Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns (DAMPs) in Plant Innate Immunity: Applying the Danger Model and Evolutionary Perspectives

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Agresti A, Bianchi ME. 2003. HMGB proteins and gene expression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13:2170–78
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Amano Y, Tsubouchi H, Shinohara H, Ogawa M, Matsubayashi Y 2007. Tyrosine-sulfated glycopeptide involved in cellular proliferation and expansion in Arabidopsis. PNAS 104:4618333–38
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Andersson U, Yang H, Harris H 2018. High-mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1) operates as an alarmin outside as well as inside cells. Semin. Immunol. 38:40–48
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Barbero F, Guglielmotto M, Capuzzo A, Maffei ME. 2016. Extracellular self-DNA (esDNA), but not heterologous plant or insect DNA (etDNA), induces plasma membrane depolarization and calcium signaling in lima bean (Phaseolus lunatus) and maize (Zea mays). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 17:101659
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Bartels S, Boller T. 2015. Quo vadis, Pep? Plant elicitor peptides at the crossroads of immunity, stress, and development. J. Exp. Bot. 66:175183–93
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Benedetti M, Pontiggia D, Raggi S, Cheng Z, Scaloni F et al. 2015. Plant immunity triggered by engineered in vivo release of oligogalacturonides, damage-associated molecular patterns. PNAS 112:175533–38
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Bergey DR, Orozco-Cardenas M, de Moura DS, Ryan CA 1999. A wound- and systemin-inducible polygalacturonase in tomato leaves. PNAS 96:41756–60
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Boller T, Felix G. 2009. A renaissance of elicitors: perception of microbe-associated molecular patterns and danger signals by pattern-recognition receptors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 60:379–406
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Bolouri Moghaddam MR, Van den Ende W. 2012. Sugars and plant innate immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 63:113989–98
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Boutrot F, Zipfel C. 2017. Function, discovery, and exploitation of plant pattern recognition receptors for broad-spectrum disease resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 55:257–86
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Brutus A, Sicilia F, Macone A, Cervone F, De Lorenzo G 2010. A domain swap approach reveals a role of the plant wall–associated kinase 1 (WAK1) as a receptor of oligogalacturonides. PNAS 107:209452–57
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Burnstock G, Verkhratsky A. 2009. Evolutionary origins of the purinergic signalling system. Acta Physiol 195:4415–47
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Buxdorf K, Rubinsky G, Barda O, Burdman S, Aharoni A, Levy M. 2014. The transcription factor SlSHINE3 modulates defense responses in tomato plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 84:137–47
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Camborde L, Raynaud C, Dumas B, Gaulin E. 2019. DNA-damaging effectors: new players in the effector arena. Trends Plant Sci 24:121094–101
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Cao J, Shi F. 2012. Evolution of the RALF gene family in plants: gene duplication and selection patterns. Evol. Bioinform. 8:271–92
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Chassot C, Nawrath C, Métraux J-P. 2007. Cuticular defects lead to full immunity to a major plant pathogen. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 49:6972–80
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Chen Y-L, Fan K-T, Hung S-C, Chen Y-R. 2020. The role of peptides cleaved from protein precursors in eliciting plant stress reactions. New Phytol 225:62267–82
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Chen Y-L, Lee C-Y, Cheng K-T, Chang W-H, Huang R-N et al. 2014. Quantitative peptidomics study reveals that a wound-induced peptide from PR-1 regulates immune signaling in tomato. Plant Cell 26:104135–48
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Chivasa S, Murphy AM, Hamilton JM, Lindsey K, Carr JP, Slabas AR. 2009. Extracellular ATP is a regulator of pathogen defence in plants. Plant J 60:3436–48
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Cho S-H, Nguyen CT, Choi J, Stacey G. 2017. Molecular mechanism of plant recognition of extracellular ATP. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 1051:233–53
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Choi HW, Manohar M, Manosalva P, Tian M, Moreau M, Klessig DF. 2016. Activation of plant innate immunity by extracellular high mobility group box 3 and its inhibition by salicylic acid. PLOS Pathog 12:3e1005518
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Choi HW, Tian M, Song F, Venereau E, Preti A et al. 2015. Aspirin's active metabolite salicylic acid targets high mobility group box 1 to modulate inflammatory responses. Mol. Med. 21:1526–35
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Choi J, Tanaka K, Cao Y, Qi Y, Qiu J et al. 2014. Identification of a plant receptor for extracellular ATP. Science 343:6168290–94
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Claverie J, Balacey S, Lemaître-Guillier C, Brulé D, Chiltz A et al. 2018. The cell wall-derived xyloglucan is a new DAMP triggering plant immunity in Vitis vinifera and Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1725
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Covey PA, Subbaiah CC, Parsons RL, Pearce G, Lay FT et al. 2010. A pollen-specific RALF from tomato that regulates pollen tube elongation. Plant Physiol 153:2703–15
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Cox KL, Meng F, Wilkins KE, Li F, Wang P et al. 2017. TAL effector driven induction of a SWEET gene confers susceptibility to bacterial blight of cotton. Nat. Commun. 8:15588
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Da'dara AA, Bhardwaj R, Skelly PJ. 2014. Schistosome apyrase SmATPDase1, but not SmATPDase2, hydrolyses exogenous ATP and ADP. Purinergic Signal 10:4573–80
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Davidsson P, Broberg M, Kariola T, Sipari N, Pirhonen M, Palva ET. 2017. Short oligogalacturonides induce pathogen resistance-associated gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. BMC Plant Biol 17:19
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    de Azevedo Souza C, Li S, Lin AZ, Boutrot F, Grossmann G et al. 2017. Cellulose-derived oligomers act as damage-associated molecular patterns and trigger defense-like responses. Plant Physiol 173:42383–98
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    de Lima Detoni M, Faria-Pinto P, Quellis LR, Rust NM, Tavares LS et al. 2012. Galls from Calliandra brevipes BENTH (Fabaceae: Mimosoidae): evidence of apyrase activity contribution in a plant–insect interaction. Aust. J. Bot. 60:6559–67
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    De Lorenzo G, Ferrari S, Cervone F, Okun E. 2018. Extracellular DAMPs in plants and mammals: immunity, tissue damage and repair. Trends Immunol 39:11937–50
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Decreux A, Thomas A, Spies B, Brasseur R, Van Cutsem P, Messiaen J. 2006. In vitro characterization of the homogalacturonan-binding domain of the wall-associated kinase WAK1 using site-directed mutagenesis. Phytochemistry 67:111068–79
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Demidchik V, Nichols C, Oliynyk M, Dark A, Glover BJ, Davies JM. 2003. Is ATP a signaling agent in plants?. Plant Physiol 133:2456–61
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Dixit S, Upadhyay SK, Singh H, Sidhu OP, Verma PC, K C 2013. Enhanced methanol production in plants provides broad spectrum insect resistance. PLOS ONE 8:11e79664
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Duran-Flores D, Heil M. 2018. Extracellular self-DNA as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) that triggers self-specific immunity induction in plants. Brain Behav. Immun. 72:78–88
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Fauth M, Schweizer P, Buchala A, Markstädter C, Riederer M et al. 1998. Cutin monomers and surface wax constituents elicit H₂O₂ in conditioned cucumber hypocotyl segments and enhance the activity of other H₂O₂ elicitors. Plant Physiol 117:41373–80
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Forde BG, Roberts MR. 2014. Glutamate receptor-like channels in plants: a role as amino acid sensors in plant defence?. F1000Prime Rep 6:37
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Foresi NP, Laxalt AM, Tonon CV, Casalongue CA, Lamattina L. 2007. Extracellular ATP induces nitric oxide production in tomato cell suspensions. Plant Physiol 145:3589–92
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Fountain SJ, Cao L, Young MT, North RA. 2008. Permeation properties of a P2X receptor in the green algae Ostreococcus tauri. J. Biol. Chem. 283:2215122–26
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Gertsberg I, Hellman V, Fainshtein M, Weil S, Silberberg SD et al. 2004. Intracellular Ca²⁺ regulates the phosphorylation and the dephosphorylation of ciliary proteins via the NO pathway. J. Gen. Physiol. 124:5527–40
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Guiguet A, Dubreuil G, Harris MO, Appel HM, Schultz JC et al. 2016. Shared weapons of blood- and plant-feeding insects: surprising commonalities for manipulating hosts. J. Insect Physiol. 84:4–21
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Gully K, Pelletier S, Guillou M-C, Ferrand M, Aligon S et al. 2019. The SCOOP12 peptide regulates defense response and root elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 70:41349–65
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Hadwiger LA, Chang MM, Parsons MA. 1995. Fusarium solani DNase is a signal for increasing expression of nonhost disease resistance response genes, hypersensitivity, and pisatin production. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 8:6871–79
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Hadwiger LA, Schwochau ME. 1971. Specificity of deoxyribonucleic acid intercalating compounds in the control of phenylalanine ammonia lyase and pisatin levels. Plant Physiol 47:3346–51
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Hadwiger LA, Tanaka K. 2017. Non-host resistance: DNA damage is associated with SA signaling for induction of PR genes and contributes to the growth suppression of a pea pathogen on pea endocarp tissue. Front. Plant Sci. 8:446
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Hadwiger LA, Tanaka K. 2018. DNA damage and chromatin conformation changes confer nonhost resistance: a hypothesis based on effects of anti-cancer agents on plant defense responses. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1056
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Hancock REW, Haney EF, Gill EE. 2016. The immunology of host defence peptides: beyond antimicrobial activity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16:5321–34
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Hander T, Fernández-Fernández ÁD, Kumpf RP, Willems P, Schatowitz H et al. 2019. Damage on plants activates Ca²⁺-dependent metacaspases for release of immunomodulatory peptides. Science 363:6433eaar7486
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Hann CT, Bequette CJ, Dombrowski JE, Stratmann JW. 2014. Methanol and ethanol modulate responses to danger- and microbe-associated molecular patterns. Front. Plant Sci. 5:550
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Haruta M, Sabat G, Stecker K, Minkoff BB, Sussman MR. 2014. A peptide hormone and its receptor protein kinase regulate plant cell expansion. Science 343:6169408–11
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Heil M. 2009. Damaged-self recognition in plant herbivore defence. Trends Plant Sci 14:7356–63
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Heil M, Land WG. 2014. Danger signals: damaged-self recognition across the tree of life. Front. Plant Sci. 5:578
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Hou S, Wang X, Chen D, Yang X, Wang M et al. 2014. The secreted peptide PIP1 amplifies immunity through receptor-like kinase 7. PLOS Pathog 10:9e1004331
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Huang H-J, Cui J-R, Xia X, Chen J, Ye Y-X et al. 2019. Salivary DNase II from Laodelphax striatellus acts as an effector that suppresses plant defence. New Phytol 224:2860–74
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Huffaker A, Dafoe NJ, Schmelz EA. 2011. ZmPep1, an ortholog of Arabidopsis elicitor peptide 1, regulates maize innate immunity and enhances disease resistance. Plant Physiol 155:31325–38
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Huffaker A, Pearce G, Ryan CA 2006. An endogenous peptide signal in Arabidopsis activates components of the innate immune response. PNAS 103:2610098–103
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Huffaker A, Pearce G, Veyrat N, Erb M, Turlings TCJ et al. 2013. Plant elicitor peptides are conserved signals regulating direct and indirect antiherbivore defense. PNAS 110:145707–12
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Igarashi D, Tsuda K, Katagiri F. 2012. The peptide growth factor, phytosulfokine, attenuates pattern-triggered immunity. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 71:2194–204
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Janeway CA. 1992. The immune system evolved to discriminate infectious nonself from noninfectious self. Immunol. Today 13:111–16
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Jeter CR, Tang W, Henaff E, Butterfield T, Roux SJ. 2004. Evidence of a novel cell signaling role for extracellular adenosine triphosphates and diphosphates in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 16:102652–64
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Jewell JB, Sowders JM, He R, Willis MA, Gang DR, Tanaka K. 2019. Extracellular ATP shapes a defense-related transcriptome both independently and along with other defense signaling pathways. Plant Physiol 179:31144–58
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Jewell JB, Tanaka K. 2019. Transcriptomic perspective on extracellular ATP signaling: a few curious trifles. Plant Signal. Behav. 14:111659079
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Johnson JM, Thürich J, Petutschnig EK, Altschmied L, Meichsner D et al. 2018. A poly(A) ribonuclease controls the cellotriose-based interaction between Piriformospora indica and its host Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 176:32496–514
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Johnson R, Ryan CA. 1990. Wound-inducible potato inhibitor II genes: enhancement of expression by sucrose. Plant Mol. Biol. 14:4527–36
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Jones JDG, Dangl JL. 2006. The plant immune system. Nature 444:7117323–29
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Jounai N, Kobiyama K, Takeshita F, Ishii KJ. 2013. Recognition of damage-associated molecular patterns related to nucleic acids during inflammation and vaccination. Front. . Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2:168
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Kadotani N, Akagi A, Takatsuji H, Miwa T, Igarashi D. 2016. Exogenous proteinogenic amino acids induce systemic resistance in rice. BMC Plant Biol 16:60
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Khakh BS, Burnstock G. 2009. The double life of ATP. Sci. Am. 301:684–90–92
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Kohorn BD. 2016. Cell wall-associated kinases and pectin perception. J. Exp. Bot. 67:2489–94
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Kuthanova A, Opatrny Z, Fischer L. 2008. Is internucleosomal DNA fragmentation an indicator of programmed death in plant cells?. J. Exp. Bot. 59:82233–40
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Land W, Schneeberger H, Schleibner S, Illner W-D, Abendroth D et al. 1994. The beneficial effect of human recombinant superoxide dismutase on acute and chronic rejection events in recipients of cadaveric renal transplants. Transplantation 57:2211–17
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Land WG. 2018. Damage-Associated Molecular Patterns in Human Diseases, Vol. 1: Injury-Induced Innate Immune Responses Cham, Switz: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Lehti-Shiu MD, Zou C, Hanada K, Shiu S-H. 2009. Evolutionary history and stress regulation of plant receptor-like kinase/pelle genes. Plant Physiol 150:112–26
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Li F, Wang J, Ma C, Zhao Y, Wang Y et al. 2013. Glutamate receptor-like channel3.3 is involved in mediating glutathione-triggered cytosolic calcium transients, transcriptional changes, and innate immunity responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 162:31497–509
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Li Q, Wang C, Mou Z. 2020. Perception of damaged self in plants. Plant Physiol 182:1545–65
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Li Y, Van den Ende W, Rolland F 2014. Sucrose induction of anthocyanin biosynthesis is mediated by DELLA. Mol. Plant 7:3570–72
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Lori M, van Verk MC, Hander T, Schatowitz H, Klauser D et al. 2015. Evolutionary divergence of the plant elicitor peptides (Peps) and their receptors: interfamily incompatibility of perception but compatibility of downstream signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 66:175315–25
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Manzoor H, Kelloniemi J, Chiltz A, Wendehenne D, Pugin A et al. 2013. Involvement of the glutamate receptor AtGLR3.3 in plant defense signaling and resistance to Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Plant J 76:3466–80
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Matsubayashi Y. 2011. Post-translational modifications in secreted peptide hormones in plants. Plant Cell Physiol 52:15–13
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Matsubayashi Y, Ogawa M, Kihara H, Niwa M, Sakagami Y. 2006. Disruption and overexpression of Arabidopsis phytosulfokine receptor gene affects cellular longevity and potential for growth. Plant Physiol 142:145–53
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Matsubayashi Y, Sakagami Y 1996. Phytosulfokine, sulfated peptides that induce the proliferation of single mesophyll cells of Asparagus officinalis L. PNAS 93:157623–27
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Matzinger P. 1994. Tolerance, danger, and the extended family. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12:991–1045
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Matzinger P. 2002. The danger model: a renewed sense of self. Science 296:5566301–5
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    McGurl B, Pearce G, Orozco-Cardenas M, Ryan CA. 1992. Structure, expression, and antisense inhibition of the systemin precursor gene. Science 255:50511570–73
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Moroz N, Fritch KR, Marcec MJ, Tripathi D, Smertenko A, Tanaka K. 2017. Extracellular alkalinization as a defense response in potato cells. Front. Plant Sci. 8:32
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Moroz N, Huffaker A, Tanaka K. 2017. Extracellular alkalinization assay for the detection of early defense response: extracellular alkalinization assay. Curr. Protoc. Plant Biol. 2:210–20
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Mosher S, Seybold H, Rodriguez P, Stahl M, Davies KA et al. 2013. The tyrosine-sulfated peptide receptors PSKR1 and PSY1R modify the immunity of Arabidopsis to biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens in an antagonistic manner. Plant J 73:3469–82
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Motose H, Iwamoto K, Endo S, Demura T, Sakagami Y et al. 2009. Involvement of phytosulfokine in the attenuation of stress response during the transdifferentiation of zinnia mesophyll cells into tracheary elements. Plant Physiol 150:1437–47
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Mousavi SAR, Chauvin A, Pascaud F, Kellenberger S, Farmer EE. 2013. GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR-LIKE genes mediate leaf-to-leaf wound signalling. Nature 500:7463422–26
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Murphy E, De Smet I. 2014. Understanding the RALF family: a tale of many species. Trends Plant Sci 19:10664–71
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Narváez-Vásquez J, Ryan CA 2002. The systemin precursor gene regulates both defensive and developmental genes in Solanum tuberosum. PNAS 99:2415818–21
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Nizam S, Qiang X, Wawra S, Nostadt R, Getzke F et al. 2019. Serendipita indica E5′NT modulates extracellular nucleotide levels in the plant apoplast and affects fungal colonization. EMBO Rep 20:2e47430
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Park H-J, Wang W, Curlango-Rivera G, Xiong Z, Lin Z et al. 2019. A DNase from a fungal phytopathogen is a virulence factor likely deployed as counter defense against host-secreted extracellular DNA. mBio 10:2e02805–18
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Pearce G. 2011. Systemin, hydroxyproline-rich systemin and the induction of protease inhibitors. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 12:5399–408
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Pearce G, Moura DS, Stratmann J, Ryan CA 2001. RALF, a 5-kDa ubiquitous polypeptide in plants, arrests root growth and development. PNAS 98:2212843–47
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Pearce G, Ryan CA. 2003. Systemic signaling in tomato plants for defense against herbivores. Isolation and characterization of three novel defense-signaling glycopeptide hormones coded in a single precursor gene. J. Biol. Chem. 278:3230044–50
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Pearce G, Strydom D, Johnson S, Ryan CA. 1991. A polypeptide from tomato leaves induces wound-inducible proteinase inhibitor proteins. Science 253:5022895–97
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Pearce G, Yamaguchi Y, Barona G, Ryan CA 2010. A subtilisin-like protein from soybean contains an embedded, cryptic signal that activates defense-related genes. PNAS 107:3314921–25
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99. 

    Pétriacq P, Ton J, Patrit O, Tcherkez G, Gakière B. 2016. NAD acts as an integral regulator of multiple defense layers. Plant Physiol 172:31465–79
    [Google Scholar]
100. 99a. 

     Pham AQ, Cho S-H, Nguyen CT, Stacey G 2020. Arabidopsis lectin receptor kinase P2K2 is a second plant receptor for extracellular ATP and contributes to innate immunity. Plant Physiol 183:31364–75
     [Google Scholar]
101. 100. 

     Ralevic V, Burnstock G. 1998. Receptors for purines and pyrimidines. Pharmacol. Rev. 50:3413–92
     [Google Scholar]
102. 101. 

     Rhodes J, Yang H, Moussu S, Boutrot F, Santiago J, Zipfel C. 2021. Perception of a divergent family of phytocytokines by the Arabidopsis receptor kinase MIK2. Nat. Commun. 12:705
     [Google Scholar]
103. 102. 

     Ruiz C, Nadal A, Montesinos E, Pla M. 2018. Novel Rosaceae plant elicitor peptides as sustainable tools to control Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni in Prunus spp. Mol. Plant Pathol. 19:2418–31
     [Google Scholar]
104. 103. 

     Ryerson DE, Heath MC. 1996. Cleavage of nuclear DNA into oligonucleosomal fragments during cell death induced by fungal infection or by abiotic treatments. Plant Cell 8:3393–402
     [Google Scholar]
105. 104. 

     Sauter M. 2015. Phytosulfokine peptide signalling. J. Exp. Bot. 66:175161–69
     [Google Scholar]
106. 105. 

     Schaller A, Oecking C. 1999. Modulation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase activity differentially activates wound and pathogen defense responses in tomato plants. Plant Cell 11:2263–72
     [Google Scholar]
107. 106. 

     Schilmiller AL, Howe GA. 2005. Systemic signaling in the wound response. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 8:4369–77
     [Google Scholar]
108. 107. 

     Seo S, Nakaho K, Hong SW, Takahashi H, Shigemori H, Mitsuhara I. 2016. l-Histidine induces resistance in plants to the bacterial pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum partially through the activation of ethylene signaling. Plant Cell Physiol 57:91932–42
     [Google Scholar]
109. 108. 

     Shiu S-H, Karlowski WM, Pan R, Tzeng Y-H, Mayer KFX, Li W-H. 2004. Comparative analysis of the receptor-like kinase family in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant Cell 16:51220–34
     [Google Scholar]
110. 109. 

     Srivastava R, Liu J-X, Guo H, Yin Y, Howell SH. 2009. Regulation and processing of a plant peptide hormone, AtRALF23, in Arabidopsis. Plant J. Cell Mol. Biol. 59:6930–39
     [Google Scholar]
111. 110. 

     Stegmann M, Monaghan J, Smakowska-Luzan E, Rovenich H, Lehner A et al. 2017. The receptor kinase FER is a RALF-regulated scaffold controlling plant immune signaling. Science 355:6322287–89
     [Google Scholar]
112. 111. 

     Stephens NR, Qi Z, Spalding EP. 2008. Glutamate receptor subtypes evidenced by differences in desensitization and dependence on the GLR3.3 and GLR3.4 genes. Plant Physiol 146:2529–38
     [Google Scholar]
113. 112. 

     Su Y-L, Li J-M, Li M, Luan J-B, Ye X-D et al. 2012. Transcriptomic analysis of the salivary glands of an invasive whitefly. PLOS ONE 7:6e39303
     [Google Scholar]
114. 113. 

     Sueldo DJ, Foresi NP, Casalongué CA, Lamattina L, Laxalt AM. 2010. Phosphatidic acid formation is required for extracellular ATP-mediated nitric oxide production in suspension-cultured tomato cells. New Phytol 185:4909–16
     [Google Scholar]
115. 114. 

     Tanaka K, Choi J, Cao Y, Stacey G. 2014. Extracellular ATP acts as a damage-associated molecular pattern (DAMP) signal in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 5:446
     [Google Scholar]
116. 115. 

     Tanaka K, Gilroy S, Jones AM, Stacey G. 2010. Extracellular ATP signaling in plants. Trends Cell Biol 20:10601–8
     [Google Scholar]
117. 116. 

     Tanaka K, Nguyen CT, Libault M, Cheng J, Stacey G. 2011. Enzymatic activity of the soybean ecto-apyrase GS52 is essential for stimulation of nodulation. Plant Physiol 155:41988–98
     [Google Scholar]
118. 117. 

     Tanaka K, Nguyen THN, Stacey G. 2011. Enzymatic role for soybean ecto-apyrase in nodulation. Plant Signal. Behav. 6:71034–36
     [Google Scholar]
119. 118. 

     Tanaka K, Swanson SJ, Gilroy S, Stacey G. 2010. Extracellular nucleotides elicit cytosolic free calcium oscillations in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 154:2705–19
     [Google Scholar]
120. 119. 

     Tanaka K, Tóth K, Stacey G. 2015. Role of ectoapyrases in nodulation. Biological Nitrogen Fixation FJ de Bruijn 517–24 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley & Sons
     [Google Scholar]
121. 120. 

     Tapken D, Anschütz U, Liu L-H, Huelsken T, Seebohm G et al. 2013. A plant homolog of animal glutamate receptors is an ion channel gated by multiple hydrophobic amino acids. Sci. Signal. 6:279ra47
     [Google Scholar]
122. 121. 

     Tavormina P, De Coninck B, Nikonorova N, De Smet I, Cammue BPA. 2015. The plant peptidome: an expanding repertoire of structural features and biological functions. Plant Cell 27:82095–118
     [Google Scholar]
123. 122. 

     Toyota M, Spencer D, Sawai-Toyota S, Jiaqi W, Zhang T et al. 2018. Glutamate triggers long-distance, calcium-based plant defense signaling. Science 361:64071112–15
     [Google Scholar]
124. 123. 

     Tran D, Dauphin A, Meimoun P, Kadono T, Nguyen HTH et al. 2018. Methanol induces cytosolic calcium variations, membrane depolarization and ethylene production in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Ann. Bot. 122:5849–60
     [Google Scholar]
125. 124. 

     Tripathi D, Tanaka K. 2018. A crosstalk between extracellular ATP and jasmonate signaling pathways for plant defense. Plant Signal. Behav. 13:5e1432229
     [Google Scholar]
126. 125. 

     Tripathi D, Zhang T, Koo AJ, Stacey G, Tanaka K. 2018. Extracellular ATP acts on jasmonate signaling to reinforce plant defense. Plant Physiol 176:511–23
     [Google Scholar]
127. 126. 

     Urano D, Jones JC, Wang H, Matthews M, Bradford W et al. 2012. G protein activation without a GEF in the plant kingdom. PLOS Genet 8:6e1002756
     [Google Scholar]
128. 127. 

     Valenzuela JG, Belkaid Y, Rowton E, Ribeiro JM. 2001. The salivary apyrase of the blood-sucking sand fly Phlebotomus papatasi belongs to the novel Cimex family of apyrases. J. Exp. Biol. 204:2229–37
     [Google Scholar]
129. 128. 

     Vanacker H, Carver TL, Foyer CH. 2000. Early H₂O₂ accumulation in mesophyll cells leads to induction of glutathione during the hyper-sensitive response in the barley-powdery mildew interaction. Plant Physiol 123:41289–300
     [Google Scholar]
130. 129. 

     Vega-Muñoz I, Duran-Flores D, Fernández-Fernández ÁD, Heyman J, Ritter A, Stael S. 2020. Breaking bad news: dynamic molecular mechanisms of wound response in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 11:610445
     [Google Scholar]
131. 130. 

     Verkhratsky A, Burnstock G. 2014. Biology of purinergic signalling: its ancient evolutionary roots, its omnipresence and its multiple functional significance. BioEssays 36:7697–705
     [Google Scholar]
132. 131. 

     Wang C, Huang X, Li Q, Zhang Y, Li J-L, Mou Z. 2019. Extracellular pyridine nucleotides trigger plant systemic immunity through a lectin receptor kinase/BAK1 complex. Nat. Commun. 10:14810
     [Google Scholar]
133. 132. 

     Wang C, Zhou M, Zhang X, Yao J, Zhang Y, Mou Z. 2017. A lectin receptor kinase as a potential sensor for extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in Arabidopsis thaliana. eLife 6:e25474
     [Google Scholar]
134. 133. 

     Wang L, Einig E, Almeida-Trapp M, Albert M, Fliegmann J et al. 2018. The systemin receptor SYR1 enhances resistance of tomato against herbivorous insects. Nat. Plants 4:3152–56
     [Google Scholar]
135. 134. 

     Wang L, Wilkins KA, Davies JM. 2018. Arabidopsis DORN1 extracellular ATP receptor; activation of plasma membrane K⁺- and Ca²⁺-permeable conductances. New Phytol 218:41301–4
     [Google Scholar]
136. 135. 

     Wen F, White GJ, VanEtten HD, Xiong Z, Hawes MC. 2009. Extracellular DNA is required for root tip resistance to fungal infection. Plant Physiol 151:2820–29
     [Google Scholar]
137. 136. 

     Wingate VP, Lawton MA, Lamb CJ. 1988. Glutathione causes a massive and selective induction of plant defense genes. Plant Physiol 87:1206–10
     [Google Scholar]
138. 137. 

     Wrzaczek M, Brosché M, Kollist H, Kangasjärvi J 2009. Arabidopsis GRI is involved in the regulation of cell death induced by extracellular ROS. PNAS 106:135412–17
     [Google Scholar]
139. 138. 

     Wrzaczek M, Vainonen JP, Stael S, Tsiatsiani L, Help-Rinta-Rahko H et al. 2015. GRIM REAPER peptide binds to receptor kinase PRK5 to trigger cell death in Arabidopsis. EMBO J 34:155–66
     [Google Scholar]
140. 139. 

     Wu S, Peiffer M, Luthe DS, Felton GW. 2012. ATP hydrolyzing salivary enzymes of caterpillars suppress plant defenses. PLOS ONE 7:7e41947
     [Google Scholar]
141. 140. 

     Yakushiji S, Ishiga Y, Inagaki Y, Toyoda K, Shiraishi T, Ichinose Y. 2009. Bacterial DNA activates immunity in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Gen. Plant Pathol. 75:3227–34
     [Google Scholar]
142. 141. 

     Yamada K, Saijo Y, Nakagami H, Takano Y. 2016. Regulation of sugar transporter activity for antibacterial defense in Arabidopsis. Science 354:63181427–30
     [Google Scholar]
143. 142. 

     Yamaguchi Y, Barona G, Ryan CA, Pearce G 2011. GmPep914, an eight-amino acid peptide isolated from soybean leaves, activates defense-related genes. Plant Physiol 156:2932–42
     [Google Scholar]
144. 143. 

     Yamaguchi Y, Huffaker A, Bryan AC, Tax FE, Ryan CA. 2010. PEPR2 is a second receptor for the Pep1 and Pep2 peptides and contributes to defense responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 22:2508–22
     [Google Scholar]
145. 144. 

     Yamaguchi Y, Pearce G, Ryan CA 2006. The cell surface leucine-rich repeat receptor for AtPep1, an endogenous peptide elicitor in Arabidopsis, is functional in transgenic tobacco cells. PNAS 103:2610104–9
     [Google Scholar]
146. 145. 

     Yoshiyama K, Sakaguchi K, Kimura S. 2013. DNA damage response in plants: conserved and variable response compared to animals. Biology 2:41338–56
     [Google Scholar]
147. 146. 

     Zhang H, Hu Z, Lei C, Zheng C, Wang J et al. 2018. A plant phytosulfokine peptide initiates auxin-dependent immunity through cytosolic Ca²⁺ signaling in tomato. Plant Cell 30:3652–67
     [Google Scholar]
148. 147. 

     Zhang L, Gleason C. 2020. Enhancing potato resistance against root-knot nematodes using a plant-defence elicitor delivered by bacteria. Nat. Plants 6:6625–29
     [Google Scholar]
149. 148. 

     Zhang X, Mou Z. 2009. Extracellular pyridine nucleotides induce PR gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J 57:2302–12
     [Google Scholar]
150. 149. 

     Zhang X, Mou Z. 2012. Expression of the human NAD(P)-metabolizing ectoenzyme CD38 compromises systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 25:91209–18
     [Google Scholar]
151. 150. 

     Zhou F, Emonet A, Dénervaud Tendon V, Marhavy P, Wu D et al. 2020. Co-incidence of damage and microbial patterns controls localized immune responses in roots. Cell 180:3440–53.e18
     [Google Scholar]
152. 151. 

     Ziemann S, van der Linde K, Lahrmann U, Acar B, Kaschani F et al. 2018. An apoplastic peptide activates salicylic acid signalling in maize. Nat. Plants 4:3172–80
     [Google Scholar]
153. 152. 

     Ziv C, Zhao Z, Gao YG, Xia Y. 2018. Multifunctional roles of plant cuticle during plant-pathogen interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 9:1088
     [Google Scholar]