Effect of reaction substrates on membrane-assisted transesterification reactions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cep.2021.108443Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Conversion increased in all tested membrane-assisted transesterification reactions.

  • Long-alkyl-chain methyl esters and alcohols afford high vapor methanol concentration.

  • Methanol removal increased with temperature and vapor-phase methanol concentration.

Abstract

Zeolite membranes are promising for the assistance of transesterification reactions, but the effects of the reaction conditions have not been fully clarified. In this study, the membrane-assisted transesterification of several methyl esters and alcohols was examined to investigate the influence of the substrates on the conversion and methanol permeation. The conversion of methyl hexanoate was 55.0% without a membrane when reacted with 1-hexanol at 353 K. When the methanol byproduct was removed using an FAU-type zeolite membrane, the conversion increased to 79.6%. A large increase in conversion was also obtained using substrates with long linear alkyl chains. The highest conversion among the 18 transesterification reactions was obtained when methyl hexanoate was reacted with 1-hexanol. These results suggest that the reaction substrates influence the boiling point of the solution and the vapor-phase methanol concentration. Additionally, the effect of temperature and feed concentration on the methanol permeation performance was evaluated for the FAU-type zeolite membrane by pervaporation to discuss their influence on the conversion. Higher reaction temperatures were favorable for membrane-assisted transesterification because more methanol was removed by the membrane. This suggests that controlling the vapor-phase methanol concentration is significant for membrane-assisted transesterification reactions.

Introduction

Inorganic membranes can be used for separation processes at high temperatures and in organic solvents because of their high thermal and chemical stability. In particular, zeolite membranes with their excellent separation performances for water [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], carbon dioxide [6], [7], [8], and hydrocarbons [9,10] have been developed since they can separate mixtures based on molecular size and affinity corresponding to microstructure and composition. Therefore, commercialization and demonstration studies using zeolite membranes have been reported for alcohol dehydration and carbon dioxide/methane separation [3,7].

Many studies on the combination of zeolite membranes with chemical reactions have been reported toward increasing the conversion, such as esterification reactions [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], the synthesis of carbonates [16] and methanol [17,18] for carbon dioxide utilization, and methanol to olefin reactions [19], [20], [21], [22]. In particular, esterification reactions using dehydration zeolite membranes are approaching commercialization. Esters are important functional chemicals and intermediates for pharmaceuticals, foods, and cosmetics. Approximately 10% of chemicals are synthesized by esterification and transesterifications. Since these are equilibrium reactions, the conversion can be increased by adding an excess amount of alcohol [23].

Membrane-assisted esterification is a promising technique for reducing the amount of added alcohol. Many studies combining esterification with zeolite membranes have been reported [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Tanaka et al. examined the esterification of acetic acid with ethanol using T-type zeolite membranes. The conversion of acetic acid was increased to 98% by the membrane [11] compared with 76% without. Moreover, the conversion could be predicted based on a reaction kinetic equation containing the reaction rate constant and water flux. Zhu et al. increased the conversion of acetic acid to 98% with sulfuric acid as a catalyst using a MOR-type zeolite membrane [12], which could be used repeatedly because of its high acid stability. Besides ethyl acetate, zeolite membranes have also been applied to other esterification reactions with target products such as ethyl lactate [13], ethyl oleate [14], and diisopropyl adipate [15]. For example, a CHA-type zeolite membrane was applied to produce diisopropyl adipate by esterification at an increased yield from 56% at equilibrium to 98% [15]. In particular, the water permeation behavior through the membrane was monitored continuously during the reaction, which indicated that the yield of the target ester was increased by the equilibrium shift caused by the removal of water as a byproduct by the CHA-type zeolite membrane. These previous studies have indicated that the use of zeolite membranes in esterification reactions requires a high water flux and good stability under the selected reaction conditions.

Recently, membrane reactors for transesterification have focused on the methanol removal performance of zeolite membranes [24,25]. For these transesterification reactions, methyl esters and alcohols are used as reaction substrates to produce the target ester products and methanol as a byproduct:

The selective removal of the methanol byproduct would theoretically increase the transesterification conversion. Kumakiri et al. applied FAU-type zeolite membranes to the transesterification of methyl acetate and 1-butanol at 323 K with Amberlyst 15 as a catalyst [24]. The methanol flux of the FAU-type zeolite membrane was 12.5 mol m−2 h−1 for a 9.7wt% methanol/butanol mixture at 323 K, and the methanol concentration on the permeate side was 97.6%. The conversion without the membrane reached 43% at equilibrium. The membrane was then soaked in the reaction solution, and removal of the methanol byproduct was attempted. However, the conversion could not be increased. They concluded that this was attributable to a reduction in the methanol flux due to the influence of the acid and byproducts. Recently, we reported the membrane-assisted transesterification of methyl acetate with 2-propanol using a FAU-type zeolite membrane [25]. The conversion was increased from 38% at equilibrium to 57% by the selective removal of methanol from the vapor phase. The membrane performance could be maintained by positioning the membrane in the vapor phase to avoid contact with the reaction solution. Since only a few studies on transesterification with zeolite membranes have been reported, there are many unknowns, such as the required membrane flux and separation performance, the effect of the reaction substrates, and the operating conditions.

In this study, the membrane-assisted transesterification of several methyl esters and alcohols was examined to investigate the influence of the reaction substrates. Moreover, the permeation properties of methanol through FAU-type zeolite membranes and the effect of reaction temperature were determined to discuss the influence of the operating conditions.

Section snippets

Materials

The following methyl esters and alcohols were used in this study: methyl acetate, methyl propionate, methyl butyrate, methyl hexanoate, methanol, 1-propanol, 1-butanol, 1-pentanol, 1-hexanol, and 2-propanol. Methyl butyrate and methyl hexanoate were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich and Tokyo Chemical Industry, respectively, and all other reagents were obtained from FUJIFILM Wako. All reagents were used for the transesterification and pervaporation experiments without further purification. A cation

Membrane characterization

Fig. 1 shows SEM images of the α-alumina support tube and FAU-type zeolite membrane. The outer surface of the support tube was completely covered with a polycrystalline layer, and no large cracks or pinholes were observed on the membrane surface. The thickness of the polycrystalline layer was ca. 3.0 μm, as shown in Fig. 1c. Fig. 2 shows the XRD patterns of the FAU-type zeolite membrane, NaY (FAU-type) zeolite seeds, and α-alumina support tube. The peaks of both the seeds and support appeared

Conclusions

In this study, we carried out the transesterification of several methyl esters and alcohols to evaluate the effect of the reaction substrates on the conversion. When methyl hexanoate was reacted with 1-hexanol at 353 K, the conversion increased from 51.8% at equilibrium to 79.6% due to the selective removal of methanol by the FAU-type zeolite membrane. In addition, the conversion of methyl hexanoate increased to 82.0% at 373 K by membrane assistance. The boiling point of the reaction solution

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ayumi Ikeda: Methodology, Investigation, Data curtion, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Wakako Matsuura: Investigation. Chie Abe: Investigation. Yasuhisa Hasegawa: Conceptualization, Resources, Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (35)

Cited by (6)

  • Emerging technologies for biodiesel production: Processes, challenges, and opportunities

    2022, Biomass and Bioenergy
    Citation Excerpt :

    Besides, the catalytic membrane improves the production rate and the conversion percentage while it can be selective toward the feedstock [162]. Some of the current trends in technological advances in membrane-assisted transesterification have been studied by recent lecturers [163,164]. Ikeda, Matsuura, Abe and Hasegawa [163] have studied the effects of reaction substrates on membrane-assisted transesterification reactions, conversion, and methanol permeation.

  • Kinetic study of the zeolite membrane-assisted transesterification reaction with methanol removal

    2022, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process Intensification
    Citation Excerpt :

    This indicates that the crystal structure of the polycrystalline layer on the support tube is an FAU-type zeolite. In addition, the Si/Al molar ratio of the membrane was 1.5 according to the EDX analysis, similar to a previously reported value that employed the same synthesis conditions [12]. The reproducibility of the FAU-type zeolite membranes was evaluated by pervaporation.

  • Recent advances in selective catalytic hydrogenation of nitriles to primary amines

    2021, Journal of Catalysis
    Citation Excerpt :

    When using supported mono-metal catalysts (MS), we can conclude from the published reports that the reaction performance greatly depends on the type, amount and mobility of transition states and surface intermediates which are controlled by the catalysts. Moreover, solvent type, reaction conditions (such as reaction pressure, hydrogen sources and substrate structure) [30,31] and additives also play important roles [32]. The metal itself has an inherent selectivity for nitrile hydrogenation.

View full text