yochum HM. Intrinsic luminescence and energy transfer processes in pure and doped YVO4 crystals. Phys Stat Sol C. 2007;4(3):801.10.1002/pssc.200673833Search in Google Scholar
[50] D’Sliva AP, Fassel VA. X-ray excited optical fluorescence of trace rare earths in yttrium phosphate and yttrium vanadate hosts. Part per giga level determination of rare earth impurities in yttrium oxide. Anal Chem. 1973;45:542–7.10.1021/ac60325a025Search in Google Scholar
[51] Ryba-Romanowski W, Macalik B, Strzep A, Lisiecki R, Solarz P, Kowalski RM. Investigation of visible emission induced by infrared femtosecond pulses in erbium-doped YVO4 and LuVO4 single crystals. J Lumin. 2013;144:217.10.1016/j.jlumin.2013.07.004Search in Google Scholar
[52] Pu YF, Huang YL, Tsuboi T, Cheng H, Seo HJ. Intrinsic [VO4]3− emission of cesium vanadate Cs5V3O10. RSC Adv. 2015;5:73467–73.10.1039/C5RA11823ASearch in Google Scholar
[53] Kolesnikov IE, Tolstikova DV, Kurochkin AV, Platonova NV, Pulkin SA, Manshina AA, et al. Concentration effect on structural and luminescent properties of YVO4:Nd3+ nanophosphors. Mater Res Bull. 2015;70:799–803.10.1016/j.materresbull.2015.06.023Search in Google Scholar
[54] Cavalli E, Angiuli F, Belletti A, Boutinaud P. Luminescence spectroscopy of YVO4:Ln3+, Bi3+ (Ln3+ = Eu3+, Sm3+, Dy3+) phosphors. Opt Mater. 2014;36:1642–8.10.1016/j.optmat.2013.12.020Search in Google Scholar
[55] Rahnamaye Aliabad HA, Parvizi Z. Structural, electronical and thermal properties of XVO4 (X = Y , Gd) vanadate crystals. Comput Mater Sci. 2014;93:125–32.10.1016/j.commatsci.2014.06.025Search in Google Scholar
[56] Lu JJ, Zhou J, Jia HY, Tian Y. High-efficient, bicolor-emitting GdVO4: Dy3+ phosphor under near ultraviolet excitation. Phys B. 2015;476:50.10.1016/j.physb.2015.07.015Search in Google Scholar
[57] McCamy CS. Correlated color temperature as an explicit function of chromaticity coordinates. Color Res Appl. 1992;17:142–4.10.1002/col.5080170211Search in Google Scholar
[58] Sameie H, Salimi R, Sabbagh Alvani AA, Sarabi AA, Moztarzadeh F, Tahriri M. Evaluation of sol–gel derived Eu2+ activated SrMgAl2SiO7 as a novel nanostructure luminescent pigment. Phys B. 2010;405:4796.10.1016/j.physb.2010.09.005Search in Google Scholar
[59] Pollnau M, Gamelin DR, Lüthi SR, Güdel HU. Power dependence of upconversion luminescence in lanthanide and transition-metal-ion systems. Phys Rev B. 2000;61:3337–46.10.1103/PhysRevB.61.3337Search in Google Scholar
© 2021 Shuai Wang et al., published by De Gruyter
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.