Abstract
In the present work, a comparative analysis of electricity and hydrogen production using concentrated solar power (CSP) and photovoltaic (PV) is carried out. For this purpose, an identical capacity is taken equal to 25 and 10 kWe for both CSP and PV systems have been considered. One-year of metrological data was taken via a high precision weather station consisting of a Kipp and Zonen (K&Z) SOLYS 2 installed in Oujda. The System Advisor Model (SAM) software, version 2018 from NREL laboratory is used for electricity production, and then the hydrogen production has been calculated. The results show that both commercial dish/stirling systems produce more electricity than PV with an annual production of 42.9 MW h instead of 38.4 MW h for PV system with a capacity 25 kWe. Furthermore, the annual hydrogen production from the SES system is 13.6% higher than the PV. Considering the capacity equal to 10 kWe, the WGA dish/stirling system gives an annual electricity production equal to 15.89 MW h instead of 14.07 MW h for the PV system. The annual hydrogen production is around 302.2 kg, while about 267.8 kg is for PV system (10 kWe).
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
L’énergie solaire au Maroc: quand une évidence devient réalité. http://www.cfcim.org/magazine/21538. Accessed April 21, 2019.
Ouammi, A., Zejli, D., Dagdougui, H., and Benchrifa, R., Artificial neural network analysis of Moroccan solar potential, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2012, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 4876–4889.
Le Maroc veut réduire sa dépendance énergétique à 85% en 2025. www.massolia.com/energie-2/le-maroc-veut-reduire-sa-dependance-energetique-a-85-en-2025/. Accessed July 21, 2019.
Groupe Masen. Carte des projets ENR. www.masen.ma/fr/projets. Accessed July 21, 2019.
Kousksou, T., Allouhi, A., Belattar, M., et al., Morocco’s strategy for energy security and low-carbon growth, Energy, 2015, vol. 84, pp. 98–105.
Sellami, M.H. and Loudiyi, K., Electrolytes behavior during hydrogen production by solar energy, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2017, vol. 70, pp. 1331–1335.
Kovač, A., Marciuš, D., and Budin, L., Solar hydrogen production via alkaline water electrolysis, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2019, vol. 44, no. 20, pp. 9841–9848.
Gibson, T. and Kelly, N., Optimization of solar powered hydrogen production using photovoltaic electrolysis devices, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2008, vol. 33, no. 21, pp. 5931–5940.
Temiz, M. and Javani, N., Design and analysis of a combined floating photovoltaic system for electricity and hydrogen production, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2020, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 3457–3469.
Boudries, R., Techno-economic study of hydrogen production using CSP technology, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 3406–3417.
Nouicer, I., Khellaf, A., Menia, S., Yaiche, M.R., Kabouche, N., and Meziane, F., Solar hydrogen production using direct coupling of SO2 depolarized electrolyser to a solar photovoltaic system, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, vol. 44, no. 39, pp. 22408–22418.
Nafchi, F.M., Baniasadi, E., Afshari, E., Javani, N., Performance assessment of a solar hydrogen and electricity production plant using high temperature PEM electrolyzer and energy storage, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, vol. 43, no. 11, pp. 5820–5831.
Babayan, M., Mazraeh, A.E., Yari, M., et al., Hydrogen production with a photovoltaic thermal system enhanced by phase change materials, Shiraz Iran case study, J. Cleaner Prod., 2019, vol. 215, pp. 1262–1278.
Sayedin, F., Maroufmashat, A., Sattari, S., et al., Optimization of photovoltaic electrolyzer hybrid systems; taking into account the effect of climate conditions, Energy Convers. Manage, 2016, vol. 118, pp. 438–449.
Rodríguez, C.R., Riso, M., Jiménez Yob, G., et al., Analysis of the potential for hydrogen production in the province of Cordoba, Argentina, from wind resources, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, vol. 35, no. 11, pp. 5952–5956.
Mohsin, M., Rasheed, A.K., and Saidur, R., Economic viability and production capacity of wind generated renewable hydrogen, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2018, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 2621–2630.
Hou, P., Enevoldsen, P., Eichman, J., et al., Optimizing investments in coupled offshore wind-electrolytic hydrogen storage systems in Denmark, J. Power Sources, 2017, vol. 359, pp. 186–197.
Ait Lahoussine Ouali, H., Guechchati, R., Moussoaui, M.A., and Mezrhab, A., Performance of parabolic through solar power plant under weather conditions of Oujda, Morocco, Appl. Sol. Energy, 2017, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 45–52.
Ait Lahoussine Ouali, H., Merrouni, A.A., Moussoaui, M.A., and Mezrhab, A., Electricity yield analysis of a 50 MW solar tower plant under Moroccan climate, in 1st Int. Conf. on Electrical and Information Technologies ICEIT, 2015.
Merrouni, A.A., Ait Lahoussine Ouali, H., Moussoaui, M.A., and Mezrhab, A., Numerical simulation of linear Fresnel solar power plants performance under Moroccan climate, Mater. Environ. Sci., 2017, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 4226–4233.
Vasu, R. and Basim Ismail, F., Design and implementation of solar powered Stirling engines: Review, AIP Conference Proceedings, 2018, vol. 2035, id. 040002.
Islam, M.T., Huda, N., Abdullah, N., and Saidur, R., A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art concentrating solar power (CSP) technologies: Current status and research trends, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2018, vol. 91, pp. 987–1018.
Braun, F.G., Hooper, E., Wand, R., and Zloczysti, P., Holding a candle to innovation in concentrating solar power technologies: a study drawing on patent data, Energy Policy, 2011, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 2441–2456.
Sharma, A., A comprehensive study of solar power in India and World, Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev., 2011, vol. 15, pp. 1767–1776.
What’s the Difference Between Solar Thermal and Photovoltaic? www.umasolar.com/blog/solar-thermal-vs-photovoltaic/. Accessed July 21, 2019.
Bonnet, S. and Stouffs, P., Low power thermodynamic solar energy conversion: Coupling of a parabolic trough concentrator and an Ericsson Engine, Int. J. Thermodyn., 2007, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 37–45.
Acarol Zilan, G. and Eray, A., Feasibility study of dish/stirling power systems in Turkey, AIP Conf. Proc., 2017, vol. 1850, id. 160029.
Balaji, R., et al., Development and performance evaluation of Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) based hydrogen generator for portable applications, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2011, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1399–1403.
Petrus, J. and Merwe, V.D., Characterisation of a proton exchange membrane electrolyser using electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, Thesis (Electr. and Electron. Eng.), Potchefstroom, School of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, North-West University, 2012.
Rahmouni, S., Negrou, B., Settou, N., Dominguez, J., and Gouareh, A., Prospects of hydrogen production potential from renewable resources in Algeria, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2017, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 1383–1395.
System Advisor Model. https://sam.nrel.gov/. Accessed April 21, 2019.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Authors would like to warmly Acknowledge EnerMENA project of the German Aerospace Center – (DLR) for making its data available to carry out this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Lahoussine Ouali, H.A., Moussaoui, M.A. & Mezrhab, A. Hydrogen Production from Two Commercial Dish/Stirling Systems Compared to the Photovoltaic System-Case Study: Eastern Morocco. Appl. Sol. Energy 56, 466–476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X20060080
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0003701X20060080