Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment Integrity Reporting in Behavior Analysis in Practice 2008–2019

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Behavior Analysis in Practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Treatment integrity is the extent to which procedures are implemented in a manner consistent with their prescribed protocols and is necessary for reaching accurate conclusions regarding functional relations between dependent (i.e., behavior) and independent (i.e., the environment) variables. Several studies assessing the frequency that studies report treatment integrity have been conducted. However, no review has included articles from Behavior Analysis in Practice. Thus, the current study reviewed Behavior Analysis in Practice between 2008 and 2019 to assess the frequency of studies reporting treatment integrity data. A total of 193 articles consisting of 205 studies met the inclusionary criteria for this review. Ninety-six studies (46.83%) reported treatment integrity data, compared to 193 (94.15%) that provided interobserver agreement data. Additionally, 98 studies (47.80%) were considered high risk for treatment implementation inaccuracies. Recommendations and implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Articles included in Table 1 were identified via PsycINFO and Google Scholar searches. More information regarding the exact parameters of the searches can be provided upon request.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Denys Brand.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

No informed consent was required to conduct this research.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Falakfarsa, G., Brand, D., Jones, L. et al. Treatment Integrity Reporting in Behavior Analysis in Practice 2008–2019. Behav Analysis Practice 15, 443–453 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00573-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-021-00573-9

Keywords

Navigation