Abstract
The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the mediating effects of second language (L2) motivation, willingness to communicate (WTC), and international posture on the relationship between L2 Self-perceived communication competence (SPCC) and L2 frequency of communication (L2 FC) in online informal English learning contexts among tertiary students in Malaysia. The predictor variables were drawn from Gardner’s (1985) socio-educational model of language learning and MacIntyre and Charos’ (1996) WTC model and adapted to examine the frequency of communication in online contexts. A total of 296 valid responses were collected from university students in Malaysia. The data were collected using online survey and were analysed through partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) technique. The findings suggested that higher level of L2 SPCC would lead to more frequent L2 use in online contexts. Furthermore, the mediating roles of L2 WTC and international posture were found to be statistically significant. However, the mediating effect of L2 motivation on the relationship between L2 SPCC and communication frequency was not supported in this study. Implications of the research findings for understanding the relationship among the study’s variables are also discussed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker, S. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2000). The role of gender and immersion in communication and second language orientations. Language Learning, 50(2), 311–341.
Cameron, L., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (2007). Complex systems and applied linguistics. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 226–239.
Cha, J. S., & Kim, T. Y. (2013). Effects of English-learning motivation and language anxiety of the elementary school students on willingness to communicate in English and English speaking. Primary English Education, 19(1), 271–294.
Chichon, J. (2019). Factors influencing overseas learners’ Willingness to Communicate (WTC) on a pre-sessional programme at a UK university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 39, 87–96.
Clément, R., & Gardner, R. C. (2001). Second language mastery. The New Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, 2, 489–504.
de Saint Léger, D., & Storch, N. (2009). Learners’ perceptions and attitudes: Implications for willingness to communicate in an L2 classroom. System, 37(2), 269–285.
Dornyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 Learning Experience, the Cinderella of the L2 Motivational Self System. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 19–30.
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and Challenges in Language Learning Motivation. Routledge.
Dörnyei, Z., & A1‐Hoorie, A. L. I. H. (2017). The motivational foundation of learning languages other than Global English: Theoretical issues and research directions. The Modern Language Journal, 101(3), 455–468.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(3), 1–22.
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-12-2017-0515
Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. Edward Arnold.
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and Motivation in Second-Language Learning. ERIC.
Geisser, S. (1974). A predictive approach to the random effect model. Biometrika, 61(1), 101–107.
Grant, S. (2018). Effects of intensive EFL immersion programmes on willingness to communicate. The Language Learning Journal, 1–12.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review.
Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017a). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
Hair Jr, Joe F, Howard, M. C., & Nitzl, C. (2020). Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research, 109, 101–110.
Hair Jr, Joseph F, Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Gudergan, S. P. (2017b). Advanced issues in partial least squares structural equation modeling. Sage Publications.
Hashimoto, Y. (2002). Motivation and willingness to communicate as predictors of reported L2 use: The Japanese ESL context. Second Language Studies, 20(2), 29–70.
Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.
He, T., Huang, Q., Yu, X., & Li, S. (2020). Exploring students’ digital informal learning: the roles of digital competence and DTPB factors. Behaviour & Information Technology, 1–11.
Henseler, J. (2017). Partial least squares path modeling. In Advanced methods for modeling markets (pp. 361–381). Springer.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135.
Khajavy, G. H., Ghonsooly, B., Hosseini Fatemi, A., & Choi, C. W. (2016). Willingness to communicate in English: A microsystem model in the Iranian EFL classroom context. Tesol Quarterly, 50(1), 154–180.
Knell, E., & Chi, Y. (2012). The roles of motivation, affective attitudes, and willingness to communicate among Chinese students in early English immersion programs. International Education, 41(2), 5.
Kong, J. H., Han, J. E., Kim, S., Park, H., Kim, Y. S., & Park, H. (2018). L2 Motivational Self System, international posture and competitiveness of Korean CTL and LCTL college learners: A structural equation modeling approach. System, 72, 178–189.
Kyei-Blankson, L., Iyer, K. S., & Subramanian, L. (2016). Social networking sites: College students’ patterns of use and concerns for privacy and trust by gender, ethnicity, and employment status. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 12(4), 62–75.
Lee, C., Yeung, A. S., & Cheung, K. W. (2019). Learner perceptions versus technology usage: A study of adolescent English learners in Hong Kong secondary schools. Computers & Education, 133, 13–26.
Lee, J. H. (2018). The effects of short-term study abroad on L2 anxiety, international posture, and L2 willingness to communicate. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 39(8), 703–714.
Lee, J. S., & Hsieh, J. C. (2019). Affective variables and willingness to communicate of EFL learners in in-class, out-of-class, and digital contexts. System, 82, 63–73.
Lee, J. S., & Lee, K. (2019). Affective factors, virtual intercultural experiences, and L2 willingness to communicate in in-class, out-of-class, and digital settings. Language Teaching Research, 1–21.
Lin, Y.-T. (2019). Taiwanese EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate in English in the Classroom: Impacts of Personality, Affect, Motivation, and Communication Confidence. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 101–113.
MacIntyre, P. D. (1994). Variables underlying willingness to communicate: A causal analysis. Communication Research Reports, 11(2), 135–142.
MacIntyre, P. D. (2002). Motivation, anxiety and emotion in second language acquisition. Individual Differences and Instructed Language Learning, 2, 45–68.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Charos, C. (1996). Personality, attitudes, and affect as predictors of second language communication. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 15(1), 3–26.
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a L2: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545–562.
Marton, E., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2020). Feedback from L1 users–a potential facilitator of L2 use. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(5), 457–470.
Meyers, E. M., Erickson, I., & Small, R. V. (2013). Digital literacy and informal learning environments: an introduction. Learning, Media and Technology, 38(4), 355–367.
Munezane, Y. (2013). Attitudes, affect and ideal L2 self as predictors of willingness to communicate. EUROSLA Yearbook, 13(1), 176–198
Munezane, Y. (2016). Motivation, ideal self and willingness to communicate as the predictors of observed L2 use in the classroom. EUROSLA Yearbook, 16(1), 85–115.
Mystkowska-Wiertelak, A., & Pawlak, M. (2016). Designing a tool for measuring the interrelationships between L2 WTC, confidence, beliefs, motivation, and context. In Classroom-oriented research (pp. 19–37). Springer.
Peng, J. E. (2015). L2 motivational self system, attitudes, and affect as predictors of L2 WTC: An imagined community perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 24(2), 433–443.
Peng, J., & Woodrow, L. (2010). Willingness to communicate in English: A model in the Chinese EFL classroom context. Language Learning, 60(4), 834–876.
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731.
Pyun, D. O., Kim, J. S., Cho, H. Y., & Lee, J. H. (2014). Impact of affective variables on Korean as a foreign language learners’ oral achievement. System, 47, 53–63.
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2015). SmartPLS 3. In Boenningstedt: SmartPLS GmbH. http://www.smartpls.com
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2017). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. Handbook of Market Research, 26, 1–40.
Shimizu, S. (2017). Japanese University Students’ L2 Communication Frequency in Positive Classroom Climate. Temple University.
Stone, M. (1974). Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 36(2), 111–133.
Tabira, Y., & Goto, S. (2017). Impact of International Postures on Willingness to Communicate During International Exchanges Using Skype. Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 2017, 1–5.
Urbach, N., & Ahlemann, F. (2010). Structural equation modeling in information systems research using partial least squares. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 11(2), 5–40.
Wold, H. (1975). Path models with latent variables: The NIPALS approach. In Quantitative sociology (pp. 307–357). Elsevier.
Wood, D. (2016). Willingness to communicate and second language speech fluency: An idiodynamic investigation. System, 60, 11–28.
Yashima, T. (2002). Willingness to communicate in a second language: The Japanese EFL context. The Modern Language Journal, 86(1), 54–66.
Yashima, T. (2009). International posture and the ideal L2 self in the Japanese EFL context. Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self, 86(1), 144–163.
Yashima, T., Zenuk-Nishide, L., & Shimizu, K. (2004). The influence of attitudes and affect on willingness to communicate and second language communication. Language Learning, 54(1), 119–152.
Zhao, X., Lynch Jr, J. G., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206.
Zhou, L., Xi, Y., & Lochtman, K. (2020). The relationship between second language competence and willingness to communicate: the moderating effect of foreign language anxiety. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 1–15.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1: Survey instrument
Appendix 1: Survey instrument
Willingness to communicate (Lee & Hsieh, 2019)
I am willing to.
-
1. Talk with non-native speakers of English in online contexts.
-
2. Talk with native speakers of English in online contexts.
-
3. Comments in English on other people’s posts/pictures in online contexts
-
4. Talk to other users of English while playing online games.
-
5. Initiate communication in English with other people from different countries who I met in online contexts.
-
6. In general, I believe the opportunity to interact with other L2 learners in online contexts would increase my willingness to communicate in English.
Motivation (Gardner, 1985; Shimizu, 2017)
-
1. I have a great desire to communicate with others using online contexts.
-
2. I would like to be surrounded by as much English as possible when I am online.
-
3. If I had the opportunity to communicate in English in online contexts, I would speak/write English as much as possible.
-
4. I put more effort into learning English using online contexts.
-
5. If English were not taught at school, I would study on my own using online contexts.
-
6. I really enjoy learning English in online contexts.
-
7. I find learning English through online contexts is really interesting.
-
8. I’m always looking forward to learning more English through online contexts.
International posture (Mystkowska-Wiertelak & Pawlak, 2016; Yashima, 2009)
When I am online.
-
1. I want to make friends with people from other countries.
-
2. I try to use every opportunity to speak in English with foreigners (people who do not speak the same language as you do)
-
3. I often read and watch the news, short films, clips, etc., about life/events in other countries.
-
4. I sometimes feel like a member of an international community of people who want to share ideas and opinions.
-
5. I share my ideas about international issues such as sports, cultural, social, political, or economic events or phenomena in online platforms with other users.
-
6. The online environment is a response to my strong interest in international affairs.
L2 Self-perceived communication competence (MacIntyre & Charos, 1996; Pyun et al., 2014)
In online environments, I am more confident that.
-
1. I can talk with other L2 learners from different countries.
-
2. I can read and understand a comment posted in English.
-
3. I can post in English without feeling embarrassed about my English.
-
4. I can use the correct vocabulary when posting in English.
-
5. I can use the correct grammar when posting in English.
-
6. I can use the English that I learned to interact with others.
-
7. I can talk about myself in English using sentences.
L2 frequency of communication in online context (Lee et al., 2019)
-
1. I use online contexts to share my views related to my English studies content online (e.g., Facebook, WhatsApp groups, etc.).
-
2. I use online contexts to seek help or support related to my English studies from classmates/friends/strangers (WhatsApp messages, Forum posting, etc.).
-
3. I use online contexts to consults with teachers, L2 learners, or native speakers about issues related to my English studies (e.g., assignments, projects, etc.).
-
4. I use online context to increase my English language communication opportunities.
-
5. I use online context to expand my knowledge of the English language.
-
6. I use online contexts to help myself to increase my ability to interact with other L2 users.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balouchi, S., Samad, A.A. The effect of perceived competence on second language communication frequency: the mediating roles of motivation, willingness to communicate, and international posture. Educ Inf Technol 26, 5917–5937 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10579-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10579-z