Skip to main content
Log in

4-D tomographic change of Vp and Vp/Vs structure before destructive earthquakes: a case study of the Sivrice-Elazığ earthquake (mw = 6.8), Eastern Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A destructive earthquake (Mw 6.8) occurred at Sivrice-Elazığ on the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ) on 24th January, 2020, causing loss of life and property. During the period of historical and instrumental seismology, destructive earthquakes have occurred at certain periodic intervals on the EAFZ, and micro-earthquake activity is also a frequent tectonic event. In this study, time-dependent four-dimensional tomography images of the Hazar-Sincik segment, one of the six segments of the EAFZ that produced the Sivrice earthquake, were obtained for the first time using the local earthquake tomography method. Synthetic tests show that data sets from before and after the Sivrice earthquake can produce reliable results in the Hazar-Sincik segment up to 20 km deep. Low Vp and Vp/Vs values were observed before the Sivrice earthquake, and an increase in Vp/Vs rates was detected after the Sivrice earthquake. Low Vp and Vp/Vs values along the Bitlis-Zagros Thrust Belt indicate that this area may present a high earthquake hazard. Very low Vp velocities on the Erkenek segment, which has produced destructive earthquakes in the past make us think that this region is still loaded with stress and that potential earthquakes in the future are likely. The results show that Vp and Vp/Vs characteristics change radically after a major earthquake. The reasons for these changes include the evolution of underground porosity and permeability values after major earthquakes. Detecting the area of seismological changes underground with time-dependent four-dimensional tomographic images can provide an important basis for earthquake prediction research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AFAD (2020a) Earthquake Department of the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency Earthquake Catalog. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • AFAD (2020b) 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) Mw 6.8 Earthquake Report. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/depremdokumanlari/1831. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • AFAD (2020c) 24 January 2020 Elazığ Earthquake news. https://deprem.afad.gov.tr/tarihteBuAy?id=79. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • Akbas B, Akdeniz N, Aksay A, Altun I, Balci V, Bilginer E (2013) Turkey Geological Map-General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara-Turkey. http://yerbilimleri.mta.gov.tr/anasayfa.aspx. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • Akuhara T, Mochizuki K, Nakahigashi K, Yamada T, Shinohara M, Sakai S, Kanazawa T, Uehira K, Shimizu H (2013) Segmentation of the Vp/Vs ratio and low-frequency earthquake distribution around the fault boundary of the Tonankai and Nankai earthquakes. Geophys Res Lett 40:1306–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy E (1993) General geological features of Elazığ west and South. Turkish J Earth Sci 2:113–123 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aksoy E, Inceoz M, Kocyigit A (2007) Lake Hazar basin: a negative flower structure on the East Anatolian fault system (EAFS), SE Turkey. Turkish J Earth Sci 16(3):319–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Aktug B, Dikmen U, Dogru A, Ozener H (2013) Slip rates near Karlıova Triple Junction by GPS Observations. J Geodyn 67:21–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aktug B, Ozener H, Dogru A, Sabuncu A, Turgut B, Halicıoglu K, Yilmaz O, Havazli E (2016) Slip rates and seismic potential on the East Anatolian Fault System using an improved GPS velocity field. J Geodyn 94–95:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN, Finkel CF (1987) Seismicity of Turkey and neighbouring regions, 1899 – 452 1915. Ann Geophys 5B(6):701–726

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambraseys NN (1989) Temporary seismic quiescence: SE Turkey. Geophys J Int 96:311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak E, Yilmaz Ş, Softa M, Turker T, Bayrak Y (2015) Earthquake hazard analysis for East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Nat Hazards 76:1063–1077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak E, Nas M, Bayrak Y (2019) New macroseismic intensity predictive models for Turkey. Acta Geophys 67:1483–1513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beltran LP, Nissen E, Bergman EA, Cambaz MD, Gaudrea E, Karasozen E, Tan F (2020) The 2020 Mw 6.8 Elazığ (Turkey) Earthquake Reveals Rupture Behavior of the East Anatolian Fault. Geophys Res Lett 47(13), https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL088136

  • Bozkurt E (2001) Neotectonics of Turkey-a synthesis. Geodin Acta 14:3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin H, Guneyli H, Mayer L (2003) Paleoseismology of the Palu-Lake Hazar segment of the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey. Tectonophysics 374:163–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheloni D, Akinci A (2020) Source modelling and strong ground motion simulations for the 24 January 2020, Mw 6.8 Elazığ earthquake, Turkey. Geophys J Int 223(2):1054–1068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiarabba C, De Gori P, Boschi E (2009) Pore-pressure migration along normal-fault system resolved by time-repeated seismic tomography. Geology 37(1):67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duman TY, Emre O (2013) The East Anatolian Fault: geometry, segmentation and jog characteristics. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 372: 495–529

  • Diaz-Moreno A, Barberi G, Cocina O, Kolakov I, Scarfi L, Zuccarello L, Prudencio J, Garcia-Yeguas A, Alvarez I, Garcia L, Ibanez JM (2018) New Insights on Mt. Etna’s crust and relationship with the regional tectonic framework from joint active and passive P-wave seismic tomography. Surv Geophys 39:57–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emre O, Duman TY, Ozalp S, Elmaci H, Olgun S, Saroglu F (2013) 1/1.250.000 scaled Turkey active fault map-General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration Special Publication. http://www.mta.gov.tr/. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • Emre O, Duman TY, Ozalp S, Saroglu F, Olgun S, Elmaci H, Can T (2018) Active fault database of Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 16:3229–3275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr TG, Rosen PA, Caro E, Crippen R, Duren R, Hensley S, Kobrick M, Paller M, Rodriguez E, Roth L, Seal D, Shaffer S, Shimada J, Umland J, Werner M, Oskin M, Burbank D, Alsdorf D (2007) The shuttle radar topography mission (SRTM). Rev Geophys 45(2):1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari AH, Lamair L, Hage S, Schmidt S, Cagatay MN, Avsar U (2020) A 3800 year paleoseismic record (Lake Hazar sediments, eastern Turkey): implications for the east Anatolian fault seismic cycle. Earth Planet Sci Lett 538:116152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaina C, Medvedev S, Torsvik TH, Koulakov I, Werner SC (2014) 4D Arctic: A glimpse into the structure and evolution of the Arctic in the light of new geophysical maps, plate tectonics and tomographic models. Surv Geophys 35:1095–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunasekera RC, Foulger GR, Julian BR (2003) Reservoir depletion at The Geysers geothermal area, California, shown by four-dimensional seismic tomography. J Geophys Res 108(3):2134

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurocak Z (1993) Geology of Sevrice (Elazığ) and its surroundings. Master Thesis, Universtiy of Fırat, Elazığ-Turkey (in Turkish)

  • Hisarlı ZM, Cinku MC, Ustaomer T, Keskin M, Orbay N (2016) Neotectonic deformation in the Eurasia–Arabia collision zone, the East Anatolian Plateau, E Turkey: evidence from palaeomagnetic study of Neogene-Quaternary volcanic rocks. Int J Earth Sci 105:139–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Italiano F, Sasmaz A, Yuce G, Okan OO (2013) Thermal fluids along the East Anatolian Fault Zone (EAFZ): Geochemical features and relationships with the tectonic setting. Chem Geol 339:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamalreyhani M, Buyukakpinar P, Cesca S, Dahm T, Sudhaus H, Rezapour M, Isken MP, Asayesh BM, Heimann S (2020) Seismicity related to the eastern sector of Anatolian escape tectonic: the example of the 24 January 2020 Mw 6.77 Elazığ-Sivrice earthquake. Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2020-55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaypak B, Gokkaya G (2012) 3-D imaging of the upper crust beneath the Denizli geothermal region by local earthquake tomography, western Turkey. J Volcanol Geoth Res 211–212:47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulakov I, Sobolev S (2006) Moho depth and three-dimensional P and S structure of the crust and uppermost mantle in the Eastern Mediterranean and Middle East derived from tomographic inversion of local ISC data. Geophys J Int 164(1):218–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulakov I, Bohm M, Asch G, Lühr BG, Manzanares A, Brotopuspito KS, Fauzi P, Purbawinata MA, Puspito NT, Ratdomopurbo A, Kopp H, Rabbel W, Shevkunova E (2007) P and S velocity structure of the crust and the upper mantle beneath central Java from local tomography inversion. J Geophys Res 112:B08310

    Google Scholar 

  • Koulakov I (2009) LOTOS code for local earthquake tomographic inversion: benchmarks for testing tomographic algorithms. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99(1):194–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulakov I, Gordeev EI, Dobretsov NL, Vernikovsky VA, Senyukov S, Jakovlev A, Jaxbulatov K (2013) Rapid changes in magma storage beneath the Klyuchevskoy group of volcanoes inferred from time-dependent seismic tomography. J Volcanol Geoth Res 263:75–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koulakov I (2020) BASIC TOMO: an educational tool for investigating the role of controlling parameters and observation geometry in tomography problems. Russ J Geophys Technol 1:40–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maden N (2012) One-Dimensional Thermal Modelling of the Eastern Pontides Orogenic Belt (NE Turkey). Pure appl Geophys 169:235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahatsente R, Onal G, Çemen I (2018) Lithospheric structure and the isostatic state of Eastern Anatolia: Insight from gravity data modelling. Lithosphere 10(2):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreno DG, Hubert-Ferrari A, Moernaut J, Fraser JG, Boes X, Van Daele M, Avsar U, Çağatay N, De Batist M (2011) Structure and recent evolution of the Hazar Basin: a strike-slip basin on the East Anatolian Fault, Eastern Turkey. Basin Res 23:191–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MTA (2020) MTA Geoscience map viewer and Drawing Editor. http://yerbilimleri.mta.gov.tr/. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • Palutoglu M, Tanyolu E (2006) Seismicity of Elazığ city center settlement area. Sci Eng J Fırat Univ 18(4):577–588 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozer C, Ozyazicioglu M (2019) The local earthquake tomography of Erzurum (Turkey) geothermal area. Earth Sci Res J 23(3):209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer C, Ozyazicioglu M, Gok E, Polat O (2019) Imaging the crustal structure throughout the East Anatolian Fault Zone, Turkey, by local earthquake tomography. Pure appl Geophys 176(6):2235–2261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk S, Bayrak Y (2012) Spatial variations of precursory seismic quiescence observed in recent years in the Eastern part of Turkey. Acta Geophys 60(1):92–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk S (2017) Space-time assessing of the earthquake potential in recent years in the Eastern Anatolia region of Turkey. Earth Sci Res J 21(2):67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk S (2018) Earthquake hazard potential in the Eastern Anatolian Region of Turkey: seismotectonic b and Dc-values and precursory quiescence Z-value. Front Earth Sci 12:215–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige CC, Saunders MA (1982) LSQR: an algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares. ACM Trans Math Softw 8:43–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peci V (1995) The Behaviour of some precursors before some strong earthquakes occurred in Albania and surrounding areas. Teknik Dergi. http://www.imo.org.tr/resimler/ekutuphane/pdf/11583.pdf. Accessed 24 January 2021

  • Prudencio J, Ibanez JM, Del Pezzo E, Marti J, Garcia-Yeguas A, De Siena L (2015) 3D Attenuation tomography of the Volcanic Island of Tenerife (Canary Islands). Surv Geophys 36:693–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragon T, Simons M, Bletery Q, Cavalie O, Fielding E (2020) A stochastic view of the 2020 Elazığ Mw6.8 earthquake. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020GL090704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin S, Oksum E (2021) The relation of seismic velocity and attenuation pattern in the East Anatolian Fault zone with earthquake occurrence: example of January 24, 2020 Sivrice Earthquake. Bull Min Res Explorat: 165, (in Turkish)

  • Saroglu F, Emre O, Kuscu I (1992) The East Anatolian fault zone of Turkey. Annales Tectonicae 6:99–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Simao NM, Nalbant SS, Sunbul F, Mutlu AK (2016) Central and eastern Anatolian crustal deformation rate and velocity fields derived from GPS and earthquake data. Earth Planet Sci Lett 433:89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sertcelik F (2012) Estimation of Coda Wave Attenuation in the East Anatolia Fault Zone, Turkey. Pure appl Geophys 169:1189–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasgin CK, Altun F (2019) An Example of Soft Sediment Deformation Structures Developed in Marine Environments; Slumps, Kırkgeçit Formation, NW Baskil, Elazığ. Sci Eng J Fırat Univ 31(1):145–156 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkoglu E, Unsworth M, Bulut F, Caglar I (2015) Crustal structure of the North Anatolian and East Anatolian Fault Systems from magnetotelluric data. Phys Earth Planet Inter 241:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Sluis A, van der Vorst HA (1987) Numerical solution of large, sparse linear algebraic systems arising from tomographic problems. In: Nolet, G. (Editor). Seismology and Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 5, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 49–83

  • Wang Ly G, Yx, Liu F, Jiang C (2008) Temporal Vp/Vs variation characteristics in different zones of China’s Capital Circle area before and after Wen’an earthquake. Acta Seismol Sin 21:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitcomb JH, Garmany JD, Anderson DL (1973) Earthquake Prediction: Variation of Seismic Velocities before the San Francisco Earthquake. Science 180(4086):632–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (2004) GMT Version 5.1 Generic mapping tools graphics. Laboratory for Satellite Altimetry, NOAA/NESDIS/NODC, p 123

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The arrival time of earthquakes data is provided by the AFAD (Earthquake Department of the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency, Ankara-Turkey) for tomographic calculations. The LOTOS code (Koulakov 2009) is used to create the tomograms. Some images are created using GMT software (Wessel et al. 2013). The tectonic units are digitized in the geoscience map viewer and drawing editor licensed to the General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration (MTA) (Emre et al. 2013; 2018). High-resolution topography data sets have been collected from Farr (2007) and US Geological Survey Earth Resources Observation and Science (EROS) Center. The author thanks Emre Mulumulu for his efforts in drawing Fig. 9 using the Python library.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caglar Ozer.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozer, C. 4-D tomographic change of Vp and Vp/Vs structure before destructive earthquakes: a case study of the Sivrice-Elazığ earthquake (mw = 6.8), Eastern Turkey. Nat Hazards 108, 1901–1917 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04761-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-021-04761-2

Keywords

Navigation