Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access May 10, 2021

Morphological structures and histochemistry of roots and shoots in Myricaria laxiflora (Tamaricaceae)

  • Linbao Li , Di Wu , Qiaoling Zhen , Jun Zhang , Liwen Qiu , Guiyun Huang EMAIL logo and Chaodong Yang EMAIL logo
From the journal Open Life Sciences

Abstract

Myricaria laxiflora (Tamaricaceae) is an endangered plant that is narrowly distributed in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges, along the Yangtze River, China. Using bright-field and epifluorescence microscopy, we investigated the anatomical and histochemical features that allow this species to tolerate both submerged and terrestrial environments. The adventitious roots of Myr. laxiflora had an endodermis with Casparian bands and suberin lamellae; the cortex and hypodermal walls had lignified thickenings in the primary structure. In the mature roots, the secondary structure had cork. The apoplastic barriers in stems consisted of a lignified fiber ring and a cuticle at the young stage and cork at the mature stage. The leaves had two layers of palisade tissue, a hyaline epidermis, sunken stomata, and a thick, papillose cuticle. Aerenchyma presented in the roots and shoots. Several Myr. laxiflora structures, including aerenchyma, apoplastic barriers in the roots and shoots, were adapted to riparian habitats. In addition, shoots had typical xerophyte features, including small leaves, bilayer palisade tissues, sunken stomata, a thick, papillose cuticle, and a hyaline epidermis. Thus, our study identified several anatomical features that may permit Myr. laxiflora to thrive in the riparian zone of the Three Gorges, China.

1 Introduction

Myricaria laxiflora (Tamaricaceae) is an endangered species that prior to the construction of the Three Gorges Dam (TGD) was narrowly distributed in the riparian zone along the Yangtze River, China, from Banan County, Chongqing Province, to Zhijiang County, Hubei Province [1,2,3,4,5]. After TGD construction was completed in 2009, only a few natural populations of Myr. laxiflora remained, all downstream of Yidu and Zhijiang counties; as Myr. laxiflora habitats upstream of the TGD were lost, some of the plants from the upstream localities have been preserved ex situ [4,6,7,8,9]. In its native environment along the Yangtze River, Myr. laxiflora remains dormant while completely submerged during summer flood pulses and then sprouts in the autumn and winter after the floods recede [1,2,3,4,5]. Myr. laxiflora may represent a promising plant with which to restore the ecology of Yangtze River after the degradation associated with TGD construction [8,9,10,11,12,13,14].

Like many other wetland plants, Myr. laxiflora is typically subjected to anoxic submersion during summer flooding [2,3,15,16,17]. Aquatic and amphibious plants have aerenchyma and tight barriers to store and retain oxygen in anoxic conditions and during water–solute exchanges [18,19,20,21]. In the amphibious species Cynodon dactylon, Artemisia lavandulaefolia, and Alternanthera philoxeroides, which we have studied from the Jianghan Plain down to the Three Gorges, air spaces included aerenchyma and pith cavities in roots and shoots, and barriers included the endodermis, exodermis, and suberized peripheral ring [22,23,24,25]. Myr. laxiflora growing in the riparian zone of the Yangtze River may have aerenchyma and structures similar to these amphibious species.

Other species in the Tamaricaceae that are closely related to Myr. laxiflora have diverse habitats and are widely distributed in mountainous, cold, and arid regions worldwide as well as in those with saline-alkali soils. Plants in the Tamaricaceae are often used for ecological restoration [26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. In this family, xerophyte shoots have abundant palisade tissues under the epidermis [34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]; the epidermis itself has a thick, papillose cuticle [28,36,42] and sunken stomata [38,43]. In addition, species that belong to Tamaricaceae have deep roots [32,34,44,45,46], which represent an adaptation to drought stress [47,48,49].

The structure and physiology of Myr. laxiflora seeds and shoots may play important roles in the propagation of this species as well as its invasion of new habitats [8,9,10,11,12,13,14,29,50]. However, little is known of the anatomical and histochemical features that allow Myr. laxiflora to tolerate submersion and exposure. To our knowledge, the only relevant previous study of this species showed that the surfaces of young branches had smooth, thin cuticles [29].

To address this knowledge gap, we aimed to investigate whether the anatomical and histochemical features of Myr. laxiflora were consistent with its tolerance to submersion as well as to diverse terrestrial environments. Evidence of such adaptative features might help to explain the ability of this plant to thrive despite summer dormancy and to grow in diverse terrestrial environments during the spring, autumn, and winter. To study the structures of roots and shoots, we analyzed the anatomical and histochemical characters of Myr. laxiflora samples, primarily using berberine hemisulfate–aniline blue (BAB) to visualize Casparian bands and lignified walls, Sudan red 7B (SR7B) to visualize suberin lamellae, and toluidine blue O (TBO) to visualize anatomical features.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Sample collection and processing

In October 2019, we collected adventitious roots, stems, and leaves specimens of Myr. laxiflora at the riparian of the Yangtze River in Yidu County, Hubei, China. Approximately 50 adventitious roots and 20 shoots with leaves were collected from 10 individuals.

Adventitious root and leaf samples were fixed in formaldehyde–alcohol–acetic acid immediately following collection [51]. After fixation, the root tissues were sectioned freehand under a stereoscope (JNOEC JSZ6, China), using a two-sided blade razor. Adventitious root samples (∼30–80 mm long) were sectioned at 10, 20, 30, 40, or 50 mm from the root tip. Aged tissue with attached cortex was sloughed off. Each distance from the root tip was represented by 3–6 sections from different samples per stain.

Shoot bases were immersed in tap water immediately following collection. Shoots (∼150–270 mm long) were sectioned at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 mm from the shoot apex. Each distance from the shoot base was represented by 3–6 sections from different samples per stain. Sections (10–30 µm thick) were cut in the middle of the seedling leaves. Leaves were represented by 3–6 sections from different samples per stain.

2.2 Histochemistry and microscopy

Sections were stained with one of three stains. SR7B was used to identify suberin in the cell walls [52], BAB was used to identify Casparian bands and lignin in the cell walls [53,54], and TBO was used to visualize tissue structures [55,56]. All specimens were examined using bright-field microscopy under a Leica DME microscope and photographed with a digital camera (Nikon E5400, Japan). Specimens stained with BAB were viewed under an Olympus IX71 epifluorescence microscope and photographed with a digital camera (RZ200C–21, China) [22].

3 Results and discussion

3.1 General structure

Myr. laxiflora had thick adventitious roots (Figure 1), fine adventitious roots (Figure 2), and shoots (Figures 3 and 4). The thick adventitious roots possessed four to five layers of cortex cells in the primary structure (Figure 1a–d); in the secondary structure, the cortex sloughed off with the bark (Figure 1e–i). The fine adventitious roots contained one or two layers of cortex cells in the primary structure and only cork in the secondary structure (Figure 2). Both thick and thin adventitious roots had diarch to tetrarch stele with differentiated proto- and metaxylem, a cortex with an endodermis, a hypodermis, and a rhizodermis. The cortex and hypodermal walls had lignified thickenings. Aerenchyma were present in the root cortices.

Figure 1 
                  Photomicrographs of thick adventitious roots (50–80 mm long) of Myricaria laxiflora, showing some of the secondary growth; scale bars = 50 µm. (a) Protoxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), lignified cortex, intercellular space, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: BAB. (b) Protoxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, cortex, intercellular space, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: SR7B. (c) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), lignified cortex, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: BAB. (d) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), cortex, aerenchyma, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: SR7B. (e) Protoxylem, vascular cambia (white arrowhead), divided pericycle (arrow), endodermis (black arrowhead), cortex, and aerenchyma. Staining: TBO. (f) Protoxylem, metaxylem, cork, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, and cortex. Staining: BAB. (g) Primary xylem, cork, endodermis (arrowhead), and cortex. Staining: SR7B. (h) Primary xylem, secondary xylem, cork, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, and lignified cortex. Staining: BAB. (i) Secondary xylem, cork, and bark (whole arrow). Staining: SR7B. Inset shows cork. Staining: BAB. Abbreviations used in the figure are as follows: ae – aerenchyma; BAB – berberine sulfate–aniline blue; ch – chloroplast; cr – cork; co – cortex; cu – cuticle; ep – epidermis; hy – hypodermis; ic – intercellular space; mx – metaxylem; pc – passage cells; pt – palisade tissue; f – phloem fibers; pi – pith; xy – primary xylem; px – protoxylem; rh – rhizodermis; st – spongy tissue; SR7B – Sudan red 7B; sx – secondary xylem; TBO – toluidine blue O; ve – vein.
Figure 1

Photomicrographs of thick adventitious roots (50–80 mm long) of Myricaria laxiflora, showing some of the secondary growth; scale bars = 50 µm. (a) Protoxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), lignified cortex, intercellular space, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: BAB. (b) Protoxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, cortex, intercellular space, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: SR7B. (c) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), lignified cortex, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: BAB. (d) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), cortex, aerenchyma, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: SR7B. (e) Protoxylem, vascular cambia (white arrowhead), divided pericycle (arrow), endodermis (black arrowhead), cortex, and aerenchyma. Staining: TBO. (f) Protoxylem, metaxylem, cork, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, and cortex. Staining: BAB. (g) Primary xylem, cork, endodermis (arrowhead), and cortex. Staining: SR7B. (h) Primary xylem, secondary xylem, cork, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, and lignified cortex. Staining: BAB. (i) Secondary xylem, cork, and bark (whole arrow). Staining: SR7B. Inset shows cork. Staining: BAB. Abbreviations used in the figure are as follows: ae – aerenchyma; BAB – berberine sulfate–aniline blue; ch – chloroplast; cr – cork; co – cortex; cu – cuticle; ep – epidermis; hy – hypodermis; ic – intercellular space; mx – metaxylem; pc – passage cells; pt – palisade tissue; f – phloem fibers; pi – pith; xy – primary xylem; px – protoxylem; rh – rhizodermis; st – spongy tissue; SR7B – Sudan red 7B; sx – secondary xylem; TBO – toluidine blue O; ve – vein.

Figure 2 
                  Photomicrographs of Myricaria laxiflora fine adventitious roots (30–50 mm long); scale bars = 50 µm. (a) Protoxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), lignified cortex, intercellular space, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: BAB. (b) Endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, cortex, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: SR7B. (c) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, lignified cortex, intercellular space. Staining: BAB. (d) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), cortex. Staining: SR7B. (e) Primary xylem, cork. Staining: BAB. (f) Cork. Staining: SR7B.
Figure 2

Photomicrographs of Myricaria laxiflora fine adventitious roots (30–50 mm long); scale bars = 50 µm. (a) Protoxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), lignified cortex, intercellular space, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: BAB. (b) Endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, cortex, hypodermis, and rhizodermis. Staining: SR7B. (c) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), passage cells, lignified cortex, intercellular space. Staining: BAB. (d) Protoxylem, metaxylem, endodermis (arrowhead), cortex. Staining: SR7B. (e) Primary xylem, cork. Staining: BAB. (f) Cork. Staining: SR7B.

Figure 3 
                  Photomicrographs of Myricaria laxiflora stems (150–270 mm long). Scale bars = 50 µm. (a) Pith, primary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, intercellular space, and epidermis. Staining: TBO. (b) Pith, primary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, chloroplast, epidermis, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. Inset shows phloem fibers and cuticle. Staining: SR7B. (c) Secondary xylem, vascular cambia (arrowhead), phloem fibers, cortex, divided cork, and epidermis. Staining: TBO. (d) Pith, secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. (e) Secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, intercellular space, chloroplast, cork, and cuticle. Staining: SR7B. (f) Secondary xylem, vascular cambia (arrowhead), phloem fibers, cortex, intercellular space, cork, and epidermis. Staining: TBO. (g) Pith, secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, cork, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. (h) Secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, cork, and cuticle. Staining: SR7B. (i) Pith, secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, cork, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. Inset shows bark (arrow). Staining: SR7B.
Figure 3

Photomicrographs of Myricaria laxiflora stems (150–270 mm long). Scale bars = 50 µm. (a) Pith, primary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, intercellular space, and epidermis. Staining: TBO. (b) Pith, primary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, chloroplast, epidermis, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. Inset shows phloem fibers and cuticle. Staining: SR7B. (c) Secondary xylem, vascular cambia (arrowhead), phloem fibers, cortex, divided cork, and epidermis. Staining: TBO. (d) Pith, secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. (e) Secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, intercellular space, chloroplast, cork, and cuticle. Staining: SR7B. (f) Secondary xylem, vascular cambia (arrowhead), phloem fibers, cortex, intercellular space, cork, and epidermis. Staining: TBO. (g) Pith, secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, cork, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. (h) Secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, cork, and cuticle. Staining: SR7B. (i) Pith, secondary xylem, phloem fibers, cortex, cork, and cuticle. Staining: BAB. Inset shows bark (arrow). Staining: SR7B.

The Myr. laxiflora stem possessed cork and an epidermis as well as a lignified phloem fiber ring enclosing a central cylinder of bundles internal to the cortex (Figure 3a–i). The Myr. laxiflora leaf had palisade tissue, a hyaline marginal epidermis, stomata, and a cuticle with a papillose surface (Figure 4a–f).

3.2 Structure of the thick adventitious root

At 10 mm from the root tip, the stele had diarch and tetrarch protoxylem poles, the endodermis had Casparian bands and almost complete suberin lamellae (only a few passage cells), the cortex and hypodermal walls had lignified thickenings, and an intercellular space appeared within the cortex (Figure 1a and b). At 20 mm from the root tip, the stele had metaxylem poles, the endodermis had almost complete suberin lamellae, the cortex had irregular lysigenous aerenchyma, and the rhizodermis was still intact (Figure 1c and d). At 30 mm from the root tip, a redivided pericycle also formed phellogen to begin cork production and the endodermis had few passage cells (Figure 1e–g). At about 40 mm from the root tip, the pericycle over the protoxylem poles and the cells between the primary xylem and the primary phloem had become a vascular cambium to initiate the secondary xylem, the cork was partially undeveloped, and the cortex begin to slough off (Figure 1e–h). At >50 mm from the root tip (mature adventitious roots), the cortex and hypodermis had been sloughed off, the stele has a secondary xylem, and the cork had suberized to form bark (Figure 1i).

3.3 Structure of the fine adventitious root

At 10 mm from the root tip, Casparian bands, suberin lamellae, and passage cells were present on the endodermis, the cortex and hypodermal walls had lignified thickenings, and the stele had a diarch protoxylem (Figure 2a and b). At 20 mm from the root tip, the endodermis had almost complete suberin lamellae with a few passage cells, the stele had a metaxylem, and the cortex and hypodermis begin to slough off (Figure 2c and d). At 30 mm from the root tip, the pericycle redivided to form phellogen and produce suberized cork, while the stele had only primary xylem (Figure 2e and f).

We demonstrated that the primary structures of the thick and fine adventitious roots exhibit similar anatomical and histochemical features of Myr. laxiflora. Myr. laxiflora roots had a suberized endodermis and a lignified hypodermis, while the cortex and hypodermal walls had lignified thickenings near the endodermis. The cortex of the thick adventitious roots had more cell layers than that of the fine adventitious roots. In addition, the thick adventitious roots had a secondary structure containing cork, as commonly observed in eudicots [57,58,59]. In contrast, the fine adventitious roots had only primary xylem.

The young roots of Myr. laxiflora were similar in structure to the young roots of Oenanthe javanica and Alt. philoxeroides [25,60]. However, the hypodermis of O. javanica has more cell layers than that of Myr. laxiflora as well as a cortex with spacious aerenchyma (although this cortex lacks lignified walls); in addition, unlike Myr. laxiflora, the roots of O. javanica are surrounded by aerenchyma, and the walls possess suberin lamellae [60]. The cortices and hypodermis of the aquatic roots of Alt. philoxeroides have lignified walls and aerenchyma [25], as well as broccoli and Cardamine hupingshanensis [61,62,63]. It is possible that the lignified thickenings we observed in the roots of Myr. laxiflora relate to the riparian habitats of the Three Gorges [25,61,62,63].

The roots of wetland or aquatic eudicots from Jianghan Plain (China) or from the Amazon Basin, such as Art. lavandulaefolia, Art. selengensis, Ranunculus trichophyllus, and Tabernaemontana juruana, possess an endodermis, a uniseriate exodermis, and a cortex that lacks lignified walls [24,64,65]. In contrast, the roots of wetland grasses, such as Oryza sativa, Phalaris arundinacea, Phragmites australis, and Zizania latifolia, possess an endodermis and a multiseriate exodermis [20,22,23,66,67]. The barriers of these wetland or aquatic species were stronger than Myr. laxiflora with an endodermis and lignified cortex as well as hypodermis in roots.

3.4 Stem structure

The stem had a lignified phloem fiber ring, enclosing a central cylinder of bundles internal to the cortex, and an epidermis with a thick cuticle. At 10 mm from the new shoot apex, the fiber ring enclosed vascular bundles, and a spacious pith was present in the center (Figure 3a and b). At 30–40 mm from the new shoot apex, the vascular cambium produced an internal secondary xylem; the phloem fibers had strengthened and lignified; and the cortical cells had redivided to form suberized cork, one cell layer thick, under the epidermis (Figure 3c–e). At the new shoot base, the cork had several layers of suberized cells (Figure 3f–h). In 1-year-old shoots, the cylinder bundles had spacious secondary xylem, and the cork has suberized to form bark (Figure 3i). Intercellular spaces and chloroplasts were present in the stem cortices (Figure 3a, b, e, and f).

Young stems of Myr. laxiflora possessed a lignified fiber ring, a thick cuticle, and a cortex either with chloroplasts and small aerenchyma or with one layer of cork cells. In contrast, mature stems had prominent secondary xylem in the center of the stem and a thick bark. In contrast, Zhang et al. [29] found that young branches of Myr. laxiflora had smooth, thin cuticles. The lignified fiber ring in the young stems of Myr. laxiflora was similar to the lignified sclerenchymal ring observed in C. hupingshanensis, P. arundinacea, and Z. latifolia [22,23,63,67]. This ring might serve to increase the mechanical strength of the young stem. Suberized cork, which is commonly observed in eudicots [58,59], is similar to the phellem of Art. selengensis and Alt. philoxeroides [24,25] and to the suberized and lignified peripheral mechanical ring in the Paspalum distichum, Pha. arundinacea, and Z. latifolia [22,23,67]. This suggests that Myr. laxiflora’s tolerance to flooding is typical of amphibious plants. The shoot cortices have chloroplasts, which are present in other Tamaricaceae species [28,30,68]. These observations indicate that Myr. laxiflora has features that belong to Tamaricaceae taxology and serve as adaptations to the environments in the Three Gorges.

3.5 Leaf structure

The upper surface of the leaf has obvious stomata, small epidermal cells, a thin cuticle, and fine papillae. The lower surface and edge of the leaf have sunken stomata, large epidermal cells, a thick cuticle, and large papillae (Figure 4a–d, e). The edges of the epidermal cells are hyaline (Figure 4a and e). Palisade tissue was observed below and above the adaxial and abaxial epidermis, respectively; scant spongy mesophyll tissue was observed between the layers of palisade tissue (Figure 4c–e). Aerenchyma was present in the middle of the leaf blade (Figure 4c).

Figure 4 
                  Photomicrographs of Myricaria laxiflora leaves. Scale bar = 50 µm. (a) Adaxial surface, stomata (arrowhead), and hyaline epidermal margin (arrow). Unstained. Inset shows stomata (arrowhead), and fine papillae (*). Staining: BAB. (b) Abaxial surface and vein. Unstained. Upper inset shows lower and marginal epidermal walls with thick cuticle (arrowhead) and papillae (*). Staining: BAB. Lower inset shows large papillae (*). Staining: BAB. (c) Middle blade, vein, upper epidermis with cuticle and fine papillae (white #), lower epidermis with cuticle and large papillae (gray #), stomata (arrowhead), palisade tissue, aerenchyma, spongy tissue, and papillae (*). Staining: SR7B. (d) Marginal blade, upper epidermis with cuticle and fine papillae (white #), lower epidermis with cuticle and large papillae (gray #), stomata (arrowhead), palisade tissue, papillae (*), and marginal epidermis (arrow). Staining: SR7B. (e) Blade, upper epidermis (*), lower epidermis (#), palisade tissue, spongy tissue, and hyaline epidermal margin (arrow). Staining: TBO.
Figure 4

Photomicrographs of Myricaria laxiflora leaves. Scale bar = 50 µm. (a) Adaxial surface, stomata (arrowhead), and hyaline epidermal margin (arrow). Unstained. Inset shows stomata (arrowhead), and fine papillae (*). Staining: BAB. (b) Abaxial surface and vein. Unstained. Upper inset shows lower and marginal epidermal walls with thick cuticle (arrowhead) and papillae (*). Staining: BAB. Lower inset shows large papillae (*). Staining: BAB. (c) Middle blade, vein, upper epidermis with cuticle and fine papillae (white #), lower epidermis with cuticle and large papillae (gray #), stomata (arrowhead), palisade tissue, aerenchyma, spongy tissue, and papillae (*). Staining: SR7B. (d) Marginal blade, upper epidermis with cuticle and fine papillae (white #), lower epidermis with cuticle and large papillae (gray #), stomata (arrowhead), palisade tissue, papillae (*), and marginal epidermis (arrow). Staining: SR7B. (e) Blade, upper epidermis (*), lower epidermis (#), palisade tissue, spongy tissue, and hyaline epidermal margin (arrow). Staining: TBO.

The leaves of Myr. laxiflora are typical of xerophytes adapted to arid environments: they are small and have two layers of palisade tissue, sunken stomata, and a thick papillose cuticle. Bilayer palisade tissues are also found in several other xerophytes, including Myr. bracteate [26], Myr. germanica [70], Reaumuria soongoriea [35], Tamarix ramosissima [30], Elaeagnus angustifolia [36], Eschweilera tenuifolia [69], Populus euphratica [36,40], Peganum nigellastrum [39], Alhagi sparsifolia [34], and Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa [41]. Similarly, the leaves of several xerophyte plants, including Myr. germanica [70], Tam. laxa [28,42], Tam. ramosissima [30], Tam. chinensis [68], Ela. angustifolia [36], and Caragana spp. [37,38], have sunken stomata, thick cuticles, and surface papillae [59]. The epidermis at the abaxial margins of the leaves of Myr. laxiflora was largely hyaline and may function similar to the white hairs on xerophyte leaves [36,37] or the hyaline tips of bryophyte leaves [71].

In plant tissues, aerenchyma help to retain oxygen when the plant is submerged, in order to improve survival [15,16,17,20,72,73]. The roots of Myr. laxiflora had aerenchyma and histochemical features similar to those of Alt. philoxeroides aquatic roots, even though Alt. philoxeroides shoots have large air spaces [25], and the leaves have lysigenous of xeromorphic New Zealand hemp [59], while Myr. laxiflora shoots have narrow intercellular spaces. In contrast, the shoots of wetland plants, such as Pas. distichum, Art. lavandulaefolia, and Art. selengensis, have spacious pith cavities and cortical lacunae, which might facilitate survival when submerged over long periods [22,23,24,64,67].

4 Conclusion

We identified that Myr. laxiflora have typical amphibious plant features, including apoplastic barriers consisting of the endodermis, lignified wall thickenings, cork, and cuticle as well as the aerenchyma, suggesting that Myr. laxiflora is well adapted to the riparian habitats of the Three Gorges along the Yangtze River [16,17,18,19,24,25,54,60,63,72]. The shoots of Myr. laxiflora have typical xerophyte features, common across the Tamaricaceae, including small leaves, bilayer palisade tissues, sunken stomata, a thick papillose cuticle, and a largely hyaline epidermis [26,28,30,35,36,37,40,42,59,68,69]. Our results help to explain how the rare plant Myr. laxiflora survives in flooded and receded environments and may help to contextualize the taxonomy, evolution, and phylogeny of Myr. laxiflora within Tamaricaceae.


Linbao Li and Di Wu are contributed equal to this work, and as co-first authors.


  1. Funding information: This work was supported by the China Three Gorges Corporation (2019H210), and the Engineering Research Center of Ecology and Agriculture Use of Wetland, Ministry of Education opening fund, Yangtze University (KFT202004).

  2. Conflict of interest: The authors state no conflict of interest.

  3. Data availability statement: The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

[1] Zhang PY, Zhang YJ. A study on the taxonomy of the genus Myricaria Desv. in China. Bull Bot Res. 1984;4:67–80.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Wu JQ, Zhao ZE, Jin YX, Shen ZH. Investigation and study on the endemic plant Myricaria laxiflora in the Three-Gorge Reservoir area. J Wuhan Bot Res. 1998;16:111–6.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Li ZZ, Wang CH, Xu TQ, Wu JQ, Huang HW. Conservation genetics of the endemic species Myricaria laxiflora (Tamaricaceae) in the Three-Gorges Reservoir area, Hubei. Biodivers Sci. 2003;11:109–17.10.17520/biods.2003015Search in Google Scholar

[4] Wang Y, Wu JQ, Tao Y, Li Z, Huang H. Natural distribution and ex situ conservation of endemic species Myricaria laxiflora in water-level-fluctuation zone within Three Gorges Reservoir area of Changjiang River. J Wuhan Bot Res. 2003;21(5):415–22.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Tao Y, Li JQ, Jiang MX, Jin X. Study on diversity of structural characters of Myricaria laxiflora. J Wuhan Bot Res. 2004;22:315–22.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bao DC, Lu ZJ, Jiang MX, Xu SD, Yao Q, Liu QF, et al. Population structure and dynamics of remanent Myricaria laxiflora downstream from the Three Gorges Dam. J Wuhan Bot Res. 2010;28:711–7.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Tian H, Kang M, Liu Y, Ye Q, Yao X. High genetic diversity in remnant natural populations of Myricaria laxiflora, a species once considered to be extinct in the wild. Aquat Bot. 2012;103:48–53.10.1016/j.aquabot.2012.06.001Search in Google Scholar

[8] Qin HW, Liu ZX, Zhong Y, Liu R, Zheng LD, Su HY. The effects of submergence and waterloggingon growth and regrowth of endangered species Myricaria laxiflora. Chin Agric Sci Bull. 2014;30:284–8.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Chen F, Guan S, Ma Y, Xie Z, Lv K, Huang Y, et al. Impact of regulated water level fluctuations on the sexual reproduction of remnant Myricaria laxiflora populations. Glob Ecoll Conserv. 2019;18:e00628.10.1016/j.gecco.2019.e00628Search in Google Scholar

[10] Chen FQ, Xie ZQ. Reproductive allocation, seed dispersal and germination of Myricaria laxiflora, an endangered species in the Three Gorges Reservoir area. Plant Ecol. 2007;191:67–75.10.1007/s11258-006-9214-4Search in Google Scholar

[11] Chen FQ, Xie ZQ. Survival and growth responses of Myricaria laxiflora seedlings to summer flooding. Aquat Bot. 2009;90:333–8.10.1016/j.aquabot.2008.12.006Search in Google Scholar

[12] Chen FQ, Xie ZQ. The physiological and biochemical responses of endangered Myricaria laxiflora to simulated summer flooding. J Trop Subtrop Bot. 2009;17:249–53.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Yuan WQ, Zhan HY, Chen FQ, Xia HW, Luo YC, Liu CC. Ecological characteristics of seed germination of an endangered species Myricaria laxiflora. Ecol Environ. 2008;17(6):2341–5.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Ma YR, Guan SP, Chen FQ, Lv K. Characteristics of seed germination and seedling growth of Myricaria laxiflora under different groundwater table treatments. Bot Res. 2018;7(02):150–7.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Vartapetian BB, Jackson MB. Plant adaptations to anaerobic stress. Ann Bot. 1997;79(Supplement A):3–20.10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a010303Search in Google Scholar

[16] Jackson MB, Colmer TD. Response and adaptation by plants to flooding stress. Ann Bot. 2005;96:501–5.10.1093/aob/mci205Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[17] Bailey–Serres J, Voesenek LACJ. Flooding stress: acclimations and genetic diversity. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59:313–39.10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092752Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Colmer TD, Gibberd MR, Wiengweera A, Tinh TK. The barrier to radial oxygen loss from roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) is induced by growth in stagnant solutions. J Exp Bot. 1998;49:1431–6.10.1093/jxb/49.325.1431Search in Google Scholar

[19] Enstone DE, Peterson CA, Ma F. Root endodermis and exodermis: structure, function, and responses to the environment. J Plant Growth Regul. 2003;21:335–51.10.1007/s00344-003-0002-2Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kotula L, Ranathunge K, Schreiber L, Steudle E. Functional and chemical comparison of apoplastic barriers to radial oxygen loss in roots of rice (Oryza sativa L.) grown in aerated or deoxygenated solution. J Exp Bot. 2009;60:2155–67.10.1093/jxb/erp089Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Ranathunge K, Lin J, Steudle E, Schreiber L. Stagnant deoxygenated growth enhances root suberization and lignifications, but differentially affects water and NaCl permeabilities in rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2011;34:1223–40.10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02318.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[22] Yang CD, Zhang X, Zhou CY, Seago Jr JL. Root and stem anatomy and histochemistry of four grasses from the Jianghan Floodplain along the Yangtze River. China Flora. 2011;206:653–61.10.1016/j.flora.2010.11.011Search in Google Scholar

[23] Zhang X, Hu LJ, Yang C, Zhou C, Yuan L, Chen Z, et al. Structural features of Phalaris arundinacea L. in the Jianghan Floodplain of the Yangtze River. China Flora. 2017;229:100–6.10.1016/j.flora.2017.02.016Search in Google Scholar

[24] Zhang X, Yang C, Seago Jr JL. Anatomical and histochemical traits of roots and stems of Artemisia lavandulaefolia and A. selengensis (Asteraceae) in the Jianghan Floodplain. China Flora. 2018;239:87–97.10.1016/j.flora.2017.11.009Search in Google Scholar

[25] Yang CD, Yang XL, Zhang X, Zhou CY, Zhang F, Wang XE, et al. Anatomical structures of alligator weed (Alternanthera philoxeroides) suggest it is well adapted to the aquatic–terrestrial transition zone. Flora. 2019;253:27–34.10.1016/j.flora.2019.02.013Search in Google Scholar

[26] Wei Y, Tan DY, Yin LK. The discussions on the anatomical structure of leaf and its taxonomic relationship of Tamaricaceae in china. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin. 1999;19:113–8.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Qong M, Takamura H, Hudaberdi M. Formation and internal structure of Tamarix cones in the Taklimakan Desert. J Arid Environ. 2002;50:81–97.10.1006/jare.2001.0829Search in Google Scholar

[28] Zhang DY, Tan DY, Zhang J, Pan BR. Comparative anatomy of young branches of 16 species of Tamarix from China with reference to their ecological significance. Acta Bot Yunnanica. 2003;25(6):653–62.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Zhang DY, Zhang J, Tan DY, Pan BR. Anatomical observation of young branches of 6 species of Tamaricaceae from China. Acta Bot Boreali-Occident Sin. 2003;23:380–8.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Gong WC, Zhuang L, Zhao WQ, Tian ZP. Anatomical structure and ecological adaptability of two kinds of halophytes (Haloxylon ammondendron Chenopodiaceae and Tamarix ramosissima Tamaricaceae). Acta Ecol Sin. 2009;29:6764–71.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Liu Y, Wang Y, Huang H. Species‐level phylogeographical history of Myricaria plants in the mountain ranges of western China and the origin of Myr. laxiflora in the Three Gorges mountain region. Mol Ecol. 2009;18:2700–12.10.1111/j.1365-294X.2009.04214.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[32] Shan LS, Li Y, Geng DM, Dong QL. Ecological adaptation of Reaumuria soongorica root system architecture to arid environments. Sci Cold Arid Reg. 2014;32:150–8.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Zhang ML, Meng HH, Zhang HX, Vyacheslav BV, Sanderson SC. Himalayan origin and evolution of Myricaria (Tamaricaeae) in the Neogene. PLoS One. 2014;9:e97582.10.1371/journal.pone.0097582Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[34] Chen CC, Sun YW, Chang KL. A preliminary study on the morphology and anatomy of the dominant of the vegetations distributing along the middle and low drainage basin of the Shor-ler River based on the view point of ecology. J Lanzhou Univ. 1961;3:61–96.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Wang YZ, Wang XL, Li Y. Observation on leaf structure of some species in desert steppe. J Lanzhou Univ. 1983;19:87–96.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Luo XY, Deng YB. Anatomical observation of leaves and assimilative branches on several xerophytes structure in Xinjiang. J Xinjiang Univ. 1986;1:77–84.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Yang G, Wang CG. A preliminary study on the stem and leaf structure of several xerophytes in Lop Nur area. Arid Zone Res. 1984;1:57–63.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Yan L, Li H, Liu Y. The anatomical ecology studies on the leaf of 13 species in Caragana genus. J Arid Land Resour Environ. 2002;16:100–6.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Zhao JH, li QF, Gao YH, Bao YL, Tian FY. Xerophytic structure of vegetative organs of Peganum nigellastrum Bunge in desert steppe of Inner Mongolia. Inn Mong Pratacult. 2009;21:38–41.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Liu Y, Li X, Chen G, Li M, Liu M, Liu D. Epidermal micromorphology and mesophyll structure of Populus euphratica heteromorphic leaves at different development stages. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0137701.10.1371/journal.pone.0137701Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[41] Zhu GL, Wei XZ. Leaf morphological plasticity of Ziziphus jujuba var. spinosa in response to natural drought gradient ecotopes. Acta Ecol Sin. 2016;19:6178–87.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Yao XL, Huang PY. Observations on morphology and anatomy about the seedling of Tamarix laxa. J Xinjiang Univ. 1998;3:77–82.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Dörken VM, Parsons R. Morpho–anatomical studies on the leaf reduction in Casuarina: the ecology of xeromorphy. Trees. 2017;31:1165–77.10.1007/s00468-017-1535-5Search in Google Scholar

[44] Jiang LX, Li Y. Comparison on architecture characteristics of root systems and leaf traits for three desert shrubs adapted to arid habitat. J Desert Res. 2008;28:1118–24.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Shan LS, Li Y, Ren W, Su SP, Dong QL, Geng DM. Root architecture of two desert plants in central Hexi Corridor of Northwest China. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2013;24:25–31.Search in Google Scholar

[46] He GZ, Chen YN, Chen YP, Wang RZ. Adaptive strategy of Tamarix spp. root architecture in arid environment. J Beijing Norm Univ (Nat Sci). 2016;52:277–82.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Wahid A. Physiological significance of morpho–anatomical features of xerophytes. Int J Agric Biol. 2003;5:207–12.Search in Google Scholar

[48] De Micco V, Aronne G. Morpho–anatomical traits for plant adaptation to drought. In: Aroca R, editor. Plant responses to drought stress. Berlin: Springer–Verlag; 2012. p. 37–61.10.1007/978-3-642-32653-0_2Search in Google Scholar

[49] Dörken VM, Parsons RF. The foliar change in two species of Melaleuca (Myrtaceae): a morpho-anatomic and ontogenetic approach. Trees. 2018;32:1013–28.10.1007/s00468-018-1692-1Search in Google Scholar

[50] Tao Y, Chen F, Wan KY, Li JQ, Meng AP, Chen SS. Study on structural traits of seed of Myricaria laxiflora (Tamaricaceae). Acta Bot Yunnanica. 2008;30:190–4.10.3724/SP.J.1143.2008.00190Search in Google Scholar

[51] Jensen WA. Botanical histochemistry – principles and practice. CA, USA. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman; 1962.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Brundrett MC, Kendrick B, Peterson CA. Efficient lipid staining in plant material with Sudan red 7B or Fluorol yellow 088 in polyethylene glycol–glycerol. Biotechnol Histochem. 1991;66:111–6.10.3109/10520299109110562Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Brundrett MC, Enstone DE, Peterson CA. A berberine–aniline blue fluorescent staining procedure for suberin, lignin and callose in plant tissue. Protoplasma. 1988;146:133–42.10.1007/BF01405922Search in Google Scholar

[54] Seago Jr JL, Peterson CA, Enstone DE, Scholey CA. Development of the endodermis and hypodermis of Typha glauca Godr. and T. angustifolia L. roots. Can J Bot. 1999;77:122–34.Search in Google Scholar

[55] Feder N, O’Brien TP. Plant microtechnique: some principles and new methods. Am J Bot. 1968;55:123–42.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1968.tb06952.xSearch in Google Scholar

[56] Peterson RL, Peterson CA, Meiville LH. Teaching plant anatomy through creative laboratory exercise. Ontartio: NRC Press Ottawa; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Ginzburg C. Organization of the adventitious root apex in Tamarix aphylla. Am J Bot. 1967;54(1):4–8.10.1002/j.1537-2197.1967.tb06887.xSearch in Google Scholar

[58] Evert RF. Esau’s plant anatomy: meristems, cells, and tissues of the plant body: their structure, function, and development. 3rd ed. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: Wiley– Interscience; 2006.10.1002/0470047380Search in Google Scholar

[59] Crang R, Lyons-Sobaski S, Wise R. Plant anatomy: a concept-based approach to the structure of seed plants. 1st ed. Gewerbestrasse, Switzerland: Springer; 2018.10.1007/978-3-319-77315-5Search in Google Scholar

[60] Zhang X, Hu LJ, Zhou CY, Yang CD. Studies on anatomy and apoplastic barrier histochemistry characters of Oenanthe javanica (Bl.) DC. adapted to wetland environment. China Veg. 2016;1:52–8.Search in Google Scholar

[61] López-Pérez L, Fernández-García N, Olmos E, Carvajal M. The phi thickening in roots of broccoli plants. An adaptation mechanism to salinity. Int J Plant Sci. 2007;168:1141–9.10.1086/520722Search in Google Scholar

[62] Fernández-García N, López-Pérez L, Hernandez M, Olmos E. Role of phi cells and the endodermis under salt stress in Brassica oleracea. N Phytol. 2009;181:347–60.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02674.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[63] Xiang JQ, Ming JJ, Yin HQ, Zhu YF, Li YJ, Long L, et al. Anatomy and histochemistry of the roots and shoots in the aquatic Selenium hyperaccumulator Cardamine hupingshanensis (Brassicaceae). Open Life Sci. 2019;14:318–26.10.1515/biol-2019-0035Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[64] Vecchia FD, Cuccato F, Rocca NL, Larcher W, Rascio N. Endodermis-like sheaths in the submerged freshwater macrophyte Ranunculus trichophyllus Chaix. Ann Bot. 1999;83:93–7.10.1006/anbo.1998.0787Search in Google Scholar

[65] De Simone O, Haase K, Müller E, Junk WJ, Hartmann K, Schreiber L, et al. Apoplastic barriers and oxygen transport properties of hypodermal cell walls in roots from four Amazonian tree species. Plant Physol. 2003;132:206–17.10.1104/pp.102.014902Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[66] Soukup A, Armstrong W, Schreiber L, Rochus F, Votrubová O. Apoplastic barriers to radial oxygen loss and solute penetration: a chemical and functional comparison of the exodermis of two wetland species, Phragmites australis and Glyceria maxima. N Phytol. 2007;173:264–78.10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01907.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[67] Yang CD, Zhang X, Li JK, Bao MZ, Ni DJ, Seago Jr JL. Anatomy and histochemistry of roots and shoots in wild rice (Zizania latifolia Griseb.). J Bot. 2014;2014:1–9.10.1155/2014/181727Search in Google Scholar

[68] Wang GY, Fu YP, Yang YL, Lu JM, Yu ZM, Lu Q. Study on anatomical structure of Tamarix chinensis. J Changchun Norm Univ. 2009;28:43–5.Search in Google Scholar

[69] Herrera A, Escala M, Rengifo E. Leaf anatomy changes related to physiological adaptations to flooding in Amazonian tree species. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2009;21:301–8.10.1590/S1677-04202009000400006Search in Google Scholar

[70] Dörken VM, Parsons RF, Marshall AT. Studies on the foliage of Myricaria germanica (Tamaricaceae) and their evolutionary and ecological implications. Trees. 2017;31:997–1013.10.1007/s00468-017-1523-9Search in Google Scholar

[71] Gillespie LM, Volaire F. Are winter and summer dormancy symmetrical seasonal adaptive strategies? The case of temperate herbaceous perennials. Ann Bot. 2017;119:311–23.10.1093/aob/mcw264Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[72] Seago Jr JL, Marsh LC, Stevens KJ, Soukup A, Votrubová O, Enstone DE. A re-examination of the root cortex in wetland flowering plants with respect to aerenchyma. Ann Bot. 2005;96:565–79.10.1093/aob/mci211Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[73] Striker GG. Flooding stress on plants: anatomical, morphological and physiological responses. In: Mworia JK, editor. Janeza Trdine, Croatia: Botany InTech; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-05-24
Revised: 2020-12-15
Accepted: 2021-02-17
Published Online: 2021-05-10

© 2021 Linbao Li et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 27.4.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/biol-2021-0049/html
Scroll to top button