Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Experimental and simulation investigations of cyclic water injection in low-permeability reservoir

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many studies have been carried out to investigate the cyclic water injection (CWI) in enhancing oil recovery, while most of the target reservoirs are conventional, and the study for CWI in application to ultralow permeability reservoir is limited. In this study, a combination of experiment and numerical simulation was used to evaluate the performances of CWI in ultralow permeability reservoir. The results indicate that short pressurizing period but long depressurizing period gives the low possibility of water breakthrough and sufficient time for oil/water exchanging and redistribution, which achieves better oil recovery efficiency. In addition, high pressurizing pressure is a good compensation to the reservoir energy, and pushes the water into the far region to displace more oil. The optimized operation parameters for the core-scale experiments are further evaluated with numerical simulation of a realistic ultralow permeability reservoir located in Ordos basin, China, and consistent results between experiment and simulation are found. In the simulation, the optimal injection period and injection pressure during the pressurizing cycle are 20 days and 14 MPa, respectively; the optimal injection period and injection pressure during the depressurizing cycle are 60 days and 2 MPa, respectively. Good field response has been achieved after the implementation of the optimized parameters. This work, for the first time, systematically studies the performances of CWI technique in application to ultralow permeability reservoirs both at core scale and reservoir scale, and it provides theoretical and practical implications for enhancing oil recovery in similar types of ultralow permeability oil reservoirs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalkadeer, K. M., Dunn-Norman, S., Senturk, E., Rivera, N., Prada, M., and Goodman, H. E., 2009, Changes in Near Wellbore Stress and Fracture Gradient Due to Cold Water injection in a Sirte Basin Field, Libya, SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Oct. 19–21, SPE Paper No. SPE-125310-MS.

  • Alhuraishawy AK, Bai B, Wei M et al (2018) Mineral dissolution and fine migration effect on oil recovery factor by low-salinity water flooding in low-permeability sandstone reservoir. Fuel 220(MAY 15):898–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig FF (1971) The Reservoir Engineering Aspects of Waterflooding. H.l.doherty Memorial Fund of Aime 3.

  • Delamaide E, Tabary R, Rousseau D (2014) Chemical EOR in low permeability reservoirs. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia, Muscat

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Du Z, Zeng F, Peng X, Chan C (2016) Optimizing the Pressure Decline Rate on the Cyclic Solvent Injection Process for Enhanced Heavy Oil Recovery. J Pet Sci Eng 145:629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang T, Wang M, Gao Y et al (2018) Enhanced oil recovery with CO2/N2 slug in low permeability reservoir: Molecular Dynamics Simulation[J]. Chem Eng Sci 197:204–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fic J, Pedersen PK (2013) Reservoir characterization of a "tight" oil reservoir, the middle Jurassic Upper Shaunavon Member in the Whitemud and Eastbrook pools, SW Saskatchewan[J]. Mar Pet Geol 44:41–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He Y, Cheng S, Li L, Mu G, Zhang T, Xu H, Qin J, Yu H (2017) Waterflood Direction and Front Characterization With Four-Step Work Flow: A Case Study in Changqing Oil Field, China. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 20(3):708–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester CT, Walker JW, Sawver GH (1963) Oil Recovery by Imbibition Austin and Buds Water Flooding in the Formations. J Pet Technol 17(8):919–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hou J, Xia Z, Li S, Zhou K, Lu N (2016) Operation Parameter Optimization of a Gas Hydrate Reservoir Developed by Cyclic Hot Water Stimulation With a Separated-Zone Horizontal Well Based on Particle Swarm Algorithm. Energy 96:581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen TB, Sharma MP (1989) Thermal Hydraulics of Wellbores and Surface Lines During Steam/Hot Water Injection—Part I: Theoretical Model. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 111(2):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulathu S, Dandekar AY, Patil S, Khataniar S (2013) Low Salinity Cyclic Water Floods for Enhanced Oil Recovery on Alaska North Slope. SPE Asia Pacific Oil & Gas Conference and Exhibition, Jakarta SPE Paper No. SPE-165812-MS

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucia FJ (2007). Carbonate Reservoir Characterization: An Integrated Approach. Springer Science & Business Media.pp260.

  • Ma J, Wang X, Gao R, Zeng F, Huang C, Tontiwachwuthikul P, Liang Z (2016) Study of Cyclic CO2 Injection for Low-Pressure Light Oil Recovery Under Reservoir Conditions. Fuel 174:296–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattax CC, Kyte JR (1962) Imbibition Oil Recovery From Fractured, Water-Drive Reservoir. Soc Pet Eng J 2(2):177–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaron BA, Bradley DC, Cooke A, Prouvost LP, Raffn AG, Vidal A, Wilt M (2007) Shapes of Flood Fronts in Heterogeneous Reservoirs and Oil Recovery Strategies. SPE/EAGE Reservoir Characterization and Simulation Conference, Abu Dhabi SPE Paper No. SPE-111147-MS

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peng X, Wang Y, Diao Y et al (2018) Experimental investigation on the operation parameters of carbon dioxide huff-n-puff process in ultra low permeability oil reservoirs[J]. J Pet Sci Eng 174:903–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perez D, Salicioni F, Ucan S (2014) Cyclic Water Injection in San Jorge Gulf Basin, Argentina. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Maraca Ibo SPE Paper No. SPE-169403-MS

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prasun S, Wojtanowicz AK (2018) Determination and Implication of Ultimate Water Cut in Well-Spacing Design for Developed Reservoirs With Water Coning. ASME J Energy Resour Technol 140(8):082902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ran X (2013) Advanced Water Injection for Low Permeability Reservoirs. Elsevier Inc. P39.

  • Reuvers N, Golombok M (2009) Shear Rate and Permeability in Water Flooding. Transp Porous Med 79(2):249–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shchipanov A, Surguchev L, Jakobsen S R (2008). Improved Oil Recovery by Cyclic Injection and Production[C]// Spe Russian Oil & Gas Technical Conference & Exhibition. US.

  • Surguchev L, Koundin A, Melberg O, Rolfsvåg TA, Menard WP (2002) Cyclic Water Injection: Improved Oil Recovery at Zero Cost[J]. Pet Geosci 8(1):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surguchev L, Giske NH, Kollbotn L, Shchipanov A (2008) Cyclic Water Injection Improves Oil Production in Carbonate Reservoir. International Petroleum Exhibition and Conference, Abu Dhabi SPE Paper No. SPE-117836-MS

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wan T, Yu Y, Sheng JJ (2015) Experimental and Numerical Study of the EOR Potential in Liquid-Rich Shales by Cyclic Gas Injection. J UnconvOil Gas Resour 12:56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Tian Y, Yu X et al (2017) Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs[J]. Fuel 210(dec.15):425–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Guo C, Wei M, Jiang R (2015) Impact of Parameters’ Time Variation on Waterflooding Reservoir Performance. J Pet Sci Eng 126:181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang T, Li X, Li J, Feng D, Li P, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Wang S (2017) Numerical investigation of the well shut-in and fracture uncertainty on fluid-loss and production performance in gas-shale reservoirs. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 46:421–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Science and Technology Major Projects of China (2016ZX05023-005-001-003) and the National Natural Science Foundation Projects of China (51474070).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xuangang Meng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Santanu Banerjee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meng, X., Zhang, Q., Dai, X. et al. Experimental and simulation investigations of cyclic water injection in low-permeability reservoir. Arab J Geosci 14, 791 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07129-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07129-9

Keywords

Navigation