Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Boards of directors and corporate sustainability performance: evidence from the emerging East Asian markets

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Disclosure and Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study examines the influence of board structure on the economic, environmental, and social dimensions of corporate sustainability performance from the perspective of agency theory and stakeholder theory. If a firm’s commitment to sustainable development is to satisfy environmental and social needs and to develop long-term relationships with all stakeholders for sustainable business, we expect that a board of directors would demonstrate their commitment by enhancing all different dimensions of sustainability. Based on a panel analysis of data from the emerging East Asian markets between 2011 and 2016, we identify which board attributes promote corporate sustainability performance and also prove that some attributes fit well with some particular sustainability dimensions. The findings have important implications by identifying the role of corporate boards in sustainability performance and providing a foundation for their efforts to enhance sustainable development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

Thomson Reuters.

Code availability

Stata software.

References

  • Amran, A., S.P. Lee, and S.S. Devi. 2014. The influence of governance structure and strategic corporate social responsibility toward sustainability reporting quality. Business Strategy and the Environment 23(4): 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aras, G., and D. Crowther. 2008. Governance and sustainability: An investigation into the relationship between corporate governance and corporate sustainability. Management Decision 46(3): 433–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiach, T., D. Lee, D. Nelson, and J. Walker. 2010. The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance 50(1): 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braam, G., and R. Peeters. 2018. Corporate sustainability performance and assurance on sustainability reports: Diffusion of accounting practices in the realm of sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 25(2): 164–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branco, M.C., and L.L. Rodrigues. 2008. Factors influencing social responsibility disclosure by Portuguese companies. Journal of Business Ethics 83(4): 685–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, M. C., Watson, J., Woodliff, D. (2014). Corporate governance quality and CSR disclosures. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(1), 59–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., and X. Wang. 2011. Corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance in China: an empirical research from Chinese firms. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society 11(4): 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, B., I. Ioannou, and G. Serafeim. 2014. Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal 35(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S., and A. Ng. 2011. Environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability and price effects on consumer responses. Journal of Business Ethics 104(2): 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, P.M., Y. Li, G.D. Richardson, and F.P. Vasvari. 2011. Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 30(2): 122–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowen, S.S., L.B. Ferreri, and L.D. Parker. 1987. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society 12(2): 111–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Villiers, C., V. Naiker, and C.J. Van Staden. 2011. The effect of board characteristics on firm environmental performance. Journal of Management 37(6): 1636–1663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drempetic, S., C. Klein, and B. Zwergel. 2019. The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics 167: 333–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Eding, E., and B. Scholtens. 2017. Corporate social responsibility and shareholder proposals. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 24(6): 648–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliwa, Y., A. Aboud, and A. Saleh. 2019. ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, In Press.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. 1998. Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Environmental Quality Management 8(1): 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E.F., and M.C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. The journal of law and Economics 26(2): 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C., and C. Foss. 2004. Business ethics: Corporate responses to scandal. Corporate Reputation Review 7(3): 284–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes, D.P., and F.J. Milliken. 1999. Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review 24(3): 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galbreath, J. 2018. Do boards of directors influence corporate sustainable development? An attention-based analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment 27(6): 742–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graafland, J., and N. Noorderhaven. 2020. Culture and institutions: How economic freedom and long-term orientation interactively influence corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies 51: 1034–1043.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W.H. 2000. Econometric analysis. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., F. Figge, J. Pinkse, and L. Preuss. 2010. Trade-offs in corporate sustainability: you can’t have your cake and eat it. Business Strategy and the Environment 19(4): 217–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R.M., and T.E. Cooke. 2002. Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysian corporations. Abacus 38(3): 317–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, N., U. Rigoni, and R.P. Orij. 2018. Corporate governance and sustainability performance: Analysis of triple bottom line performance. Journal of Business Ethics 149(2): 411–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development. 1992. Business Strategy for Sustainable Development. https://www.iisd.org/business/pdf/business_strategy.pdf. Accessed August 12, 2018.

  • Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(4): 305–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jizi, M. 2017. The influence of board composition on sustainable development disclosure. Business Strategy and the Environment 26(5): 640–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, K., and L.W. Senbet. 1998. Corporate governance and board effectiveness. Journal of Banking & Finance 22(4): 371–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. 2008. Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment 17(1): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., and J. Moon. 2008. “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review 33(2): 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mervelskemper, L., and D. Streit. 2017. Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: Is integrated reporting keeping its promise? Business Strategy and the Environment 26(4): 536–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michelon, G., and A. Parbonetti. 2012. The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management and Governance 16(3): 477–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naciti, V. 2019. Corporate governance and board of directors: the effect of a board composition on firm sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production 237: 117727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, G.J. 2012. Global business ethical perspectives on capitalism, finance and corporate responsibility: the impact of the global financial crisis of 2008. Asian Journal of Business Ethics 1(1): 63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shahab, Y., and C. Ye. 2018. Corporate social responsibility disclosure and corporate governance: empirical insights on neo-institutional framework from China. International Journal of Disclosure and Governance 15(2): 87–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J.N., N.K. Sethia, and S. Srinivas. 2011. Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 39(1): 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M.C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Berghe, L.A., and A. Levrau. 2004. Evaluating boards of directors: What constitutes a good corporate board? Corporate Governance: An International Review 12(4): 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Danang, University of Economics, 71 Ngu Hanh Son, Danang, Vietnam

    Linh-TX Nguyen & Anh N.P. Doan

  2. Department of Economics, Ghent University, Sint-Pietersplein 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium

    Linh-TX Nguyen & Michael Frömmel

Authors
  1. Linh-TX Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anh N.P. Doan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael Frömmel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linh-TX Nguyen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nguyen, LT., Doan, A. & Frömmel, M. Boards of directors and corporate sustainability performance: evidence from the emerging East Asian markets. Int J Discl Gov 18, 95–105 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00102-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41310-020-00102-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation