Skip to main content
Log in

Correction of seismic attribute-based small-structure prediction errors using GPR data—A case study of the Shuguang Coal Mine, Shanxi

  • Case Histories
  • Published:
Applied Geophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Small structures in coal mine working face is one of the main hidden dangers of safe and efficient production in coal mine. Currently, seismic exploration is often used as the main method for detecting such structures. However, limited by the accuracy of seismic data processing and interpretation, the interpreted location of small structures is often deviated. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can detect small structures accurately, but the exploration depth is shallow. The combination of the two methods can improve the exploration accuracy of small structures in coal mine. Aiming at the 1226# working face of Shuguang coal mine, we propose a method of seismic-attributes based small-structure prediction error correction using GPR data. First, we extract the coherence, curvature, and dip attributes from seismic data, that are sensitive to small structures, then by considering factors such as the effective detection range of GPR and detection environment, we select two structures from the prediction results of seismic attributes for GPR detection. Finally, based on the relationship between the positions of small structures predicted by the two methods, we use statistical methods to determine the overall offset distance and azimuth of the small structures in the entire study area and use the results as a standard for correcting each structure position. The results show that the GPR data can be used to correct the horizontal position errors of small structures predicted by seismic attribute analysis. The accuracy of the prediction results is greatly improved, with the error controlled within 5 m and reduced by more than 80%. Therefore, the feasibility of the method proposed in this study is verified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audun, L., Behzad, A., and Anita, T., 2017, Fault visualization and identification in fault seismic attribute volumes: Implications for fault geometric characterization: Interpretation, A Journal of Subsurface Characterization, 5(2), B1–B16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balanis, C. A., 1989, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics: John Wiley & Sons, New York. Barnes, A. E., 1999, Seismic attribute: past, present, and future: 69th Annual International Meeting SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 892–895.

  • Benson, A. K., 1995, Applications of ground penetrating radar in assessing some geological hazards: Examples of groundwater contamination, faults, cavities: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33(1–3), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch, M., 2007, A Monte Carlo approach to the joint estimation of reservoir and elastic parameters from seismic amplitudes: Geophysics, 72(6), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, J. P., and Merritt, J. W., 1999, Quaternary deformation mapping with ground penetrating radar: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 41(1), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao, L. T., Yao, Y. B., Liu, D. M., et al., 2020, Application of seismic curvature attributes in the delineation of coal texture and deformation in Zhengzhuang field, southern Qinshui Basin: AAPG Bulletin, 104(5), 1143–1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, M., Tsoflias, G. P., Stockli, D. F., et al., 2008, Assessing fault displacement and off-fault deformation in an extensional tectonic setting using 3-D ground-penetrating radar imaging: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68(1), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chouksey, V., Joshi, P. N., Chamyal, L. S., et al., 2013, Application of GPR for delineating the neotectonic setting and shallow subsurface nature of the seismically active Gedi Fault, Kachchh, western India: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10(3), 34006–34017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J. L., and Annan, A. P., 1989, Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy 1: Geophysical Prospecting, 37(5), 531–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng, W. A., Kim, T., and Jang, S., 2018, Seismic attributes for characterization of a heavy-oil shaly-sand reservoir in the Muglad Basin of South Sudan: Geosciences Journal, 22(6), 1027–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evison, F. F., 1955, A coal seam as a guide for seismic energy: Nature, 176, 1224–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo, H. J., Ji, M., Chen, K., et al., 2018, The Feasibility of Mining Under a Water Body Based on a Fuzzy Neural Network: Mine Water and the Environment, 37(4), 703–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huo, L. N., Zhang, J. J., Zheng, L. H., et al., 2014, Fault interpretation with multiple attributes in coal-bed methane interpretation: Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 49(S1), 221–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, G. Z., Zhang, P.S., Guo, L.Q., et al., 2020, Characteristics of dispersion curves for Love channel waves in transversely isotropic media: Applied Geophysics, 17(2), 243–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, H. P., Si, L. P., and Su, B., 2010, Borehole observation methods in coal and rock mass and their applications: Journal of China Coal Society, 35(12), 1949–1956.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q. H., Wu, Y. Q., Song, J., et al., 2014, Experimental study on advanced detection of mine-detecting radar in coal roadway excavation: Coal Science and Technology, 42(5), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Q., Zhao, W., Huang, Z., et al., 2018, Attribute analysis in seismic response of collapsed column: Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 53(S2), 285–288+18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Y. S., Shen, J. S., Su, B. Y., et al., 2019, Research on Ground of Penetrating Radar in the Coal Mine Detecting: A Case Study of Application in Huaibei Coal Mine: Elektronika Ir Elektrotechnika, 25(2), 37–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neal, A, 2004, Ground-penetrating radar and its use in sedimentology: Principles, problems and progress: Earth Science Reviews, 66(3–4), 261–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, S. P., and Yang, F., 2004, Fine geological radar processing and interpretation: Applied Geophysics, 1(2), 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. G., Jol, H. M., and Owen, T. E., 1995, Ground penetrating radar: Antenna frequencies and maximum probable depths of penetration in Quaternary sediments: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 33(1–3), 93–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, H. T., Guo, N. C., Qin, T., et al., 2017, Application of geostatistical inversion for super thin reservoir prediction: Progress in Geophysics (in Chinese), 32(01), 248–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. W., Liu, H., Teng, B. B., et al., 2012, Application of geostatistical inversion to thin reservoir prediction: Oil and Gas Geology, 33(05), 730–735.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, E. Y., Chen, P., Liu, Z. T., et al., 2019, Fine detection technology of gas outburst area based on direct current method in Zhuxianzhuang Coal Mine, China: Safety Science, 115, 12–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, B., Kong, J. Y., and Dong, S. H., 2020, Seismic attribute method for concealed collapse column identification in coal fields: Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica, 55(1), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. H., Hu, S. Y., Wang, L., et al., 2019, Seismic sedimentologic study of facies and reservoir in middle Triassic Karamay Formation of the Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin, China: Marine and Petroleum Geology, 107, 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. T., Peng, S. P., and Du, W. F., 2016, Seismic small-scale discontinuity sparsity-constraint inversion method using a penalty decomposition algorithm: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 13(1), 109–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou, G. G., Ren, K., Sun, Z. Y., et al., 2019, Fault interpretation using a support vector machine: A study based on 3D seismic mapping of the Zhaozhuang coal mine in the Qinshui Basin, China: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 171, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study work is supported by the Directly Managed Scientific Research Project of Huainan Mining (Group) Co. Ltd. (No. HNKYJTJS(2018)181), the Major Project of Shaanxi Coal and Chemical Industry Group Co. Ltd. (No. 2018SMHKJ-A-J-03), China Energy Investment Corporation 2030 Pilot Project (No. GJNY2030XDXM-19-03.2), State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing). I also would like to thank the editorial department and the review experts for their valuable comments and suggestions, and thank the Compagnie Générale de Géophysique (CGG) for the Jason software support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cui Fan.

Additional information

Cui Fan, PhD, associate professor, he graduated from the Anhui University of Science and Technology with a bachelor’s degree in Resource Management in 2006, from the China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, with a master’s degree in Earth Exploration and Information Technology in 2009, and from the China University of Mining and Technology, Beijing, with a doctorate degree in Earth Exploration and Information Technology in 2012. His research interests include applications of ground penetration, geophysical methods for electromagnetic applications and geophysics for coal fields. Email: cuifan@cumtb.edu.cn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, C., Zhi-Rong, Z., Yun-Fei, D. et al. Correction of seismic attribute-based small-structure prediction errors using GPR data—A case study of the Shuguang Coal Mine, Shanxi. Appl. Geophys. 17, 489–500 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-020-0841-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-020-0841-7

Keywords

Navigation