Energy storage selection and operation for night-time survival of small lunar surface systems
Introduction
After decades of very limited activity, a renaissance of lunar exploration has started in recent years. Perhaps kick-started by the Lunar X-Prize and by the desire of space agencies to explore the resource potential of the Moon, a large number of surface missions have recently been announced by agencies and private enterprises. This new wave of lunar surface exploration, spearheaded by the landing of Chang'e 3 in 2013, and possibly culminating in the announced crewed NASA Artemis landings in the mid-2020s, targets more ambitious science objectives and will be more sustainable than Apollo era exploration.
For any lunar surface mission, one of the most demanding challenges is the extreme environment of dust, radiation, vacuum and especially its thermal environment. In the absence of a tempering atmosphere, surface temperatures range from about 50 K to 390 K, depending on daytime, latitude and surrounding topography [1]. Maximum daytime temperatures are more moderate near the poles, but low solar elevation causes significant shadowing by local topography that severely impact surface temperatures. In addition, the relatively long duration of a lunar month (average synodic lunar day) of 29.531 [2] lead to a nighttime of 354 h. In the absence of solar illumination and faced with the extremely low temperatures of the surface and space, there will be no external energy source available. Ensuring reliable operation during, or survival of this period is “probably the most demanding energy storage challenge that will be faced in the exploration of the solar system” [3].
Some of the previous lunar missions have faced the same problem and have coped with varying degrees of success. Prior to the Apollo landings, the USA successfully landed a total of five solar powered Surveyor landers. Surveyor 3 died during its first lunar night, the other four managed to survive up to six nights with varying degrees of damage. Surveyor 6 and 7 even achieved a combined 120 h of night-time operation [4,5]. A set of long term experiment packages was also deployed during the manned Apollo missions: The Early Apollo Scientific Experiments Package (EASEP) of Apollo 11 and the Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Packages (ALSEP) of Apollo 12 to 17. EASEP was solar powered but with Radio-Isotopic Heating Units (RHUs) and survived its first lunar night but died during noon on the second day. The following ALSEP packages operated flawlessly for up to 98 lunar day/night cycles [5], thanks to a Radioisotope Thermo-Electric Generator (RTG). On the soviet side, the two solar powered but RHU assisted Lunokhod rovers managed to survive 4 and 10 months. Similarily, the Chinese Chang'e 3 and recently landed Chang'e 4 lander and rover use solar power and RHU assistance to cope with the lunar conditions. So far, both landers and the second Yutu rover are still fully operational while the first Yutu rover survived at least 31 months but lost mobility in the first lunar night [6].
While these past achievements must not be understated, the challenge is significantly greater for some of the currently proposed systems. Building on the advances in spacecraft miniaturization demonstrated by CubeSat technology in recent years, many of the proposed or planned missions involve surface systems with a mass of less than 25 kg. Examples include the Sorato (4 kg) and Polar Ice Explorer (12 kg) rovers of ispace inc. [7], Cuberover (4 kg) from Astrobotics [8], Mission One (5 kg) of Pulispace [9] or the stationary Robex Remote Unit concept (3 kg and 10 kg) [10]. Together with further similar examples, these standalone units make a new class of lunar surface systems that are considerably smaller than what has flown previously. Considering the significant time, effort and cost involved in the preparation and execution of any lunar mission, it should be a priority to maximize the operational lifetime of deployed systems. Despite this, it is expected that the majority of early commercial lunar systems are not planned to survive the first lunar day [3].
Keeping systems operational during the lunar night requires thermal control to keep internal temperatures within component envelopes. Insulation, such as multi-layer insulation (MLI), low emissivity coatings or aerogel reduce heat loss at night, but heating is required to keep temperatures constant. For this reason, efficient energy storage is crucial to enable nighttime operation. Radio-isotope based energy sources would be ideal because of their extremely high energy density, but access to such systems is restricted, procurement is expensive and their usage can be politically challenging. Smaller systems, especially those of non-institutional origin, will therefore typically rely on battery storage [3].
Various battery technologies have been used in space systems to date, but in recent years rechargeable lithium ion cells have become the “preferred choice because of their high energy & power density, reliability, robustness and long cycle life” [11]. This includes application on planetary missions with highly challenging environmental conditions. For example, both Mars Exploration Rovers (Spirit and Opportunity), the Mars Science Laboratory (Curiosity) and Mars Insight use lithium ion batteries for energy storage [12]. Multiple different chemistries of lithium ion batteries exist, some of which are specifically tailored for low temperature operation [13], though these specialty products usually don't exhibit the energy densities of currently available cells. High energy density chemistries and architectures for future batteries are a topic of intense investigation, with promising developments into the direction of lithium metal and lithium sulphur batteries, but early prototypes are still constrained by limited temperature ranges, limited cycle life and safety concerns. Primary lithium batteries have also been used for exploration missions, where recharging was not necessary, e.g. for the Philae [14] or Huygens landers [15]. For the application of sustaining operation during the long and cold lunar night, a compromise is needed between high energy density, capacity at low temperature and high temperature tolerance.
However, nominal capacity and temperature ranges are only of limited use for the comparison and selection of energy storage devices [16], as battery capacity generally significantly decreases towards lower temperatures, but increases for lower discharge currents [17]. The extent of these effects is not always reported in datasheets and presented values may not always be comparable. For example, self-heating of batteries is seldom documented, which can lead to higher apparent capacities at higher discharge currents [e.g.18]. In addition, the presented problem uses very low discharge currents, which are also not usually covered for rechargeable batteries.
Passive hibernation could be another strategy to extend mission operations beyond the first lunar day. In this case, the surface system would be switched off during the night and reawaken once the sun rises again. This would require non-operational survival of cryogenic temperatures. This has already been demonstrated by some lithium batteries [19,20], but it is unclear if this also applies to other cells.
For these reasons, the present study investigates the suitability of a broad selection of batteries and other energy storage devices. A selection of batteries are subjected to low current discharge testing over a wide temperature range. Temperature dependent capacity data is then used to calculate theoretical self-heated survival times to compare their performance. In addition, the selected batteries are tested for their ability to survive passive exposure to cryogenic temperatures.
Section snippets
Rechargeable batteries
Rechargeable battery technology has seen tremendous progress in recent decades, driven by the rapid development of consumer electronics and battery electric vehicles. Today, lithium ion batteries have eclipsed most other technologies, due to their high energy density and high cycle life. For this reason, they have become the standard solution for electric vehicles, consumer electronics [21] as well as the majority of space systems [11]. A wide range of subtypes exist, with different chemistries
Experimental setup
Table 1 shows a list of the energy storage systems that have been selected for further investigation. Two common high energy density lithium ion batteries, the Panasonic NCR18650BF and the LG Chem INR18650 have been chosen. The BP Swing 5300, the SAFT MP174565 xtd and the LTO TK 18650 NT35 represent common low temperature lithium ion batteries. A Maxwell BCAP3000 double layer capacitor and two HybridC Shenzen Toomen hybrid electrochemical capacitors are included, also for their low temperature
Energy density vs. temperature
All discharge tests were concluded successfully, no visible damage was observable on any of the tested cells. Initial cell temperatures were within ± 2K of the target temperature for all cells except for the Max3000 supercapacitor, for which a tolerance of ± 5K was used (due to its large thermal inertia). During testing, the cells remained within ± 5K of the target temperature, therefore self-heating was moderate but generally higher for lower temperatures.
Fig. 5 shows the gravimetric and
Discussion and conclusions
A selection of eight energy storage devices was tested for low temperature performance at low discharge currents and the presented results were compared to existing datasheet values of four primary battery types and three classes of PCMs. The temperature dependent energy densities were then used to calculate expected operation times during the lunar night based on a simple generic thermal model and for various amounts of insulation. It was shown that the choice of optimum energy storage depends
Declaration of competing interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgements
This study was conducted as part of the Lunar Volatiles Mobile Instrumentation – Extended (LUVMI-X) project funded by the European Commission as part of the Horizon 2020 framework (grant number 822018).
References (79)
- et al.
The global surface temperatures of the Moon as measured by the diviner lunar radiometer experiment
Icarus
(2017) - et al.
Power system analysis and optimization of a modular experiment Carrier during an analog lunar demo mission on a volcanic environment
Acta Astronaut.
(2019) - et al.
The use of lithium-ion batteries for JPL's Mars missions
Electrochim. Acta
(2018) - et al.
Low-temperature performance of Li-ion batteries: the behavior of lithiated graphite
J. Power Sources
(2015) - et al.
The experimental evaluation of lithium ion batteries after flash cryogenic freezing
Journal of Energy Storage
(2019) - et al.
Super-capacitor energy storage for micro-satellites: feasibility and potential mission applications
Acta Astronaut.
(2013) - et al.
Hydrogen fuel cells for portable applications
NaBH4 (sodium borohydride) hydrogen generator with a volume-exchange fuel tank for small unmanned aerial vehicles powered by a PEM (proton exchange membrane) fuel cell
Energy
(2014)- et al.
Energy distributions exhibited during thermal runaway of commercial lithium ion batteries used for human spaceflight applications
J. Power Sources
(2016) - et al.
“Rosetta lander – landing and operations on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko
Acta Astronaut.
(2016)
Surviving and operating through the lunar night
“Lessons Learned from Missions that Have Survived Lunar Night (Surveyor, ALSEP, Lunokhod),” Survive and Operate through the Lunar Night Workshop
Chang'e 3, 4 (CE 3, 4)/Yutu 1, 2. Gunters Space Page
Flight System Architecture of the Sorato Lunar Rover
CubeRover Payload User's Guide v1.4
Hungarian Team Puli towards Lunar Science and Exploration
Space Batteries Market Review 2017
Lithium-ion electrolytes containing ester cosolvents for improved low temperature performance
J. Electrochem. Soc.
Rosetta lander batteries experience during all operation phases
The Huygens probe system design
Space Sci. Rev.
Data.sheet.MP.174565.xtd
Study on survivability of 18650 Lithium-ion cells at cryogenic temperatures
Journal of Energy Storage
A review of rechargeable batteries for portable electronic devices
InfoMat
Electrolytes for low-temperature lithium batteries based on ternary mixtures of aliphatic carbonates
J. Electrochem. Soc.
“Performance characteristics of lithium-ion cells for NASA's Mars 2001 Lander application
IEEE Aero. Electron. Syst. Mag.
Lithium-ion batteries for aerospace
IEEE Aero. Electron. Syst. Mag.
Li-ion electrolytes containing ester Co-solvents for wide operating temperature range
ECS Transactions
The use of ester Co-solvent based low temperature electrolytes in experimental and large capacity prototype graphite-LiNiCoAlO2 lithium-ion cells
MP176065 Integration xc: rechargeable lithium-ion cell
Swing 5300 rechargeable lithium-ion cell - datasheet
Handbuch Lithium-Ionen-Batterien
Batteries in a portable world
Pathways for practical high-energy long-cycling lithium metal batteries
Nat Energy
“Lithium–Sulfur batteries: state of the art and future directions
ACS Appl. Energy Mater.
Ultra Light Lithium Sulfur Pouch Cell: Datasheet
Cited by (4)
A brief review on different hybrid methods of enhancement within latent heat storage systems
2022, Journal of Energy StorageIn-situ regolith based nanothermite heating for lunar rovers and equipment during the lunar night
2023, Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IACEXERGY ANALYSIS OF PHOTOVOLTAICS COUPLED WITH ELECTROCHEMICAL ENERGY STORAGE FOR LUNAR POWER APPLICATIONS
2022, ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, Proceedings (IMECE)