Abstract
The expansion of cognitive load theory to include evolutionary perspectives posits that biologically primary knowledge might support the acquisition of biologically secondary knowledge, which needs explicit instruction for novices to construct. Pointing and tracing actions with the index finger may be forms of biologically primary knowledge that can assist students to learn biologically secondary knowledge. Incorporating such actions is theorised to have cognitive benefits, but may also enhance intrinsic motivation during the lesson. The present investigated whether instructions to point at and trace over elements of a lesson on star formation presented on a computer screen would affect participants’ reports of intrinsic cognitive load, extraneous cognitive load, intrinsic motivation, and retention and transfer test performance. Following an astronomy knowledge pre-test, 44 adult participants were randomly assigned to one of two conditions. In the experimental condition, they were instructed to point at and trace out lesson elements while learning, while in the control condition, they were asked to position their hands in their laps. Following the lesson participants reported on intrinsic motivation and cognitive load experienced during the lesson, then completed retention and transfer posttests. Participants who pointed and traced reported lower extraneous (but not intrinsic) cognitive load and higher intrinsic motivation, while scoring higher on retention and transfer posttests. This study replicates and extends earlier research by demonstrating effects in a new topic (astronomy), medium (computer-based lesson), and learning process (intrinsic motivation).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agostinho, S., Tindall-Ford, S., Ginns, P., Howard, S. J., Leahy, W., & Paas, F. (2015). Giving learning a helping hand: Finger tracing of temperature graphs on an iPad. Educational Psychology Review, 27, 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9315-5
Bailey, J. M. (2015). Blazing the trail for astronomy education research. Journal of Astronomy & Earth Sciences Education, 2(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.19030/jaese.v2i2.9512
Bara, F., Gentaz, E., & Colé, P. (2007). Haptics in learning to read with children from low socio-economic status families. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1348/026151007X186643
Bara, F., Gentaz, E., Colé, P., & Sprenger-Charolles, L. (2004). The visuo-haptic and haptic exploration of letters increases the kindergarten-children’s understanding of the alphabetic principle. Cognitive Development, 19, 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2004.05.003
Bednarik, R. G. (1986). Parietal finger markings in Europe and Australia. Rock Art Research, 3, 30–61
Brünken, R., Seufert, T., & Paas, F. (2010). Measuring cognitive load. In J. L. Plass, R. Moreno, & Brünken (Eds.), Cognitive Load Theory (pp.181–202). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Congdon, E. L., Kwon, M., & Levine, S. C. (2018). Learning to measure through action and gesture: Children’s prior knowledge matters. Cognition, 180, 182–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.07.002
Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2010). Attention affects visual perceptual processing near the hand. Psychological Science, 21, 1254–1258. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610380697
Davoli, C. C., & Brockmole, J. R. (2012). The hands shield attention from visual interference. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1386–1390. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-012-0351-7
Dodd, M. D., & Shumborski, S. (2009). Examining the influence of action on spatial working memory: The importance of selection. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1236–1247. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210802439869
Du, X., & Zhang, Q. (2019). Tracing worked examples: Effects on learning in geometry. Educational Psychology, 39, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1536256
De Jong, T. (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: Some food for thought. Instructional Science, 38, 105–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-009-9110-0
de Koning, B. B., Tabbers, H. K., Rikers, R. M., & Paas, F. (2009). Towards a framework for attention cueing in instructional animations: Guidelines for research and design. Educational Psychology Review, 21, 113–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-009-9098-7
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00160
Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43, 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802392133
Ginns, P. (2006). Integrating information: Meta-analyses of the spatial contiguity and temporal contiguity effects. Learning and Instruction, 16, 511–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.001
Ginns, P., Hu, F. T., & Bobis, J. (2020). Tracing enhances problem-solving transfer, but without effects on intrinsic or extraneous cognitive load. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34, 1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3732
Ginns, P., Hu, F., Byrne, E., & Bobis, J. (2016). Learning by tracing worked examples. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3171
Ginns, P., & Kydd, A. (2019). Learning human physiology by pointing and tracing: A cognitive load approach. In S. Agostinho, S. Tindall-Ford, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in Cognitive Load Theory. (pp. 119–130). London: Routledge.
Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wires Cognitive Science, 1, 586–596. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.55
Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613498098
Goldin-Meadow, S., Nusbaum, H., Kelly, S. D., & Wagner, S. (2001). Explaining math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Science, 12, 516–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00395
Hattie, J. A. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of 800+ meta-analyses on achievement. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hostetter, A. B., Alibali, M. W., & Kita, S. (2007). I see it in my hands’ eye: Representational gestures reflect conceptual demands. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 313–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600632812
Hu, F.-T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2014). Does tracing worked examples enhance geometry learning? Australian Journal of Educational & Developmental Psychology, 14, 45–49
Hu, F. T., Ginns, P., & Bobis, J. (2015). Getting the point: tracing worked examples enhances learning. Learning and Instruction, 35, 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.10.002
James, W. (1899). Talks to teachers on psychology: and to students on some of life’s ideals. London: Longmans Green and Co.
Johnson, C. I., & Mayer, R. E. (2012). An eye movement analysis of the spatial contiguity effect in multimedia learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 18, 178–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026923
Kalenine, S., Pinet, L., & Gentaz, E. (2011). The visual and visuo-haptic exploration of geometrical shapes increases their recognition in preschoolers. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410367443
Keselman, H. J., Othman, A. R., & Wilcox, R. R. (2013). Preliminary testing for normality: Is this a good practice? Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 12, 2–19
Korbach, A., Park, B., Brünken, R., & Ginns, P. (2020). Should learners use their hands for learning? Results from an eye-tracking study. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36, 102–113. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12396
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Inc.
Leppink, J., & van den Heuvel, A. (2015). The evolution of cognitive load theory and its application to medical education. Perspectives on Medical Education, 4, 119–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-015-0192-x
Leppink, J., & van Merriënboer, J. J. (2015). The beast of aggregating cognitive load measures in technology-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 18, 230–245
Lespiau, F., & Tricot, A. (2019). Using primary knowledge: An efficient way to motivate students and promote the learning of formal reasoning. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 915–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09482-4
Leutner, D., & Schmeck, A. (2014). The generative drawing principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning. (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liszkowski, U., Brown, P., Callaghan, T., Takada, A., & De Vos, C. (2012). A prelinguistic gestural universal of human communication. Cognitive Science, 36, 698–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01228.x
Macken, L., & Ginns, P. (2014). Pointing and tracing gestures may enhance anatomy and physiology learning. Medical Teacher, 36, 596–601. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2014.899684
Matthews, G., Campbell, S. E., Falconer, S., Joyner, L., Huggins, J., Gilliland, K., Grier, R., & Warm, J. S. (2002). Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: Task engagement, distress and worry. Emotion, 2, 315–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.4.315
Mayer, R. E. (1996). Learning strategies for making sense out of expository text: The SOI model for guiding three cognitive processes in knowledge construction. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 357–371. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01463939
Mayer, R. E. (2020). Multimedia learning. (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
McCauley, E., Duncan, T., & Tammen, V. V. (1989). Psychometric properties of the intrinsic motivation inventory in a competitive sport setting: A confirmatory factor analysis. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 60, 48–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1989.10607413
McNeill, D. (1992). Hand and mind: What gesture reveals about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mehta, C. R., & Patel, N. R. (2012). IBM SPSS exact tests. Retrieved May 6, 2021, from ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss/documentation/statistics/21.0/en/client/Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Exact_Tests.pdf
Memmert, D., Hagemann, N., Althoetmar, R., Geppert, S., & Seiler, D. (2009). Conditions of practice in perceptual skill learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80, 32–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2009.10599527
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97
Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori Method. New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company.
Newcombe, R. (2006a). Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann–Whitney statistic. Part 1: General issues and tail-area-based methods. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 543–557. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2323
Newcombe, R. (2006b). Confidence intervals for an effect size measure based on the Mann–Whitney statistic. Part 2: Asymptotic methods and evaluation. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 59–573. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.2324
Osborne, J. W., & Overbay, A. (2004). The power of outliers (and why researchers should always check for them). Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9, 1–12
Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2012). An evolutionary upgrade of cognitive load theory: Using the human motor system and collaboration to support the learning of complex cognitive tasks. Educational Psychology Review, 24, 27–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-011-9179-2
Park, B., Korbach, A., Ginns, P., & Brünken, R. (2019). Embodied cognition? Effects of pointing and tracing gestures on learning performance, eye movement and cognitive load. In S. Agostinho, S. Tindall-Ford, & J. Sweller (Eds.), Advances in Cognitive Load Theory. (pp. 142–154). London: Routledge.
Peterson, L. R., & Peterson, M. J. (1959). Short-term retention of individual verbal items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 193–198
Ping, R., & Goldin-Meadow, S. (2010). Gesturing saves cognitive resources when talking about nonpresent objects. Cognitive Science, 34, 602–619. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01102.x
Reed, C. L., Grubb, J. D., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166e177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.166
Sepp, S., Howard, S. J., Tindall-Ford, S., Agostinho, S., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive load theory and human movement: Towards an integrated model of working memory. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09461-9
Skulmowski, A., Pradel, S., Kühnert, T., Brunnett, G., & Rey, G. D. (2016). Embodied learning using a tangible user interface: The effects of haptic perception and selective pointing on a spatial learning task. Computers & Education, 92, 64–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.10.011
Steinbach, M. J., & Held, R. (1968). Eye tracking of observer-generated target movements. Science, 161, 187–188
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., & Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. New York: Springer Science Business Media LLC.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 119, 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.119.2.176
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. G. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 251–296. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022193728205
Tang, M., Ginns, P., & Jacobson, M. J. (2019). Tracing enhances recall and transfer of knowledge of the water cycle. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09466-4
Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 104–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104
Van Gelder, L. (2015). Counting the children: The role of children in the production of finger flutings in four upper Palaeolithic caves. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 34, 119–138
Van Gog, T., Kirschner, F., Kester, L., & Paas, F. (2012). Timing and frequency of mental effort measurement: Evidence in favour of repeated measures. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 833–839. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2883
Wightman, D. C., & Lintern, G. (1985). Part-task training for tracking and manual control. Human Factors, 27, 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088502700304
Wilson, D. B. (2021). Practical meta-analysis effect size calculator. Retrieved May 6, 2021, from https://www.campbellcollaboration.org/escalc/html/EffectSizeCalculator-Home.php
Yue, C. L., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). Reducing verbal redundancy in multimedia learning: An undesired desirable difficulty? Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 266–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031971
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Associate Professor Carole Yue for generously sharing the experimental lesson materials used in this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants
The research study received ethical approval from The University of Sydney (HREC protocol 2017/880) and was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ginns, P., King, V. Pointing and tracing enhance computer-based learning. Education Tech Research Dev 69, 1387–1403 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09997-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-09997-0