Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T22:40:28.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Parenting Support and its Different Functions – Parents’ Experiences. A Case Study from Norway

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 May 2021

ASTRID O. SUNDSBØ Open the ORCID record for ASTRID O. SUNDSBØ [Opens in a new window]
ASTRID O. SUNDSBØ*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences (HVL) (https://www.hvl.no/en/) email: aosu@hvl.no
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The research literature is characterized by a fundamental controversy about what parenting support is and what it aims to be: A health-promotion measure that supports child development or a “totalizing tendency […] of defining the relation between parents and children in technical terms” (Smeyers, 2010). This paper presents a study from Norway, where parenting support is offered as a “universal”, publicly funded service. It presents and discusses findings based on in-depth interviews with 45 parents from different social (educational, economic) and cultural (migration) backgrounds, focusing on how they perceived the purpose and outcomes of parenting support programs in which they participated. A key finding is that parents with majority backgrounds are less enamoured with the quality and usefulness of provision, and tend instead towards other sources for advice on parenting (primarily their social and familial networks). Many also express scepticism of broad approaches to parenting support provision. In contrast, minority parents lacking “Norwegian” social and familial networks genuinely find the courses valuable, both for their own integration and self-confidence and also the development of their children. The findings help address the need for further research into the effectiveness of parenting support and its potential role in reducing social inequality.

Keywords

Parenting CultureParenting SupportPublic ServicesMinority ParentsSocial InequalityMigration
Type
Article
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 51 , Issue 4 , October 2022 , pp. 687 - 706
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Askheim, O. P. (2012), Empowerment i Helse- og Sosialfaglig Arbeid: Floskel, Styringsverktøy, eller Frigjøringsstrategi? Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
Bacchi, C. L. (2009), Analysing Policy. What’s the Problem Represented To Be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Australia.Google Scholar
Bråten, B. and Sønsterudbråten, S. (2016), Parental Guidance – Is it Effective? A Status of Knowledge, Oslo: FAFO (Report 2016, 19).Google Scholar
BLD [The Norwegian Department for Children and Family Affairs] (2018), Trygge Foreldre - Trygge Barn. Regjeringens Strategi for Foreldrestøtte (2018-2021) (Q1247 B).Google Scholar
Bufdir [The Norwegian Directorate for Children, Youth, and Family Affairs] (2015), Program for Foreldreveiledning. Informasjonsbrosjyre. Google Scholar
Daly, M. (2015), ‘Parenting support as policy field: an analytic framework’, Social Policy and Society, 14, 04, 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danielsen, H., Ludvigsen, K. and Mühleisen, W. (2012), ‘Governing couple-sexuality: Publicly funded couples’ courses in Norway’, Culture, Health & Sexuality, 14, 6, 645–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donzelot, J. (1979), The Policing of Families, London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
Edwards, R. and Gillies, V. (2004), ‘Support in parenting: Values and consensus concerning who to turn to’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 4, 627–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. and Gillies, V. (2011), ‘Clients or consumers, commonplace or pioneers? Navigating the contemporary class politics of family, parenting skills and education’, Ethics and Education, 6, 2, 141–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eng, H., Ertesvåg, S. K., Frønes, I. and Kjøbli, J. (eds) (2017), Den Krevende Foreldrerollen: Familierettede Intervensjoner for Barn og Unge, Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
Erstad, I. (2015), Here, now and into the future: Child rearing among Norwegian–Pakistani mothers in a diverse borough in Oslo, Norway. Doctoral thesis, Oslo: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Oslo. http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-53827.Google Scholar
Faircloth, C. (2014), ‘Intensive parenting and the expansion of parenting‘, in Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C. and Macvarish, J. (eds.), Parenting culture studies, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furedi, F. (2008), Paranoid Parenting: Why Ignoring the Experts May be Best for Your Child (3rd ed.), London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Fylkesnes, M. K., Iversen, A. C. and Nygren, L. (2018), ‘Negotiating deficiency: Exploring ethnic minority parents’ narratives about encountering child welfare services in Norway’, Child and Family Social Work, 23, 2, 196–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, V. (2005), ‘Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of ‘support’ and ‘inclusion’ in family policy’, Critical Social Policy, 25, 1, 70–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, V. (2011), ‘From function to competence: engaging with the new politics of family’, Sociological Research Online, 16, 4, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillies, V. (2012), ‘Family policy and the politics of parenting: From function to competence’, in Richter, M. and Andresen, S. (eds.), The Politicization of Parenthood. Shifting Private and Public Responsibilities in Education and Child Rearing, Dordrecht/New York: Springer, 13–26.Google Scholar
Hagelund, A. (2008), “For women and children!’ The family and immigration politics in Scandinavia’, in Grillo, R. (ed.), Family in Question. Immigrant and Ethnic Minorities in Multicultural Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 71–88.Google Scholar
Hays, S. (1996), The Cultural Contradictions of Motherhood, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hennum, N. (2014), ‘Developing child-centered social policies: When professionalism takes over’, Social Sciences, 3, 3, 441–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennum, N. (2010): ‘Mot en standardisering av voksenhet? Barn som redskap i statens disiplinering av voksne’, Sosiologi i dag, 40, 1–2, 57–75.Google Scholar
Holloway, S. L. and Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2014), ‘“Any advice is welcome isn’t it?” Neoliberal parenting education, local mothering cultures, and social class’, Environment and Planning A, 46, 1, 94–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holt, A. (2008), ‘Room for resistance? Parenting Orders, disciplinary power and the production of ‘the bad parent”, in Squires, P. (ed.), ASBO Nation. The Criminalisation of Nuisance, Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
Hägglöf, B. (2013), Familjepeppen- en Familjestödssatsning i Umeåregionen, Umeå: Familjepeppen.seGoogle Scholar
Joas, H. and Knöbl, W. (2009), Social Theory: Twenty Introductory Lectures (translated by Skinner, Alex), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knijn, T. and Hopman, M. (2015), ‘Parenting support in the Dutch ‘Participation Society”, Social Policy and Society, 14, 04, 645–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroken, R. and Madsen, O. J. (eds.) (2016), Forvaltning av Makt og Moral i Velferdsstaten. Fra Sosialt Arbeid til “Arbeid Med Deg Selv”?, Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.Google Scholar
Lareau, A. (2011), Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race, and Family Life (2nd ed.), Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E. (2014), ‘Experts and parenting culture’, in Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C. and Macvarish, J. (eds.), Parenting Culture Studies, Basingstoke: Houndmills; New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leira, A. (2004), ‘Omsorgsstaten og Familien’, in Ellingsæter, A. E. and Leira, A. (eds.), Velferdsstaten og Familien. Utfordringer og Dilemmaer, Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk, 67–99.Google Scholar
Lipsky, M. (2010), Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (30th Anniversary Edition), New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Macvarish, J. (2014), ‘The politics of parenting’, in Lee, E., Bristow, J., Faircloth, C. and Macvarish, J. (eds.), Parenting Culture Studies, Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1936), ‘The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action’, American Sociological Review, 1, 6, 894–904.Google Scholar
Ramaekers, S. and Suissa, J. (2012), The Claims of Parenting: Reasons, Responsibility and Society, Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.Google Scholar
Richter, M. and Andresen, S. (eds.) (2012), The Politicization of Parenthood: Shifting Private and Public Responsibilities in Education and Child Rearing, Dordrecht/New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romagnoli, A. and Wall, G. (2012), “I know I’m a good mom’: Young, low-income mothers’ experiences with risk perception, intensive parenting ideology and parenting education programmes’, Health, Risk and Society, 14, 3, 273–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rye, H. and Hundeide, K. (2012), ‘ICDP: Resymé av verdigrunnlag og den tidlige utviklingshistorie’, Pædagogisk Psykologisk Tidsskrift, 49, 3, 110–15.Google Scholar
Shulruf, B., O’Loughlin, C. and Tolley, H. (2009), ‘Parenting education and support policies and their consequences in selected OECD countries’, Children and Youth Services Review, 31, 5, 526–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skar, A.-M. S., von Tetzchner, S. Clucas, C. and Sherr, L. (2014), ‘The impact of a parenting guidance programme for mothers with an ethnic minority background’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 4, 3, 108–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skirbekk, H. and Grimen, H. (eds.) (2012), Tillit i Norge, Oslo: Res Publica.Google Scholar
Smeyers, P. (2010), Child rearing in the “risk” society: On the discourse of rights and the “best interest of a child”, Educational Theory, 60, 3, S. 71–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundsbø, A. O. (2018a), ‘Parenting support in Europe’s north: How is it understood and evaluated in research?, Social Policy & Society, 17, 03, S. 431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundsbø, A. O. (2018b), ‘Universal parenting support in Norway — An unfulfilled promise’, Social Policy & Society, 5, S. 1–15.Google Scholar
Trommald, M. (2015), ‘Det er nok synsing nå’, Bergens Tidende, 13 August.Google Scholar
Vincent, C. (2000), Including Parents? Education, Citizenship and Parental Agency, Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Wesseltoft-Rao, N., Holt, T. and Helland, M. S. (eds) (2017), Gruppetiltak og Kurs for Foreldre. Norsk Praksis, Erfaringer og Effektevalueringer, Oslo : Folkehelseinstituttet.Google Scholar
Widding, U. (2011), ‘Problematic parents and the community parent education: Representations of social class, ethnicity, and gender’, Journal of Feminist Family Therapy, 23, 1, 19–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar