Skip to main content
Log in

The US Peace Corps as a public diplomacy strategy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Place Branding and Public Diplomacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The US Peace Corps has been operating programs globally since 1961 with an enduring mission toward international friendship and world peace structured around clear goals that emphasize cross-cultural learning objectives. Little is known about whether the program has a positive effect on US soft power abroad and, if so, the magnitude of that influence. This paper examines the impact of Peace Corps programming in foreign states on US public diplomacy objectives. The primary research aims to understand the relationship between indicators of a foreign population’s favorability toward the US and Peace Corps participation to determine the effects of program size as well as program presence and removal. Pew Research Center US favorability scores were analyzed alongside Peace Corps volunteer cohort sizes between years 2004 and 2016 among 20 sample countries. The findings indicate a positive and statistically significant relationship between the size of the Peace Corps volunteer cohort and US favorability. Each additional volunteer increases favorability toward the US by 0.12 points. The results are robust to the inclusion of additional soft power factors. Supplementary findings illustrate that the removal of Peace Corps programming may adversely impact favorability toward the US, establishing the negative soft power effect of ceasing participation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Copyright 2013 by SAGE Publications

Fig. 2

Copyright 2017 by Peter Lang Publishing

Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The term graduation is used within the agency to imply a program closing as a result of meeting all intended goals.

  2. Data were gathered by The Economist Intelligence Unit.

  3. Democracy index scores are unique to each sample country and the year measured. When conducting OLS regression, data were entered for each year. For those years without a recorded score (2007 and 2009), years prior and after were averaged to generate a result. OLS regression includes a placeholder for year 2005 as based on the 2006 score.

  4. Le Centre d’études prospectives et d’informations internationals (CEPII) is a French research center specifically focusing on international economics (CEPII, n.d.).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew T. Palmer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

See Table 4.

Table 4 Cohort method country and favorability score sample

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palmer, M.T., Bempong Nyantakyi, E. & Fullerton, J.A. The US Peace Corps as a public diplomacy strategy. Place Brand Public Dipl 19, 15–29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00205-7

Download citation

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-021-00205-7

Navigation