Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Decade of Sentic Computing: Topic Modeling and Bibliometric Analysis

  • Published:
Cognitive Computation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Research on sentic computing has received intensive attention in recent years, as indicated by the increased availability of academic literature. However, despite the growth in literature and researchers’ interests, there are no reviews on this topic. This study comprehensively explores the current research progress and tendencies, particularly the thematic structure of sentic computing, to provide insights into the issues addressed during the past decade and the potential future of sentic computing. We combined bibliometric analysis and structural topic modeling to examine sentic computing literature in various aspects, including the tendency of annual article count, top journals, countries/regions, institutions, and authors, the scientific collaborations between major contributors, as well as the major topics and their tendencies. We obtained interesting and meaningful findings. For example, sentic computing has attracted growing interest in academia. In addition, Cognitive Computation and Nanyang Technological University were found to be the most productive journal and institution in publishing sentic computing studies, respectively. Moreover, important issues such as cyber issues and public opinion, deep neural networks and personality, financial applications and user profiles, and affective and emotional computing have been commonly addressed by authors focusing on sentic computing. Our study provides a thorough overview of sentic computing, reveals major concerns among scholars during the past decade, and offers insights into the future directions of sentic computing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://sentic.net/

  2. https://scholar.google.com/

  3. https://gephi.org/

References

  1. Cambria E, Hussain A. Sentic computing: techniques, tools, and applications. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. Cham, Switzerland.

  2. Cambria E, Rajagopal D, Olsher D, Das D. Big social data analysis. Big data computing. 2013;13:401–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dashtipour K, Gogate M, Li J, Jiang F, Kong B, Hussain A. A hybrid Persian sentiment analysis framework: Integrating dependency grammar based rules and deep neural networks. Neurocomputing. 2020;380:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cambria E. Affective computing and sentiment analysis. IEEE Intell Syst. 2016;31(2):102–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cambria E, Das D, Bandyopadhyay S, Feraco A. A practical guide to sentiment analysis. Springer; 2017. Cham, Switzerland.

  6. Vashishtha S, Susan S. Sentiment cognition from words shortlisted by fuzzy entropy. IEEE Trans Cogn Dev Syst. 2019;12(3):541–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ayutthaya TSN, Pasupa K, Thai sentiment analysis via bidirectional lstm-cnn model with embedding vectors and sentic features. In, 2018. International joint symposium on artificial intelligence and natural language processing (iSAI-NLP). IEEE. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cambria E, Grassi M, Hussain A, Havasi C. Sentic computing for social media marketing. Multimed Tools Appl. 2012;59(2):557–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang M, Xie H, Rao Y, Feng J, Wang FL. Sentiment strength detection with a context-dependent lexicon-based convolutional neural network. Inf Sci (Ny). 2020;520:389–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cambria E, Speer R, Havasi C, Hussain A. Senticnet: A publicly available semantic resource for opinion mining. In: 2010 AAAI Fall Symposium Series. 2010. p. 14–18.

  11. Mehta Y, Majumder N, Gelbukh A, Cambria E. Recent trends in deep learning based personality detection. Artif Intell Rev. 2020;53:2313–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boudad N, Faizi R, Thami ROH, Chiheb R. Sentiment analysis in Arabic: A review of the literature. Ain Shams Eng J. 2018;9(4):2479–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang Z, Ho S-B, Cambria E. A review of emotion sensing: categorization models and algorithms. Multimed Tools Appl. 2020;79:35553–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar A, Jaiswal A. Systematic literature review of sentiment analysis on Twitter using soft computing techniques. Concurr Comput Pract Exp. 2020;32(1):e5107.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Sukthanker R, Poria S, Cambria E, Thirunavukarasu R. Anaphora and coreference resolution: A review. Inf Fusion. 2020;59:139–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang J, Yin Z, Chen P, Nichele S. Emotion recognition using multi-modal data and machine learning techniques: A tutorial and review. Inf Fusion. 2020;59:103–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ain QT, Ali M, Riaz A, Noureen A, Kamran M, Hayat B, Rehman A. Sentiment analysis using deep learning techniques: A review. Int J Adv Comput Sci Appl. 2017;8(6):424–33.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Azmi AM, Al-Qabbany AO, Hussain A. Computational and natural language processing based studies of hadith literature: A survey. Artif Intell Rev. 2019;52(2):1369–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen X, Yu G, Cheng G, Hao T. Research topics, author profiles, and collaboration networks in the top-ranked journal on educational technology over the past 40 years: A bibliometric analysis. J Comput Educ. 2019;6(4):563–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen X, Hao J, Chen J, Hua S, Hao T, Hao T, et al. A bibliometric analysis of the research status of the technology enhanced language learning. In Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 169–79.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Chen X, Wang S, Tang Y, Hao T. A bibliometric analysis of event detection in social media. Online Inf Rev. 2019;43(1):29–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen X, Xie H, Wang FL, Liu Z, Xu J, Hao T. A bibliometric analysis of natural language processing in medical research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018;18(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Keramatfar A, Amirkhani H. Bibliometrics of sentiment analysis literature. J Inf Sci. 2019;45(1):3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mäntylä MV, Graziotin D, Kuutila M. The evolution of sentiment analysis—A review of research topics, venues, and top cited papers. Comput Sci Rev. 2018;27:16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Blei DM. Probabilistic topic models. Commun ACM. 2012;55(4):77–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Blei DM, Edu BB, Ng AY, Edu AS, Jordan MI, Edu JB. Latent Dirichlet allocation. J Mach Learn Res. 2003;3:993–1022.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hu N, Zhang T, Gao B, Bose I. What do hotel customers complain about? Text analysis using structural topic model. Tour Manag. 2019;72:417–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lester CA, Wang M, Vydiswaran VGV. Describing the patient experience from Yelp reviews of community pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2019;59(3):349–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Korfiatis N, Stamolampros P, Kourouthanassis P, Sagiadinos V. Measuring service quality from unstructured data: A topic modeling application on airline passengers’ online reviews. Expert Syst Appl. 2019;116:472–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen X, Xie H, Cheng G, Poon LKM, Leng M, Wang FL. Trends and deatures of the applications of natural language processing techniques for clinical trials text analysis. Appl Sci. 2020;10(6):2157–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bennett R, Vijaygopal R, Kottasz R. Willingness of people who are blind to accept autonomous vehicles: An empirical investigation. Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2020;69:13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Cambria E, Hussain A, Havasi C, Eckl C. Sentic computing: Exploitation of common sense for the development of emotion-sensitive systems. In: Development of Multimodal Interfaces: Active Listening and Synchrony. Springer; 2010. p. 148–56.

  33. Svensson G. SSCI and its impact factors: A “prisoner’s dilemma”? Eur J Mark. 2010;44(1/2):23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peng B, Guo D, Qiao H, Yang Q, Zhang B, Hayat T, et al. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of China’s coal research 2000–2015. J Clean Prod. 2018;197:1177–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gutiérrez-Salcedo M, Martínez MÁ, Moral-Munoz JA, Herrera-Viedma E, Cobo MJ. Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Appl Intell. 2018;48(5):1275–87.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Roberts ME, Stewart BM, Tingley D. stm: R package for structural topic models. J Stat Softw. 2014;10(2):1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Chen X, Chen J, Cheng G, Gong T. Topics and trends in artificial intelligence assisted human brain research. PLoS One. 2020;15(4):e0231192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen X, Zou D, Xie H. Fifty years of British Journal of Educational Technology: A topic modeling based bibliometric perspective. Br J Educ Technol. 2020;51(3):692–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen X, Zou D, Cheng G, Xie H. Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of Computer & Education. Comput Educ. 2020;151:1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mann HB. Nonparametric tests against trend. Econom J Econom Soc. 1945;13:245–59.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Kendall MG. Rank correlation methods. Oxford: Griffin; 1948.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen X, Ding R, Xu K, Wang S, Hao T, Zhou Y. A bibliometric review of natural language processing empowered mobile computing. Wirel Commun Mob Comput. 2018;1–21.

  43. Poria S, Cambria E, Gelbukh A. Aspect extraction for opinion mining with a deep convolutional neural network. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2016;108:42–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Poria S, Cambria E, Howard N, Huang G-B, Hussain A. Fusing audio, visual and textual clues for sentiment analysis from multimodal content. Neurocomputing. 2016;174:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saif H, He Y, Fernandez M, Alani H. Contextual semantics for sentiment analysis of Twitter. Inf Process Manag. 2016;52(1):5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Majumder N, Poria S, Gelbukh A, Cambria E. Deep learning-based document modeling for personality detection from text. IEEE Intell Syst. 2017;32(2):74–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kasun LLC, Zhou H, Huang G-B, Vong CM. Representational learning with extreme learning machine for big data. IEEE Intell Syst. 2013;28(6):31–4.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Poria S, Cambria E, Winterstein G, Huang G-B. Sentic patterns: Dependency-based rules for concept-level sentiment analysis. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2014;69:45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Manek AS, Shenoy PD, Mohan MC, Venugopal KR. Aspect term extraction for sentiment analysis in large movie reviews using Gini Index feature selection method and SVM classifier. World Wide Web. 2017;20(2):135–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Ribeiro FN, Araújo M, Gonçalves P, Gonçalves MA, Benevenuto F. Sentibench-a benchmark comparison of state-of-the-practice sentiment analysis methods. EPJ Data Sci. 2016;5(1):1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cambria E, Poria S, Gelbukh A, Thelwall M. Sentiment analysis is a big suitcase. IEEE Intell Syst. 2017;32(6):74–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Dinakar K, Jones B, Havasi C, Lieberman H, Picard R. Common sense reasoning for detection, prevention, and mitigation of cyberbullying. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst. 2012;2(3):1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Hájek P. Combining bag-of-words and sentiment features of annual reports to predict abnormal stock returns. Neural Comput Appl. 2018;29(7):343–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wöllmer M, Weninger F, Knaup T, Schuller B, Sun C, Sagae K, et al. Youtube movie reviews: Sentiment analysis in an audio-visual context. IEEE Intell Syst. 2013;28(3):46–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Brandes U, Borgatti SP, Freeman LC. Maintaining the duality of closeness and betweenness centrality. Soc Networks. 2016;44:153–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Peng H, Cambria E. CSenticNet: A concept-level resource for sentiment analysis in chinese language. In: International Conference on Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing. Springer; 2017. p. 90–104.

  57. Li W, Zhu L, Shi Y, Guo K, Zheng Y. User reviews: Sentiment analysis using lexicon integrated two-channel CNN-LSTM family models. Appl Soft Comput. 2020;94:1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Kumari K, Singh JP, Dwivedi YK, Rana NP. Towards cyberbullying-free social media in smart cities: A unified multi-modal approach. Soft Comput. 2020;24(15):11059–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Liang G, He W, Xu C, Chen L, Zeng J. Rumor identification in microblogging systems based on users’ behavior. IEEE Trans Comput Soc Syst. 2015;2(3):99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Asghar MZ, Habib A, Habib A, Khan A, Ali R, Khattak A. Exploring deep neural networks for rumor detection. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput. 2019;1–19.

  61. Akhtar MS, Ekbal A, Narayan S, Singh V. No, that never happened!! Investigating rumors on Twitter. IEEE Intell Syst. 2018;33(5):8–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Ahmad H, Arif A, Khattak AM, Habib A, Asghar MZ, Shah B. Applying deep neural networks for predicting dark triad personality trait of online users. In: International Conference on Information Networking (ICOIN). IEEE; 2020. p. 102–105.

  63. Jain G, Sharma M, Agarwal B. Spam detection in social media using convolutional and long short term memory neural network. Ann Math Artif Intell. 2019;85(1):21–44.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  64. Li X, Xie H, Lau RYK, Wong T-L, Wang F-L. Stock prediction via sentimental transfer learning. IEEE Access. 2018;6:73110–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Li Q, Chen Y, Wang J, Chen Y, Chen H. Web media and stock markets: A survey and future directions from a big data perspective. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2017;30(2):381–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Loughran T, McDonald B. When is a liability not a liability? Textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10-Ks. J Finance. 2011;66(1):35–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Xie H, Li Q, Mao X, Li X, Cai Y, Rao Y. Community-aware user profile enrichment in folksonomy. Neural Netw. 2014;58:111–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zhou D, Wu X, Zhao W, Lawless S, Liu J. Query expansion with enriched user profiles for personalized search utilizing folksonomy data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng. 2017;29(7):1536–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Jain VK, Kumar S, Fernandes SL. Extraction of emotions from multilingual text using intelligent text processing and computational linguistics. J Comput Sci. 2017;21:316–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Chatzakou D, Vakali A. Harvesting opinions and emotions from social media textual resources. IEEE Internet Comput. 2015;19:46–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hernández Farías DI. Irony and sarcasm detection in Twitter: The role of affective content. 2017. Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Politècnica de València.

  72. Farías DIH, Patti V, Rosso P. Irony detection in twitter: The role of affective content. ACM Trans Internet Technol. 2016;16(3):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Qiu J, Liu C, Li Y, Lin Z. Leveraging sentiment analysis at the aspects level to predict ratings of reviews. Inf Sci (Ny). 2018;451:295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Bi JW, Liu Y, Fan ZP, Cambria E. Modelling customer satisfaction from online reviews using ensemble neural network and effect-based Kano model. Int J Prod Res. 2019;57(22):7068–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Bertola F, Patti V. Ontology-based affective models to organize artworks in the social semantic web. Inf Process Manag. 2016;52(1):139–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Krizhevsky A, Sutskever I, Hinton GE. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. 2012. p. 1097–105.

  77. Kim Y. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP); 2014. p. 1746–1751.

  78. Yadav S, Ekbal A, Saha S, Bhattacharyya P. Medical sentiment analysis using social media: Towards building a patient assisted system. In Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018); 2018. p. 2790–2797.

  79. Zhang S, Zhao X, Tian Q. Spontaneous speech emotion recognition using multiscale deep convolutional LSTM. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2019:1–10.

  80. Mandhula T, Pabboju S, Gugulotu N. Predicting the customer’s opinion on amazon products using selective memory architecture-based convolutional neural network. J Supercomput. 2020;76:5923–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Yang X, Molchanov P, Kautz J. Making convolutional networks recurrent for visual sequence learning. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. IEEE; 2018. p. 6469–6478.

  82. Pasupa K, Ayutthaya TSN. Thai sentiment analysis with deep learning techniques: A comparative study based on word embedding, POS-tag, and sentic features. Sustain Cities Soc. 2019;50:1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Luong M-T, Pham H, Manning CD. Effective approaches to attention-based neural machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing; 2015. p. 1412–1421.

  84. Sukhbaatar S, Weston J, Fergus R. End-to-end memory networks. In: Advances in neural information processing systems. 2015. p. 2440–2448.

  85. Mubarok MS, Adiwijaya, Aldhi MD. Aspect-based sentiment analysis to review products using Naïve Bayes. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing LLC; 2017. p. 20060.

  86. Al-Sabahi K, Zhang Z, Long J, Alwesabi K. An enhanced latent semantic analysis approach for arabic document summarization. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018;43(12):8079–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Huang J, Xue Y, Hu X, Jin H, Lu X, Liu Z. Sentiment analysis of Chinese online reviews using ensemble learning framework. Cluster Comput. 2019;22(2):3043–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Firmanto A, Sarno R. Aspect-based sentiment analysis using grammatical rules, word similarity and SentiCircle. Int J Intell Eng Syst. 2019;12(5):190–201.

    Google Scholar 

  89. Chowdhary KR. Natural language processing. In: Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence. Springer; 2020. p. 603–49.

  90. Dehdarbehbahani I, Shakery A, Faili H. Semi-supervised word polarity identification in resource-lean languages. Neural Netw. 2014;58:50–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Jimenez S, Gonzalez FA, Gelbukh A, Duenas G. Word2set: WordNet-based word representation rivaling neural word embedding for lexical similarity and sentiment analysis. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2019;14(2):41–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. McShane M. Natural language understanding (NLU, not NLP) in cognitive systems. Ai Mag. 2017;38(4):43–56.

    Google Scholar 

  93. Mishra A, Bhattacharyya P. Automatic extraction of cognitive features from gaze data. In: Cognitively Inspired Natural Language Processing. Springer; 2018. p. 153–69.

  94. Pang J, Rao Y, Xie H, Wang X, Wang FL, Wong T-L, et al. Fast supervised topic models for short text emotion detection. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2019:1–14.

  95. Ekinci E, Omurca SI. A new approach for a domain-independent turkish sentiment seed lexicon compilation. Int Arab J Inf Technol. 2019;16(5):843–53.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Kumar A, Sharma A. Ontology driven social big data analytics for fog enabled sentic-social governance. Scalable Comput Pract Exp. 2019;20(2):223–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Rintyarna BS, Sarno R, Fatichah C. Evaluating the performance of sentence level features and domain sensitive features of product reviews on supervised sentiment analysis tasks. J Big Data. 2019;6(1):84–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Banerjee S, Bhattacharyya S, Bose I. Whose online reviews to trust? Understanding reviewer trustworthiness and its impact on business. Decis Support Syst. 2017;96:17–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Firdaus SN, Ding C, Sadeghian A. Topic specific emotion detection for retweet prediction. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2019;10(8):2071–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Solomon RS, Srinivas P, Das A, Gamback B, Chakraborty T. Understanding the psycho-sociological facets of homophily in social network communities. IEEE Comput Intell Mag. 2019;14(2):28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  101. Dridi A, Atzeni M, Recupero DR. FineNews: Fine-grained semantic sentiment analysis on financial microblogs and news. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. 2019;10(8):2199–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Atzeni M, Dridi A, Recupero DR. Using frame-based resources for sentiment analysis within the financial domain. Prog Artif Intell. 2018;7(4):273–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Nakikj D, Mamykina L. A park or a highway: Overcoming tensions in designing for socio-emotional and informational needs in online health communities. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 2017. p. 1304–19.

  104. Zhao Y, Zhang J. Consumer health information seeking in social media: A literature review. Heal Inf Libr J. 2017;34(4):268–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. Satapathy R, Chaturvedi I, Cambria E, Ho SS, Na JC. Subjectivity detection in nuclear energy tweets. Comput y Sist. 2017;21(4):657–64.

    Google Scholar 

  106. Sindhu I, Daudpota SM, Badar K, Bakhtyar M, Baber J, Nurunnabi M. Aspect-based opinion mining on student’s feedback for faculty teaching performance evaluation. IEEE Access. 2019;7:108729–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. Casales-Garcia V, Museros L, Sanz I, Falomir Z, Gonzalez-Abril L. Extracting feeling from food colour. In: Advances in Tourism, Technology and Smart Systems. Springer; 2020. p. 15–24.

  108. Sorensen V, Lansing J, Thummanapalli N, Cambria E. Mood of the Planet: Challenging Visions of Big Data in the Arts. Cognit Comput. 2020. https://sentic.net/mood-of-the-planet.pdf. Accessed 11 Dec 2020.

  109. Susanto Y, Livingstone A, Ng B, Cambria E. The hourglass model revisited. IEEE Intell Syst. 2020;35(5):96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Rafeek R, Remya R. Detecting contextual word polarity using aspect based sentiment analysis and logistic regression. In: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Smart Technologies and Management for Computing, Communication, Controls, Energy and Materials (ICSTM). IEEE; 2017. p. 102–7.

  111. Poria S, Chaturvedi I, Cambria E, Bisio F. Sentic LDA: Improving on LDA with semantic similarity for aspect-based sentiment analysis. In: 2016 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE; 2016. p. 4465–4473.

  112. Ma Y, Peng H, Khan T, Cambria E, Hussain A. Sentic LSTM: A hybrid network for targeted aspect-based sentiment analysis. Cognit Comput. 2018;10(4):639–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. Gupta A, Agrawal D, Chauhan H, Dolz J, Pedersoli M. An attention model for group-level emotion recognition. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 2018. p. 611–5.

  114. Wei Q, Zhao Y, Xu Q, Li L, He J, Yu L, et al. A new deep-learning framework for group emotion recognition. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 2017. p. 587–92.

  115. Wang K, Zeng X, Yang J, Meng D, Zhang K, Peng X, et al. Cascade attention networks for group emotion recognition with face, body and image cues. In: Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. 2018. p. 640–5.

  116. Cambria E. An introduction to concept-level sentiment analysis. In: Mexican international conference on artificial intelligence. Springer; 2013. p. 478–83.

  117. Balogh V, Berend G, Diochnos DI, Turán G. Understanding the semantic content of sparse word embeddings using a commonsense knowledge base. In: AAAI. 2020. p. 7399–406.

  118. Srivastava R, Bhatia MPS. Challenges with sentiment analysis of on-line micro-texts. Int J Intell Syst Appl. 2017;9(7):31–40.

    Google Scholar 

  119. Kim K. An improved semi-supervised dimensionality reduction using feature weighting: Application to sentiment analysis. Expert Syst Appl. 2018;109:49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. Alami N, En-nahnahi N, Ouatik SA, Meknassi M. Using unsupervised deep learning for automatic summarization of Arabic documents. Arab J Sci Eng. 2018;43(12):7803–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. Canales L, Strapparava C, Boldrini E, Martínez-Barco P. Intensional learning to efficiently build up automatically annotated emotion corpora. IEEE Trans Affect Comput. 2020;11(2):335–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. Kalarani P, Selva BS. An embellishment of semantic knowledge base using novel crowd sourcing and graph based methods for improving sentiment analysis. J Theor Appl Inf Technol. 2017;95(15):3543–50.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Hassan A, Abbasi A, Zeng D. Twitter sentiment analysis: A bootstrap ensemble framework. In: 2013 International Conference on Social Computing. IEEE; 2013. p. 357–64.

  124. Bisio F, Meda C, Gastaldo P, Zunino R, Cambria E. Concept-level sentiment analysis with SenticNet. In: A Practical Guide to Sentiment Analysis. Springer; 2017. p. 173–88.

  125. Ho D, Hamzah D, Poria S, Singlish CE, SenticNet: a concept-based sentiment resource for Singapore English. In, . IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE. 2018;2018:1285–91.

    Google Scholar 

  126. Cambria E, Li Y, Xing FZ, Poria S, Kwok K. Senticnet 6: Ensemble application of symbolic and subsymbolic ai for sentiment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2020. p. 105–114.

  127. Vilares D, Peng H, Satapathy R, Cambria E, Babelsenticnet: a commonsense reasoning framework for multilingual sentiment analysis. In, . IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence (SSCI). IEEE. 2018;2018:1292–8.

    Google Scholar 

  128. Simsek A, Karagoz P. Wikipedia enriched advertisement recommendation for microblogs by using sentiment enhanced user profiles. J Intell Inf Syst. 2020;54(2):245–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Liu N, Cheng Y. The academic ranking of world universities. High Educ Eur. 2005;30(2):127–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. Salmi J. The challenge of establishing world class universities. The World Bank; 2009. Washington DC: NACUBO.

  131. Xie H, Chu H-C, Hwang G-J, Wang C-C. Trends and development in technology-enhanced adaptive/personalized learning: a systematic review of journal publications from 2007 to 2017. Comput Educ. 2019;140:1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. Li K, Rollins J, Yan E. Web of Science use in published research and review papers 1997–2017: A selective, dynamic, cross-domain, content-based analysis. Scientometrics. 2018;115(1):1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Wei Y-M, Mi Z-F, Huang Z. Climate policy modeling: an online SCI-E and SSCI based literature review. Omega. 2015;57:70–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  134. Wang C-C, Chen C-C. Electronic commerce research in latest decade: a literature review. Int J Electron Commer Stud. 2010;1(1):1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  135. Cambria E, Hussain A. Sentic computing: a common-sense-based framework for concept-level sentiment analysis. Springer; 2015. Cham, Switzerland.

  136. Bell D, Koulouri T, Lauria S, Macredie RD, Sutton J. Microblogging as a mechanism for human–robot interaction. Knowledge-Based Syst. 2014;69:64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by One-off Special Fund from Central and Faculty Fund in Support of Research from 2019/20 to 2021/22 (MIT02/19–20), the Research Cluster Fund (RG 78/2019-2020R), and the Interdisciplinary Research Scheme of the Dean’s Research Fund 2019–20 (FLASS/DRF/IDS-2) of The Education University of Hong Kong, and the HKIBS Research Seed Fund 2019/20 (190–009), the Direct Grant (101138), the Lam Woo Research Fund (LWI20011) and the Research Seed Fund (102367) of Lingnan University, Hong Kong.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mathematics and Information Technology, The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Xieling Chen & Gary Cheng

  2. Department of Computing and Decision Sciences, Lingnan University, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Haoran Xie

  3. Department of Computer Science, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China

    Zongxi Li

Authors
  1. Xieling Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haoran Xie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gary Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Zongxi Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haoran Xie.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was not required as no human or animals were involved.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

This article belongs to the Topical Collection: A Decade of Sentic Computing

Guest Editor: Erik Cambria and Amir Hussain

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Xie, H., Cheng, G. et al. A Decade of Sentic Computing: Topic Modeling and Bibliometric Analysis. Cogn Comput 14, 24–47 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09861-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-021-09861-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation