Skip to main content
Log in

Grappling with modern technology: interruptions mediated by mobile devices impact older workers disproportionately

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Information Systems and e-Business Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mobile technologies have dramatically increased the number of work-related interruptions. In many organizations, employees must remain accessible and respond to these technology-mediated (T-M) interruptions even after regular work hours. Thus, demands from work interruptions can spill over into workers’ evening and family time, entailing role stress. Ultimately, workers can shy away from using the technologies they deem responsible, with negative impacts for organizations. This implies an indirect effect of demands from T-M interruptions through workers’ experiences of role stress on the use of mobile technology for work. At the same time, the workforce is aging rapidly, and there is a strong reason to assume that older workers may be significantly more susceptible to the negative impacts of interruptions than their younger counterparts. Therefore, the focus of this research is on examining whether the indirect effect of demands from T-M interruptions via workers’ experiences of role stress on the use of mobile technology depends on age such that it is stronger for older workers. Data collected from 135 younger and 137 older knowledge workers supported this idea. The data also show that experience with mobile devices can help older users manage the consequences of interruptions more effectively. Implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Since the focus of this study is on interruptions that are mediated by mobile technologies, we use the terms T-M interruptions and mobile interruptions synonymously in this paper.

References

  • Ahuja MK, Chudoba KM, Kacmar CJ, McKnight DH, George JF (2007) IT road warriors: balancing work-family conflict, job autonomy, and work overload to mitigate turnover intentions. MIS Q 31(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari R, Grover V, Purvis R (2011) Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Q 35(4):831–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):496–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin M (2018) Memory performance in older adults: experimental evidence for the indirect effect of memory self-efficacy on processing efficiency through worry. Mot Emot 42:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee A, Premkumar G (2004) Understanding changes in belief and attitude toward information technology: a theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Q 4:229–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton-Jones A, Straub DW (2006) Reconceptualizing system usage: an approach and empirical test. Inf Syst Res 17(3):228–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AF, Webster J (2005) Unintended consequences of emerging communication technologies: Instant messaging in the workplace. Comput Hum Behav 21(1):85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson MC, Hasher L, Connelly SL, Zacks RT (1995) Aging, distraction, and the benefits of predictable location. Psychol Aging 10(3):427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen A, Karahanna E (2018) Life interrupted: the effects of technology-mediated work interruptions on work and nonwork outcomes. MIS Q 42(4):1023–1042

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J, Cohen P, West SG, Aiken LS (2003) Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper CL, Dewe PJ, O’Driscoll MP (2001) Organizational stress: a review and critique of theory, research, and applications. Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis FD, Bagozzi RP, Warshaw PR (1989) User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag Sci 35(8):982–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Lange AH, Taris TW, Kompier MA, Houtman IL, Bongers PM (2003) The very best of the millennium": Longitudinal research and the demand-control-(support) model. J Occup Health Psychol 8(4):282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLone WH, McLean ER (1992) Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf Syst Res 3(1):60–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Shamy N, Hassanein K (2018) The impact of age and cognitive style on e-commerce decisions: the role of cognitive bias susceptibility. In: Information systems and neuroscience. Springer, Cham, pp 73–83

  • Ericsson K, Kintsch W (1995) Long-term working memory. Psychol Rev 102(2):211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Market Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galluch PS, Grover V, Thatcher JB (2015) Interrupting the workplace: examining stressors in an information technology context. J Assoc Inf Syst 16(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Greengard S (2009) Facing an age-old problem. Commun ACM 52(9):20–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor S (2006) The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q 30(3):611–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasher L, Zacks RT (1988) Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In: Bower GH (ed) The psychology of learning and motivation: advances in research and theory, vol. 22. Academic Press, New York, pp 193–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. A regression-based approach. Guilford, New York, p 1609182308

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF (2015) An index and test of linear moderated mediation. Multivar Behav Res 50(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes AF, Preacher KJ (2014) Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. Br J Math Stat Psychol 67(3):451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal ST, Horvitz E (2010) Notifications and awareness: a field study of alert usage and preferences. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, pp 27–30

  • Karahanna E, Agarwal R, Angst CM (2006) Reconceptualizing compatibility beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Q 30(4):781–804

  • Karasek RA (1979) Job demands, job decision latitude, and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Adm Sci Q 24(2):285–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleiner P, Caufield B (2013) Internet trends. Retrieved from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2449632/How-check-phone-The-average-person-does-110-times-DAY-6-seconds-evening.html. 8 Nov 2013

  • Kogovsek M, Kogovsek M (2013) Retaining mature knowledge workers: the quest for human capital investments. Proc Soc Behav Sci 106:2280–2288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry PB, D’Arcy J, Hammer B, Moody GD (2016) “Cargo cult” science in traditional organization and information systems survey research: a case for using nontraditional methods of data collection, including mechanical turk and online panels. J Strat Inf Syst 25(3):232–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Hoffman JM, West SG, Sheets V (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7(1):83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J (2004) Confidence limits for the indirect effect: distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar Behav Res 39(1):99–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maier C, Laumer S, Weinert C, Weitzel T (2015) The effects of technostress and switching stress on discontinued use of social networking services: a study of FB use. Info Systems J 25:275–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath JE (1976) Stress and behavior in organizations. In: Dunnette M (ed). Rand McNally, Chicago, pp 1351–1395

  • Montoya AK, Hayes AF (2017) Two condition within-participant statistical mediation analysis: a path-analytic framework. Psychol Methods 22:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris MG, Venkatesh V, Ackerman PL (2005) Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: an extension to the theory: of planned behavior. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 52(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan S, Lyytinen K, Majchrzak A, Song M (2017) Digital innovation management: reinventing innovation management research in a digital world. MIS Q 41(1):223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) The ageing challenge. In Ageing and the public service: human resource challenges. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 17–28

  • OECD (2011) Helping older workers find and retain jobs. In: Pensions at a glance 2011: retirement -income systems in OECD and G20 countries. OECD Publishing, Paris, pp 67–79

  • OECD (2013) OECD employment outlook 2013. OECD Publishing, Paris. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/employment/oecd-employment-outlook-2013_empl_outlook-2013-en

  • OECD (2018) Labour market statistics: labour force statistics by sex and age. OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics (Database). http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1787/data-00309-en

  • Paas F, Renkl A, Sweller J (2003) Cognitive load theory and instructional design: recent developments. Educ Psychol 38(1):1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park DC, Festini SB (2017) Theories of memory and aging: a look at the past and a glimpse of the future. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 72(1):82–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee J, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42(1):185–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedl R, Kindermann H, Auinger A, Javor A (2012) Technostress from a neurobiological perspective—system breakdown increases the stress hormone cortisol in computer users. Bus Inf Syst Eng 4(2):61–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salthouse TA (1991) Expertise as the circumvention of human processing limitations. In: Toward a general theory of expertise: prospects and limits, pp 286

  • Sarker S, Ahuja M, Sarker S (2018) Work-life conflict of globally distributed software development personnel: an empirical investigation using border theory. Inf Syst Res 29(1):103–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speier C, Vessey I, Valacich JS (2003) The effects of interruptions, task complexity, and information presentation on computer-supported decision-making performance. Decis Sci 34(4):771–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweller J (1994) Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learn Instruct 4(4):295–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics, 5th edn. Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Tams S (2017) A refined examination of worker age and stress: explaining how, and why, older workers are especially techno-stressed in the interruption Age. In: Davis FD et al (eds) Information systems and neuroscience. Springer, Cham, pp 175–183

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tams S (forthcoming) Helping older workers realize their full organizational potential: a moderated mediation model of age and IT-enabled task performance. MIS Q

  • Tams S, Dulipovici A (2019) The creativity model of age and innovation with IT. In: Proceedings of the 52nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 649, 6549–6558

  • Tams S, Grover V, Thatcher J (2014) Modern information technology in an old workforce: toward a strategic research agenda. J Strateg Inf Syst 23(4):284–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tams S, Thatcher J, Grover V (2018) Concentration, competence, confidence, and capture: an experimental study of age, interruption-based technostress, and task performance. J Assoc Inf Syst 19(9):857–908

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarafdar M, Tu Q, Ragu-Nathan T, Ragu-Nathan BS (2011) Crossing to the dark side: examining creators, outcomes, and inhibitors of technostress. Commun ACM 54(9):113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor S, Todd P (1995) Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience MIS Q 19(4):561–570

  • Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD (2003) User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q 27(3):425–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner N, Hassanein K, Head M (2010) Computer use by older adults: a multi-disciplinary review. Comput Hum Behav 26(5):870–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD, Lee J, Liu YD, Becker SG (2004) Introduction to human factors engineering. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes SM, Barber LK, Rogers AP (2018) Development and validation of the workplace interruptions measure. Stress Health 34(1):102–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zacks R, Hasher L (1997) Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: a reply to burke and McDowd. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 52B(6):P274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Venkatesh V (2013) Explaining employee job performance: The role of online and offline workplace communication networks. MIS Q 37(3):695–A3

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to the editors and reviewers for the help that they provided throughout the review process. In addition, we would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Tams.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix: Measurement items for principal constructs

Appendix: Measurement items for principal constructs

Instructions sent to respondents:

The following questions ask about how you perceive or use mobile technologies i.e., PDA, smartphones etc. When answering these questions, please keep in mind the mobile technology that you use most frequently for work related purposes.

All items were on 7-point likert-type scales ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree). An exception was the scale used to assess respondents’ use of mobile technology for work. This scale had different response options (see below for more details).

Demands from T-M interruptions (Ahuja et al. 2007; Chen and Karahanna 2018)

  • I feel overloaded because I receive more interruptions than I can process.

  • I feel rushed due to more frequent interruptions.

  • I feel busier because I must handle interruptions.

  • I feel pressure due to interruptions.

Role-based Stress (Ahuja et al. 2007)

My use of mobile devices for work results in…

  • the demands of my work interfering with my home and family life.

  • my job taking up more time and making it difficult to fulfill family responsibilities.

  • things I want to do at home do not getting done because of the demands my job puts on me.

  • my job producing stress that makes it difficult to fulfill family duties.

  • my making changes to my plans for family activities so that I can meet work-related demands.

Use of Mobile Technology for Work (Burton-Jones and Straub 2006; Karahanna et al. 2006)

  • How frequently do you access your mobile technology device? Response options: Never, a few times a year, monthly, weekly, daily, all the time.

  • During a typical day, how many minutes do you spend using your mobile technology device? Response options: 0, 1–20, 20–60, 60–120, 120–180, > 180.

  • Of all the features and functions available on your mobile technology device, what percentage would you estimate that you use on a fairly regular basis? Response options: < 10%, 10–24%, 25–49%, 50–74%, 75–94%, 95% + .

  • Approximately, what percentage of all your job functions is managed using your mobile technology device? Response options: ___%.

Mobile Experience (Taylor and Todd 1995; Venkatesh et al. 2003; Zhang and Venkatesh 2013)

  • I understand how to communicate using my mobile technology device.

  • I frequently use my mobile technology device to communicate.

  • Overall, I believe I am very familiar with my mobile technology device.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tams, S., Grover, V., Thatcher, J. et al. Grappling with modern technology: interruptions mediated by mobile devices impact older workers disproportionately. Inf Syst E-Bus Manage 20, 635–655 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00526-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-021-00526-3

Keywords

Navigation