Skip to main content
Log in

Influence mechanism of dynamic and static liquid bridge forces on particle deposition behaviors in solar photovoltaic mirrors

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solar energy is one of the most promising forms of renewable energy for solving the energy crisis and environmental problems. Dust deposition on photovoltaic mirrors has a serious negative impact on the photoelectric conversion efficiency of solar power stations. In this paper, the influence mechanism of the dynamic and static liquid bridge forces on particle deposition behaviors on solar photovoltaic mirrors is investigated. In addition, the expression and physical meaning of the particle critical separation velocity are proposed. The research results show that the static liquid bridge force can be the primary deposition force causing dust particles to adhere to photovoltaic mirrors. However, the dynamic liquid bridge force can act as a resistance force for the particle motion process and even make dust particles roll along and finally stay on the mirror. The contact force is the primary separation force that causes dust particles to flow away from the mirror. Whether dust particles adhere to the mirror depends on the relative size of the deposition and separating forces. The particle critical separation velocity describes the relative size of the collision-rebound effect and mirror adhesion effect and is expressed in Eq. (16). These research findings can provide theoretical guidance for mirror cleaning methods in the operation process of photovoltaic mirrors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\(\overline{\omega}\) :

Lifshitz constant

l 0 :

Average distance between molecules/m

α :

Particle incident angle/(°)

θ :

Mirror installing angle/(°)

θ 1 :

Solid-liquid contact angle/(°)

g :

Gravitational acceleration component/(m·s−2)

μ l :

Dynamic viscosity/(kg·(m·s)−1)

μ t :

Turbulent viscosity/(kg·(m·s)−1)

μ s :

Friction coefficient

k n :

Spring constant in normal direction/(N·m−1)

k t :

Spring constant in tangential direction/(N·m−1)

u c :

Particle critical separation velocity/(m·s−1)

u 0 :

Particle inlet velocity/(m·s−1)

v r,n :

Normal relative velocity/(m·s−1)

v r,t :

Tangential relative velocity/(m·s−1)

R*:

Equivalent radius/m

δ n :

Normal displacement/m

δ t :

Tangential displacement/m

c n :

Damping coefficient in normal direction/(N·s·m−1)

c t :

Damping coefficient in tangential direction/(N·s·m−1)

F v :

van der Waals force/N

F l :

Liquid bridge force/N

F l,d :

Dynamic liquid bridge force/N

F l,dn :

Normal viscous component of Fl,d/N

F l,dt :

Tangential viscous component of Fl,d/N

F l,s :

Static liquid bridge force/N

F g :

Gravity force/N

F e :

Electrostatic force/N

F ee :

Mirror electrostatic force/N

F el :

Electrical double layer force/N

F es :

Electric field force/N

F b :

Buoyancy force/N

F c :

Contact force/N

F x :

Other forces/N

F cn :

Normal contact force/N

F ct :

Tangential contact force/N

m p :

Particle mass/kg

r, d p :

Particle radius, diameter/m

γ :

Liquid surface tension/(N·m−2)

V*:

Dimensionless liquid bridge volume

ρ p :

Particle density/(kg·m−3)

ρ :

Gas density/(kg·m−3)

\(\overrightarrow{\nu_{ij}}\) :

Relative velocity between particles i and j/(m·s−1)

t :

Time/s

\(\overrightarrow{n}\) :

Unit vector from particle i to particle j

\(\overrightarrow{n_{\rm{t}}}\) :

Tangential unit vector of \(\overrightarrow{n}\)

\(\overrightarrow{\nu_{\rm{s}}}\) :

Sliding velocity vector/(m·s−1)

References

  1. Mekhilef S, Saidur R, Safari A. A review on solar energy use in industries. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(4): 1777–1790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Realizing a clean energy future: highlights of NREL analysis (Brochure). NREL/BR-6A20-60894, 2013

  3. Wang S, Cui X. Photovoltaic will become the most important power source in the world. China Science Journal, 2020, 26: 003

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yaghoubi M, Niknia I, Kanaan P, et al. Experimental study of dust deposition effect on the performances of parabolic trough collectors. In: Proceedings of 17th Solar Paces Conference, Granada, Spain, 2011

  5. Sahin A D. A new formulation for solar irradiation and sunshine duration estimation. International Journal of Energy Research, 2007, 31(2): 109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sansoni P, Fontani D, Francini F, et al. Optical collection efficiency and orientation of a solar trough medium-power plant installed in Italy. Renewable Energy, 2011, 36(9): 2341–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarver T, Al-Qaraghuli A, Kazmerski L L. A comprehensive review of the impact of dust on the use of solar energy: history, investigations, results, literature, and mitigation approaches. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2013, 22: 698–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sayyah A, Horenstein M N, Mazumder M K. Energy yield loss caused by dust deposition on photovoltaic panels. Solar Energy, 2014, 107: 576–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erdenedavaa P, Rosato A, Adiyabat A, et al. Model analysis of solar thermal system with the effect of dust deposition on the collectors. Energies, 2018, 11(7): 1795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Caron J R, Littmann B. Direct monitoring of energy lost due to soiling on first solar modules in California. IEEE Journal of Photovoltaics, 2013, 3(1): 336–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mani M, Pillai R. Impact of dust on solar photovoltaic (PV) performance: research status, challenges and recommendations. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(9): 3124–3131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hegazy A A. Effect of dust accumulation on solar transmittance through glass covers of plate-type collectors. Renewable Energy, 2001, 22(4): 525–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed O K, Mohammed Z A. Dust effect on the performance of the hybrid PV/thermal collector. Thermal Science and Engineering Progress, 2017, 3: 114–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu H, Zhao W. CFD prediction of dust pollution and impact on an isolated groundmounted solar photovoltaic system. Renewable Energy, 2019, 131: 829–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lu H, Lu L, Wang Y. Numerical investigation of dust pollution on a solar photovoltaic (PV) system mounted on an isolated building. Applied Energy, 2016, 180: 27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu H, Zhang L. Numerical study of dry deposition of monodisperse and polydisperse dust on building-mounted solar photovoltaic panels with different roof inclinations. Solar Energy, 2018, 176: 535–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khadhim I J, Mehdi I J, Muhsson I M. Periodic cleaning effect on the output power of solar panels. In: 2nd Scientific Conference, Karbala University, 2014

  18. Chesnutt J, Ashkanani H, Guo B, et al. Simulation of microscale particle interactions for optimization of an electrodynamic dust shield to clean desert dust from solar panels. Solar Energy, 2017, 155: 1197–1207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu X, Yue S, Lu L, et al. Study on dust deposition mechanics on solar mirrors in a solar power plant. Energies, 2019, 12(23): 4550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chu K W, Wang B, Xu D L, et al. CFD-DEM simulation of the gas-solid flow in a cyclone separator. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(5): 834–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sae-Heng S, Swasdisevi T, Amornkitbamrung M. Investigation of temperature distribution and heat transfer in fluidized bed using a combined CFD-DEM model. Drying Technology, 2011, 29(6): 697–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsuji Y, Kawaguchi T, Tanaka T. Discrete particle simulation of two-dimensional fluidized bed. Powder Technology, 1993, 77(1): 79–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu B H, Yu A B. Numerical simulation of the gas-solid flow in a fluidized bed by combining discrete particle method with computational fluid dynamics. Chemical Engineering Science, 1997, 52(16): 2785–2809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu R R, Zhu W B, Xing L C, et al. DEM simulation on particle mixing in dry and wet particles spouted bed. Powder Technology, 2011, 210(1): 73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikami T, Kamiya H, Horio M. Numerical simulation of cohesive powder behavior in a fluidized bed. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998, 53(10): 1927–1940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hotta K, Takeda K, Iinoya K. The capillary binding force of a liquid bridge. Powder Technology, 1974, 10(4–5): 231–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pitois O, Moucheront P, Chateau X. Liquid bridge between two moving spheres: an experimental study of viscosity effects. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 2000, 231(1): 26–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liu X, Yue S, Lu L, et al. Study on single-particle residence time of impulse, symmetric and asymmetric coaxial impinging streams. Powder Technology, 2019, 342: 118–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Behrens S H, Grier D G. The charge of glass and silica surfaces. Journal of Chemical Physics, 2001, 115(14): 6716–6721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Bowling R A. An analysis of particle adhesion on semiconductor surfaces. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1985, 132(9): 2208–2214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dzyaloshinskii I E, Lifshitz E M, Pitaevskii L P. The general theory of van der Waals forces. Advances in Physics, 1961, 10(38): 165–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Liu X, Yue S, Lu L, et al. Simulations of an asymmetric gas-solid two-phase impinging stream reactor. Numerical Heat Transfer Part A, 2018, 74(2): 1032–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zhong W Q, Xiong Y Q, Yuan Z L, et al. DEM simulation of gassolid flow behaviors in spout-fluid bed. Chemical Engineering Science, 2006, 61(5): 1571–1584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meng G S. Research on mechanism of dust particle adhesion and removal from solar panel surface in desert area. Dissertation for the Master’s Degree. Xining: Qinghai University, 2015 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Xu H B. Study on spouting and fluidization characteristics of wet particles. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2017 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Qasem H, Betts T R, Müllejans H, et al. Dust-induced shading on photovoltaic modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2014, 22(2): 218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51975235).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianlan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Zhao, X., Lu, L. et al. Influence mechanism of dynamic and static liquid bridge forces on particle deposition behaviors in solar photovoltaic mirrors. Front. Energy 15, 499–512 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0742-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-021-0742-3

Keywords

Navigation