Parents’ attitudes towards students with a background of migration—Does the background of migration matter?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Parents with a migrant background show more positive attitudes.

  • Fathers show positive attitudes towards students with lower cultural differences.

  • Mothers with a higher level of education had more positive attitudes.

Abstract

As linguistic heterogeneity in classrooms is rising constantly, it was shown that attitudes play a role in the inclusion of students with migrant backgrounds. This paper focuses on attitudes of parents towards students with a migrant background and how variables such as parents’ level of education, cultural differences, and their own background of migration shape their attitudes. To this end, data from 876 parents (486 mothers and 390 fathers) was assessed, and it was found out that parents with a migrant background displayed more positive attitudes towards the inclusion of students with a background of migration in contrast to parents without a migrant background. Moreover, fathers displayed more positive attitudes towards students with lower cultural differences compared to students with higher cultural differences. Furthermore, mothers with a higher level of education had more positive attitudes towards students with a migrant background compared to mothers with a lower level of education.

Introduction

The demographic heterogeneity in Western European countries has risen continually in the past years, making the countries increasingly multicultural (Schachner, Brenick, Noack, van de Vijver, & Heizmann, 2015). Due to the increasing immigration to European countries, host members have been observed to have negative attitudes towards immigrants (Barni, Cavazza, Russo, Vieno, & Roccato, 2020). As a result of the rise of students with migrant backgrounds, linguistic heterogeneity in Austrian classrooms has also been constantly growing (Braunsteiner, Fischer, Kernbichler, Prengel, & Wohlhart, 2019). This is reflected in the current data from Statistik Austria for the school year 2017–18, which showed that 26 % of the students enrolled had a family language that was different from the language of instruction, which was German (Statistik Austria, 2018; Statistik Austria, 2021).

Educational institutions play an important role in bringing about social change, and their goal is the recognition of and the knowledge of cultural differences in order to facilitate a respectful contact between majority and minority groups (Fowers & Richardson, 1996). Multicultural classrooms should, therefore, be seen as a place where students can acquire social skills and learn the values of tolerance, openness, and empathy (Dessel, 2010). The assessment of educational skills of migrant students are often affected by the teachers’ interpretation of educational policy or education standards (Nortvedt et al., 2020). Nayir et al. (2019) found a significant trend within the promotion of heterogeneity in schools, namely, complementary assessments for learning strategies that should support the learning of students.

The attitudes of the general public – in our case, the attitudes of parents – tend to influence the process of inclusion of minorities, however (Burge, Quellette-Kuntz, Hutchinson, & Box, 2008), and impact their acceptance of heterogeneity.

The issue of immigration generally elicits specific reactions from various populations. It was additionally observed that attitudes towards immigration are influenced by specific characteristics such as age, education, and urban/rural location (Card, Dustmann, & Preston, 2005). In this study, we decided to focus on parents’ attitudes, as they play a significant role in terms of the implementation of inclusivity (Paseka & Schwab, 2019). This is because, to a certain extent, parents can participate in their children’s choice of school. Moreover, parents may provide an external view of inclusive practices.

Section snippets

Inclusion of students with migrant backgrounds

Generally, there exist plenty of definitions of a ‘migrant background’; however, defining the subgroup of students with migrant backgrounds is difficult, as this group is not homogeneous in any way. According to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2015), students having a migrant background are native-born and have at least one foreign-born parent. The inclusion of these students, therefore, results in the creation of heterogeneity in classrooms, and it should be

Integration of students with migrant background in Austria

Since the school year 2018–19, Austria has tried to find a way to deal with students with deficient or insufficient German language skills, who are not able to follow the language of instruction satisfactorily. The country has implemented German language tuition and support classes and German language tuition and support courses to this end. ‘Extraordinary’ students (who just started learning German) attend – depending on their language skills, which are determined with a standardised

Attitudes towards students with migrant backgrounds

The concept of attitudes is described in different ways, and there is no uniform definition (De Boer, Pijl, & Minnaert, 2012). Gall, Borg, and Gall (1996, p. 273) stated broadly, ‘An attitude is an individual’s viewpoint or disposition towards a particular ‘object’ (a person, a thing, an idea, etc.)’. Eagly and Chaiken (1993, p. 1) defined attitudes as ‘a psychological tendency that is expressed by evaluating a particular entity with some degree of favour or disfavour.’

According to Meeusen,

The current study

The common thread running along previous studies is that they examined parents of children with special educational needs. However, there is a lack of research on parents’ attitudes towards inclusive schooling for students with migrant backgrounds. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to focus on parents’ attitudes towards students with a migrant background and the variables that influence those attitudes (e.g., parents’ migrant background, parents’ educational level, small vs. great

Procedure

The data used in this study is derived from a project called ATIS-STEP (Attitudes Towards Inclusive Schooling- Students Teachers and Parents). This work was supported by the Styrian government [grant number: ABT08-247083/2015-34]. Classes with at least one student with special educational needs were asked to participate. All in all, 48 inclusive classes from Styria (a federal state in Austria) participated. Ethical approval for the study was given by the local school authority of Styria. Before

Measures

To assess parents’ attitudes towards students’ migrant background, a revised version of the CATCH (Chedoke Mc Master of Attitudes towards Children with Handicaps Scale) was used (Rosenbaum, Armstrong, & Kings, 1986; for the revised form see Schwab, 2018). The original version comprised 36 items of three components (behavioural, cognitive, and affective). However, in this study, only four items were used (see Appendix A). The results by Rosenbaum et al. (1986) of the test quality criteria showed

Descriptive results

Before answering the research questions, descriptive results are presented. Table 3 shows the mean scores and standard deviations of the parents’ attitudes towards children without and with migratory backgrounds. All empirical means are (see Table 3) above the theoretical scale mean of 2.5 (as the answer format is in the range 1–4). Apparently, there seems to be no great difference among the attitudes towards diverse vignettes.

Results of attitudes towards students with migrant backgrounds

In order to answer the research questions, a multilevel analysis was conducted, to determine the variance on class level. In the first step, null-models with the dependent variables (parents’ attitudes towards students with backgrounds of migration) were calculated. They showed intraclass correlations (ICCs) from .022 to .075, with non-significant Waldmann-Z values from 1.26 to .91. Accordingly, no explained variance on class level was found. Due to the incomplete dataset (not all parents were

Discussion

The previous literature review showed a paucity of investigations on parents’ attitudes towards students with a background of migration. There are many studies that focus on attitudes towards immigrants in general (Ackermann & Freitag, 2015; Barni et al., 2020; Card et al., 2005), but relatively little research focuses particular on parents’ attitudes and students with (different) migrant backgrounds. Given the fact that the implementation of inclusion in general is associated with attitudes (

Conclusion

Various people are involved in the process of implementation of inclusion: teachers, students, and even parents. The last group allows for an examination of the measures of inclusion from an external perspective. The present study was, therefore, designed to investigate parents’ attitudes towards students with migrant backgrounds. the results indicated that certain variables such as the cultural distance, the level of education, and participants’ own migrant backgrounds influence their

Limitations

One limitation of this study is that we have to keep in mind the fact that the vignettes only provide an extract of a given situation and give no further information – especially in the case of inclusive education. For the vignettes, only a short self-report scale was used. Additionally, parents may have answered the questionnaire following social desirability. Moreover, the passive research design that controls for pre-existing differences does not reveal causal evidence but only the

Funding

This work was supported by the Styrian Government [grant number: ABT08-247083/2015-34].

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest.

References (58)

  • E. Avramidis et al.

    Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion: A review of the literature

    European Journal of Special Needs Education

    (2002)
  • L. Bešić et al.

    Don’t forget about us: Attitudes towards the inclusion of refugee children with(out) disabilities

    International Journal of Inclusive Education

    (2018)
  • H. Blumer

    Race prejudice as a sense of group position

    Pacific Sociological Review

    (1958)
  • BMBWF

    Deutschförderklassen und Deutschförderkurse. [German language tuition and support classes and German language tuition and support courses]

    (2018)
  • M.-L. Braunsteiner et al.

    Erfolgreich lernen und unterrichten in Klassen mit hoher Heterogenität. [Successful learning and teaching in classes with high heterogeneity]

  • P. Burge et al.

    A quarter century of inclusive education for children with intellectual disabilities in Ontario: Public Perceptions

    Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy

    (2008)
  • D. Card et al.

    Understanding attitudes to immigration

    (2005)
  • P. Chatman

    Relationship between teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion and professional development

    (2017)
  • J. Cohen

    Statistical power analysis for the behavioural science

    (1988)
  • M. Crul et al.

    The European second generation compared. Does the integration context matter?

    (2012)
  • A. De Boer et al.

    Evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention program to influence attitudes of students towards peers with disabilities

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2014)
  • A. De Boer et al.

    Students’ Attitudes towards Peers with Disabilities: A review of the literature

    European Journal of Disability, Development and Education

    (2012)
  • A. De Vroy et al.

    Secondary schools included: A literature review

    International Journal of Inclusive Education

    (2016)
  • A. Dessel

    Prejudice in schools: Promotion of an inclusive culture and climate

    Education and Urban Society

    (2010)
  • A.H. Eagly et al.

    The nature of attitudes

  • H. Esser

    Migration, Sprache und Integration. [Migration, language and integration]

    (2006)
  • V.M. Esses et al.

    The global refugee crisis: Empirical evidence and policy implications for improving public attitudes and facilitating refugee resettlement

    Social Issues and Policy Review

    (2017)
  • European Union

    Public attitudes in migration: Rethink how people perceive migration

    (2018)
  • T. Fillitz

    Interkulturelles lernen. Zwischen institutionellem Rahmen, schulischer Praxis und gesellschaftlichem Kommunikationsprinzip

    (2002)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text