Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analysis of the stress distribution in a laminar direct simple shear device and implications for test data interpretation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Granular Matter Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Direct simple shear (DSS) testing allows observation of load-deformation response under rotation of the major principal stress plane, which is descriptive of many actual field problems. While the simplicity of the test configuration makes its use popular in research and industry, key uncertainties still remain regarding the interpretation of the laboratory data. This study uses laboratory validated discrete element method (DEM) models to examine the stress transmission in laminar-type direct simple shear devices under drained constant effective stress conditions. The DEM models (comprised of spheres) closely replicate physical specimens of precision chrome steel ball bearings for which the properties (e.g., shape, surface friction, and stiffness) were measured directly. The DEM models were also validated using experimental tests, so that conclusions regarding the system response can be derived with confidence from the available DEM data. The testing program included both loose and dense specimens, allowing for a comparison of the influence of density on stress state which has not been examined in previous simple shear DEM studies. Differences were observed between vertical effective stresses and shear stresses derived from boundary measurements (as commonly carried out in experimental programs) and those derived from force measurements within the DEM specimens. The failure state of the material in simple shear was also examined through Mohr’s circles of stress. The evolution of stresses on both the horizontally and vertically oriented planes were considered so that established methods of direct simple shear interpretation could be critically assessed. For the loose specimens, the angle of shearing resistance can be confidently estimated considering the maximum shear stress acting on the horizontal plane, which is easily inferred from measurements of the shear force during the physical test. This was true considering both internal and boundary calculated stresses. This approach, however, is inaccurate for the dense specimens. Analysis of the particle-scale kinematics of the response illustrates that the deformation field within the central portion of the specimen is in simple shear, although the magnitude of this shearing was significantly larger than what was measured on the boundary. This study and the conclusions derived focus on smooth spherical particle specimens; the objective was to examine the stress distribution within DSS devices and the implications for test interpretation using DEM models that more closely matched the physical laboratory specimens tested than in previous studies. When considered alongside the existing studies, the findings show that there is no broad conclusion that can be applied for all materials and all conditions in simple shear and that interpretation should be carefully tied to the physical conditions simulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ai, J., Langston, P.A., Yu, H.S.: Discrete element modelling of material non-coaxiality in simple shear flows. Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Methods Geomech. 38(6), 615–635 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Airey, D., Budhu, M.: Wood D (1985) Some aspects of the behaviour of soils in simple shear. In: Banerjee, P.K., Butterfield, R. (eds.) Developments in Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 185–213. Elsevier, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Asadzadeh, M., Soroush, A.: Fundamental investigation of constant stress simple shear test using DEM. Powder Technol. 292, 129–139 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bernhardt, M.L., Biscontin, G., O’Sullivan, C.: Experimental validation study of 3D direct simple shear DEM simulations. Soils Found. 56(3), 336–347 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bjerrum, L., Landva, A.: Direct simple shear test on a Norwegian quick clay. Géotechnique 16(1), 1–20 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Budhu, M.: Simple shear deformation of sands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge (1979)

  7. Budhu, M.: Nonuniformities imposed by simple shear apparatus. Can. Geotech. J. 21(1), 125–137 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budhu, M.: Lateral stresses observed in the simple shear apparatus. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 111(6), 698–711 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Budhu, M.: Failure state of a sand in simple shear. Can. Geotech. J. 25(2), 395–400 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Budhu, M., Britto, A.: Numerical analysis of soils in simple shear devices. Soils Found. 29(2), 31–41 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavarretta, I., O’Sullivan, C., Ibraim, E., Lings, M., Hamlin, S., Muir Wood, D.: Characterization of artificial, spherical particles for DEM validation studies. Particuology 10(2), 209–220 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho, G.C., Dodds, J., Santamarina, J.C.: Particle shape effects on packing density, stiffness, and strength: Natural and crushed sands. ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 103(5), 591–602 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cundall, P.A., Strack, O.D.L.: A discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 29(1), 47–65 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dabeet, A., Wijewickreme, D., Byrne, P. M.: Discrete element modelling of direct simple shear response of granular soils and model validation using laboratory element tests. In: Proceedings of Pan-Am CGS Geotechnical Conference, Toronto, Canadian Geotechnical Society (2011)

  15. Dabeet, A.: Discrete element modeling of direct simple shear response of granular soils and model validation using laboratory tests. Ph.D. Thesis. University of British Columbia, Vancover (2014)

  16. Dabeet, A., Wijewickreme, D., Byrne, P.: Evaluation of stress strain non-uniformities in the laboratory direct simple shear test specimens using 3D discrete element analysis. Geomech. Geoeng. 10(4), 249–260 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. de Josselin de Jong, G.: The double sliding, free rotating model for granular assemblies. Géotechnique 21(2), 155–162 (1971)

  18. Dounias, G.T., Potts, D.M.: Numerical analysis of drained direct and simple shear tests. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 119(12), 1870–1891 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Duncan, J. M., Dunlop, P.: Behavior of soils in simple shear tests. In: Proceedings of The Seventh International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 101–109 (1969)

  20. Finn, W.D.L., Pickering, D.J., Bransby, P.L.: Sand liquefaction in triaxial and simple shear tests. Geotech. Test. J. 2(4), 190–199 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Franke, E., Kiekbusch, M., Schuppener, B.: A new direct simple shear device. Geotech. Test. J. 14(4), 190–199 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Huang, X., Hanley, K., O’Sullivan, C., Kwok, F.C.Y.: Effect of specimen size on the response of DEM specimens with a realistic grading. Particuology 15, 107–115 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc.: PFC3D - Particle flow code in three dimensions, version 4.0. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA (2008)

  24. Jardine, J. R., Menkiti, C. O.: The undrained anisotropy of k0 consolidated sediments. Proc. ECSMGE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2, 1101–1108 (1999)

  25. Kammerer, A.: Undrained response of cohesionless soils under multidirectional cyclic simple shear conditions. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Berkeley (2002)

  26. Kjellman, W.: Testing the shear strength of clay in Sweden. Géotechnique 2(3), 225–232 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Langston, P., Ai, J., Yu, H.S.: Simple shear in 3D DEM polyhedral particles and in a simplified 2D continuum model. Granul. Matter 15(5), 595–606 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lopera Perez, J. C., Kwok, C.Y., O’Sullivan, C., Huang, X., Hanley, K.J.: Assessing the quasi-static conditions for shearing in granular media within the critical state soil mechanics framework. Soils Found. 56(1), 152–159 (2016)

  29. Lucks, A., Christian, J., Brandow, G., Hoeg, K.: Stress conditions in NGI simple shear test. J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE 98(SM1), 155–160 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Malek, A. M.: Cyclic behavior of clay in undrained simple shearing and application to offshore tension piles. Ph.D. Thesis, MIT (1987)

  31. Marketos, G., Bolton, M.D.: Flat boundaries and their effect on sand testing. Int. J. Numer. Analyt. Methods Geomech. 34(8), 821–837 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. O’Sullivan, C.: Particulate Discrete Element Modeling. Spoon Press, New York (2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  33. Potyondy, D.O., Cundall, P.A.: A bonded-particle model for rock. Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. 41(8), 1329–1364 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Prévost, J.H., Hoeg, K.: Reanalysis of simple shear soil testing. Can. Geotech. J. 13, 418–429 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Roscoe, K.: An apparatus for the application of simple shear to soil specimens. In: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference Soil Mechanical Foundation Engineering. vol. 1, pp. 186–191 (1953)

  36. Roscoe, K., Bassett, R. H., Cole, E. R.: Principal axes observed during simple shear of a sand. In: Proceedings of the Geotechnical Conference Oslo. vol. 1, pp. 231–237 (1967)

  37. Roscoe, K.H., Schofield, A.N., Wroth, C.P.: On the yielding of soils. Géotechnique 8(1), 22–53 (1958)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rowe, P.W.: The stress-dilatancy relation for static equilibrium of an assembly of particles in contact. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 269(1339), 500–527 (1962)

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Saada, A. S., Townsend, F. C.: State of the art: laboratory strength testing of soils. Laboratory shear strength of soils, ASTM Spec. Tech. Publ. 740, 7–77 (1981)

  40. Santamarina, C., Cascante, G.: Effect of surface roughness on wave propagation parameters. Géotechnique 48(1), 129–136 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Shen, C. K.: A micromechanical investigation of drained simple shear tests on dense sand using discrete element simulations. Ph.D. thesis, Imperial College London, London, UK (2013)

  42. Shen, C. K, Sadigh, K., Herrmann, L. R.: An analysis of NGI simple shear apparatus for cyclic load testing. Dynamic Geotech. Testing, ASTM International, No. STP 654, 148–162 (1978)

  43. Stroud, M.: The behavior of sand at low stress levels in the simple shear apparatus. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (1971)

  44. Talesnick, M., Frydman, S.: Simple shear of an undisturbed soft marine class in NGI and torsional shear equipment. Geotech. Testing J. 14(2), 180–194 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Vucetic, M.: The influence of height versus diameter ratio on the behaviour of Haga clay in the NGI simple shear device. Internal Report No.56204-9, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, Norway (1981).

  46. Vucetic, M., Lacasse, S.: Specimen size effect in simple shear test. J. Geotech. Eng. Div. ASCE 108(2), 1567–1585 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Wang, J., Gutierrez, M.: Discrete element simulation of direct shear specimen scale effects. Géotechnique 60(5), 395–409 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wijewickreme, D., Dabeet, A., Byrne, P.M.: Some observations on the state of stress in the direct simple shear test using 3d discrete element analysis. Geotech. Testing J. 36(2), 1–8 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wood, D.M., Drescher, A., Budhu, M.: On the determination of the stress state in the simple shear apparatus. Geotech. Testing J. 2(4), 211–222 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Wroth, C. P.: The behavior of soils and other granular media when subjected to shear. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cambridge (1958)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0449021 and the Graduate Research Fellowship Program. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. The authors also wish to acknowledge the support provided by the Zachry Department of Civil Engineering at Texas A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, USA

    Michelle L. Bernhardt-Barry

  2. Department of Engineering, Cambridge University, Cambridge, UK

    Giovanna Biscontin

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Imperial College London, London, UK

    Catherine O’Sullivan

Authors
  1. Michelle L. Bernhardt-Barry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanna Biscontin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Catherine O’Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle L. Bernhardt-Barry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bernhardt-Barry, M.L., Biscontin, G. & O’Sullivan, C. Analysis of the stress distribution in a laminar direct simple shear device and implications for test data interpretation. Granular Matter 23, 55 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-021-01118-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-021-01118-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation