Abstract
Research indicates that deliberate thinking and eye movements are related. However, how various thought processes influence eye movements is not explored well. The present research examined the role of convergent and divergent thinking in eye movement. Divergent thinking involves novel alternatives, multiple uses, and unconventional answers which may require scanning visual surroundings precisely and extensively. Hence, it was hypothesized that divergent thinking would involve more scattered and detailed visual scanning than convergent thinking. Two experiments were conducted using repeated measures design: both involved a visual remote association task for convergent thinking and an adapted visual task of the alternate uses task for divergent thinking. Experiment 1 tracked participants’ eye movement while solving the task when images of objects were on the screen; whereas, in Experiment 2, the blank screen paradigm was used where the images of items were removed and the eyes were tracked while participants solved the task. Data analysis showed that the eye movements were more object focused during convergent thinking than divergent thinking. The results confirmed that participants in divergent thinking had more detailed and dispersed visual scanning than in convergent thinking.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbari Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2010). The (b) link between creativity and dopamine: Spontaneous eye blink rates predict and dissociate divergent and convergent thinking. Cognition, 115(3), 458–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2010.03.007
Akbari Chermahini, S., & Hommel, B. (2012). Creative mood swings: Divergent and convergent thinking affect mood in opposite ways. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 76(5), 634–640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0358-z
Altmann, G. T. (2004). Language-mediated eye movements in the absence of a visual world: The ‘blank screen paradigm.’ Cognition, 93(2), B79–B87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.02.005
Anderson, J., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315805696
Ansburg, P. I., & Hill, K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(7), 1141–1152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00104-6e
Benedek, M., Bergner, S., Könen, T., Fink, A., & Neubauer, A. C. (2011). EEG alpha synchronization is related to top-down processing in convergent and divergent thinking. Neuropsychologia, 49(12), 3505–3511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.004
Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2013.768221
Chrysikou, E. G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2011). Dissociable brain states linked to common and creative object use. Human Brain Mapping, 32(4), 665–675. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21056
Dellas, M., & Gaier, E. L. (1970). Identification of creativity: The individual. Psychological Bulletin, 73(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028446
Dorfman, L., & Gassimova, V. (2015). Divergent thinking and differential focusing of perceptual attention in visual serial search tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, 44, 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.007
Dow, G. T., & Mayer, R. E. (2004). Teaching students to solve insight problems: Evidence for domain specificity in creativity training. Creativity Research Journal, 16(4), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1604_2
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving (L.S. Lees, Trans). Psychological Monographs, 58(5), 1–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093599
Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1997). Can salient reward increase creative performance without reducing intrinsic creative interest? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(3), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.652
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
Grant, E. R., & Spivey, M. J. (2003). Eye movements and problem solving: Guiding attention guides thought. Psychological Science, 14(5), 462–466
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Hass, R. W. (2017). Semantic search during divergent thinking. Cognition, 166, 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039
Hommel, B. (2011). Convergent and divergent operations in cognitive search. In P. M. Todd, T. T. Hills, & T. W. Robbins (Eds.), Cognitive Search: Evolution, Algorithms, and the Brain. (Vol. 9, pp. 221–235). MIT Press.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1985). Cognitive coordinate systems: Accounts of mental rotation and individual differences in spatial ability. Psychological Review, 92(2), 137–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.92.2.137
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. E. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 29(7), 1000–1009. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195762
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2009). The Aha! Moment: The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(4), 210–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01638.x
Maheshwari, S., Tuladhar, V., Roy, S., Sarmah, P., Rai, K., & Thargay, T. (2020). Do mindsets help in controlling eye gaze? A study to explore the effect of abstract and concrete mindsets on eye movements control. The Journal of General Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221309.2020.1828253
Mednick, S. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69(3), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048850
Metcalfe, J. (1986). Feeling of knowing in memory and problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12(2), 288–294. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.12.2.288
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Prentice-Hall.
Nijstad, B. A., De Dreu, C. K., Rietzschel, E. F., & Baas, M. (2010). The dual pathway to creativity model: Creative ideation as a function of flexibility and persistence. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 34–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463281003765323
Razoumnikova, O. M. (2000). Functional organization of different brain areas during convergent and divergent thinking: An EEG investigation. Cognitive Brain Research, 10(1–2), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(00)00017-3
Ritter, S. M., & Ferguson, S. (2017). Happy creativity: Listening to happy music facilitates divergent thinking. PloS one, 12(9), e0182210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182210
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092
Spivey, M. J., & Geng, J. J. (2001). Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: Eye movements to absent objects. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 65(4), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260100059
Spivey, M. J., Tyler, M. J., Richardson, D. C., & Young, E. E. (2000). Eye movements during comprehension of spoken descriptions. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 22, 487–492. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7z34j8zw
Sternberg, R. J., & O’Hara, L. A. (2000). Intelligence and creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of Intelligence. (pp. 611–630). Cambridge University Press.
Weinberger, A. B., Green, A. E., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2017). Using transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance creative cognition: interactions between task, polarity, and stimulation site. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 246. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00246
Funding
Cognitive Science Research Initiative, Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology, India (Grant No.: SR/CSRI/31/2014).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
All the procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Maheshwari, S., Tuladhar, V., Thargay, T. et al. Do our eyes mirror our thought patterns? A study on the influence of convergent and divergent thinking on eye movement. Psychological Research 86, 746–756 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01520-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01520-7