Proof of a conjecture of Adamchuk

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcta.2021.105478Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we prove a congruence which contains a congruence conjectured by Adamchuk (OEIS A066796 in 2006, http://oeis.org/A066796). For any prime p1(mod3) and aZ+, we havek=123(pa1)(2kk)0(modp2).

Introduction

In 2006, Adamchuk [1] conjectured that for any prime p1(mod3),k=123(p1)(2kk)0(modp2). After that, many people studied congruences for sums of binomial coefficients (see, for instance, [3], [5], [8], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [21], [25], [26], [27]). For example, Pan and Sun [21] used a combinatorial identity to deduce that if p is prime thenk=0p1(2kk+d)(pd3)(modp)ford=0,1,,p, where () is the Jacobi symbol. Then in 2011, Sun and Tauraso [27] gave a generalization of the above result: For any odd prime p and aZ+, d=0,,pa,k=0pa1(2kk+d)(pad3)(modp2). Apagodu and Zeilberger [3] proved that for any prime p5 and any positive integer r, Pan and Sun [21, Corollary 1.3] also showed that for any odd prime p,n=0p1(3n+1)(2nn)(p3)(modp). In 2018, Apagodu [2] gave the following conjecture: For any odd prime p,n=0p1(5n+1)(4n2n)(p3)(modp). Then the author and Cao [14] confirmed this conjecture and showed another congruence: For any odd prime p,n=0p1(15n+5)(4n2n)(p5)(modp). Recall that the Bernoulli numbers {Bn} and the Bernoulli polynomials {Bn(x)} are defined as follows:xex1=n=0Bnxnn!(0<|x|<2π)andBn(x)=k=0n(nk)Bkxnk(nN). Mattarei and Tauraso [18] proved that for any prime p>3, we havek=0p1(2kk)(p3)p23Bp2(13)(modp3). Many researchers also studied numerous complicated congruences involving binomial coefficients and q-binomial coefficients (for instance, [6], [7], [9], [11]).

The main objective of this paper is to obtain the following result which contains the conjecture of Adamchuk.

Theorem 1.1

Let p be an odd prime and let aZ+. If p1(mod3) and aZ+, thenk=123(pa1)(2kk)0(modp2).

In order to prove Theorem 1.1, we first show the following interesting congruence.

Theorem 1.2

For any prime p1(mod3), we havek=0k(p1)/3(p1)/2(2kk)3k+10(modp).

We shall prove Theorem 1.2 in Section 2, Section 3 is devoted to prove Theorem 1.1.

Section snippets

Proof of Theorem 1.2

Define the hypergeometric seriesFmm+1[α0α1αmβ1βm|z]:=k=0(α0)k(α1)k(αm)k(β1)k(βm)kzkk!, where α0,,αm,β1,,βm,zC and(α)k={α(α+1)(α+k1),if k1,1,if k=0. For a prime p, let Zp denote the ring of all p-adic integers and letZp×:={aZp:a is prime to p}. For each αZp, define the p-adic order νp(α):=max{nN:pn|α} and the p-adic norm |α|p:=pνp(α). Define the p-adic gamma function Γp() byΓp(n)=(1)n1k<n(k,p)=1k,n=1,2,3,, andΓp(α)=lim|αn|p0nNΓp(n),αZp. In particular, we set Γp(0)=1.

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Proof of Theorem 1.1

Now p1(mod3), so (pa3)=1, by (1.1) we havek=1pa1(2kk)0(modp2). Thus we only need to prove thatk=(2pa+1)/3pa1(2kk)0(modp2). Let k and l be positive integers with k+l=pa and 0<l<pa/2. In view of the first two congruences in page 7 of [22], we havel2(2ll)=(2l1)!(l1)!20(modpa) and(2kk)pa(l1)!2(2l1)!=2pal(2ll)(modp2). So we havek=(2pa+1)/3p1(2kk)=k=1(pa1)/3(2pa2kpak)2pak=1(pa1)/31k(2kk)(modp2). Hence we only need to show thatpa1k=1(pa1)/31k(2kk)0(modp). It is easy to see

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the anonymous referees for helpful comments. This work is funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12001288) and the Startup Foundation for Introducing Talent of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (2019r062), and it is partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12071208).

References (28)

  • A. Adamchuk

    Comments on OEIS A066796 in 2006

  • M. Apagodu

    Elementary proof of congruences involving sum of binomial coefficients

    Int. J. Number Theory

    (2018)
  • M. Apagodu et al.

    Using the “freshman's dream” to prove combinatorial congruences

    Am. Math. Mon.

    (2017)
  • H.W. Gould

    Combinatorial Identities

    (1972)
  • Cited by (4)

    View full text