Preparing Better Samples for Cryo–Electron Microscopy: Biochemical Challenges Do Not End with Isolation and Purification

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Glaeser RM. 2013. Stroboscopic imaging of macromolecular complexes. Nat. Methods 10:475–76
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Bai X-C, Fernandez IS, McMullan G, Scheres SHW 2013. Ribosome structures to near-atomic resolution from thirty thousand cryo-EM particles. eLife 2:e00461
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Li XM, Mooney P, Zheng S, Booth CR, Braunfeld MB et al. 2013. Electron counting and beam-induced motion correction enable near-atomic-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 10:584–90
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Nogales E, Scheres SHW. 2015. Cryo-EM: a unique tool for the visualization of macromolecular complexity. Mol. Cell 58:677–89
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Scheres SHW, Gao HX, Valle M, Herman GT, Eggermont PPB et al. 2007. Disentangling conformational states of macromolecules in 3D-EM through likelihood optimization. Nat. Methods 4:27–29
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Nogales E. 2016. The development of cryo-EM into a mainstream structural biology technique. Nat. Methods 13:24–27
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Zhou R, Yang GH, Guo XF, Zhou Q, Lei JL, Shi YG. 2019. Recognition of the amyloid precursor protein by human γ-secretase. Science 363:eaaw0930
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Rae CD, Gordiyenko Y, Ramakrishnan V. 2019. How a circularized tmRNA moves through the ribosome. Science 363:740–44
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Ehara H, Kujirai T, Fujino Y, Shirouzu M, Kurumizaka H, Sekine S. 2019. Structural insight into nucleosome transcription by RNA polymerase II with elongation factors. Science 363:744–47
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Fica SM, Oubridge C, Wilkinson ME, Newman AJ, Nagai K. 2019. A human postcatalytic spliceosome structure reveals essential roles of metazoan factors for exon ligation. Science 363:710–14
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Alam A, Kowal J, Broude E, Roninson I, Locher KP. 2019. Structural insight into substrate and inhibitor discrimination by human P-glycoprotein. Science 363:753–56
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Nakane T, Kotecha A, Sente A, McMullan G, Masiulis S et al. 2020. Single-particle cryo-EM at atomic resolution. Nature 587:152–56
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Yip KM, Fischer N, Paknia E, Chari A, Stark H. 2020. Atomic-resolution protein structure determination by cryo-EM. Nature 587:157–61
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Wu M, Lander GC. 2020. How low can we go? Structure determination of small biological complexes using single-particle cryo-EM. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 64:9–16
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Dashti A, Schwander P, Langlois R, Fung R, Li W et al. 2014. Trajectories of the ribosome as a Brownian nanomachine. PNAS 111:17492–97
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Frank J. 2017. Time-resolved cryo-electron microscopy: recent progress. J. Struct. Biol. 200:303–6
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Dandey VP, Budell WC, Wei H, Bobe D, Maruthi K et al. 2020. Time-resolved cryo-EM using Spotiton. Nature Methods 17:897–900
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Crowther RA. 2016. Preface. Methods Enzymol. 579:xiii–xx
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Danev R, Yanagisawa H, Kikkawa M. 2019. Cryo-electron microscopy methodology: current aspects and future directions. Trends Biochem. Sci. 44:837–48
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Fernandez-Leiro R, Scheres SHW. 2016. Unravelling biological macromolecules with cryo-electron microscopy. Nature 537:339–46
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Cheng Y, Grigorieff N, Penczek PA, Walz T. 2015. A primer to single-particle cryo-electron microscopy. Cell 161:438–49
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Milne JLS, Borgnia MJ, Bartesaghi A, Tran EEH, Earl LA et al. 2013. Cryo-electron microscopy—a primer for the non-microscopist. FEBS J 280:28–45
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Carragher B, Cheng Y, Frost A, Glaeser RM, Lander GC et al. 2019. Current outcomes when optimizing ‘standard’ sample preparation for single-particle cryo-EM. J. Microsc. 276:39–45
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Drulyte I, Johnson RM, Hesketh EL, Hurdiss DL, Scarff CA et al. 2018. Approaches to altering particle distributions in cryo-electron microscopy sample preparation. Acta Crystallogr. D74:560–71
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Klebl DP, Gravett MSC, Kontziampasis D, Wright DJ, Bon RS et al. 2020. Need for speed: examining protein behaviour during cryoEM grid preparation at different timescales. Structure 28:1238–48.e4
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Peet MJ, Henderson R, Russo CJ. 2019. The energy dependence of contrast and damage in electron cryomicroscopy of biological molecules. Ultramicroscopy 203:125–31
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Glaeser RM, Downing K, DeRosier D, Chiu W, Frank J. 2007. Electron Crystallography of Biological Macromolecules Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
28. 28. 

    Taylor KA, Glaeser RM. 2008. Retrospective on the early development of cryoelectron microscopy of macromolecules and a prospective on opportunities for the future. J. Struct. Biol. 163:214–23
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Dubochet J, Adrian M, Chang JJ, Homo JC, Lepault J et al. 1988. Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q. Rev. Biophys. 21:129–228
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Dobro MJ, Melanson LA, Jensen GJ, McDowall AW. 2010. Plunge freezing for electron cryomicroscopy. Methods Enzymol. 481:63–82
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Russo CJ, Passmore LA. 2016. Ultrastable gold substrates: properties of a support for high-resolution electron cryomicroscopy of biological specimens. J. Struct. Biol. 193:33–44
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Herzik MA Jr., Wu M, Lander GC. 2017. Achieving better-than-3-Å resolution by single-particle cryo-EM at 200 keV. Nat. Methods 14:1075–78
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Naydenova K, Russo CJ. 2017. Measuring the effects of particle orientation to improve the efficiency of electron cryomicroscopy. Nat. Commun. 8:629
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Wikipedia 2020. Affirming the consequent. Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirming_the_consequent
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Vinothkumar KR, Henderson R. 2016. Single particle electron cryomicroscopy: trends, issues and future perspective. Q. Rev. Biophys. 49:e13
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Bharat TAM, Scheres SHW. 2016. Resolving macromolecular structures from electron cryo-tomography data using subtomogram averaging in RELION. Nat. Protoc. 11:2054–65
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Noble AJ, Dandey VP, Wei H, Braschi J, Chase J et al. 2018. Routine single particle cryoEM sample and grid characterization by tomography. eLife 7:e34257
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    D'Imprima E, Floris D, Joppe M, Sánchez R, Grininger M, Kühlbrandt W 2019. Protein denaturation at the air-water interface and how to prevent it. eLife 8:e42747
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Fan X, Wang J, Zhang X, Yang Z, Zhang J-C et al. 2019. Single particle cryo-EM reconstruction of 52kDa streptavidin at 3.2 Angstrom resolution. Nat. Commun. 10:2386
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Lum K, Chandler D, Weeks JD. 1999. Hydrophobicity at small and large length scales. J. Phys. Chem. B 103:4570–77
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Parker JL, Claesson PM, Attard P. 1994. Bubbles, cavities, and the long-ranged attraction between hydrophobic surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. 98:8468–80
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Glaeser RM, Han B-G. 2017. Hazards faced by macromolecules when confined to thin aqueous films. Biophys. Rep. 3:1–7
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Raffaini G, Ganazzoli F. 2010. Protein adsorption on a hydrophobic surface: a molecular dynamics study of lysozyme on graphite. Langmuir 26:5679–89
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Postel C, Abillon O, Desbat B. 2003. Structure and denaturation of adsorbed lysozyme at the air-water interface. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 266:74–81
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Gidalevitz D, Huang ZQ, Rice SA 1999. Protein folding at the air–water interface studied with x-ray reflectivity. PNAS 96:2608–11
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Yoshimura H, Scheybani T, Baumeister W, Nagayama K. 1994. Two-dimensional protein array growth in thin layers of protein solution on aqueous subphases. Langmuir 10:3290–95
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Glaeser RM. 2018. Proteins, interfaces, and cryo-EM grids. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 34:1–11
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Egelman EH. 2020. Cryo-EM: Ice is nice, but good ice can be hard to find. Biophys. J. 118:1238–39
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Galkin VE, Orlova A, Vos MR, Schroder GF, Egelman EH. 2015. Near-atomic resolution for one state of F-actin. Structure 23:173–82
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Jaspe J, Hagen SJ. 2006. Do protein molecules unfold in a simple shear flow?. Biophys. J. 91:3415–24
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Han B-G, Watson Z, Cate JHD, Glaeser RM. 2017. Monolayer-crystal streptavidin support films provide an internal standard of cryo-EM image quality. J. Struct. Biol. 200:307–13
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Rice WJ, Cheng AC, Noble AJ, Eng ET, Kim LY et al. 2018. Routine determination of ice thickness for cryo-EM grids. J. Struct. Biol. 204:38–44
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Pantelic RS, Meyer JC, Kaiser U, Baumeister W, Plitzko JM. 2010. Graphene oxide: a substrate for optimizing preparations of frozen-hydrated samples. J. Struct. Biol. 170:152–56
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Boland A, Martin TG, Zhang ZG, Yang J, Bai XC et al. 2017. Cryo-EM structure of a metazoan separase-securin complex at near-atomic resolution. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 24:414–18
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Han Y, Fan X, Wang H, Zhao F, Tully CG et al. 2020. High-yield monolayer graphene grids for near-atomic resolution cryoelectron microscopy. PNAS 117:1009–14
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Naydenova K, Peet MJ, Russo CJ 2019. Multifunctional graphene supports for electron cryomicroscopy. PNAS 116:11718–24
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Rafiee J, Mi X, Gullapalli H, Thomas AV, Yavari F et al. 2012. Wetting transparency of graphene. Nat. Mater. 11:217–22
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Kim D, Pugno NM, Buehler MJ, Ryu S. 2015. Solving the controversy on the wetting transparency of graphene. Sci. Rep. 5:15526
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Ghoshal D, Jain R, Koratkar NA. 2019. Graphene's partial transparency to van der Waals and electrostatic interactions. Langmuir 35:12306–16
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Llaguno MC, Xu H, Shi L, Huang N, Zhang H et al. 2014. Chemically functionalized carbon films for single molecule imaging. J. Struct. Biol. 185:405–17
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Liu N, Zhang J, Chen Y, Liu C, Zhang X et al. 2019. Bioactive functionalized monolayer graphene for high-resolution cryo-electron microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141:4016–25
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Zheng L, Chen Y, Li N, Zhang J, Liu N et al. 2020. Robust ultraclean atomically thin membranes for atomic-resolution electron microscopy. Nat. Commun. 11:541
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Benjamin CJ, Wright KJ, Bolton SC, Hyun SH, Krynski K et al. 2016. Selective capture of histidine-tagged proteins from cell lysates using TEM grids modified with NTA-graphene oxide. Sci. Rep. 6:32500
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Wang F, Liu Y, Yu Z, Li S, Cheng Y, Agard DA 2020. General and robust covalently linked graphene oxide affinity grids for high-resolution cryo-EM. PNAS 117:24269–73
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Schmitt L, Dietrich C, Tampe R. 1994. Synthesis and characterization of chelator-lipids for reversible immobilization of engineered proteins at self-assembled lipid interfaces. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 116:8485–91
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Kubalek EW, Legrice SFJ, Brown PO. 1994. Two-dimensional crystallization of histidine-tagged, HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase promoted by a novel nickel-chelating lipid. J. Struct. Biol. 113:117–23
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Wilson-Kubalek EM, Chappie JS, Arthur CP. 2010. Helical crystallization of soluble and membrane binding proteins. Methods Enzymol 481:45–62
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Kelly DF, Abeyrathne PD, Dukovski D, Walz T. 2008. The affinity grid: a pre-fabricated EM grid for monolayer purification. J. Mol. Biol. 382:423–33
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Kelly DF, Dukovski D, Walz T. 2010. A practical guide to the use of monolayer purification and affinity grids. Methods Enzymol. 481:83–107
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Benjamin CJ, Wright KJ, Hyun S-H, Krynski K, Yu G et al. 2016. Nonfouling NTA-PEG-based TEM grid coatings for selective capture of histidine-tagged protein targets from cell lysates. Langmuir 32:551–59
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Yu G, Li K, Jiang W. 2016. Antibody-based affinity cryo-EM grid. Methods 100:16–24
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Darst SA, Kubalek EW, Edwards AM, Kornberg RD. 1991. Two-dimensional and epitaxial crystallization of a mutant form of yeast RNA polymerase II. J. Mol. Biol. 221:347–57
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Wang LG, Ounjai P, Sigworth FJ. 2008. Streptavidin crystals as nanostructured supports and image-calibration references for cryo-EM data collection. J. Struct. Biol. 164:190–98
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Wang LG, Sigworth FJ. 2010. Liposomes on a streptavidin crystal: a system to study membrane proteins by cryo-EM. Methods Enzymol. 481:147–64
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Crucifix C, Uhring M, Schultz P. 2004. Immobilization of biotinylated DNA on 2-D streptavidin crystals. J. Struct. Biol. 146:441–51
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Han BG, Walton RW, Song A, Hwu P, Stubbs MT et al. 2012. Electron microscopy of biotinylated protein complexes bound to streptavidin monolayer crystals. J. Struct. Biol. 180:249–53
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Han B-G, Watson Z, Kang H, Pulk A, Downing KH et al. 2016. Long shelf-life streptavidin support-films suitable for electron microscopy of biological macromolecules. J. Struct. Biol. 195:238–44
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Lahiri I, Xu J, Han BG, Oh J, Wang D et al. 2019. 3.1 Å structure of yeast RNA polymerase II elongation complex stalled at a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer lesion solved using streptavidin affinity grids. J. Struct. Biol. 207:270–78
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Kasinath V, Beck C, Sauer P, Poepsel S, Kosmatka J et al. 2020. JARID2 and AEBP2 regulate PRC2 activity in the presence of H2A ubiquitination or other histone modifications. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.20.049213
    [Crossref]
80. 80. 

    Takizawa Y, Binshtein E, Erwin AL, Pyburn TM, Mittendorf KF, Ohi MD. 2017. While the revolution will not be crystallized, biochemistry reigns supreme. Protein Sci 26:69–81
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Joppe M, D'Imprima E, Salustros N, Paithankar KS, Vonck J et al. 2020. The resolution revolution in cryoEM requires high-quality sample preparation: a rapid pipeline to a high-resolution map of yeast fatty acid synthase. IUCrJ 7:220–27
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Chari A, Haselbach D, Kirves J-M, Ohmer J, Paknia E et al. 2015. ProteoPlex: stability optimization of macromolecular complexes by sparse-matrix screening of chemical space. Nat. Methods 12:859–65
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Stark H. 2010. GraFix: stabilization of fragile macromolecular complexes for single particle cryo-EM. Methods Enzymol. 481:109–26
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Yan L, Zheng YB, Zhao F, Li SJ, Gao XF et al. 2012. Chemistry and physics of a single atomic layer: strategies and challenges for functionalization of graphene and graphene-based materials. Chem. Soc. Rev. 41:97–114
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Mali KS, Greenwood J, Adisoejoso J, Phillipson R, De Feyter S. 2015. Nanostructuring graphene for controlled and reproducible functionalization. Nanoscale 7:1566–85
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Touze E, Gohier F, Daffos B, Taberna PL, Cougnon C. 2018. Improvement of electrochemical performances of catechol-based supercapacitor electrodes by tuning the redox potential via different-sized O-protected catechol diazonium salts. Electrochim. Acta 265:121–30
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Kaplan A, Yuan Z, Benck JD, Rajan AG, Chu XS et al. 2017. Current and future directions in electron transfer chemistry of graphene. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46:4530–71
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    ElSohly AM, Francis MB. 2015. Development of oxidative coupling strategies for site-selective protein modification. Acc. Chem. Res. 48:1971–78
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Armstrong M, Han BG, Gomez S, Turner J, Fletcher DA, Glaeser RM. 2020. Microscale fluid behavior during cryo-EM sample blotting. Biophys. J. 118:708–19
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Wei H, Dandey VP, Zhang ZN, Raczkowski A, Rice WJ et al. 2018. Optimizing “self-wicking” nanowire grids. J. Struct. Biol. 202:170–74
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Dandey VP, Wei H, Zhang ZN, Tan YZ, Acharya P et al. 2018. Spotiton: new features and applications. J. Struct. Biol. 202:161–69
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Ashtiani D, Venugopal H, Belousoff M, Spicer B, Mak J et al. 2018. Delivery of femtolitre droplets using surface acoustic wave based atomisation for cryo-EM grid preparation. J. Struct. Biol. 203:94–101
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Liu Y, Zhou K, Zhang N, Wei H, Tan YZ et al. 2020. FACT caught in the act of manipulating the nucleosome. Nature 577:426–31
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Scapin G, Dandey VP, Zhang Z, Prosise W, Hruza A et al. 2018. Structure of the insulin receptor-insulin complex by single-particle cryo-EM analysis. Nature 556:122–25
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    Han H, Fulcher JM, Dandey VP, Iwasa JH, Sundquist WI et al. 2019. Structure of Vps4 with circular peptides and implications for translocation of two polypeptide chains by AAA+ ATPases. eLife 8:e44071
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Feng X, Fu Z, Kaledhonkar S, Jia Y, Shah B et al. 2017. A fast and effective microfluidic spraying-plunging method for high-resolution single-particle cryo-EM. Structure 25:663–70.e3
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Kontziampasis D, Klebl DP, Iadanza MG, Scarff CA, Kopf F et al. 2019. A cryo-EM grid preparation device for time-resolved structural studies. IUCrJ 6:1024–31
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Tan YZ, Rubinstein JL. 2020. Through-grid wicking enables high-speed cryoEM specimen preparation. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.03.075366
    [Crossref]
99. 99. 

    Schmidli C, Albiez S, Rima L, Righetto R, Mohammed I et al. 2019. Microfluidic protein isolation and sample preparation for high-resolution cryo-EM. PNAS 116:15007–12
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Arnold SA, Albiez S, Bieri A, Syntychaki A, Adaixo R et al. 2017. Blotting-free and lossless cryo-electron microscopy grid preparation from nanoliter-sized protein samples and single-cell extracts. J. Struct. Biol. 197:220–26
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Ravelli RBG, Nijpels FJT, Henderikx RJM, Weissenberger G, Thewessem S et al. 2020. Cryo-EM structures from sub-nl volumes using pin-printing and jet vitrification. Nat. Commun. 11:2563
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Trurnit HJ. 1960. A theory and method for the spreading of protein monolayers. J. Colloid Sci. 15:1–13
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Kistler J, Kellenberger E. 1977. Collapse phenomena in freeze-drying. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 59:70–75
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     Lepault J, Booy FP, Dubochet J. 1983. Electron-microscopy of frozen biological suspensions. J. Microsc. 129:89–102
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     McMillan PF, Clary DC, Sobott F, McCammon MG, Hernández H, Robinson CV. 2005. The flight of macromolecular complexes in a mass spectrometer. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 363:379–91
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Robinson CV. 2019. Mass spectrometry: from plasma proteins to mitochondrial membranes. PNAS 116:2814–20
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Wagner FR, Watanabe R, Schampers R, Singh D, Persoon H et al. 2020. Preparing samples from whole cells using focused-ion-beam milling for cryo-electron tomography. Nat. Protoc. 15:2041–70
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Dearnaley WJ, Schleupner B, Varano AC, Alden NA, Gonzalez F et al. 2019. Liquid-cell electron tomography of biological systems. Nano Lett 19:6734–41
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Frederik PM, Stuart MCA, Bomans PHH, Busing WM. 1989. Phospholipid, nature's own slide and cover slip for cryo-electron microscopy. J. Microsc. 153:81–92
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Chen J, Noble AJ, Kang JY, Darst SA. 2019. Eliminating effects of particle adsorption to the air/water interface in single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: bacterial RNA polymerase and CHAPSO. J. Struct. Biol. X 1:100005
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Ruckenstein E, Jain RK. 1974. Spontaneous rupture of thin liquid films. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 2 70:132–47
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Jones MN, Mysels KJ, Scholten PC. 1966. Stability and some properties of 2nd black film. Trans. Faraday Soc. 62:1336–48
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Parsegian VA, Zemb T. 2011. Hydration forces: observations, explanations, expectations, questions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 16:618–24
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114. 

     Mysels KJ, Jones MN. 1966. Direct measurement of variation of double-layer repulsion with distance. Discuss. Faraday Soc. 42:42–50
     [Google Scholar]