Abstract
In this study, it is aimed to determine the energy generation capability of the designed and manufactured thermoelectric system when mounted on the two-axis solar tracking system. Thus, it was possible to compare the results obtained from current study with previous study. The system used in previous study was comprised of a thermoelectric generator (TEG) for energy conversion, a linear Fresnel lens for concentrating solar rays, and a one-axis tracking system to increase the electrical and thermal efficiency of the system. In this study, a dual-axis (two-axis) tracking system was used as a tracking system to examine the change in thermal and electrical efficiency. Therefore, experimental measurements were performed again using both two-axis and one-axis solar tracking systems on 16th October 2019 and 17th October 2019, respectively, at the location which falls at 41°14′ N and 36°26′ E. Additionally, the heat transfer and electricity generation performance of TEG was theoretically analyzed using CFD model. For this purpose, a numerical model consisting TEG with heat sink was developed. It was observed that the model data obtained and the experimental data were in good agreement. The values of parameters such as temperature, solar radiation, wind speed and TEG open circuit voltage were measured instantaneously during the measurements. The maximum open circuit voltages obtained is 1.02 and 1.13 V for one-axis and dual-axis systems, respectively. The solar radiation values were measured as 464 and 472 \(\mathrm{W}/{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\), respectively when the maximum open circuit voltages value is obtained. The duration for measurements was kept about 15 min so that the average values of these parameters were used in calculations. Thus, the values of maximum output power \(\left({\mathrm{P}}_{\mathrm{maxout}}\right)\), electrical efficiency \(\left({\upeta }_{\mathrm{e}}\right)\) and Seebeck coefficient \(\left( {\alpha _{{{\text{TEG}}}} } \right)\) were calculated and given in the paper.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- \({c}_{p}\) :
-
Specific heat capacity, \(\mathrm{J}/(\mathrm{kg}\cdot \mathrm{K})\)
- ce :
-
Ceramic plates
- co :
-
Copper electrodes
- E :
-
Electric field intensity vector, \(\mathrm{mV}/{\mathrm{mm}}^{2}\)
- h :
-
Hot side
- \(I\) :
-
Electric current, mA
- \({I}_{si}\) :
-
Solar irradiation, \(\mathrm{W}/{\mathrm{m}}^{2}\)
- J :
-
Current density vector, \(\mathrm{mA}/{\mathrm{mm}}^{2}\)
- L :
-
Load resistance
- n :
-
N-type thermoelement
- Nu :
-
Nusselt number
- p :
-
P-type thermoelement
- \({P}_{maxout}\) :
-
Maximum output power, \(\mathrm{W}\)
- \({P}_{in}\) :
-
Incident power, \(\mathrm{W}\)
- \(Q\) :
-
Heat, \(\mathrm{W}\)
- R :
-
Resistance, \(\Omega\)
- \({R}_{int}\) :
-
Internal resistance of the TE module, \(\Omega\)
- \({R}_{T}\) :
-
Thermal resistance of the used TE module, \({^\circ{\rm C} }/\mathrm{W}\)
- \({R}_{L}\) :
-
Load resistance, \(\Omega\)
- T :
-
Temperature, \(\mathrm{K}\)
- \(\Delta T\) :
-
Temperature difference between hot side and cold side of used TEG module, ℃
- \({T}_{c}\) :
-
Thermoelectric cold side temperature, ℃
- \({T}_{h}\) :
-
Thermoelectric hot side temperature, ℃
- TE :
-
Thermoelectric
- \({V}_{oc}\) :
-
Open circuit voltage, \(\mathrm{V}\)
- \(\alpha\) :
-
Seebeck coefficient, \(\upmu {\rm V}/\mathrm{K}\)
- \({\alpha }_{TEG}\) :
-
Effective Seebeck coefficient of the TEG module
- η :
-
Efficiency
- \({\eta }_{e}\) :
-
Electrical efficiency, %
- λ :
-
Thermal conductivity, \(\mathrm{W}/(\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{K})\)
- \(\mu\) :
-
Dynamic viscosity, \(\mathrm{kg}/(\mathrm{m}\cdot \mathrm{s})\)
- \(\rho\) :
-
Density, \(\mathrm{kg}/{\mathrm{m}}^{3}\)
- \(\varphi\) :
-
Electric potential, \(\mathrm{mV}\)
- \({\sigma }^{-1}\) :
-
Electrical resistivity, \(\Omega \cdot \mathrm{m}\)
References
Bhandari, B., Lee, K. T., Lee, G. Y., Cho, Y. M., & Ahn, S. H. (2015). Optimization of hybrid renewable energy power systems: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-015-0013-z.
Ha, K., Truong, H. V. A., Dang, T. D., & Ahn, K. K. (2021). Recent control technologies for floating offshore wind energy system: A review. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00269-5.
Ebhota, W. S., & Jen, T. C. (2020). Fossil fuels environmental challenges and the role of solar photovoltaic technology advances in fast tracking hybrid renewable energy system. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00101-9.
Idoko, L., Anaya-Lara, O., & McDonald, A. (2018). Enhancing PV modules efficiency and power output using multi-concept cooling technique. Energy Reports. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.05.004.
Castro, L. M., Rodríguez-Rodrízguez, J. R., & Martin-del-Campo, C. (2020). Modelling of PV systems as distributed energy resources for steady-state power flow studies. Electrical Power and Energy Systems. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.105505.
Rowe, D. M. (1995). Handbook of thermoelectrics. . CRC Press.
Choi, H. J., Cho, C., Woo, S., Lee, J. Y., Yoo, Y. E., Jeon, M., Kim, G. H., Je, T. J., & Jeon, E. C. (2020). Manufacturing of compound parabolic concentrator devices using an ultra-fine planing method for enhancing efficiency of a solar cell. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-020-00287-3.
Huang, R., Zhang, X. Q., Ng, B. P., Kumar, A. S., & Liu, K. (2021). Roll-to-roll embossing of optical radial fresnel lenses on polymer film for concentrator photovoltaics: A feasibility study. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-019-00166-6.
Mu, L., Xu, X., Williams, T., Debroux, C., Gomez, R. C., Park, Y. H., Wang, H., Kota, K., Xu, P., & Kuravi, S. (2019). Enhancing the performance of a single-basin single-slope solar still by using Fresnel lens: Experimental study. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118094.
Meng, J., Song, P. P., Wei, M. S., Tian, G. H., Zhao, M., Zheng, H. F., & Hu, G. D. (2019). Experimental study of a micro-scale solar organic Rankine cycle system based on compound cylindrical Fresnel lens solar concentrator. Science Chin Technological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11431-019-9562-4.
Willars-Rodríguez, F. J., Chavez-Urbiola, E. A., Vorobiev, P., & Vorobiev, Y. V. (2017). Investigation of solar hybrid system with concentrating Fresnel lens, photovoltaic and thermoelectric generators. International Journal of Energy Research, 41, 377–388.
Perini, S., Tonnellier, X., King, P., & Sansom, C. (2017). Theoretical and experimental analysis of an innovative dual-axis tracking linear Fresnel lenses concentrated solar thermal collector. Solar Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.06.010.
Nia, M. H., Nejad, A. A., Goudarzi, A. M., Valizadeh, M., & Samadian, P. (2014). Cogeneration solar system using thermoelectric module and Fresnel lens. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.041.
Gupta, M., Dubey, A. K., Kumar, C., & Mehta, D. S. (2019). Solar concentrator based multipurpose sunlight harvesting system without tracking. OSA Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1364/OSAC.2.000667.
Korecko, J., Jirka, V., Sourek, B., & Cerveny, J. (2010). Module greenhouse with high efficiency of transformation of solar energy, utilizing active and passive glass optical rasters. Solar Energy, 84, 1794–1808.
Tripanagnostopoulos, Y., Siabekou, Ch., & Tonui, J. K. (2007). The Fresnel lens concept for solar control of buildings. Solar Energy, 81, 661–675.
Miller, D. C., & Kurtz, S. R. (2011). Durability of Fresnel lenses: A review specific to the concentrating photovoltaic application. Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, 95, 2037–2068.
Sonneveld, P. J., Swinkels, G. L. A. M., van Tuijl, B. A. J., Janssen, H. J. J., Campen, J., & Bot, G. P. A. (2011). Performance of a concentrated photovoltaic energy system with static linear Fresnel lenses. Solar Energy, 85, 432–442.
Ahmadi, M. H., Ghazvini, M., Sadeghzadeh, M., Nazari, M. A., Kumar, R., Naeimi, A., & Ming, T. (2018). Solar power technology for electricity generation: A critical review. Energy Science and Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.239.
Özdemir, A. E., Köysal, Y., Özbaş, E., & Atalay, T. (2015). The experimental design of solar heating thermoelectric generator with wind cooling chimney. Energy Conversion and Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.03.108.
Atalay, T., Köysal, Y., Özdemir, A. E., & Özbaş, E. (2018). Evaluation of energy efficiency of thermoelectric generator with two-phase thermo-syphon heat pipes and nano-particle fluids. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing-Green Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-018-0001-1.
Köysal, Y., Özdemir, A. E., & Atalay, T. (2018). Experimental and modeling study on solar system using linear Fresnel lens and thermoelectric module. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039777.
Köysal, Y. (2019). Performance analysis on solar concentrating thermoelectric generator coupled with heat sink. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-019-00060-w.
Mahmouudinezhad, S., Rezaniakolaei, A., & Rosendahl, L. A. (2019). Numerical parametric study on the performance of CPV–TEG hybrid system. Energy Procedia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.131.
Nayak, R. K., Ray, S., Sahoo, S. S., & Satapathy, P. K. (2019). Effect of angle of attack and wind direction on limiting input heat flux for solar assisted thermoelectric power generator with plate fin heat sink. Solar Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.05.010.
Date, A., Date, A., Dixon, C., Singh, R., & Akbarzadeh, A. (2015). Theoretical and experimental estimation of limiting input heat flux for thermoelectric power generators with passive cooling. Solar Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.10.043.
Eldesoukey, A., & Hassan, H. (2019). 3D model of thermoelectric generator (TEG) case study: Effect of flow regime on the TEG performance. Energy Conversion and Management, 180, 231–239.
Mahmoudinezhad, S., Rezania, A., & Rosendahl, L. A. (2018). Behavior of hybrid concentrated photovoltaic-thermoelectric generator under variable solar radiation. Energy Conversion and Management, 164, 443–452.
Darkwa, J., Calautit, J., Du, D., & Kokogianakis, G. A. (2019). Numerical and experimental analysis of an integrated TEG–PCM power enhancement system for photovoltaic cells. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.04.147.
Hazama, H., Masuoka, Y., Suzumura, A., Matsubara, M., Tajima, S., & Asahi, R. (2018). Cylindrical thermoelectric generator with water heating system for high solar energy conversion efficiency. Applied Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.06.015.
Karthick, K., Suresh, S., Joy, G. C., & Dhanuskodi, R. (2019). Experimental investigation of solar reversible power generation in thermoelectric generator (TEG) using thermal energy storage. Energy for Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2018.11.002.
Pourkiaei, S. M., Ahmadi, M. H., Sadeghzadeh, M., Moosavi, M., Pourfayaz, F., Chen, L., Yazdi, M. A. P., & Kumar, R. (2019). Thermoelectric cooler and thermoelectric generator devices: A review of present and potential applications, modeling and materials. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.179.
Yılmaz, M. (2017). Improving tracking efficiency of two axis tracking systems. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences, 7(1/2), 56–62.
Sidek, M. H. M., Azis, N., Hasan, W. Z. W., Ab Kadir, M. Z. A., Shafie, S., & Radzi, M. A. M. (2017). Automated positioning dual-axis solar tracking system with precision elevation and azimuth angle control. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.001.
Zhang, P., Zhou, G., Zhu, Z., Li, W., & Cai, Z. (2013). Numerical study on the properties of an active sun tracker for solar street light. Mechatronics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2013.08.007.
Ansys Fluent Tutorial Guide. (2017). Ansys Inc, Canonsburg, PA.
Luo, D., Wang, R., & Yu, W. (2019). Comparison and parametric study of two theoretical modeling approaches based on an air-to-water thermoelectric generator system. Journal of Power Sources. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227069.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors confirm that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Atalay, T., Yakut, Y., Köysal, Y. et al. Experimental and Thermal Analysis of Solar Thermoelectric System Performance Incorporated with Solar Tracker. Int. J. of Precis. Eng. and Manuf.-Green Tech. 9, 587–602 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00341-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40684-021-00341-8