Full length article
The gaze of the gatekeeper: Unpacking the multi-level influences and interactions of household food waste through a video elicitation study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105625Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A video-elicitation methodology and multi-level perspective novel to the food waste literature is utilised in this study.

  • Factors at the household level played a central role in influencing food provisioning decisions of the dietary gatekeeper.

  • Dietary gatekeepers make food provisioning choices and decisions for their household within conditions imposed by the food industry (supermarkets and manufacturers).

  • Dietary gatekeepers need to negotiate a number of trade-offs between micro, meso and macro level factors when shopping or cooking for their families.

  • Food waste emerges from the gaps, cracks and compromises dietary gatekeepers are forced to make between interacting factors at multiple levels.

Abstract

Changing the household food waste related behaviours of consumers vital to the sustainable transformation of the global food system. This study utilised a video-elicitation methodology to explore the different factors that influence the food provisioning practices of the household dietary gatekeeper from a multi-level perspective, and to consider their food waste implications. Key findings included the central role of the household level in influencing food provisioning practices, the conditions imposed on households by the food industry, and the different trade-offs that are negotiated when shopping or cooking. Household food waste emerges from the gaps, cracks and compromises that dietary gatekeepers are forced to make between interacting factors at multiple levels. This study supports a move an exclusively individual level focus in food waste research to include greater consideration of the entire household, as well as the external conditions imposed upon them.

Introduction

There is growing recognition that the modern-day food system is a threat to human and planetary health and requires urgent transformation to avoid large scale environmental collapse (HLPE, 2014; Willett et al., 2019). The extraordinary levels of loss and waste currently inherent in the food system are part of this challenge (FAO, 2011, 2019; FUSIONS, 2014). Food that is produced, but never consumed, is associated with a broad spectrum of social, environmental and economic costs (FAO, 2014). These include greenhouse gas emissions, land degradation, unsustainable resource-use, increasing production costs, and threats to the long-term security of food production (HLPE, 2014; Neff et al., 2016).

The mounting sustainability implications of food waste have increased policy and research attention to this issue (Parfitt et al., 2010; Porpino, 2016; Young et al., 2017). However, despite substantial volumes of food waste from the domestic sector, research attention to the behavioural antecedents of household food waste is still relatively recent (Boulet et al., 2021; Schanes et al., 2018; Stangherlin and de Barcellos, 2018). To date, a range of consumer food provisioning behaviours (from purchasing to cooking to disposal) have been associated with food waste. In turn, a growing body of factors, such as demographics, attitudes, household dynamics and food packaging, have been identified as potential influencers of these behaviours and of household food waste (Principato, 2018; Secondi et al., 2015; Stangherlin and de Barcellos, 2018).

The relationship between household food waste, behaviour, and influencing factors is complex, multi-facted and resists simple explanatory models. Pioneering conceptual frameworks from Roodhuyzen et al (2017) and Quested et al (2013) attempt to model this complexity by framing multiple, contextually sensitive, causal pathways from which behaviour and food waste emerge.

Adding to these efforts, we recently developed a multi-level framework (see Fig. 1) of household food waste and consumer behaviour that recognizes the nested relationships between different context (or levels) and their associated factors (Boulet et al., 2021). Based on an extensive systematic review, the framework organizes known influencing factors at individual (micro), household (meso), and external to household (macro) levels (see Fig. 1). The general food provisioning practices (and their specific associated behaviours) of a consumer are the emergent property of interactions between different factors depicted across the levels in the framework. Household food waste is then the final outcome of the different behaviours enacted.

While the range of influencing factors on household food waste have been comprehensively explored (Boulet et al., 2021; Roodhuyzen et al., 2017; Schanes et al., 2018), much less attention has been given to the levels at which factors are located and their relative influence on food waste. Do particular levels exert a higher degree of influence on consumer behaviour and household food waste than others? Reid et al. (2010) have theorised that the household (meso) level is the ‘crucible’ of pro-environmental behaviours, mediating influences between different levels. Is this the case for food waste related behaviours? Do food waste policy makers and practitioners need to pay attention to particular levels (rather than single factors) to effectively tackle the problem?

The nested hierarchy in our framework also illustrates that influencing factors can be moderated, or even cancelled out, by factors that exist at other levels. For example, an individual may have particular food-related attitudes that would predict minimal amounts of food waste, yet this factor can be subsumed by the food related tastes and preferences of others in the home, leading to more food being wasted at the household level (Cappellini, 2009; Evans, 2011). Other studies and frameworks have addressed the possible interactions between factors (see for e.g. Aschemann-Witzel et al., 2015; Roodhuyzen et al., 2017), however, to the best of our knowledge, none have been empirically investigated from a multi-level perspective. Greater understanding of these relationships, as well as the relative influence of different levels, will assist food waste policy makers and practitioners in designing effective interventions that target factors and levels ‘that matter’ in order to influence consumer behaviour change.

This study explores the relevance of our conceptual framework for empirical research by conducting a multi-level investigation of household food waste factors, and interactions, from the perspective of the individual consumer. Our research asks: which factors and levels are relevant to an individual's behaviour and decision-making during household food provisioning practices? In addition, we consider what interactions between factors and levels are also evident.

We utilized a qualitative video-elicitation methodology to explore food provisioning from the perspective of the household member most responsible for shopping and cooking, i.e. the household's ‘dietary gatekeeper’ (Reid et al., 2015; Wijayaratne et al., 2020). Factors identified were then organized from a multi-level perspective to the relevant micro, meso and macro levels in the framework above. We focus on household food provisioning practices, and their associated behaviours, because as previously discussed, it is from these practices that household food waste emerges (Boulet et al., 2021; Principato, 2018; Roodhuyzen et al., 2017). Understanding the influencers of household food provisioning gives greater insight into the background conditions that generate food waste.

The next sections describe this study's research methodology, present the results, and discuss key emergent themes, including implications for behaviour change interventions that reduce food waste. We finish with a reflection on the pros, cons and opportunities of video-elicitation as a methodology that has not been extensively used in the research field of food waste and consumer behaviour.

Section snippets

Method

Our research design is a qualitative observational study, with video-elicitation used as the primary data collection method. Video-elicitation is a visual method; incorporating the use of visual materials (such as pictures or videos) in the research process (Basil, 2011; Dodds et al., 2018; Pain, 2012; Patricia et al., 2017). An individual's memory of past events can be imperfect and biased, and the colour, motion and sound from visual materials such as videos, can trigger a broader spectrum of

Results

Our coding procedures identified two thematic categories from the video recordings and audio transcripts. The first category concerns the key influencing factors, and their relevant levels, while the second category was about the trade-offs and negotiations based on multiple factors that participants needed to make when carrying out different food provisioning practices. These categories are detailed below together with illustrative quotes.

Discussion

We began this paper by asking which factors, at what levels, were relevant to an individual's behaviours and decision-making during common household food provisioning practices? In addition, we were also interested in the interactions that might be evident between factors and levels. Food waste emerges from food provisioning practices, and a better understanding of their influencing factors helps to trace out the pathways that generate household food waste (Boulet et al., 2021; Quested et al.,

Conclusion and future research

Our study aimed to identify the relevant factors and levels, and their interactions, to an individual's household food provisioning practices, and to consider their food waste implications. Taking the perspective of the household member most responsible for cooking and shopping (the dietary gatekeeper), the central role of the household (meso) level on food provisioning was identified, as were the conditions imposed on households by the food industry (macro level) and the different compromises

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Mark Boulet: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Visualization. Annet Hoek: Conceptualization, Methodology, Funding acquisition, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing, Supervision. Rob Raven: Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research project was commissioned by OzHarvest and supported by the NSW Environmental Protection Authority (Australia) through its Love Food Hate Waste program. We are very grateful to staff from both organisations for their guidance, support and involvement, and would also like to thank our research participants for providing such generous insights into their lives.

Literature cited (66)

  • K. Schanes et al.

    Food waste matters - A systematic review of household food waste practices and their policy implications

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2018)
  • L. Secondi et al.

    Household food waste behaviour in EU-27 countries: a multilevel analysis

    Food Policy

    (2015)
  • T.R. Wenrich et al.

    Family Members' Influence on Family Meal Vegetable Choices

    J. Nutr. Educ. Behav.

    (2010)
  • W. Willett et al.

    Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems

    The Lancet

    (2019)
  • H. Williams et al.

    Reasons for household food waste with special attention to packaging

    J. Clean. Prod.

    (2012)
  • W. Young et al.

    Can social media be a tool for reducing consumers’ food waste? A behaviour change experiment by a UK retailer

    Resour. Conservat. Recycl.

    (2017)
  • K. Abeliotis et al.

    Food waste prevention in Athens, Greece: the effect of family characteristics

    Waste Manag. Res.

    (2016)
  • J. Aschemann-Witzel et al.

    Consumer-related food waste: causes and potential for action

    Sustainability (Switzerland)

    (2015)
  • J. Aschemann-Witzel et al.

    Consumer-related food waste: role of food marketing and retailers and potential for action

    J. Int. Food Agribusiness Market.

    (2016)
  • M. Basil

    Use of photography and video in observational research

    Qual. Market Res.

    (2011)
  • M. Boulet et al.

    Return to sender: a behavioural approach to reducing food waste in schools

    Austral. J. Environ. Manag.

    (2019)
  • M. Boulet et al.

    Towards a multi-level framework of household food waste and consumer behaviour: untangling spaghetti soup

    Appetite

    (2021)
  • V. Braun et al.

    Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Qualit. Res. Psychol.

    (2006)
  • L. Bravi et al.

    Motivations and actions to prevent food waste among young Italian consumers

    Sustainability (Switzerland)

    (2019)
  • B. Cappellini

    The sacrifice of re-use: the travels of leftovers and family relations

    J. Consum. Behav.

    (2009)
  • J.Y. Cho et al.

    Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: similarities and differences

    Qualit. Rep.

    (2014)
  • L. Devaney et al.

    Disrupting household food consumption through experimental HomeLabs: outcomes, connections, contexts

    J. Consum. Culture

    (2017)
  • S. Dodds et al.

    Incorporating visual methods in longitudinal transformative service research

    J. Serv. Theory Practice

    (2018)
  • D. Evans

    Blaming the consumer - once again: the social and material contexts of everyday food waste practices in some English households

    Critic. Publ. Health

    (2011)
  • D. Evans

    Beyond the throwaway society: ordinary domestic practice and a sociological approach to household food waste

    Sociology

    (2012)
  • R.M. Fanelli

    Using causal maps to analyse the major root causes of household food waste: results of a survey among people from central and southern Italy

    Sustainability (Switzerland)

    (2019)
  • FAO. (2011). Global Food Losses and Food Waste – Extent, Causes and Prevention....
  • FAO. (2014). Food Wastage Footprint: Full-Cost Accounting....
  • Cited by (9)

    • Household food waste disposal behaviour is driven by perceived personal benefits, recycling habits and ability to compost

      2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although self-reported measures of household FW may under-estimate the actual level of FW (Hebrok and Boks, 2017) – e.g. due to inaccurate recall (Xue et al., 2017) – this method was determined to be suitable for our study due to the relatively low respondent burden (van Herpen et al., 2019). The method allowed understanding of the use of both sustainable and unsustainable FW behaviour among a large sample of households, and incorporation of behavioural determinants such as household routines, beliefs, and attitudes, which have been found to be important factors influencing FW behaviours (Boulet et al., 2021; Elimelech et al., 2018; Roodhuyzen et al., 2017). Direct measurements (e.g. physical waste surveys) are not conducive for combining with behavioural determinants with such a large sample (Elimelech et al., 2018).

    • Segmenting households based on food waste behaviours and waste audit outcomes: Introducing Over Providers, Under Planners and Considerate Planners

      2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, “Over Providers” and “Under Planners” still wasted relatively large amounts of food. This ‘gap’ between attitude (or intention) and action has been demonstrated in a number of studies (see for e.g. Boulet et al., 2021a; Graham-Rowe et al., 2015; Russell et al., 2017; Toma et al., 2017). However, our study highlights several potential drivers of food waste which are discussed for each segment below.

    • Influencing across multiple levels: The positive effect of a school-based intervention on food waste and household behaviours

      2022, Journal of Environmental Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      The lack of attention to macro level factors in food waste research is mirrored by current food waste interventions, which tend to target micro level factors such as an individual's awareness, knowledge and skills in order to change provisioning practices (Schmidt, 2016; Young et al., 2017). These interventions are also notable for their predominant focus on those responsible for shopping and cooking in the home, namely the household ‘dietary gatekeeper’, as opposed to other household members (Boulet et al., 2021a & b). Interventions targeting, or incorporating, macro-level factors are much less common and/or have had very little empirical examination of their influence on consumers or households (Reynolds et al., 2019).

    • Households in sustainability transitions: a systematic review and new research avenues

      2021, Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions
      Citation Excerpt :

      However overall, the agency of household(er)s is not specifically or explicitly discussed in the sustainability transitions literature, but rather is assumed, and often is implicitly and problematically considered a property of the household rather than that of diverse householders within a social unit. We also note that unpacking household agency does not necessarily need to be explored by social practice theory, as for instance demonstrated by Boulet et al. (2021). Section 4.2 further develops the argument on households as a social unit.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text