Abstract
Understanding regional environmental heterogeneity (EH) and biodiversity relationships (heterogeneity-diversity relationships: HDRs) is the first step toward coupling environmental variables with biodiversity surrogates into regional systematic conservation planning. However, there is no universal method for determining regional HDRs that considers various environmental variables and biodiversity in different regions. This study selected 32 nature reserves as natural areas in Yunnan, China, to examine regional HDRs in Yunnan. We calculated 17 EH parameters (of soil, topography, and climate) and three (ecosystem, plant, and animal) biodiversity indices in the nature reserves. By examining the explanatory power of each EH parameter and area of the nature reserve, we identified the primary parameters and constructed an optimal model for each biodiversity index. The explanatory powers of these parameters varied for each biodiversity index, and those of climatic parameters were generally higher than soil and topographic heterogeneity ones. Heterogeneity of the temperature annual range, followed by area and heterogeneity of soil type, were important parameters for ecosystem diversity of Yunnan and the optimal model explained 56.9%. Plant diversity was explained 54.5% by its optimal model, consisting of heterogeneity of precipitation of the coldest quarter and annual precipitation. Heterogeneity of temperature annual range was important for animal diversity in Yunnan and explained 29.6% of its optimal model. This study suggests that EH parameters can be an effective surrogate for biodiversity, therefore, we suggested that the significance and role of climatically heterogeneous regions for the conservation of biodiversity in Yunnan should be further studied in the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerly D D, Loarie S R, Cornwell W K et al., 2010. The geography of climate change: implications for conservation biogeography. Diversity and Distributions, 16(3): 476–187. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00654.x
Aguilée R, Raoul G, Rousset F et al., 2016. Pollen dispersal slows geographical range shift and accelerates ecological niche shift under climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(39): E5741–E5748. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1607612113
Bailey J J, Boyd D S, Hjort J et al., 2017. Modelling native and alien vascular plant species richness: at which scales is geodiversity most relevant? Global Ecology and Biogeography, 26(7): 763–776. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12574
Bar-Massada A, Wood E M, 2014. The richness-heterogeneity relationship differs between heterogeneity measures within and among habitats. Ecography, 37(6): 528–535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00590.X
Chocron R, Flather C H, Kadmon R, 2015. Bird diversity and environmental heterogeneity in North America: a test of the area-heterogeneity trade-off. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24(11): 1225–1235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12353
Cramer M D, Verboom G A, 2017. Measures of biologically relevant environmental heterogeneity improve prediction of regional plant species richness. Journal of Biogeography, 44(3): 579–591. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbi.12911
Di Minin E, Moilanen A, 2014. Improving the surrogacy effectiveness of charismatic megafauna with well — surveyed taxonomic groups and habitat types. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(2): 281–288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12203
Dormann C F, Elith J, Bacher S et al., 2013. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography, 36(1): 27–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
Forestry Department of Yunnan Province, 2017. 2016 Annual Report of Nature Reserves in Yunnan Province. Kunming: Forestry Department of Yunnan Province. (in Chinese)
Gazol A, Tamme R, Price J N et al., 2013. A negative heterogeneity -diversity relationship found in experimental grassland communities. Oecologia, 173(2): 545–555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2623-x
Gianoli E, Valladares F, 2012. Studying phenotypic plasticity: the advantages of a broad approach. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 105(1): 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01793.x
Heller N E, Kreitler J, Ackerly D D et al., 2015. Targeting climate diversity in conservation planning to build resilience to climate change. Ecosphere, 6(4): 1–20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/ES14-00313.1
Hijmans R J, Cameron S E, Parra J L et al., 2005. Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology, 25(15): 1965–1978. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1276
Hoffmann A A, Sgrò, C M, 2011. Climate change and evolutionary adaptation. Nature, 470(7335): 479–485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09670
Hua X, Wiens J J, 2013. How does climate influence speciation? The American Naturalist, 182(1): 1–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/670690
Huang J H, Chen B, Liu C R et al., 2012. Identifying hotspots of endemic woody seed plant diversity in China. Diversity and Distributions, 18(7): 673–688. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-4642.2011.00845.x
Huang J H, Huang J H, Liu C R et al., 2016. Diversity hotspots and conservation gaps for the Chinese endemic seed flora. Biological Conservation, 198: 104–112. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2016.04.007
Hufford K M, Mazer S J, Schimel J P, 2014. Soil heterogeneity and the distribution of native grasses in California: can soil properties inform restoration plans? Ecosphere, 5(4): 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00377.1
Hulshof C M, Spasojevic M J, 2020. The edaphic control of plant diversity. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 29(10): 1634–1650. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.13151
Irl S D H, Harter D E V, Steinbauer M J et al., 2015. Climate vs. topography-spatial patterns of plant species diversity and endemism on a high-elevation island. Journal of Ecology, 103(6): 1621–1633. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12463
Jones K R, Watson J E M, Possingham H P et al., 2016. Incorporating climate change into spatial conservation prioritisation: A review. Biological Conservation, 194: 121–130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.12.008
Kaplan J O, New M, 2006. Arctic climate change with a 2°C global warming: timing, climate patterns and vegetation change. Climatic Change, 79(3–4): 213–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9113-7
Klopfer P H, MacArthur R H, 1960. Niche size and faunal diversity. The American Naturalist, 94(877): 293–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/282130
Klopfer P H, MacArthur R H, 1961. On the causes of tropical species diversity: niche overlap. The American Naturalist, 95(883): 223–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/282179
Kormos C F, Bertzky B, Jaeger T et al., 2016. A wilderness approach under the World Heritage Convention. Conservation Letters, 9(3): 228–235. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12205
Laanisto L, Tamme R, Hiiesalu I et al., 2013. Microfragrnentation concept explains non-positive environmental heterogeneity-diversity relationships. Oecologia, 171(1): 217–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-012-2398-5
Lapin M, Barnes B V, 1995. Using the landscape ecosystem approach to assess species and ecosystem diversity. Conservation Biology, 9(5): 1148–1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051134.x-i1
Lázaro-Nogal A, Matesanz S, Godoy A et al., 2015. Environmental heterogeneity leads to higher plasticity in dry-edge populations of a semi-arid Chilean shrub: insights into climate change responses. Journal of Ecology, 103(2): 338–350. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12372
Lehikoinen A, Brotons L, Calladine J et al., 2019. Declining population trends of European mountain birds. Global Change Biology, 25(2): 577–588. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14522
Levine N M, Zhang K, Longo M et al., 2016. Ecosystem heterogeneity determines the ecological resilience of the Amazon to climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(3): 793–797. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511344112
Li Guo, Wu Xiaopu, Luo Zunlan et al., 2011. Establishing an indicator system for biodiversity assessment in China. Biodiversity Science, 19(5): 497–504. (in Chinese). doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2011.08068
Li Qiaoyan, Wang Xiangping, 2013. Elevational pattern of species richness in the Three Gorges Region of the Yangtze River: effect of climate, geometric constraints, area and topographical heterogeneity. Biodiversity Science, 21(2): 141–152. (in Chinese). doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.12183
Li Xiwen, 1994. Two big biodiversity centres of Chinese endemic genera of seed plants and their characteristics in Yunnan Province. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 16(3): 221–227. (in Chinese)
Lundholm J T, 2009. Plant species diversity and environmental heterogeneity: spatial scale and competing hypotheses. Journal of Vegetation Science, 20(3): 377–391. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1654-1103.2009.05577.x
MacArthur R, 1970. Species packing and competitive equilibrium for many species. Theoretical Population Biology, 1(1): 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-5809(70)90039-0
MFPRC (Ministry of Forestry of the People’s Republic of China), MAPRC (Ministry of Agriculture of People ‘s Republic of China), 1988. The list of the National protected wild animals in China. Available at http://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2000/content_60072.htm. 2016-03-06. (in Chinese)
Myers N, Mittermeier R A, Mittermeier C G et al., 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772): 853–858. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501
National Soil Survey Office of Yunnan Province, 1996. Soils of Yunnan. Kunming, China: Yunnan Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese)
Paudel P K, Heinen J T, 2015. Conservation planning in the Nepal Himalayas: effectively (re) designing reserves for heterogeneous landscapes. Applied Geography, 56: 127–134. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.11.018
Quinn G P, Keough M J, 2002. Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
R Core Team, 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.
Regos A, D’Amen M, Titeux N et al., 2016. Predicting the future effectiveness of protected areas for bird conservation in Mediterranean ecosystems under climate change and novel fire regime scenarios. Diversity and Distributions, 22(1): 83–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12375
Reside A E, Butt N, Adams V M, 2018. Adapting systematic conservation planning for climate change. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(1): 1–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1442-5
Ricklefs R E, 1977. Environmental heterogeneity and plant species diversity: a hypothesis. The American Naturalist, 111(978): 376–381. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/283169
Schloss C A, Lawler J J, Larson E R et al., 2011. Systematic conservation planning in the face of climate change: bet-hedging on the Columbia Plateau. PLoS One, 6(12): e28788. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028788
Scriven S A, Hodgson J A, McClean C J et al., 2015. Protected areas in Borneo may fail to conserve tropical forest biodiversity under climate change. Biological Conservation, 184: 414–423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.018
Seiferling I, Proulx R, Wirth C, 2014. Disentangling the environmental-heterogeneity-species-diversity relationship along a gradient of human footprint. Ecology, 95(8): 2084–2095. doi: https://doi.org/10.1890/13-1344.1
Song Q, Wang B, Wang J et al., 2016. Endangered and endemic species increase forest conservation values of species diversity based on the Shannon-Wiener index. iForest-Biogeocciences and Forestry, 9(3): 469–474. doi: https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1373-008
Stein A, Gerstner K, Kreft H, 2014. Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecology Letters, 17(7): 866–880. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12277
Stein A, Beck J, Meyer C et al., 2015. Differential effects of environmental heterogeneity on global mammal species richness. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 24(9): 1072–1083. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12337
Stevens G C, 1989. The latitudinal gradient in geographical range: how so many species coexist in the tropics. The American Naturalist, 133(2): 240–256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/284913
Theobald D M, Reed S E, Fields K et al., 2012. Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters, 5(2): 123–133. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2011.00218.x
Tingley M W, Darling E S, Wilcove D S, 2014. Fine-and coarse-filter conservation strategies in a time of climate change. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1322(1): 92–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12484
Triviño M, Kujala H, Araújo M B et al., 2018. Planning for the future: identifying conservation priority areas for Iberian birds under climate change. Landscape Ecology, 33(4): 659–673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0626-z
Tukiainen H, Bailey J J, Field R et al., 2017. Combining geodiversity with climate and topography to account for threatened species richness. Conservation Biology, 31(2): 364–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12799
Van Schalkwyk J, Pryke J S, Samways M J, 2017. Wide corridors with much environmental heterogeneity best conserve high dung beetle and ant diversity. Biodiversity and Conservation, 26(5): 1243–1256. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1299-7
Veech J A, Crist T O, 2007. Habitat and climate heterogeneity maintain beta-diversity of birds among landscapes within ecoregions. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 16(5): 650–656. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1466-8238.2007.00315.x
Wang Hesheng, Zhang Yili, 1994. The bio-diversity and characters of spermatophytic genera endemic to China. Acta Botanica Yunnanica, 16(3): 209–220. (in Chinese)
Wang J J, Wu R D, He D M et al., 2018. Spatial relationship between climatic diversity and biodiversity conservation value. Conservation Biology, 32(6): 1266–1277. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13147
Wang Z W, Chen S T, Nie Z L et al., 2015. Climatic factors drive population divergence and demography: insights based on the phylogeography of a riparian plant species endemic to the Hengduan Mountains and adjacent regions. PLoS One, 10(12): e0145014. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145014
Wei T, Simko V, 2016. R package ‘corrplot’: visualization of a Correlation Matrix. R package version 0.77. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=corrplot
Xing Y W, Ree R H, 2017. Uplift-driven diversification in the Hengduan Mountains, a temperate biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(17): E3444–E3451. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1616063114
Yang F L, Hu J M, Wu R D, 2016. Combining endangered plants and animals as surrogates to identify priority conservation areas in Yunnan, China. Scientific Reports, 6(1): 30753. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30753
Yang Y M, Tian K, Hao J M et al., 2004. Biodiversity and biodiversity conservation in Yunnan, China. Biodiversity and Conservation, 13(4): 813–826. doi: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BIOC.0000011728.46362.3c
Zhang M G, Zhou Z K, Chen W Y et al., 2012. Using species distribution modeling to improve conservation and land use planning of Yunnan, China. Biological Conservation, 153: 257–264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.023
Zhang M G, Zhou Z K, Chen W Y et al., 2014. Major declines of woody plant species ranges under climate change in Yunnan, China. Diversity and Distribution, 20(4): 405–415. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/ddi.12165
Zhang Yanni, Zhang Zhiming, Geng Yupeng et al., 2013. Priority plant communities for conservation in Northwest Yunnan. Biodiversity Science, 21(3): 296–305. (in Chinese). doi: https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1003.2013.10207
Zomer R J, Xu J C, Wang M C et al., 2015. Projected impact of climate change on the effectiveness of the existing protected area network for biodiversity conservation within Yunnan Province, China. Biological Conservation, 184: 335–345. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.01.031
Acknowledgement
We are grateful to HUA Chaolang at the Yunnan Institute of Forest Inventory and Planning for providing the Yunnan Nature Reserve information.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item
Under the auspices of National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2017YFC0505200), the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (No. 2019QZKK0502), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41461018), Youth Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 41701110), the Applied Basic Research Foundation of Yunnan Province (No. 2015FA011), Yunnan University’s Research Innovation Fund for Graduate Students (No. 2019z058)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, F., Hu, J., Yang, F. et al. Heterogeneity-diversity Relationships in Natural Areas of Yunnan, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 31, 506–521 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1207-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-021-1207-7