Skip to main content
Log in

A Simplified Fundamental Frequency Formulation Based on In-Situ Tests for Masonry Stone Minarets

  • Research paper
  • Published:
Experimental Techniques Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The high and slender historical masonry minarets are vulnerable to the static and dynamic loads. Performance analyses of minarets are implemented using three-dimensional numerical models in recent years. However, the complex and inhomogeneous nature of historical structures increases the likelihood of incorrect creation of numerical models. For that reason, it is important to know the experimental dynamic characteristics of masonry minarets to update the numerical models accordingly. However, it is very difficult and costly to conduct in-situ tests for every minaret. The present paper aims to develop a simplified fundamental frequency formula based on in-situ ambient vibration tests for historical masonry stone cylindrical minarets. Nineteen historical masonry stone cylindrical minarets are chosen for this purpose. Firstly, experimental frequencies, mode shapes and damping ratios of the selected minarets are determined and evaluated using the experimental measurements. Enhanced Frequency Domain Decomposition (EFDD) technique is used to obtain the experimental dynamic characteristics. Based on the obtained experimental natural frequencies, the correlation of the first natural frequency with various geometrical parameters of minaret is demonstrated by the regression analyses. In order to verify numerical models of the masonry stone cylindrical minarets, a simplified fundamental natural frequency formula based on the minaret geometrical dimensions is proposed using the experimental natural frequencies. In addition, coefficients for estimating the second and third frequencies are also presented. It has been observed that the proposed formula gives very consistent results with the measurement and literature data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Acar R (2009) “Anıtsal Kule Türü Yapıların Deprem Davranışlarının İncelenmesi ve Alternatif Sistemlerin Geliştirilmesi”, MSc Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon (in Turkish)

  2. Bartoli G, Betti M, Marra AM, Monchetti S (2017) Semiempirical formulations for estimating the main frequency of slender masonry towers. J Perform Constr Facil 31(4)

  3. Başaran H, Demir A, Ercan E, Nohutçu H, Hökelekli E, Kozanoğlu C (2016) Investigation of seismic safety of a masonry minaret using its dynamic characteristics. Earthquake and Structures 10(3):523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bayraktar A, Sevim B, Altunışık AC. and Türker T (2009a) “Analytical and operational modal analyses of Turkish style reinforced concrete minarets for structural identification”, Society for Experimental Mechanics, dynamic testing of civil engineering structures series, March–April, 65-75

  5. Bayraktar A, Türker T, Sevim B, Altunışık AC, Yıldırım F (2009b) Modal parameter identification of hagia sophia bell tower via ambient vibration test. J Nondestruct Eval 28(1):37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bayraktar A, Altunisik AC, Sevim B, Turker T (2011) Seismic response of a historical masonry minaret using a finite element model updated with operational modal testing. J Vib Contr 17:129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bayraktar A, Çalık İ, Türker T (2013) “Restorasyon sonrası tarihi sundura camisi ve minaresinin çevresel titreşim testi yöntemiyle dinamik özelliklerinin belirlenmesi”, Vakıf Restorasyon Yıllığı, VGM İstanbul I. Bölge Yayını 6:53–62 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bayraktar A, Altunişik AC and Muvafik M (2014) “Damages of minarets during Erciş and Edremit earthquakes, 2011 in Turkey”, Smart Structures and Systems, 14 (3)

  9. Bayraktar A, Çalık İ, Türker T, Ashour A (2018), “Restoration effects on experimental dynamic characteristics of masonry stone minarets”, Materials and Structures, 51 (6), Article number 141

  10. Brincker R, Zhang L and Andersen P (2000), “Modal identification from ambient responses using frequency domain decomposition”, 18th international modal analysis conference, 4062, 2, 625–630, San Antonio, USA

  11. Çalık İ, Demirtaş B, Bayraktar A, Türker T (2012) Yığma taş minarelerin analitik ve deneysel yöntemlerle güvenliğinin belirlenmesi: Trabzon Muhittin Camisi Minaresi Örneği. Vakıflar Dergisi 38:121–140 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Çalık İ (2017), “Tarihi Cami ve Minarelerin Deneysel Dinamik Karakteristiklerinin Belirlenmesi ve Restorasyon Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi”, PhD Thesis, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon (in Turkish)

  13. Erdogan YS, Kocatürk T and Demir C (2017), “Investigation of the seismic behavior of a historical masonry minaret considering the interaction with surrounding structures”, J Earth Eng, 1-29

  14. Erdil B, Tapan M, Akkaya İ, Korkut F (2018) Effects of structural parameters on seismic behaviour of historical masonry minaret. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 62(1):148–161

    Google Scholar 

  15. Faccio P, Podestà S, Ve Saetta A (2009) Campanile della Chiesa di Sant’Antonin, Esempio 5. In: In Linee guida per la valutazione e riduzione del Rischio Sismico del Patrimonio Culturale Allineate alle Nuove. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni, Venezia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hejazi M, Moayedian SM, Daei M (2016) Structural analysis of Persian historical brick masonry minarets. J Perform Constr Facil 30:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hacıefendioğlu K, Maraş EE (2016) Photogrammetry in documentation and ambient vibration test of historical masonry minarets. Exp Tech 40(6):1527–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacobsen NJ, Andersen P, Brincker R (2006), “Using enhanced frequency domain decomposition as a robust technique to harmonic excitation in operational modal analysis”, proceedings of ISMA2006: international conference on noise and vibration engineering, September, Leuven, Belgium

  19. Kocatürk T, Erdoǧan YS (2016) Earthquake behavior of M1 minaret of historical sultan Ahmed mosque (blue mosque). Struct Eng Mech 59(3):539–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Livaoğlu R, Baştürk MH, Doğangün A, Serhatoğlu C (2016) Effect of geometric properties on dynamic behavior of historic masonry minaret. KSCE J Civ Eng 20(6):2392–2402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mirtaheri M, Abbasi A, Salari N (2017) A seismic behavior and rehabilitation of the historic masonry minaret by experimental and numerical methods. Asian Journal of Civil Engineering 18(5):807–822

    Google Scholar 

  22. OMA (2006), “Operational Modal Analysis”, Release 4.0, Structural Vibration Solution A/S, Denmark

  23. Oliveira CS, Cakti E, Stenge D, Branco M (2012) Minaret behavior under earthquake loading: the case of historical Istanbul. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peeters B (2000), System Identification and Damage Detection in Civil Engineering, PhD Thesis, K.U, Leuven, Belgium

  25. Pekgökgöz RK, Gürel MA, Mammadov Z, Çili F (2013) Dynamic analysis of vertically post-tensioned masonry minarets. J Earthq Eng 17(4):560–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. PULSE (2006), “Analyzers and solutions”, release 11.2. Bruel and Kjaer, sound and vibration measurement A/S, Denmark

  27. Rainieri C, Fabbrocin G (2011),” Predictive correlations for the estimation of the elastic period of masonry towers”, In Proceedings of Experimental Vibration Analysis for CivilEngineering Structures (EVACES), Varenna, 513–520,

  28. Shakya M, Varum H, Vicente R, Costa A (2016) Empirical formulation for estimating the fundamental frequency of slender masonry structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10(1):55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ural A, Fırat FK (2015) Evaluation of masonry minarets collapsed by a strong wind under uncertainty. Nat Hazards 76(2):999–1018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Tuluk Öİ, Doğangün A, Livaoğlu R, Acar A (2006) Mimari ve taşıyıcı sistem özelliği bağlamında Türk minare geleneği. Yapı Dünyası Dergisi 122:41–49 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was implemented by using the measurement system provided by the projects from TUBITAK and Karadeniz Technical University under Research Grant No. 106 M038, 2005.112.001.1and 2006.112.001.1, respectively. Many thanks to Trabzon Regional Directorate of Foundation and its valuable personnel for their supports and permissions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Bayraktar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bayraktar, A., Çalik, İ. & Türker, T. A Simplified Fundamental Frequency Formulation Based on In-Situ Tests for Masonry Stone Minarets. Exp Tech 46, 225–238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00474-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40799-021-00474-0

Keywords

Navigation