Abstract
Rationale
Schizophrenia patients consistently show deficits in sensory-evoked broadband gamma oscillations and click-evoked entrainment at 40 Hz, called the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR). Since such evoked oscillations depend on cortical N-methyl D-aspartic acid (NMDA)-mediated network activity, they can serve as pharmacodynamic biomarkers in the preclinical and clinical development of drug candidates engaging these circuits. However, there are few test-retest reliability data in preclinical species, a prerequisite for within-subject testing paradigms.
Objective
We investigated the long-term psychometric stability of these measures in a rodent model.
Methods
Female rats with chronic epidural implants were used to record tone- and 40 Hz click-evoked responses at multiple time points and across six sessions, spread over 3 weeks. We assessed reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Separately, we used mixed-effects ANOVA to examine time and session effects. Individual subject variability was determined using the coefficient of variation (CV). Lastly, to illustrate the importance of long-term measure stability for within-subject testing design, we used low to moderate doses of an NMDA antagonist MK801 (0.025–0.15 mg/kg) to disrupt the evoked response.
Results
We found that 40-Hz ASSR showed good reliability (ICC=0.60–0.75), while the reliability of tone-evoked gamma ranged from poor to good (0.33–0.67). We noted time but no session effects. Subjects showed a lower variance for ASSR over tone-evoked gamma. Both measures were dose-dependently attenuated by NMDA antagonism.
Conclusion
Overall, while both evoked gamma measures use NMDA transmission, 40-Hz ASSR showed superior psychometric properties of higher ICC and lower CV, relative to tone-evoked gamma.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- ASSR:
-
Auditory steady state response
- CV:
-
Coefficient of variation
- EEG:
-
Electroencephalography
- ICC:
-
Intraclass correlation coefficient
- NMDA:
-
N-methyl D-aspartic acid
- RMS:
-
Root mean square
References
Brenner, CA, Krishnan, GP, Vohs, JL, Ahn, WY, Hetrick, WP, Morzorati, SL, O’Donnell, BF (2009). Steady state responses: electrophysiological assessment of sensory function in schizophrenia. In Schizophrenia Bulletin (Vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 1065–1077). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp091
Buzsáki G, Wang X-J (2012) Mechanisms of gamma oscillations. Annu Rev Neurosci 35(1):203–225. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150444
Cardin JA, Carlén M, Meletis K, Knoblich U, Zhang F, Deisseroth K, Tsai LH, Moore CI (2009) Driving fast-spiking cells induces gamma rhythm and controls sensory responses. Nature 459(7247):663–667. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08002
Cervenka MC, Franaszczuk PJ, Crone NE, Hong B, Caffo BS, Bhatt P, Lenz FA, Boatman-Reich D (2013) Reliability of early cortical auditory gamma-band responses. Clin Neurophysiol 124(1):70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2012.06.003
Cleophas TJM, De Vogel EM (1998) Crossover studies are a better format for comparing equivalent treatments than parallel-group studies. Pharm World Sci 20(3):113–117. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008626002664
Curic S, Leicht G, Thiebes S, Andreou C, Polomac N, Eichler IC, Eichler L, Zöllner C, Gallinat J, Steinmann S, Mulert C (2019) Reduced auditory evoked gamma-band response and schizophrenia-like clinical symptoms under subanesthetic ketamine. Neuropsychopharmacology 44(7):1239–1246. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-019-0328-5
Drake ME, Pakalnis A, Phillips B, Padamadan H, Hietter SA (1991) Auditory evoked potentials in anxiety disorder. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience 22(2):97–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/155005949102200209
Fernandes A, Wojcik T, Baireddy P, Pieschl R, Newton A, Tian Y, Hong Y, Bristow L, Li YW (2015) Inhibition of in vivo [3H]MK-801 binding by NMDA receptor open channel blockers and GluN2B antagonists in rats and mice. Eur J Pharmacol 766:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2015.08.044
Gonzalez-Burgos G, Lewis DA (2008) GABA neurons and the mechanisms of network oscillations: implications for understanding cortical dysfunction in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 34(5):944–961. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbn070
Gonzalez-Burgos G, Lewis DA (2012) NMDA receptor hypofunction, parvalbumin-positive neurons, and cortical gamma oscillations in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 38(5):950–957. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbs010
Griskova I, Morup M, Parnas J, Ruksenas O, Arnfred SM (2007) The amplitude and phase precision of 40 Hz auditory steady-state response depend on the level of arousal. Exp Brain Res 183(1):133–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-007-1111-0
Griskova-Bulanova I, Ruksenas O, Dapsys K, Maciulis V, Arnfred SMH (2011) Distraction task rather than focal attention modulates gamma activity associated with auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). Clin Neurophysiol 122(8):1541–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2011.02.005
Guo Y, Logan HL, Glueck DH, Muller KE (2013) Selecting a sample size for studies with repeated measures. BMC Med Res Methodol 13(1):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-13-100
Ip CT, Ganz M, Ozenne B, Sluth LB, Gram M, Viardot G, l’Hostis P, Danjou P, Knudsen GM, Christensen SR (2018) Pre-intervention test-retest reliability of EEG and ERP over four recording intervals. Int J Psychophysiol 134:30–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.09.007
Javitt DC (2009a) When doors of perception close: bottom-up models of disrupted cognition in schizophrenia. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 5:249–275. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153502
Javitt, DC (2009b). Sensory processing in schizophrenia: neither simple nor intact. In Schizophrenia Bulletin (Vol. 35, Issue 6, pp. 1059–1064). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbp110
Javitt, DC, Sweet, RA (2015). Auditory dysfunction in schizophrenia: integrating clinical and basic features. In Nature Reviews Neuroscience (Vol. 16, Issue 9, pp. 535–550). Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn4002
Koo TK, Li MY (2016) A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. Journal of Chiropractic Medicine 15(2):155–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JCM.2016.02.012
Koshiyama D, Thomas ML, Miyakoshi M, Joshi YB, Molina JL, Tanaka-Koshiyama K, Sprock J, Braff DL, Swerdlow NR, Light GA (2021) Hierarchical pathways from sensory processing to cognitive, clinical, and functional impairments in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 47(2):373–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbaa116
Kozono N, Honda S, Tada M, Kirihara K, Zhao Z, Jinde S, Uka T, Yamada H, Matsumoto M, Kasai K, Mihara T (2019) Auditory steady state response; nature and utility as a translational science tool. Sci Rep 9(1):8454. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44936-3
Krishnan RR, Kraus MS, Keefe RSE (2011) Comprehensive model of how reality distortion and symptoms occur in schizophrenia: could impairment in learning-dependent predictive perception account for the manifestations of schizophrenia? Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 65(4):305–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1819.2011.02203.x
Lauschke, VM, Zhou, Y, Ingelman-Sundberg, M (2019). Novel genetic and epigenetic factors of importance for inter-individual differences in drug disposition, response and toxicity. In Pharmacology and Therapeutics (Vol. 197, pp. 122–152). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pharmthera.2019.01.002
Legget KT, Hild AK, Steinmetz SE, Simon ST, Rojas DC (2017) MEG and EEG demonstrate similar test-retest reliability of the 40 Hz auditory steady-state response. Int J Psychophysiol 114:16–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2017.01.013
Leicht G, Karch S, Karamatskos E, Giegling I, Möller HJ, Hegerl U, Pogarell O, Rujescu D, Mulert C (2011) Alterations of the early auditory evoked gamma-band response in first-degree relatives of patients with schizophrenia: hints to a new intermediate phenotype. J Psychiatr Res 45(5):699–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychires.2010.10.002
Leicht G, Andreou C, Polomac N, Lanig C, Schöttle D, Lambert M, Mulert C (2015) Reduced auditory evoked gamma band response and cognitive processing deficits in first episode schizophrenia. World J Biol Psychiatry 16(6):387–397. https://doi.org/10.3109/15622975.2015.1017605
Leicht G, Vauth S, Polomac N, Andreou C, Rauh J, Mußmann M, Karow A, Mulert C (2016) EEG-informed fMRI reveals a disturbed gamma-band-specific network in subjects at high risk for psychosis. Schizophr Bull 42(1):239–249. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbv092
Light GA, Joshi YB, Molina JL, Bhakta SG, Nungaray JA, Cardoso L, Kotz JE, Thomas ML, Swerdlow NR (2020) Neurophysiological biomarkers for schizophrenia therapeutics. Biomarkers in Neuropsychiatry 2:100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bionps.2020.100012
Luck, SJ, Mathalon, DH, O’Donnell, BF, Hmlinen, MS, Spencer, KM, Javitt, DC, Uhlhaas, PJ (2011). A roadmap for the development and validation of event-related potential biomarkers in schizophrenia research. In Biological Psychiatry (Vol. 70, Issue 1, pp. 28–34). Elsevier USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.021
McFadden KL, Steinmetz SE, Carroll AM, Simon ST, Wallace A, Rojas DC (2014) Test-retest reliability of the 40 Hz EEG auditory steady-state response. PLoS One 9(1):e85748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085748
Molina JL, Thomas ML, Joshi YB, Hochberger WC, Koshiyama D, Nungaray JA, Cardoso L, Sprock J, Braff DL, Swerdlow NR, Light GA (2020) Gamma oscillations predict pro-cognitive and clinical response to auditory-based cognitive training in schizophrenia. Transl Psychiatry 10(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-020-01089-6
Oribe N, Hirano Y, del Re E, Seidman LJ, Mesholam-Gately RI, Woodberry KA, Wojcik JD, Ueno T, Kanba S, Onitsuka T, Shenton ME, Goldstein JM, Niznikiewicz MA, McCarley RW, Spencer KM (2019) Progressive reduction of auditory evoked gamma in first episode schizophrenia but not clinical high risk individuals. Schizophr Res 208:145–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2019.03.025
Perez, V. B., Roach, B. J., Woods, S. W., Srihari, VH, McGlashan, TH, Ford, JM, Mathalon, DH (2013). Early auditory gamma-band responses in patients at clinical high risk for schizophrenia. In Supplements to Clinical Neurophysiology (Vol. 62, pp. 147–162). Elsevier B.V. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7020-5307-8.00010-7
Rissling, AJ, Light, GA (2010). Neurophysiological measures of sensory registration, stimulus discrimination, and selection in schizophrenia patients. In Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (Vol. 4, pp. 283–309). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2010_59
Roach BJ, D’Souza DC, Ford JM, Mathalon DH (2019) Test-retest reliability of time-frequency measures of auditory steady-state responses in patients with schizophrenia and healthy controls. NeuroImage: Clinical 23:101878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101878
Roach BJ, Ford JM, Mathalon DH (2019b) Gamma band phase delay in schizophrenia. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging 4(2):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.08.011
Ross B, Schneider B, Snyder JS, Alain C (2010) Biological markers of auditory gap detection in young, middle-aged, and older adults. PLoS One 5(4):10101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010101
Salkind, N (2010). Encyclopedia of research design. In Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412961288
Silverstein, SM, Keane, BP (2011). Vision science and schizophrenia research: toward a re-view of the disorder editors’ introduction to special section. In Schizophrenia Bulletin (Vol. 37, Issue 4, pp. 681–689). Schizophr Bull. https://doi.org/10.1093/schbul/sbr053
Sivarao DV (2015) The 40-Hz auditory steady-state response: a selective biomarker for cortical NMDA function. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1344(1):27–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.12739
Sivarao DV, Chen P, Senapati A, Yang Y, Fernandes A, Benitex Y, Whiterock V, Li Y-W, Ahlijanian MK (2016) 40 Hz auditory steady-state response is a pharmacodynamic biomarker for cortical NMDA receptors. Neuropsychopharmacology 41(9):2232–2240. https://doi.org/10.1038/NPP.2016.17
Spellman, TJ, Gordon, JA (2015). Synchrony in schizophrenia: a window into circuit-level pathophysiology. In Current Opinion in Neurobiology (Vol. 30, pp. 17–23). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2014.08.009
Stroup TS, Lieberman JA, McEvoy JP, Swartz MS, Davis SM, Capuano GA, Rosenheck RA, Keefe RSE, Miller AL, Belz I, Hsiao JK (2007) Effectiveness of olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone in patients with chronic schizophrenia after discontinuing perphenazine: a CATIE study. Am J Psychiatr 164(3):415–427. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2007.164.3.415
Tan H-RM, Gross J, Uhlhaas PJ (2015) MEG—measured auditory steady-state oscillations show high test–retest reliability: a sensor and source-space analysis. NeuroImage 122:417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.055
Tiesinga, P, Sejnowski, TJ (2009). Cortical enlightenment: are attentional gamma oscillations driven by ING or PING? In Neuron (Vol. 63, Issue 6, pp. 727–732). Neuron. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2009.09.009
Acknowledgement
The authors gratefully acknowledge the help provided in the initial stages of this project by Dr. Ying Liu, Assistant Professor at the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
Funding
This study was funded by a starter grant from Bill Gatton College of Pharmacy and East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
Line plots showing the mean RMS-amplitude value for tone-evoked response (left panel) and 40 Hz ASSR (right panel) for each animal, across six sessions (N=12). (PNG 10289 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Raza, M.U., Sivarao, D.V. Test-retest reliability of tone- and 40 Hz train-evoked gamma oscillations in female rats and their sensitivity to low-dose NMDA channel blockade. Psychopharmacology 238, 2325–2334 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05856-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05856-1