Abstract
This research was investigated to assess the effect of fly ash (FA) on the growth, yield, biochemical attributes, and enzymatic antioxidant response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L. cv. Avrodhi). After evaluating soil and FA nutrient status by energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX), different concentrations of FA with soil were applied (5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30%). Chickpea plants grown at all FA-amended soil concentrations demonstrate significant improvement (p ≤ 0.05) in growth and yield biomass. Exhibition of enhancement in biochemical attributes such as photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a and b, total chlorophyll, and total carotenoid by 16.83, 24.50, 19.13, and 21.74%), total protein (48.54%), leghemoglobin (42.39%), nitrate reductase activity (18.35%), proline content (28.16%), and antioxidant enzymes activities. Moreover, an improvement in the stomatal pore of the FA treated plant also noticed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Overall, the findings of this study indicate that the supplementation of FA contributed to increment in these attributes at all the concentrations compared with control (without FA) ‘but maximally ~ up to FA 20%.’ However, plant growth and yield biomass decreased above the concentration of FA 20% because chickpea can balanced nutrients efficiency up to FA 20%.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates LS, Walden RT, Tearse ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207
Beauchamp LO, Fridovich I (1971) Superoxide dismutase improved assays and assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Ann Biochem 44:276–287
Bisoi SS, Mishra SS, Barik J, Panda D (2017) Effects of different treatments of fly ash and mining soil on growth and antioxidant protection of Indian wild rice. Int J Phytoremediation 19:446–452
Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254
Cakmak I (2005) The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 168:521–530
CEA (2017–2018) Report on fly ash generation at coal/lignite based thermal power stations and its utilization in the country for the year 2017–2018. Central Electricity Authority, New Delhi, India
Chance B, Maehly AC (1955) Assay of catalase and peroxidase. Methods Enzymol 2:764–775
FAOSTAT (2019) Chickpea production in 2018, crops/regions/word list/production quantity (pick lists). http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC. Accessed 28 Apr 2020
Hadke PB, Wankhade SG, Ingle SN (2019) Consequence of fym and fly ash application on yield, nutrient uptake, and quality of safed musli grown on inceptisols. Int J Curr Microbiol Appl Sci 8:263–273
Haris M, Ahmad G, Shakeel A, Khan AA (2019) Utilization of fly Ash to improve the growth and the management of root-knot nematode on carrot. Haya Saudi J Life Sci 4:221–226
Hell R, Hillebrand H (2001) Plant concepts for mineral acquisition and allocation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 12:161–168
Jaworski EG (1971) Nitrate reductase assay in intact plant tissues. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 43:1274–1279
Jukanti AK, Gaur PM, Gowda CLL, Chibbar RN (2012) Nutritional quality and health benefits of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.): a review. Br J Nutr 108:11–26
Maclachlan S, Zalik S (1963) Plastid structure, chlorophyll concentration, and free amino acid composition of chlorophyll mutant barley. Can J Bot 41:1053–1062
Marschner P (2012) Mineral nutrition of higher plants, 3rd edn. Academic Press, London
Moorby J, Besford RT (1983) Mineral nutrition and growth. In: Lauchli A, Bieleski RL (eds) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, vol 15B. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–527
Ochecova P, Tlustos P, Szakova J (2014) Wheat and soil response to wood fly ash application in contaminated soils. Agron J 206:995–1002
Panda D, Panda D, Padhan B, Biswas M (2018) Growth and physiological response of lemongrass (Cymbopogon citratus (DC) Stapf.) under different levels of fly ash-amended soil. Int J Phytoremediation 20:538–544
Panda RB, Biswal T (2018) Impact of fly ash on soil properties and productivity. Int J Agric Environ Biotechnol 11:275–283
Pandey VC, Abhilash PC, Upadhyay RN, Tewari DD (2009) Application of fly ash on the growth performance and translocation of toxic heavy metals within Cajanus cajan L: implication for safe utilization of fly ash for agricultural production. J Hazard Mater 166:255–259
Pandey VC, Singh N (2010) Impact of fly ash incorporation in soil systems. Agric Eco Environ 136:16–27
Qurratul JS, Khan R, Mahmooduzzafar STO (2013) Soil amendments of fly ash: effects on function and biochemical activity of Carthamus tinctorius L. plants. Isr J Plant Sci 61:12–24
Sadasivam S, Manickam A (1992) Chlorophylls. Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Limited, New Delhi, pp 184–185
Saito K (2000) Regulation of sulfate transport and synthesis of sulfur containing amino acids. Curr Opin Plant Biol 3:188–195
Shakeel A, Khan AA, Hakeem KR (2020) Growth, biochemical, and antioxidant response of beetroot (Beta vulgaris L.) grown in fly ash-amended soil. SN Appl Sci 2:1378
Shamsi IH, Jilani G, Guo-Ping Z, Kang W (2008) Cadmium stress tolerance through potassium nutrition in soybean. Asian J Chem 20:1099–1108
Sharma B, Singh RP (2019) Physiological, biochemical, growth, and yield responses of Radish (Raphanus sativus L.) plants grown on different sewage sludge-fly ash mixture (SLASH) ratios. In: Ghosh S (ed) Waste valorisation and recycling. Springer, Singapore, pp 539–552
Siddique KH, Johansen C, Turner NC, Jeuffroy MH, Hashem A, Sakar D, Gan Y, Alghamdi SS (2012) Innovations in agronomy for food legumes. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 32:45–64
Skousen J, Yang JE, Lee JS, Ziemkiewicz P (2013) Review of fly ash as a soil amendment. Geosys Eng 16:249–256
Thind HS, Singh Y, Singh B, Singh V, Sharma S, Vashistha M, Sing G (2012) Land application of rice husk ash, bagasse ash and coal fly ash: effects on crop productivity and nutrient uptake in rice-wheat system on an alkaline loamy sand. Field Crop Res 135:137–144
Ukwattage NL, Ranjith PG, Bouazza M (2013) The use of coal combustion fly ash as a soil amendment in agricultural lands (with comments on its potential to improve food security and sequester carbon). Fuel 109:400–408
Verma SK, Singh K, Gupta AK, Pandey VC, Trivedi P, Verma RK, Patra DD (2014) Aromatic grasses for phytomanagement of coal fly ash hazards. Ecol Eng 73:425–428
Wang YL, Wei MY, Chen SJ (2008) Effects of Cr6+ on the growth and physiological and biochemical characteristics of Mentha crispata. J Anhui Agric Sci 36:7100–7102
Wong JWC, Wong MH (1990) Effects of fly ash on yields and elemental composition of two vegetables, Brassica parachinensis and B. chinensis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 30:251–264
Yamasaki S, Dillenburg LC (1999) Measurements of leaf relative water content in Araucaria angustifolia. Rev Bras Fisiol Veg 11:69–75
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to thank Department of Botany, AMU to carry out the research work. We would like to extend our gratitude to University Sophisticated Instrumentation Facility (USIF), Aligarh Muslim University (AMU) for providing the SEM and EDX facilities.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
MH and AAK designed the experimental work. MH and MSA performed the experimental work. MH has done the statistical analysis, and formatting of the manuscript. AAK has done the final editing of the manuscript. The manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Communicated by Sung Kyeom Kim.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haris, M., Ansari, M.S. & Khan, A.A. Supplementation of fly ash improves growth, yield, biochemical, and enzymatic antioxidant response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 62, 715–724 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-021-00351-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-021-00351-0