Relevance of secondary tropical forest for landscape restoration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119265Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Tropical timber demand is increasing resulting in degradation and deforestation.

  • Secondary forests (SFs) may be alternative sources of wood production.

  • Wood production in tropical SFs involves major limitations.

  • Restoration for wood production may sustain SF dynamics and related environmental services.

  • Enhancing timber production in SFs should reduce pressure on the remaining tropical forests.

Abstract

Tropical Secondary Forests (SFs) are vulnerable forest systems growing in areas that have been subject to unsustainable human activities leading to deforestation. SFs account for swathes of tropical forest landscapes that have lost their capacity to provide a high level of goods and services. They are also located in highly dynamic and human-pressured landscapes and are vulnerable to natural and human-induced catastrophic events, such as hurricanes or fires. Without appropriate silvicultural management to increase their economic value and restore their ecological functions, they often become degraded and are sometimes cleared for more short-term economically productive activities. Given the increasing demand for tropical timber in recent decades that will continue in the near future, we suggest that active restoration geared towards wood production is an opportunity for SF conservation. Promoting sustainable wood production -i.e. associated with other environmental services- in these disturbed forest ecosystems is also a way to reduce logging pressure on the remaining intact primary tropical forests, indeed, this may be the most important reason to enhance active restoration aimed at wood production in tropical SFs worldwide. Future research in forest ecology and management should produce experimental evidence of enhanced production of wood and ecosystem services in SFs through appropriate silvicultural experimentations.

Introduction

Since the 1920 s, most deforestation has taken place in tropical countries (FAO, 2001, FAO, 2012b, Hansen et al., 2013, FAO, 2018). Although the rate of net tropical forest loss dropped after 1990, between 2015 and 2020 the total area of tropical forest disappeared at a huge average rate of 9.28 million ha per year! (Keenan et al., 2015, FAO, 2020). Old-growth forests now only account for 25–30% of all existing tropical forests (Mercer, 2015, FAO, 2020) and most tropical forests have already been substantially altered (Laurance et al., 2014, FAO, 2018, Vancutsem et al., 2021)

Loss of forested areas during the decades of deforestation across the tropics is mainly the result of agricultural development including shifting agriculture and commodity-driven deforestation, which has led to the clearance of millions of hectares of primary forest (Curtis et al., 2018). Unsustainable logging practices in tropical regions have also been an indirect cause of deforestation, by facilitating access to and colonization of the forest (Lambin et al., 2001, Noriko et al., 2012, Finegan, 2016, FAO, 2018), and by encouraging the conversion of degraded forests to more profitable land uses: agriculture, pasture, industrial plantations, and mining (Lambin et al., 2001, Noriko et al., 2012, Zimmerman and Kormos, 2012, Finegan, 2016).

The loss of soil fertility in deforested areas has led to the abandonment of marginal agricultural lands, where forests were able to regenerate. Forests that regenerate in previously deforested areas are usually called secondary forests (SFs). In this paper, we define SFs as forests that regenerate naturally in abandoned deforested areas. This definition follows that of Brown and Lugo (Brown and Lugo, 1990) and is widely used in the literature (Poorter et al., 2016, Rozendaal et al., 2019). Even if today there is no precise estimation of the extent of tropical SFs, it is acknowledged that SFs are now the dominant forest ecosystems in many tropical regions and landscapes (Chazdon, 2003, Lugo and Helmer, 2004). Brown and Lugo (2009) estimated that at the time, SFs in the tropics, accounted for about 40% of the total tropical forest area, and that their rates of formation were about 9 million ha yr−1. Across Southeast Asia, Mukul et al. (2016) estimated that SFs accounted for 63% of the remaining forest cover.

In the current global context of climate change and biodiversity loss, forest ecosystems will play an increasingly important role in providing key environmental services. The potential of SFs to provide such services is widely characterized and evaluated in the literature (Feldpausch et al., 2004, Arroyo-Mora et al., 2005, Chazdon et al., 2009, Poorter et al., 2016, FAO, 2018, Bastin et al., 2019, Rozendaal et al., 2019). SFs regulate the water cycle, provide critically important habitats that preserve biodiversity, and enable carbon storage in above and belowground biomass thereby improving soil fertility, even if biodiversity and associated ecosystem services in SFs are lower than in primary forest ecosystems (Benayas et al., 2009, Gibson et al., 2011). However, the wood production potential of SFs has rarely been studied, or even taken into account. This is vital, as the current global context is also characterized by increasing global demand for (tropical) wood products (Malhi et al., 2014, FAO, 2015, FAO, 2018), meaning logging pressure on the remaining tropical primary forests will not let up. SF expansion and decline in old growth forest highly justifies considering SFs as one of the sustainable future sources of wood, in a way that avoids further decline of natural forests and biodiversity loss while enabling sustainable climate mitigation (Lewis et al., 2019).

In this position paper based on relevant literature and expert knowledge, we argue that in many situations, tropical SFs should be actively managed as sustainable and complementary alternatives to selective logging of old growth forests for future wood production. Currently, many tropical SFs are vulnerable forest ecosystems: many are in transition and not currently under sustainable forest management (Blaser et al., 2011, Guimarães Vieira et al., 2014, Finegan, 2016). Without appropriate management, and because of uncontrolled use along with other human (agriculture) and non-human disturbances (fire), they may become even more degraded and again be converted into pastures or agricultural fields, resulting in further degradation (Chazdon et al., 2007, Marin-Spiotta et al., 2008, Hirota et al., 2011, Jakovac et al., 2015, Reid et al., 2018). Producing wood in SFs systems may increase their value and reduce their vulnerability. The sustainability of wood production in tropical SFs would be based on combining wood production with the preservation of ecosystem services already provided by these forest ecosystems, with a positive effect on their long-term maintenance in pressured landscapes. Moreover, considering SFs as a potential source of wood is fully consistent with the need to reduce logging pressure on tropical old growth forests.

The paper is organized in three sections aimed at answering three questions. Why should we enhance wood production in tropical SFs? What are the limitations and obstacles to wood production in tropical SFs? How could future research in forest ecology and management enhance active restoration of wood production in SFs? The paper also provides practical guidance and suggests future research priorities to support the sustainable implementation of wood production in tropical SFs.

Section snippets

We need to reduce logging pressure on the remaining tropical primary forests

At global scale, reducing logging pressure on remaining tropical primary forests may be the most important reason to enhance wood production in tropical SFs. Indeed, non-sustainable logging operations in tropical primary production forests have increased due to the increasing demand for tropical timber (Malhi et al., 2014) leading to forest degradation (Calaboni et al., 2018, Torrella et al., 2018). Using current rotation times, at best, only about 50% of the volume of timber extracted from

What are the limits and obstacles to wood production in tropical Sfs?

Considering SFs as potential systems for wood production involves both limits and obstacles. In this section, we describe the limits and obstacles to more general SF dynamics, and discuss how to overcome them and reverse the trend, by providing practical guidance and identifying priorities to support the sustainable implementation of active restoration in tropical SFs through wood production.

How could future research in forest ecology and management enhance active restoration for wood production in SFs?

SFs may have serious biophysical limitations to the development of ecologically and economically viable forestry. Depending on the previous land use and its intensification, natural regeneration dynamics in SFs may be hindered by biophysical factors (Guariguata and Ostertag, 2001). Biophysical limitations include environmental factors such as soil degradation, local climate variability, seed availability and seed sources (that allow secondary dynamics and succession) within the forest itself,

Conclusion

Tropical forests are currently disappearing at an alarming rate, and the increasing demand for wood in the near future will increase pressure on the remaining tropical natural forests. Secondary forests (SFs) that grow in former deforested areas today account for a considerable proportion of the natural tropical forests that remain. These SFs are vulnerable ecosystems located in highly pressured landscapes. They are also exposed to catastrophic events including fire. Without appropriate

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry (FTA). We would like to thank all the financial partners who supported this research through their contributions to the CGIAR Fund. To view a list of donors to the Fund, visit: http://www.cgiar.org/about- us / our-funders / http://www.cgiar.org/about-%20us/our-funders/

References (99)

  • R.J. Keenan et al.

    Dynamics of global forest area: Results from the FAO Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2015)
  • E.F. Lambin et al.

    The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths

    Global Environ. Change

    (2001)
  • W.F. Laurance et al.

    Agricultural expansion and its impacts on tropical nature

    Trends Ecol. Evol.

    (2014)
  • A.E. Lugo et al.

    Emerging forests on abandoned land: Puerto Rico's new forests

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2004)
  • E. Marin-Spiotta et al.

    Chemical and mineral control of soil carbon turnover in abandoned tropical pastures

    Geoderma

    (2008)
  • N. Marron et al.

    Are mixed-tree plantations including a nitrogen-fixing species more productive than monocultures?

    For. Ecol. Manage.

    (2019)
  • C. Adams et al.

    Impacts of large-scale forest restoration on socioeconomic status and local livelihoods: what we know and do not know

    Biotropica

    (2016)
  • J. Barlow et al.

    Quantifying the biodiversity value of tropical primary, secondary, and plantation forests

    PNAS

    (2007)
  • Bastin, J.F., Finegold, Y., Garcia, C., Mollicone, D., Rezende, M., Routh, D., Zohner, C.M., Crowther, T.W., 2019. The...
  • K. Bawa et al.

    Natural Forest Management and Conservation of Biodiversity in Tropical Forests

    Conserv. Biol.

    (1998)
  • J.M.R. Benayas et al.

    Enhancement of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services by Ecological Restoration: A Meta-Analysis

    Science

    (2009)
  • E. Berenguer et al.

    A large-scale field assessment of carbon stocks in human-modified tropical forests

    Glob. Change Biol.

    (2014)
  • Bettinger, P., Boston, K., Siry, J.P., Grebner, D.L., 2017. Chapter 1 - Management of Forests and Other Natural...
  • Blaser, J., Sarre, A., Poore, D., Johnson, S., 2011. Status of Tropical Forest Management 2011. In, ITTO Technical...
  • J.R. Boyle et al.

    Sustainable Forestry: Ecology and Silviculture for Resilient Forests. In, Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences

    (2016)
  • P.H.S. Brancalion et al.

    Exotic eucalypts: From demonized trees to allies of tropical forest restoration?

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2020)
  • S. Brown et al.

    Tropical Secondary Forest

    J. Trop. Ecol.

    (1990)
  • S. Brown et al.

    Tropical secondary forests

    J. Trop. Ecol.

    (2009)
  • Calaboni, A., Tambosi, L.R., Igari, A.T., Farinaci, J.S., Metzger, J.P., Uriarte, M., 2018. The forest transition in...
  • Cardil, A., de-Miguel, S., Silva, C.A., Reich, P.B., Calkin, D., Brancalion, P.H.S., Vibrans, A.C., Gamarra, J.G.P.,...
  • R.L. Chazdon et al.

    Natural regeneration as a tool for large-scale forest restoration in the tropics: prospects and challenges

    Biotropica

    (2016)
  • R.L. Chazdon et al.

    Rates of change in tree communities of secondary Neotropical forests following major disturbances. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London

    Series B, Biolog. Sci.

    (2007)
  • R.L. Chazdon et al.

    The potential for species conservation in tropical secondary forests

    Conservat. Biol. J. Soc. Conservat. Biol.

    (2009)
  • J.D. Corbin et al.

    A long-term evaluation of applied nucleation as a strategy to facilitate forest restoration

    Ecolog. Appl. Publicat. Ecolog. Soc. America

    (2016)
  • R. Crouzeilles et al.

    A global meta-analysis on the ecological drivers of forest restoration success

    Nat. Commun.

    (2016)
  • R. Crouzeilles et al.

    Ecological restoration success is higher for natural regeneration than for active restoration in tropical forests

    Sci. Adv.

    (2017)
  • R. Crouzeilles et al.

    Forest restoration: a global dataset for biodiversity and vegetation structure

    Ecology

    (2016)
  • M. Curran et al.

    Is there any empirical support for biodiversity offset policy?

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2014)
  • P.G. Curtis et al.

    Classifying drivers of global forest loss

    Science

    (2018)
  • A.P. Dobson et al.

    Hopes for the Future: Restoration Ecology and Conservation Biology

    Science

    (1997)
  • R.R. Dunn

    Recovery of Faunal Communities During Tropical Forest Regeneration

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2004)
  • B. Dupuy et al.

    Timber plantations in the humid tropics of Africa

    (1993)
  • F. Elias et al.

    Assessing the growth and climate sensitivity of secondary forests in highly deforested Amazonian landscapes

    Ecology

    (2020)
  • S. Elliott

    The potential for automating assisted natural regeneration of tropical forest ecosystems

    Biotropica

    (2016)
  • M. Fagan et al.

    Land cover dynamics following a deforestation ban in northern Costa Rica

    Environ. Res. Lett.

    (2013)
  • FAO, 2001. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2000. In, FAO Forestry Paper N° 140. UN Food and Agriculture...
  • FAO, 2012a. Global forest land-use change 1990–2005 In. UN FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION, Rome,...
  • FAO, 2012b. State of the world’s forests. Enhancing the socioeconomic benefits. In. UN Food and Agriculture...
  • FAO, 2015. Global Forest Resources Assessment 2015. How are the world’s forests changing? In, FAO Forestry Paper No. 1....
  • Cited by (20)

    • Plant functional traits under cattle grazing and fallow age scenarios in a tropical dry forest of Northwestern Mexico

      2022, Basic and Applied Ecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since secondary vegetation represents a large reservoir of biodiversity and ecosystem services, some strategies for secondary forest conservation and recovery have been developed (Chazdon, 2014). For instance, the use of enrichment plantings of old-growth species to accelerate succession or the use of physical barriers to protect seedlings from herbivores thereby support recovery (Nelson et al., 2011, Forbes et al., 2020; Ngo Bieng et al., 2021). Compared with active restoration (see Dimson & Gillespie, 2020), fencing (i.e., grazing exclusion barriers that prevent the entry of livestock) may represent a more cost-effective approach for accelerating the successional process and biodiversity recovery (Benayas et al., 2009; Meli et al., 2017; Sapkota & Stahl, 2019).

    • Biomass of timber species in Central American secondary forests: Towards climate change mitigation through sustainable timber harvesting

      2021, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      This has happened despite attempts to encourage their conservation with REDD + policies and payment for ecosystem services (Arroyo-Mora et al., 2014; Pagiola et al., 2007) and relatively recent regulations that create adequate legal frameworks for SF management. Our interest in the timber potential of SF is based on the hypothesis that sustainable management for wood production may give added value to these vulnerable forest ecosystems, thereby contributing to the improvement of rural livelihoods, climate change mitigation and the achievement of long-term forest and landscape restoration goals (Ngo Bieng et al., 2021). At the same time, timber production in SFs may provide a complementary alternative for wood production, hopefully contributing to a decrease in the logging pressure on OGFs, and the resulting degradation and deforestation (Brown & Lugo, 1990; Bawa & Seidler, 1998; Fantini et al., 2019).

    • Sustainability of Brazilian forest concessions

      2021, Forest Ecology and Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      Our simulations suggest that, under present regulations, the production of timber from forest concessions in the Brazilian Amazon can be sustained for only one harvest cycle. Additional sources of timber should be sought from plantations of exotic or native species, enriched secondary or degraded forests, and silvo-pastoral and other agroforestry systems that could be part of the forest restoration programs under the Bonn Challenge Initiative (; Ngo Bieng et al., 2021). Tree plantations in Brazil are concentrated in the South (SFB, 2019) and cover 9.8 Mha of which 75% is Eucalyptus (SFB 2019).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text