Elsevier

Structures

Volume 33, October 2021, Pages 378-389
Structures

Dynamic tensile behavior of steel strands at different strain rates

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2021.04.012Get rights and content

Abstract

In engineering structures, steel strands can be subjected to dynamic loads associated with earthquakes, vehicle impacts, explosions and other special circumstances occurring in addition to static loads and resulting in higher strain rates. Therefore, it is of great significance to study the mechanical performance of steel strands subjected to dynamic loads at high strain rates. In this study, first an electrohydraulic high-speed impact test system, an electrohydraulic servo shear-stress test system, and a universal testing machine were used to conduct the dynamic tensile tests on single-wire, single-bundle, and four-bundle steel strands at ten different strain rates (2.73 × 10−3–10.714 s−1), and the influences of the strain rate and strand diameter on the mechanical behavior of steel strands were analyzed based on the experimental data. At the same time, the wire breakage, failure modes, and fracture forms were analyzed, and the Ramberg-Osgood and Johnson-Cook constitutive models were revised to obtain a constitutive relationship which, along with the related material parameters, better describes the stress–strain behavior of the tensile steel strands subjected to dynamic tensile loads. The results show that the steel strands are clearly sensitive to strain rate, which is higher in quasi-static states and at low strain rates. At higher strain rates, the sensitivity to strain rate decreases, and the sensitivity of yield strength is higher than the ultimate strength. The strand diameter has certain influence on the steel strands performance. The ultimate strains of the single-wire and four-bundle steel strands are all smaller than that of the single-bundle steel strands. Twisting of the single-bundle steel strands weakened the wires and resulted in premature wire breakage. The failure modes of steel strands subjected to different tensile strain rates shifted from ductile to brittle. The failure modes were mainly of three types, namely, necking-milling, splitting-milling, and splitting. The Ramberg-Osgood and the Johnson-Cook constitutive models with the Cowper-Symonds strain rate parameter correction can more accurately reflect the variation in the strain hardening characteristics of steel strands with strain rate.

Introduction

Steel strands are made of hot-rolled wires, and are formed from individual high-strength steel rods through several cold-drawing operations. Subsequently, several high-strength steel wires are twisted around a long, straight central steel wire. Because steel strands exhibit high strength, low relaxation, and good mechanical properties, they are widely used in all types of civil engineering structures, as bridge cables, rock and soil anchorages, prestressed concrete strands, and spatial-grid cables.

In the past, many studies have investigated steel strands subjected to quasi-static tension, which also involved the influence of temperature [1], [2], fatigue [3], [4], corrosion [5], [6], stress relaxation [7], [8], equivalent breakage force [9]. In practical engineering applications, in addition to static loads steel strands are inevitably subjected to dynamic loads caused by earthquakes, winds, vehicles, explosions, etc. [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], resulting in a high strain rate of the steel strands. For example, existing studies have shown that the maximum strain rate in structures during earthquakes reaches about 0.1 s−1, while the strain rate of steel materials under impact and explosion load is generally greater than 1 s−1 [15], [16], [17]. Since steel strands are mainly used in structural engineering and their mechanical properties under seismic load are often of importance, this paper focuses on and studies the strain rate range that may be encountered under seismic actions, thus the experimental strain rate range in this paper is 2.73 × 10−3−10.714 s−1.

At present, the static assumption is often used in engineering design to account for the dynamic effects, which clearly is inconsistent with the reality. Therefore, it is necessary to study the dynamic tensile performance of steel strands.

In recent years, as the scope of applications of steel strands has wideend, their dynamic mechanical performance has received increased attention. The research is, however, still in its infancy, and the mechanical performance of steel strands at diffrent strain rates is rarely reported. However, studies on the dynamic mechanical performance of different steel materials and similar alloys have been carried out [18]. Although differences may exist in specimen structure and material properties, it is useful to review the dynamic mechanical performance of other steels and alloys. For example, Yang et al. [19] conducted quasi-static and dynamic tensile tests at different strain rates on the Q550 steel. The results showed that the strain rate of the Q550 steel increased with the increase of strain rate, but its sensitivity to the strain rate was lower than that of the ordinary low-carbon steel. Xu et al. [20] studied the dynamic mechanical performance of the TWIP steel, and pointed out that its strength was negatively correlated with the strain rate at low strains, but positively correlated at high strains. Singh et al. [21] showed that the MP800HY high-strength steel was not sensitive to strain rate. Yu et al. [22] found through tests that the Q345 steel was a strain-rate sensitive material, but its strength did not change much at ultra-high strain rates. Huang [23], Lin [16], and Li et al. [17] conducted dynamic tensile tests on HPB235, HRB335, and HRB400 reinforcing bars, and found that the yield and ultimate strength of these three steels all increased with the increase in strain rate. The increase in the yield strength was greater than that in the ultimate strength, and the steel with lower static-load yield stress was more sensitive to the strain rate.

The constitutive model of steel refers to the mathematical expression that can describe the relationship between the real stress and strain observed experimentally. Currently, models that are commonly used to describe the stress–strain relationship of steel include the L-H model [24], the Ramberg-Osgood model [25], the Johnson-Cook model [26], and the H/V-R model [27]. In view of the mutual coupling between the strain rate effect and strain hardening effect of steel subjected to dynamic loads, many researchers suggested modifying the constitutive models by assuming the steel strain hardening expression as a function of both the strain itself and the strain rate. For example, Chen et al. [28] introduced the Cowper-Symonds model [29], which considers the effect of metal strain rate, into the H/V-R model to obtain a modified model that can better describe the change of strain hardening characteristics of the Q420 steel with the change of strain rate. Zeng et al. [30] conducted dynamic tensile tests on the HRB500E steel, modified the Cowper-Symonds and Malvar models [31] that could predict the dynamic yield stress according to the test results, and tested the Johnson-Cook model and the constitutive model that took the strain rate effect into consideration. Yang et al. [19] introduced the Cowper-Symonds model into the Johnson-Cook model to obtain a modified model that can better describe the variation of strain hardening characteristics of the Q550 steel with the change in strain rate.

This paper studies seven-wire steel strands consisting of one central wire and six side wires. The strength grade of steel is 1860 MPa. The steel belongs in a strand steel specification widely used in China at present. Therefore, studying its dynamic mechanical performance at different strain rates is of great significance for actual engineering applications. First, an electrohydraulic high-speed impact test system, an electrohydraulic servo shear-stress test system, and a universal testing machine were used to conduct the dynamic tensile tests of single-wire, single-bundle, and four-bundle steel strands at ten different strain rates (2.73 × 10−3–10.714 s−1), and the influence of strain rate and strand diameter on the mechanical behavior of the steel strands were analyzed based on the experimental data. At the same time, the wire breakage, failure modes, and fracture forms were analyzed, and the Ramberg-Osgood and Johnson-Cook constitutive models were revised to obtain a constitutive model, which, along with the related material parameters, can better describe the stress–strain relationship of the tensile steel strands subjected to dynamic tensile loads.

Section snippets

Testing equipment

The electrohydraulic high-speed impact test system, the electrohydraulic servo shear-stress test system and the universal testing machine used in the test are shown in Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3. The electrohydraulic high-speed impact test system was used to carry out high-strain rate tensile test of the single-bundle strands. The system main components are a nitrogen accelerating control apparatus, a microcomputer control console, and a high-speed impact testing machine. The maximum impact

Cowper-Symonds strain-rate effect model

As can be seen from the previous analyses, with the increase in strain rate the yield strength, ultimate strength, and strain hardening characteristics of steel strands all change significantly. The yield strength increases significantly, showing very obvious strain-rate sensitivity. Therefore, the Cowper-Symonds model was used to fit the dynamic amplification coefficient of yield strength:ζ=σdσs=1+ε̇D1qwhere D and q are the material parameters to be determined.

The fitting curve is shown in

Conclusions

Dynamic tensile tests of the single-wire, single-bundle, and four-bundle steel strands at ten different strain rates (2.73 × 10−3–10.714 s−1) were performed, and the influence of the strain rate and strand diameter on the mechanical behavior of steel strands were analyzed based on the experimental data. At the same time, the wire breakage, failure modes, and fracture forms were analyzed, and the Ramberg-Osgood and Johnson-Cook constitutive models were modified. The conclusions are as follows:

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgement

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Number 51768014) and the Guangxi Innovation-driven Development Special Project (Grant Number GUIKE AA18118008).

References (33)

  • H.Y. Qin et al.

    Range-expansion technology and fatigue performance study on the self-sensing steel strand with an embedded fibre Bragg grating sensor

    Strain

    (2020)
  • C.H. Jeon et al.

    Assessment of mechanical properties of corroded prestressing strands

    Appl Sci

    (2020)
  • Y. Huang et al.

    A corrosion detection method for steel strands based on LC electromagnetic resonance

    Adv Mater Sci Eng

    (2020)
  • J.B. Yan et al.

    Stress relaxation behavior of prestressing strands under low temperatures

    PCI J

    (2019)
  • Model Code 2010. Fib model code for concrete structures 2010; International Federation for Structural Concrete(fib):...
  • L.J. Malvar

    Review of static and dynamic properties of steel reinforcing bars

    ACI Mater J

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text