Elsevier

Geotextiles and Geomembranes

Volume 49, Issue 5, October 2021, Pages 1270-1279
Geotextiles and Geomembranes

Water retention curves of a geosynthetic clay liner under non-uniform temperature-stress paths

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geotexmem.2021.04.005Get rights and content

Highlights

  • A novel suction-controlled chamber (SSC) that permits the WRC determination over the full range of suctions under non-uniform temperature-stress paths is presented.

  • The unified SSC allows measurements of suctions sequentially on a single GCL specimen.

  • WRCs are presented for typical field conditions with particular emphasis on heap leach pads and brine ponds.

  • Paper provides a new and unique insight on the water retention properties of GCLs.

Abstract

This paper presents a novel suction-controlled chamber that permits the determination of the full water retention curves of geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) under non-uniform temperature-stress paths. It investigates field conditions encountered in brine ponds (low confining stress settings) and heap leach pads (high confining stress settings) during construction and operation stages. Consequently, the analysis of the moisture dynamics in a GCL was defined under the wetting path (construction) and drying path (operation). High vertical stresses were found to facilitate a more rapid water uptake as capillarity is established faster than at low, confined stresses. In general, the drying curves increase the water desorption over the suction range investigated due to the low water viscosity caused by high temperatures. The wetting of the GCL at 20 °C and drying at 70 °C under either low, confined stress (2 kPa) or high confining stress (130 kPa) shows a reduction in the volumetric water contents. Furthermore, on the drying path, the coupled effect of elevated temperature and high confining stress accelerates water desorption leading possibly to potential desiccation.

Introduction

Geosynthetic clay liners (GCLs) are hydraulic barriers made typically of a thin layer of sodium bentonite (5–10 mm) encased between two geotextiles through needle punching or stitch bonding process and can also be bonded to a geomembrane (Bouazza, 2002; Bouazza and Bowders, 2009, Gates et al., 2018). They also include multicomponent GCLs, which are conventional GCLs with a coating or attached film (Bannour and Touze-Foltz, 2015). The GCLs primary function is to prevent or slow the flow of fluids from a pollution source, being well suited for this owing to the low hydraulic conductivity of hydrated bentonite, a condition achieved when placed on-site where it takes up water from the subsoil. They are now a ubiquitous part of landfills, mining waste and oil and gas facilities containment barrier systems (Gates et al., 2009; Hornsey et al., 2010; Fourie et al., 2010; Bouazza and Gates, 2014; Liu et al., 2015, 2019; Bouazza et al., 2013, 2014; Touze-Foltz et al., 2016, 2021; McWatters et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2019; Ören et al., 2019; Naka et al., 2019; Bouazza, 2020; Rowe, 2014, 2020a,b; Li et al., 2021; Rowe and AbdelRazek, 2021).

In applications such as brine ponds, heap leach pads and tailing dams, GCLs can be exposed to coupled effects of elevated temperatures and low or high confining stresses during the operation of these facilities. Consequently, their hydration and dehydration processes could be affected, which, in turn, could affect their hydraulic performance (Bouazza et al., 2017a; Tincopa, 2020; Ghavam-Nasiri et al., 2020). Although a GCL is commonly expected to absorb water from the subgrade soil to hydrate fully, it is not always that straightforward, as evidenced recently by Bouazza et al. (2017b), Acikel et al. (2018a) and Rowe (2020b). An estimation of the GCL hydration can be obtained using its water retention curve (WRC), which is defined as the relationship between the moisture or volumetric water content and suction (Lu and Likos, 2004). This relationship varies according to the conditions that might be encountered on site. For example, the hydration of a GCL placed on a subsoil under ambient temperatures and low confining stresses will differ from the hydration process under elevated temperatures and high confining stresses. The limitation of the bentonite swelling due to the confining stress (Bannour et al., 2014) and the acceleration of moisture transfer due to temperature changes (Romero et al., 2001; Laloui et al., 2013; Ghavam-Nasiri et al., 2019a) may affect moisture movements in GCLs.

Many studies have been conducted over recent decades to establish the WRCs of GCLs, as shown in Table 1. However, most of these studies have not considered the operation processes experienced in applications where GCLs will be exposed to non-uniform temperature-stress paths during hydration and dehydration processes. Typical of these applications are brine ponds or heap leach pads/tailings dams, among other applications. Furthermore, separate devices are traditionally used to establish the GCLs WRCs due to the wide suction range of the bentonite component. This process of measurement makes it cumbersome to evaluate the water retention properties of the GCLs accurately as such procedure is fraught with uncertainties since specimens used in separate devices may differ substantially (i.e., different mass per unit area, thickness, etc.) even if they are from the same GCL roll.

This paper presents a suction measurement system that allows the measurement of suctions to be performed over the whole suction range of GCLs using the axis translation technique, osmotic technique, vapour equilibrium technique sequentially on one single specimen. Furthermore, it examines the GCL water content-suction relationship under representative field conditions; in particular, it addresses the effect of non-uniform temperature-stress paths.

Section snippets

Background: mechanisms of moisture-suction in GCLs

GCL is commonly installed at the as-received gravimetric moisture content (GWC), which will range from 8% to 12%, depending on the product used. Bouazza et al. (2017a), Acikel et al. (2018a) and Rowe (2020b) have indicated that the final GWC of the GCL varied according to the available moisture within the subsoil after its installation. The moisture movement between a GCL and the subsoil can change from the process of adsorbing water to the desorbing water process depending on the conditions

Material

A thermally treated and needle punched commercially available GCL was used in this study. It is composed of powder sodium bentonite sandwiched between a nonwoven geotextile cover layer and a nonwoven polypropylene geotextile with a woven scrim-reinforced carrier. The physical properties of a typical GCL specimen, based on 30 specimens of equal size (50 mm diameter) randomly taken from the supplied GCL roll, are summarised in Table 2. The swell index was estimated following the procedure

The suction-controlled chamber

A suction-controlled chamber (SSC) was designed for the current study. It was based on the design of an oedometer for high-pressure and temperature testing of soft argillaceous rocks and soils (Lima et al., 2010). The schematic of the apparatus and the layout of the testing system are shown in Fig. 4, Fig. 5. The SCC was adapted to perform three suction techniques: the axis translation, osmotic, and vapour equilibrium methods. These techniques are widely used to obtain the WRC of GCLs, as

Results and discussion

The WRCs are presented in the context of the brine pond (low confining stress) and heap leach pad (high confining stress) applications to illustrate the versatility of the SCC. The moistening process of the GCL is governed by two stages (i.e. construction and operation stages), as mentioned earlier. Thus, this process was simulated in the SCC initially for the low confined stress application. The corresponding volumetric water content-suction relation is illustrated in Fig. 8 for the wetting

Conclusions

The SCC permitted the estimation of the WRC of a GCL under non-uniform temperature-stress paths, as experienced under field conditions, by using three conventional techniques, namely vapour equilibrium, osmotic, and axis translation sequentially on a single GCL specimen. This study has gone some way towards enhancing our understanding of the water retention curves of GCLs under field operational conditions, and the versatility of the SCC has allowed us to gain this invaluable insight. For the

Acknowledgments

This research project was supported by the Australian Research Council's Discovery Projects funding scheme (project number DP190100919). This support is gratefully acknowledged.

Notations

M
van Genuchten parameter –
Mb
Mass per unit area of bentonite kg/m2
MGCL
Mass per unit area of GCL kg/m2
MGT
Mass per unit area of geotextile kg/m2
MGu
Mass per unit area of cover geotextile kg/m2
MGl
Mass per unit area of carrier geotextile kg/m2
N
van Genuchten parameter –
Se
Effective degree of saturation %
Sr
Residual degree of saturation %
Tso
Surface tension at 20 °C N/m
Ts
Surface tension at a given temperature N/m
W
Gravimetric water content %
wref
Average maximum gravimetric water content %
Α
van Genuchten

References (73)

  • A. Ghavam-Nasiri et al.

    Water retention of geosynthetics clay liners: dependence on void ratio and temperature

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2019)
  • W. Hornsey et al.

    The impact of mining solutions/liquors on geosynthetics

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2010)
  • Q. Li et al.

    Hydraulic conductivity of bentonite-polymer composite geosynthetic clay liners permeated with bauxite liquor

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2021)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Hydraulic performance of geosynthetic clay liners to sulfuric acid solutions

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2015)
  • Y. Lu et al.

    Water retention curve of GCLs using a modified sample holder in a chilled-mirror dew-point device

    Geosynth. Int.

    (2017)
  • Y. Lu et al.

    Effect of water salinity on the water retention curve of geosynthetic clay liners

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2018)
  • R.S. McWatters et al.

    Geosynthetics in Antarctica: Performance of a composite barrier system to contain hydrocarbon-contaminated soil after 3 years in the field

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2016)
  • A. Naka et al.

    Hydraulic performance and chemical compatibility of a powdered Na-bentonite geosynthetic clay liner permeated with mine drainage

    Soils Found.

    (2019)
  • S. Rajesh et al.

    Characterisation of water sorption and retention behavior of partially saturated GCLs using vapor equilibrium and filter paper methods

    Appl. Clay Sci.

    (2018)
  • M.T. Rayhani et al.

    Factors affecting GCL hydration under isothermal conditions

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2011)
  • R.K. Rowe

    Geosynthetic clay liners: perceptions and misconceptions

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2020)
  • R.K. Rowe et al.

    Performance of multicomponent GCLs in high salinity impoundment applications

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2021)
  • R.K. Rowe et al.

    Chemical interaction and hydraulic performance of geosynthetic clay liners isothermally hydrated from silty sand subgrade

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2019)
  • A. Seiphoori et al.

    Water retention and swelling behaviour of granular bentonites for application in geosynthetic clay liner (GCL) systems

    Soils Found.

    (2016)
  • J.M. Southen et al.

    Evaluation of the water retention curve for geosynthetic clay liners

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2007)
  • N. Touze-Foltz et al.

    A review of the performance of geosynthetics for environmental protection

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2016)
  • N. Touze-Foltz et al.

    Performance issues of barrier systems for landfills: a review

    Geotext. Geomembranes

    (2021)
  • H.M. Abuel-Naga et al.

    A novel technique to determine the water retention curve of geosynthetic clay liners

    Geosynth. Int.

    (2010)
  • H.M. Abuel-Naga et al.

    Thermomechanical behavior of saturated geosynthetic clay liners

    J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng.

    (2013)
  • H.M. Abuel-Naga et al.

    Impact of bentonite form on the thermal evolution of the hydraulic conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners

    Géotech. Lett.

    (2013)
  • A.S. Acikel et al.

    Applicability and accuracy of the initially dry and initially wet contact filter paper tests for matric suction measurement of geosynthetic clay liners

    Geotechnique

    (2015)
  • A.S. Acikel et al.

    Time-dependent unsaturated behaviour of geosynthetic clay liners

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (2018)
  • M.A. Ali et al.

    Thermal conductivity of geosynthetic clay liners

    Can. Geotech. J.

    (2016)
  • Standard Test Methods for Measuring Mass Per Unit Area of Geotextiles

    (2018)
  • Standard Test Method for Swell Index of Clay Mineral Component of Geosynthetic Clay Liners

    (2018)
  • Standard Test Method for Measuring Mass Per Unit of Geosynthetic Clay Liner

    (2018)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text