Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“I Think that Teachers Do Not Teach Evolution Because It Is Complicated”: Difficulties in Teaching and Learning Evolution in Israel

  • Published:
International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conflict between acceptance and disapproval of evolution has led to obstacles in its teaching and learning. Other difficulties, such as both teachers’ and students’ alternative perceptions, student maturity in the face of learning this complicated topic, and teachers’ gaps in evolution knowledge, add to the difficulties in teaching and learning evolution. The aim of this study was to grasp the difficulties in the teaching and learning of evolution perceived by curriculum writers compared to those perceived by in-service junior high school science and technology teachers and high school biology teachers in Israel. The findings revealed a wide range of perceived difficulties in the teaching and learning of evolution, mainly in the fields of religion, teacher and student knowledge, student maturity, and alternative perceptions. A questionnaire distributed among in-service Israeli teachers added strength to interviews with the curriculum writers, with both referring to some of the same difficulties. However, some difficulties were heard only in the interviews. Curriculum writers were more concerned with questions of faith that teaching evolution raises, whereas in-service teachers were concerned with their students’ difficulties in understanding natural selection and mutational randomness. Teacher-training programs that focus on teachers’ lack of evolution knowledge and on pedagogical skills, as well as the design of teaching materials that take into account these difficulties, are recommended for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aleixandre, M. P. J. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: a look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(5), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amir, R. (2007). Chapters in ecology. Israeli Ministry of Education. Retrieved Feb. 1, 2020 from https://meyda.education.gov.il/files/katalog_hinuchi/books/prakim_ecologya.pdf.

  • Barnes, M. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). A call to use cultural competence when teaching evolution to religious college students: Introducing Religious Cultural Competence in Evolution Education (ReCCEE). CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(4), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0062.

  • Basit, T. N. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000133548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559.

  • Berkman, M. B., & Plutzer, E. (2011). Defeating creationism in the courtroom, but not in the classroom. Science, 331(6016), 404–405. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birdthistle, N., Hynes, B., & Fleming, P. (2007). Enterprise education programmes in secondary schools in Ireland: A multi-stakeholder perspective. Education + Training, 49(4), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910710754426.

  • Borgerding, L. A., & Deniz, H. (2018). Evolution education around the globe: Conclusions and future directions. In Evolution education around the globe (pp. 449–464). Springer international publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_24.

  • Boyatis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage Publications.

  • Central Bureau of Statistics. (2018). Retrieved Jan. 10, 2020 from https://www.cbs.gov.il

  • Chavan, R. (2016). Difficulties in teaching biology concepts by science teachers at upper primary level. Aayushi International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 3(8), 10–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cofré, H., Cuevas, E., & Becerra, B. (2017). The relationship between biology teachers’ understanding of the nature of science and the understanding and acceptance of the theory of evolution. International Journal of Science Education, 39(16), 2243–2260. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1373410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.): Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153.

  • Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devers, K., & Frankel, R. (2000). Study design in qualitative research--2: Sampling and data collection strategies. Education and Health, 13(2), 263–271.

  • Dey, I. (1999). Grounding grounded theory: Guidelines for qualitative inquiry. Academic Press.

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.2307/4444260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eder, E., Seidl, V., Lange, J., & Graf, D. (2018). Evolution education in the German-speaking countries. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution education around the globe (pp. 235–260). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_13.

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, N. A., & Kelemen, D. A. (2015). Young children’s acceptance of within-species variation: Implications for essentialism and teaching evolution. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 139, 148–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.05.011.

  • Friedrichsen, P. J., Brown, L. G., & Schul, J. (2018). Project teach evolution: Preparing biology pre-service teachers to teach evolution in Missouri, U.S.A. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution education around the globe (pp. 41–58). Springer international publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_3.

  • Glaze, A., & Goldston, J. (2019). Acceptance, understanding & experience: Exploring obstacles to evolution education among advanced placement teachers. The American Biology Teacher, 81(2), 71–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2019.81.2.71.

  • Glaze, A. L., Goldston, M. J., & Dantzler, J. (2015). Evolution in the southeastern USA: Factors influencing acceptance and rejection in pre-service science teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9541-1.

  • Glynn, S. M., Taasoobshirazi, G., & Brickman, P. (2009). Science motivation questionnaire: Construct validation with nonscience majors. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(2), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20267.

  • Graneheim, U., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2003.10.001.

  • Hall, G. E., & Woika, S. A. (2018). The fight to keep evolution out of schools: The law and classroom instruction. The American Biology Teacher, 80(3), 235–239. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2018.80.3.235.

  • Harms, U., & Reiss, M. J. (2019). The present status of evolution education. In U. Harms & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education re-considered (pp. 1–19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_1.

  • Hawley, P. H., & Sinatra, G. M. (2019). Declawing the dinosaurs in the science classroom: Reducing Christian teachers’ anxiety and increasing their efficacy for teaching evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(4), 375–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21479.

  • Heddy, B. C., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Transforming misconceptions: Using transformative experience to promote positive affect and conceptual change in students learning about biological evolution. Science Education, 97(5), 723–744. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21072.

  • Hermann, R. S. (2013). High school biology teachers’ views on teaching evolution: Implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(4), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9328-6.

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (2016a). Science and technology curriculum. Retrieved Feb. 15, 2020 from http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Mazkirut_Pedagogit/MadaTechnologya/tochnitLimudim/hatab+tl.htm

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (2016b). Biologia: Tochnit halimudim lemitnachim [Biology curriculum, 10th to 12th grade]. Retrieved Feb. 15, 2020 from https://pop.education.gov.il/tchumey_daat/biologya/chativa-elyona/biology-pedagogy/curriculum-specialize/

  • Israeli Ministry of Education. (2020). Retrieved Feb. 15, 2020 from https://poh.education.gov.il/MerhavMinhali/HachsharaHitmachutKnisaLehoraa/Pages/TeachersTraining.aspx

  • Kampourakis, K. (2020). Students’ “teleological misconceptions” in evolution education: Why the underlying design stance, not teleology per se, is the problem. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 13(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-019-0116-z.

  • Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross-cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers’ views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903563819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1994). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications.

  • Lucero, M. M., Delgado, C., & Green, K. (2020). Elucidating high school biology teachers’ knowledge of students’ conceptions regarding natural selection. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(6), 1041–1061. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-10008-1.

  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ [British Medical Journal], 320(7226), 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • McVaugh, N. K., Birchfield, J., Lucero, M. M., Petrosino, A. J., McVaugh, N. K., Birchfield, J., Lucero, M. M., & Petrosino, A. J. (2011). Evolution education: Seeing the forest for the trees and focusing our efforts on the teaching of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 4, 286–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-010-0297-y.

  • Mpeta, M., de Villiers, J. J. R., & Fraser, W. J. (2015). Secondary school learners’ response to the teaching of evolution in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Journal of Biological Education, 49(2), 150–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2014.914555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Nadelson, S. (2010). K-8 educators perceptions and preparedness for teaching evolution topics. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 21(7), 843–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-009-9171-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadelson, L. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2010). Shifting acceptance of evolution: Promising evidence of the influence of the understanding evolution website. The Researcher, 23(1), 13–29.

  • Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nehm, R. H., Kim, S. Y., & Sheppard, K. (2009). Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: Biology versus non-biology teachers. Science Education, 93(6), 1122–1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20340.

  • Ogunkola, B. J., & Samuel, D. (2011). Science teachers’ and students’ perceived difficult topics in the integrated science curriculum of lower secondary schools in Barbados. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, J., Collins, S., Ratcliffe, M., Millar, R., & Duschl, R. (2003). What “ideas-about-science” should be taught in school science? A delphi study of the expert community. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 692–720. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pear, R. S. A. (2018). Agreeing to disagree: American orthodox Jewish scientists’ confrontation with evolution in the 1960s. Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation, 28(02), 206–237. https://doi.org/10.1525/rac.2018.28.2.206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peker, D., Comert, G. G., & Kence, A. (2010). Three decades of anti-evolution campaign and its results: Turkish undergraduates’ acceptance and understanding of the biological evolution theory. Science & Education, 19(6–8), 739–755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9199-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinou, L., Halkia, L., & Skordoulis, C. (2008). What conceptions do Greek school students form about biological evolution? Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1(3), 312–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12052-008-0051-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. J., & Harms, U. (2019). What now for evolution education. In U. Harms & M. J. Reiss (Eds.), Evolution education re-considered (pp. 331–343). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14698-6_18.

  • Ritchie, J. (2003). The applications of qualitative methods to social research. In J. Ritchie & J. Lewis (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers (p. 24). Sage Publications, Inc..

  • Rutledge, M. L. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance & teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64(1), 21–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siani, M., & Yarden, A. (2020). Evolution? I don’t believe in it. Science & Education, 29(2), 411–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siani, M., & Yarden, A. (2021). Introducing evolution of the human lactase gene using an online interactive activity. American Biology Teacher. (In press).

  • Stasinakis, P. K., & Kampourakis, K. (2018). Teaching evolution in Greece. In H. Deniz & L. A. Borgerding (Eds.), Evolution education around the globe (pp. 195–212). Springer international publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90939-4_11.

  • van den Akker, J. (2003). Curriculum perspectives: An introduction. In J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, & U. Hameyer (Eds.), Curriculum landscapes and trends (pp. 1–10). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1205-7_1.

  • Vlach, P., & Plašil, M. (2006). Analysis of multiple-response data. 9th International Scientific Conference on Applications of Mathematics and Statistics in Economics. Retrieved Jan. 1, 2020 from https://statistika.vse.cz/konference/amse/PDF/Plasil+Vlach.pdf

  • Yates, T. B., & Marek, E. A. (2014). Teachers teaching misconceptions: A study of factors contributing to high school biology students’ acquisition of biological evolution-related misconceptions. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 7(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-014-0007-2.

  • Yesilyurt, E., Oztekin, C., Cakiroglu, J., & Deniz, H. (2021). Novice and experienced science teachers’ conceptual knowledge of evolutionary theory within the context of micro-and macroevolution. Journal of Biological Education, 55(2), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1667404.

  • Ziadie, M. A., & Andrews, T. C. (2018). Moving evolution education forward: A systematic analysis of literature to identify gaps in collective knowledge for teaching. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-08-0190.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Camille Vainstein for linguistic editing of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science Teaching, Weizmann Institute of Science, Herzel Street, 234, 7630031, Rehovot, Israel

    Merav Siani & Anat Yarden

  2. Herzog College, Alon Shvut, Israel

    Merav Siani

Authors
  1. Merav Siani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anat Yarden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merav Siani.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(DOCX 12 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 14 kb)

ESM 3

(DOCX 14 kb)

ESM 4

(DOCX 14 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siani, M., Yarden, A. “I Think that Teachers Do Not Teach Evolution Because It Is Complicated”: Difficulties in Teaching and Learning Evolution in Israel. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 20, 481–501 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10179-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10179-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation